COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time

Stay-at-home-orders, online learning, and work from home policies are some of the responses governments, universities, and other institutions adopted to slow the spread of COVID-19. However, research shows these measures have increased pre-existing gender disparities in the workplace. The working co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271089-e0271089
Hauptverfasser: Caldarulo, Mattia, Olsen, Jared, Frandell, Ashlee, Islam, Shaika, Johnson, Timothy P, Feeney, Mary K, Michalegko, Lesley, Welch, Eric W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0271089
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0271089
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Caldarulo, Mattia
Olsen, Jared
Frandell, Ashlee
Islam, Shaika
Johnson, Timothy P
Feeney, Mary K
Michalegko, Lesley
Welch, Eric W
description Stay-at-home-orders, online learning, and work from home policies are some of the responses governments, universities, and other institutions adopted to slow the spread of COVID-19. However, research shows these measures have increased pre-existing gender disparities in the workplace. The working conditions for women during the pandemic worsened due to increased family care responsibilities and unequal distribution of domestic labor. In the academy, working from home has resulted in reduced research time and increased teaching and family care responsibilities, with a larger proportion of that burden falling to women. We investigate the persistence of gender inequity among academic scientists resulting from university COVID-19 responses over time. We draw on two surveys administered in May 2020 and May 2021 to university-based biologists, biochemists, and civil and environmental engineers, to analyze how the pandemic response has disproportionately impacted women in academia and the endurance of those inequities. Results show significantly greater negative impacts from the pandemic on women’s research activities and work-life balance, compared to men. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results, and the need for the academy to better predict and adjust to the gender disparities its policies create.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0271089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686848015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709596974</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2395242ba1de4160a578b8e2370ba14a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A709596974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-485492c0dba5506343274796089f93af07f65cc602f8750791dae28f76e6090b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkltrFDEYhgdRbK3-A8EBQfRi15wPXgh1PS0UFjz0NmQzmd0sM8k2yRT77812R-lILyQXCV-e7_0OvFX1HII5xBy-3YUhet3N98HbOUAcAiEfVKdQYjRjCOCHd94n1ZOUdgBQLBh7XJ1gKg4Z4rT6sFhdLj_OoKy1b-qN9Y2NtfP2anD5pjzqZJz1xr6rF8Enl7L1ud7q2NfhupDZ9fZp9ajVXbLPxvus-vn504_F19nF6stycX4xM1TKPCOCEokMaNaaUsAwwYgTLllpu5VYt4C3jBrDAGoFp4BL2GiLRMuZZUCCNT6rXhx1911Iahw_KcQEE0QASAuxPBJN0Du1j67X8UYF7dRtIMSN0jE701mFsKSIoLWGjSWQAU25WAuLMAclRnTRej9WG9a9bUyZO-puIjr98W6rNuFaScSkpKQIvB4FYrgabMqqd8nYrtPehuG2b84RAAQV9OU_6P3TjdRGlwGcb0Opaw6i6pwDSSWT_FB2fg9VTmN7Z4pXWlfik4Q3k4TCZPsrb_SQklp-__b_7Opyyr66w26t7vI2hW7IrhhpCpIjaGJIKdr275IhUAer_9mGOlhdjVbHvwFSp-tL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686848015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Caldarulo, Mattia ; Olsen, Jared ; Frandell, Ashlee ; Islam, Shaika ; Johnson, Timothy P ; Feeney, Mary K ; Michalegko, Lesley ; Welch, Eric W</creator><creatorcontrib>Caldarulo, Mattia ; Olsen, Jared ; Frandell, Ashlee ; Islam, Shaika ; Johnson, Timothy P ; Feeney, Mary K ; Michalegko, Lesley ; Welch, Eric W</creatorcontrib><description>Stay-at-home-orders, online learning, and work from home policies are some of the responses governments, universities, and other institutions adopted to slow the spread of COVID-19. However, research shows these measures have increased pre-existing gender disparities in the workplace. The working conditions for women during the pandemic worsened due to increased family care responsibilities and unequal distribution of domestic labor. In the academy, working from home has resulted in reduced research time and increased teaching and family care responsibilities, with a larger proportion of that burden falling to women. We investigate the persistence of gender inequity among academic scientists resulting from university COVID-19 responses over time. We draw on two surveys administered in May 2020 and May 2021 to university-based biologists, biochemists, and civil and environmental engineers, to analyze how the pandemic response has disproportionately impacted women in academia and the endurance of those inequities. Results show significantly greater negative impacts from the pandemic on women’s research activities and work-life balance, compared to men. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results, and the need for the academy to better predict and adjust to the gender disparities its policies create.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35802718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bias ; Bibliometrics ; Career advancement ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Consent ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Economic aspects ; Employment ; Environmental engineering ; Families &amp; family life ; Family work relationship ; Gender ; Gender equality ; Gender equity ; Gender inequality ; Housework ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mothers ; Pandemics ; People and Places ; Policies ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Science ; Science Policy ; Scientists ; Sex roles ; Social Sciences ; Socialization ; Stereotypes ; Teaching ; Telecommuting ; Tenure ; Women ; Work at home ; Work life balance ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271089-e0271089</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Caldarulo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Caldarulo et al 2022 Caldarulo et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-485492c0dba5506343274796089f93af07f65cc602f8750791dae28f76e6090b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-485492c0dba5506343274796089f93af07f65cc602f8750791dae28f76e6090b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2579-2126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269954/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9269954/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27321,27901,27902,33751,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caldarulo, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frandell, Ashlee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shaika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feeney, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalegko, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Eric W</creatorcontrib><title>COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Stay-at-home-orders, online learning, and work from home policies are some of the responses governments, universities, and other institutions adopted to slow the spread of COVID-19. However, research shows these measures have increased pre-existing gender disparities in the workplace. The working conditions for women during the pandemic worsened due to increased family care responsibilities and unequal distribution of domestic labor. In the academy, working from home has resulted in reduced research time and increased teaching and family care responsibilities, with a larger proportion of that burden falling to women. We investigate the persistence of gender inequity among academic scientists resulting from university COVID-19 responses over time. We draw on two surveys administered in May 2020 and May 2021 to university-based biologists, biochemists, and civil and environmental engineers, to analyze how the pandemic response has disproportionately impacted women in academia and the endurance of those inequities. Results show significantly greater negative impacts from the pandemic on women’s research activities and work-life balance, compared to men. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results, and the need for the academy to better predict and adjust to the gender disparities its policies create.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Career advancement</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Telecommuting</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Work at home</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkltrFDEYhgdRbK3-A8EBQfRi15wPXgh1PS0UFjz0NmQzmd0sM8k2yRT77812R-lILyQXCV-e7_0OvFX1HII5xBy-3YUhet3N98HbOUAcAiEfVKdQYjRjCOCHd94n1ZOUdgBQLBh7XJ1gKg4Z4rT6sFhdLj_OoKy1b-qN9Y2NtfP2anD5pjzqZJz1xr6rF8Enl7L1ud7q2NfhupDZ9fZp9ajVXbLPxvus-vn504_F19nF6stycX4xM1TKPCOCEokMaNaaUsAwwYgTLllpu5VYt4C3jBrDAGoFp4BL2GiLRMuZZUCCNT6rXhx1911Iahw_KcQEE0QASAuxPBJN0Du1j67X8UYF7dRtIMSN0jE701mFsKSIoLWGjSWQAU25WAuLMAclRnTRej9WG9a9bUyZO-puIjr98W6rNuFaScSkpKQIvB4FYrgabMqqd8nYrtPehuG2b84RAAQV9OU_6P3TjdRGlwGcb0Opaw6i6pwDSSWT_FB2fg9VTmN7Z4pXWlfik4Q3k4TCZPsrb_SQklp-__b_7Opyyr66w26t7vI2hW7IrhhpCpIjaGJIKdr275IhUAer_9mGOlhdjVbHvwFSp-tL</recordid><startdate>20220708</startdate><enddate>20220708</enddate><creator>Caldarulo, Mattia</creator><creator>Olsen, Jared</creator><creator>Frandell, Ashlee</creator><creator>Islam, Shaika</creator><creator>Johnson, Timothy P</creator><creator>Feeney, Mary K</creator><creator>Michalegko, Lesley</creator><creator>Welch, Eric W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-2126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220708</creationdate><title>COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time</title><author>Caldarulo, Mattia ; Olsen, Jared ; Frandell, Ashlee ; Islam, Shaika ; Johnson, Timothy P ; Feeney, Mary K ; Michalegko, Lesley ; Welch, Eric W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-485492c0dba5506343274796089f93af07f65cc602f8750791dae28f76e6090b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Career advancement</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Telecommuting</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Work at home</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caldarulo, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frandell, Ashlee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shaika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Timothy P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feeney, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalegko, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Eric W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caldarulo, Mattia</au><au>Olsen, Jared</au><au>Frandell, Ashlee</au><au>Islam, Shaika</au><au>Johnson, Timothy P</au><au>Feeney, Mary K</au><au>Michalegko, Lesley</au><au>Welch, Eric W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0271089</spage><epage>e0271089</epage><pages>e0271089-e0271089</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Stay-at-home-orders, online learning, and work from home policies are some of the responses governments, universities, and other institutions adopted to slow the spread of COVID-19. However, research shows these measures have increased pre-existing gender disparities in the workplace. The working conditions for women during the pandemic worsened due to increased family care responsibilities and unequal distribution of domestic labor. In the academy, working from home has resulted in reduced research time and increased teaching and family care responsibilities, with a larger proportion of that burden falling to women. We investigate the persistence of gender inequity among academic scientists resulting from university COVID-19 responses over time. We draw on two surveys administered in May 2020 and May 2021 to university-based biologists, biochemists, and civil and environmental engineers, to analyze how the pandemic response has disproportionately impacted women in academia and the endurance of those inequities. Results show significantly greater negative impacts from the pandemic on women’s research activities and work-life balance, compared to men. We conclude by discussing the implications of our results, and the need for the academy to better predict and adjust to the gender disparities its policies create.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35802718</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271089</doi><tpages>e0271089</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-2126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271089-e0271089
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686848015
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Bias
Bibliometrics
Career advancement
Colleges & universities
Consent
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Economic aspects
Employment
Environmental engineering
Families & family life
Family work relationship
Gender
Gender equality
Gender equity
Gender inequality
Housework
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mothers
Pandemics
People and Places
Policies
Research and Analysis Methods
Science
Science Policy
Scientists
Sex roles
Social Sciences
Socialization
Stereotypes
Teaching
Telecommuting
Tenure
Women
Work at home
Work life balance
Working conditions
title COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19%20and%20gender%20inequity%20in%20science:%20Consistent%20harm%20over%20time&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Caldarulo,%20Mattia&rft.date=2022-07-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0271089&rft.epage=e0271089&rft.pages=e0271089-e0271089&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271089&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA709596974%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686848015&rft_id=info:pmid/35802718&rft_galeid=A709596974&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2395242ba1de4160a578b8e2370ba14a&rfr_iscdi=true