Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states
Policies to reduce greenhouse gases associated with electricity generation have been a major focus of public policy in the United States, but their implications for achieving environmental justice among historically overburdened communities inappropriately remains a marginal issue. In this study we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271026 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0271026 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Declet-Barreto, Juan Rosenberg, Andrew A |
description | Policies to reduce greenhouse gases associated with electricity generation have been a major focus of public policy in the United States, but their implications for achieving environmental justice among historically overburdened communities inappropriately remains a marginal issue. In this study we address research gaps in historical and current ambient air emissions burdens in environmental justice communities from power plants participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gases Initiative (RGGI), the country’s first market-based power sector emissions reduction program. We find that in RGGI states the percentage of people of color that live within 0–6.2 miles from power plants is up to 23.5 percent higher than the percent of the white population that lives within those same distance bands, and the percentage of people living in poverty that live within 0–5 miles from power plants is up to 15.3 percent higher than the percent of the population not living in poverty within those same distance bands. More importantly, the transition from coal to natural gas underway before RGGI formally started resulted in large increases in both the number of electric-generating units burning natural gas and total net generation from natural gas in environmental justice communities hosting electric-generating units, compared to other communities. Our findings indicate that power sector carbon mitigation policies’ focusing on aggregate emissions reductions have largely benefitted non-environmental justice communities and have not redressed the fundamental problem of disparities in pollutant burdens between EJ and non-EJ communities. These must be directly addressed in climate change and carbon emissions mitigation policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0271026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2692042567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710905478</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d8422c6772bf47aa808059b0c6a9b773</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A710905478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-7e69192ea088eca0e91483cac9f4052a084717d27b0a22437212bf455056101d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DQQDguDDjEnaJs2LsCzrOLCwsP55jXfS25kMnWRM0lG_vRmnyhYUpA9tb373JDn3FMVzRueslOzN1g_BQT_fe4dzyiWjXDwozpkq-UxwWj68931WPIlxS2ldNkI8Ls7Kuqml5Py8-HLtDjZ4t0OXoCfbISZrkIBryd5_w0D2PbhEcGdjtN5FYh1JGyR3uM6_uWMREN3GDxHJAiJZOpssJHtAEhMkjE-LRx30EZ-N74vi07vrj1fvZze3i-XV5c3MCKHSTKJQTHEE2jRogKJiVVMaMKqraM1zuZJMtlyuKHBelZIzvuqquqa1YJS15UXx4qS7733UozlRc6E4rXgtZCaWJ6L1sNX7YHcQfmgPVv8q-LDWEPLte9RtU3FuRLYo7yEBGtrQWq2oEaBWUpZZ6-2427DaYWuyewH6ieh0xdmNXvuDVlypkjVZ4OUoEPzXAWP6x5FHag35VNZ1PouZPAujL_PAFa0redSa_4XKT5vHZnI8Opvrk4bXk4bMJPye1jDEqJcf7v6fvf08ZV_dYzcIfdpE3w_pmJwpWJ1AE3yMAbs_zjGqj-n-7YY-pluP6S5_AosC6kc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692042567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Declet-Barreto, Juan ; Rosenberg, Andrew A</creator><contributor>Sicotte, Diane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declet-Barreto, Juan ; Rosenberg, Andrew A ; Sicotte, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>Policies to reduce greenhouse gases associated with electricity generation have been a major focus of public policy in the United States, but their implications for achieving environmental justice among historically overburdened communities inappropriately remains a marginal issue. In this study we address research gaps in historical and current ambient air emissions burdens in environmental justice communities from power plants participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gases Initiative (RGGI), the country’s first market-based power sector emissions reduction program. We find that in RGGI states the percentage of people of color that live within 0–6.2 miles from power plants is up to 23.5 percent higher than the percent of the white population that lives within those same distance bands, and the percentage of people living in poverty that live within 0–5 miles from power plants is up to 15.3 percent higher than the percent of the population not living in poverty within those same distance bands. More importantly, the transition from coal to natural gas underway before RGGI formally started resulted in large increases in both the number of electric-generating units burning natural gas and total net generation from natural gas in environmental justice communities hosting electric-generating units, compared to other communities. Our findings indicate that power sector carbon mitigation policies’ focusing on aggregate emissions reductions have largely benefitted non-environmental justice communities and have not redressed the fundamental problem of disparities in pollutant burdens between EJ and non-EJ communities. These must be directly addressed in climate change and carbon emissions mitigation policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35857722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Burning ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon emissions ; Climate change ; Community ; Community involvement ; Community participation ; Cost control ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Electric industries ; Electric power generation ; Electric power production ; Electricity generation ; Emissions ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Energy industry ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental equity ; Environmental justice ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Industrial plant emissions ; Low income groups ; Management ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Mitigation ; Natural gas ; Outdoor air quality ; Physical Sciences ; Policies ; Pollutants ; Poverty ; Power plants ; Public policy ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271026</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Declet-Barreto, Rosenberg. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Declet-Barreto, Rosenberg 2022 Declet-Barreto, Rosenberg</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-7e69192ea088eca0e91483cac9f4052a084717d27b0a22437212bf455056101d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-7e69192ea088eca0e91483cac9f4052a084717d27b0a22437212bf455056101d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7101-394X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299318/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299318/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sicotte, Diane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Declet-Barreto, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Policies to reduce greenhouse gases associated with electricity generation have been a major focus of public policy in the United States, but their implications for achieving environmental justice among historically overburdened communities inappropriately remains a marginal issue. In this study we address research gaps in historical and current ambient air emissions burdens in environmental justice communities from power plants participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gases Initiative (RGGI), the country’s first market-based power sector emissions reduction program. We find that in RGGI states the percentage of people of color that live within 0–6.2 miles from power plants is up to 23.5 percent higher than the percent of the white population that lives within those same distance bands, and the percentage of people living in poverty that live within 0–5 miles from power plants is up to 15.3 percent higher than the percent of the population not living in poverty within those same distance bands. More importantly, the transition from coal to natural gas underway before RGGI formally started resulted in large increases in both the number of electric-generating units burning natural gas and total net generation from natural gas in environmental justice communities hosting electric-generating units, compared to other communities. Our findings indicate that power sector carbon mitigation policies’ focusing on aggregate emissions reductions have largely benefitted non-environmental justice communities and have not redressed the fundamental problem of disparities in pollutant burdens between EJ and non-EJ communities. These must be directly addressed in climate change and carbon emissions mitigation policy.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Electric industries</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power production</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental equity</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DQQDguDDjEnaJs2LsCzrOLCwsP55jXfS25kMnWRM0lG_vRmnyhYUpA9tb373JDn3FMVzRueslOzN1g_BQT_fe4dzyiWjXDwozpkq-UxwWj68931WPIlxS2ldNkI8Ls7Kuqml5Py8-HLtDjZ4t0OXoCfbISZrkIBryd5_w0D2PbhEcGdjtN5FYh1JGyR3uM6_uWMREN3GDxHJAiJZOpssJHtAEhMkjE-LRx30EZ-N74vi07vrj1fvZze3i-XV5c3MCKHSTKJQTHEE2jRogKJiVVMaMKqraM1zuZJMtlyuKHBelZIzvuqquqa1YJS15UXx4qS7733UozlRc6E4rXgtZCaWJ6L1sNX7YHcQfmgPVv8q-LDWEPLte9RtU3FuRLYo7yEBGtrQWq2oEaBWUpZZ6-2427DaYWuyewH6ieh0xdmNXvuDVlypkjVZ4OUoEPzXAWP6x5FHag35VNZ1PouZPAujL_PAFa0redSa_4XKT5vHZnI8Opvrk4bXk4bMJPye1jDEqJcf7v6fvf08ZV_dYzcIfdpE3w_pmJwpWJ1AE3yMAbs_zjGqj-n-7YY-pluP6S5_AosC6kc</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Declet-Barreto, Juan</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Andrew A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-394X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states</title><author>Declet-Barreto, Juan ; Rosenberg, Andrew A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-7e69192ea088eca0e91483cac9f4052a084717d27b0a22437212bf455056101d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Electric industries</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power production</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental equity</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Declet-Barreto, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Declet-Barreto, Juan</au><au>Rosenberg, Andrew A</au><au>Sicotte, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0271026</spage><pages>e0271026-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Policies to reduce greenhouse gases associated with electricity generation have been a major focus of public policy in the United States, but their implications for achieving environmental justice among historically overburdened communities inappropriately remains a marginal issue. In this study we address research gaps in historical and current ambient air emissions burdens in environmental justice communities from power plants participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gases Initiative (RGGI), the country’s first market-based power sector emissions reduction program. We find that in RGGI states the percentage of people of color that live within 0–6.2 miles from power plants is up to 23.5 percent higher than the percent of the white population that lives within those same distance bands, and the percentage of people living in poverty that live within 0–5 miles from power plants is up to 15.3 percent higher than the percent of the population not living in poverty within those same distance bands. More importantly, the transition from coal to natural gas underway before RGGI formally started resulted in large increases in both the number of electric-generating units burning natural gas and total net generation from natural gas in environmental justice communities hosting electric-generating units, compared to other communities. Our findings indicate that power sector carbon mitigation policies’ focusing on aggregate emissions reductions have largely benefitted non-environmental justice communities and have not redressed the fundamental problem of disparities in pollutant burdens between EJ and non-EJ communities. These must be directly addressed in climate change and carbon emissions mitigation policy.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35857722</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271026</doi><tpages>e0271026</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-394X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271026 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2692042567 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed (Medline); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Air pollution Burning Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon emissions Climate change Community Community involvement Community participation Cost control Ecology and Environmental Sciences Electric industries Electric power generation Electric power production Electricity generation Emissions Emissions (Pollution) Energy industry Engineering and Technology Environmental aspects Environmental equity Environmental justice Fossil fuels Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Industrial plant emissions Low income groups Management Minority & ethnic groups Mitigation Natural gas Outdoor air quality Physical Sciences Policies Pollutants Poverty Power plants Public policy Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences |
title | Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A00%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20justice%20and%20power%20plant%20emissions%20in%20the%20Regional%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Initiative%20states&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Declet-Barreto,%20Juan&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0271026&rft.pages=e0271026-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271026&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA710905478%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692042567&rft_id=info:pmid/35857722&rft_galeid=A710905478&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d8422c6772bf47aa808059b0c6a9b773&rfr_iscdi=true |