Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test
Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) are commonly performed in beef cattle to evaluate the glucose-insulin signaling pathway. Blood samples are obtained via a catheter and then transferred back to the laboratory for further analysis. A hand-held glucometer used chute-side can make performing GTT's and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271673-e0271673 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0271673 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0271673 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Nickles, Kirsten R Relling, Alejandro E Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro Fluharty, Francis L Parker, Anthony J |
| description | Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) are commonly performed in beef cattle to evaluate the glucose-insulin signaling pathway. Blood samples are obtained via a catheter and then transferred back to the laboratory for further analysis. A hand-held glucometer used chute-side can make performing GTT's and quantifying blood glucose concentration much easier and faster for research purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between a hand-held electronic glucometer (Precision Xtra; Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada) for chute-side use in beef cattle compared with a colorimetric assay in the laboratory (Stanbio Glucose LiquiColor; Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX, USA). A GTT was performed on 13 Simmental x Angus steers during the growing phase. Blood samples were obtained via a jugular catheter. Glucometer readings were taken immediately after blood was sampled from the jugular with no preservative, and laboratory measurements were conducted on plasma preserved with sodium fluoride. A paired t-test (P = 0.40), Pearson's correlation (P < 0.001; r = 0.95), Bland-Altman plot, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC = 0.90) were completed to evaluate the performance of the glucometer relative to the results from the laboratory assay. Based on the results, we conclude that the glucometer is an acceptable method for measuring blood glucose concentration in beef cattle under field conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0271673 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2691768475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710798550</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dc35be9a793449b29053ef7846932d1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A710798550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-f8644970b3972196cb86f8427e6fe349cbbe30c2b530c20167c1ef2fbb322f103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjEnTJo0XwrD4MbCw4Kq3IU1POhnaZExSd_33pk5dtrIXEkgOJ895k7zkZNlzjNaYMPx270ZvZb8-OAtrVDBMGXmQnWJOihUtEHl4Jz7JnoSwR6giNaWPsxNS1RVBhJxmN1c752Ou3DCM1igZjbPv8s2UOEhvgrN5A_EawObx2uVdPyoXIB9AhtHDADamOO5cG3IzoaDzEAF8yNvRG9vl8rYmuh68tCpFEOLT7JGWfYBn83qWffv44ev559XF5aft-eZipSrO40rXtCw5Qw3hrMCcqqamui4LBlQDKblqGiBIFU01zSiZoDDoQjcNKQqNETnLXhx1D70LYjYtiIJyzGhdsioR2yPROrkXB28G6X8JJ434k3C-E9JHo3oQrSJVA1wyTtKtmoInR0GzuqTJ6RarpPV-Pm1sBmhV8sfLfiG63LFmJzr3U_CS45qwJPB6FvDux5h8EoMJCvpeWnDjfO-al7RM6Mt_0PtfN1OdTA8wVrt0rppExYZhxHhdVZNL63uoNFoYjEo_TJuUXxS8WRQkJsJN7OQYgtheffl_9vL7kn11h92B7OMuuH6c_mVYguURVN6F4EHfmoyRmBrkrxtiahAxNwj5DVqHAko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691768475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Nickles, Kirsten R ; Relling, Alejandro E ; Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro ; Fluharty, Francis L ; Parker, Anthony J</creator><contributor>Duarte, Marcio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nickles, Kirsten R ; Relling, Alejandro E ; Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro ; Fluharty, Francis L ; Parker, Anthony J ; Duarte, Marcio</creatorcontrib><description>Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) are commonly performed in beef cattle to evaluate the glucose-insulin signaling pathway. Blood samples are obtained via a catheter and then transferred back to the laboratory for further analysis. A hand-held glucometer used chute-side can make performing GTT's and quantifying blood glucose concentration much easier and faster for research purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between a hand-held electronic glucometer (Precision Xtra; Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada) for chute-side use in beef cattle compared with a colorimetric assay in the laboratory (Stanbio Glucose LiquiColor; Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX, USA). A GTT was performed on 13 Simmental x Angus steers during the growing phase. Blood samples were obtained via a jugular catheter. Glucometer readings were taken immediately after blood was sampled from the jugular with no preservative, and laboratory measurements were conducted on plasma preserved with sodium fluoride. A paired t-test (P = 0.40), Pearson's correlation (P < 0.001; r = 0.95), Bland-Altman plot, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC = 0.90) were completed to evaluate the performance of the glucometer relative to the results from the laboratory assay. Based on the results, we conclude that the glucometer is an acceptable method for measuring blood glucose concentration in beef cattle under field conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271673</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35853033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Blood glucose ; Blood levels ; Catheters ; Cattle ; Colorimetry ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Dairy cattle ; Diabetes mellitus ; Evaluation ; Fluorides ; Glucose ; Glucose tolerance ; Glucose tolerance tests ; Health aspects ; Insulin ; Laboratories ; Measurement methods ; Medical instruments ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Performance evaluation ; Physical Sciences ; Plasma ; Preservatives ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Signal transduction ; Sodium ; Sodium fluoride</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271673-e0271673</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Nickles et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Nickles et al 2022 Nickles et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-f8644970b3972196cb86f8427e6fe349cbbe30c2b530c20167c1ef2fbb322f103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-f8644970b3972196cb86f8427e6fe349cbbe30c2b530c20167c1ef2fbb322f103</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6370-6623</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491837/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491837/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23847,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Duarte, Marcio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nickles, Kirsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relling, Alejandro E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fluharty, Francis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><title>Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) are commonly performed in beef cattle to evaluate the glucose-insulin signaling pathway. Blood samples are obtained via a catheter and then transferred back to the laboratory for further analysis. A hand-held glucometer used chute-side can make performing GTT's and quantifying blood glucose concentration much easier and faster for research purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between a hand-held electronic glucometer (Precision Xtra; Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada) for chute-side use in beef cattle compared with a colorimetric assay in the laboratory (Stanbio Glucose LiquiColor; Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX, USA). A GTT was performed on 13 Simmental x Angus steers during the growing phase. Blood samples were obtained via a jugular catheter. Glucometer readings were taken immediately after blood was sampled from the jugular with no preservative, and laboratory measurements were conducted on plasma preserved with sodium fluoride. A paired t-test (P = 0.40), Pearson's correlation (P < 0.001; r = 0.95), Bland-Altman plot, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC = 0.90) were completed to evaluate the performance of the glucometer relative to the results from the laboratory assay. Based on the results, we conclude that the glucometer is an acceptable method for measuring blood glucose concentration in beef cattle under field conditions.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Blood levels</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance tests</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium fluoride</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjEnTJo0XwrD4MbCw4Kq3IU1POhnaZExSd_33pk5dtrIXEkgOJ895k7zkZNlzjNaYMPx270ZvZb8-OAtrVDBMGXmQnWJOihUtEHl4Jz7JnoSwR6giNaWPsxNS1RVBhJxmN1c752Ou3DCM1igZjbPv8s2UOEhvgrN5A_EawObx2uVdPyoXIB9AhtHDADamOO5cG3IzoaDzEAF8yNvRG9vl8rYmuh68tCpFEOLT7JGWfYBn83qWffv44ev559XF5aft-eZipSrO40rXtCw5Qw3hrMCcqqamui4LBlQDKblqGiBIFU01zSiZoDDoQjcNKQqNETnLXhx1D70LYjYtiIJyzGhdsioR2yPROrkXB28G6X8JJ434k3C-E9JHo3oQrSJVA1wyTtKtmoInR0GzuqTJ6RarpPV-Pm1sBmhV8sfLfiG63LFmJzr3U_CS45qwJPB6FvDux5h8EoMJCvpeWnDjfO-al7RM6Mt_0PtfN1OdTA8wVrt0rppExYZhxHhdVZNL63uoNFoYjEo_TJuUXxS8WRQkJsJN7OQYgtheffl_9vL7kn11h92B7OMuuH6c_mVYguURVN6F4EHfmoyRmBrkrxtiahAxNwj5DVqHAko</recordid><startdate>20220719</startdate><enddate>20220719</enddate><creator>Nickles, Kirsten R</creator><creator>Relling, Alejandro E</creator><creator>Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro</creator><creator>Fluharty, Francis L</creator><creator>Parker, Anthony J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-6623</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220719</creationdate><title>Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test</title><author>Nickles, Kirsten R ; Relling, Alejandro E ; Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro ; Fluharty, Francis L ; Parker, Anthony J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-f8644970b3972196cb86f8427e6fe349cbbe30c2b530c20167c1ef2fbb322f103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Blood levels</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance tests</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium fluoride</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nickles, Kirsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relling, Alejandro E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fluharty, Francis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nickles, Kirsten R</au><au>Relling, Alejandro E</au><au>Garcia-Guerra, Alvaro</au><au>Fluharty, Francis L</au><au>Parker, Anthony J</au><au>Duarte, Marcio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0271673</spage><epage>e0271673</epage><pages>e0271673-e0271673</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) are commonly performed in beef cattle to evaluate the glucose-insulin signaling pathway. Blood samples are obtained via a catheter and then transferred back to the laboratory for further analysis. A hand-held glucometer used chute-side can make performing GTT's and quantifying blood glucose concentration much easier and faster for research purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between a hand-held electronic glucometer (Precision Xtra; Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada) for chute-side use in beef cattle compared with a colorimetric assay in the laboratory (Stanbio Glucose LiquiColor; Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX, USA). A GTT was performed on 13 Simmental x Angus steers during the growing phase. Blood samples were obtained via a jugular catheter. Glucometer readings were taken immediately after blood was sampled from the jugular with no preservative, and laboratory measurements were conducted on plasma preserved with sodium fluoride. A paired t-test (P = 0.40), Pearson's correlation (P < 0.001; r = 0.95), Bland-Altman plot, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC = 0.90) were completed to evaluate the performance of the glucometer relative to the results from the laboratory assay. Based on the results, we conclude that the glucometer is an acceptable method for measuring blood glucose concentration in beef cattle under field conditions.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35853033</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271673</doi><tpages>e0271673</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6370-6623</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271673-e0271673 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2691768475 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Agreements Beef Beef cattle Biology and Life Sciences Blood Blood glucose Blood levels Catheters Cattle Colorimetry Correlation Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Dairy cattle Diabetes mellitus Evaluation Fluorides Glucose Glucose tolerance Glucose tolerance tests Health aspects Insulin Laboratories Measurement methods Medical instruments Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Performance evaluation Physical Sciences Plasma Preservatives Research and Analysis Methods Signal transduction Sodium Sodium fluoride |
| title | Short communication: A comparison between two glucose measurement methods in beef steers during a glucose tolerance test |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20communication:%20A%20comparison%20between%20two%20glucose%20measurement%20methods%20in%20beef%20steers%20during%20a%20glucose%20tolerance%20test&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Nickles,%20Kirsten%20R&rft.date=2022-07-19&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0271673&rft.epage=e0271673&rft.pages=e0271673-e0271673&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271673&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA710798550%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691768475&rft_id=info:pmid/35853033&rft_galeid=A710798550&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_dc35be9a793449b29053ef7846932d1c&rfr_iscdi=true |