Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis

This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270350-e0270350
Hauptverfasser: Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva, Torres, Pedro, Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida, Filho, Vilmar Benetti, Hauptli, Lucélia, Wagner, Glauber, Haese, Douglas, Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila, Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0270350
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0270350
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva
Torres, Pedro
Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida
Filho, Vilmar Benetti
Hauptli, Lucélia
Wagner, Glauber
Haese, Douglas
Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
description This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p < 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p < 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0270350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686273033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709378565</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b6ad7e040832409e841ad75769bccea0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A709378565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e65d184c6ec4fefb10813e7e11d42ee2b8a26965e647755e24fb38c54276800e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQLgujDjGnufRGWwcvAwoK315CmJzMZM82YtOJ-Dz-w6UyVreyDlNDk5Hf-Jzk5pyieVmhZEVG93oUhdtovD6GDJcICEYbuFedVTfCCY0Tu35qfFY9S2iHEiOT8YXFGmMhbUp4Xv1Zhf9DRpdCVwZZ26EzvQtZdBOfLxkPXlvo4emeCMa512h9XjQvZlEqwFkyfyixwgGhD3OvOwNFp70wMI6dH7SZmSYil2TrzDbqUJ9rnABtoy-amnNRDculx8cBqn-DJ9L8ovrx7-3n1YXF1_X69urxaGM7rfgGctZWkhoOhFmxTIVkREFBVLcUAuJEa85oz4FQIxgBT2xBpGMWCS4SAXBTPTroHH5KaEpoU5pJjQRAhmVifiDbonTpEt9fxRgXt1NEQ4kbpmNPgQTVctwIQRZJgimqQtMoGJnjdGAMaZa03U7Sh2UNroOuj9jPR-U7ntmoTfqgaMykpywIvJ4EYvg-QerV3yYD3uoMwHM_NKGW8rjP6_B_07ttN1EbnC7jOhhzXjKLqUqCaCMn4GHZ5B5W_FvID5-qz-VnnDq9mDpnp4We_0UNKav3p4_-z11_n7Itb7Ba077cp-GEs2DQH6QnM5ZdSBPs3yRVSY_P8yYYam0dNzUN-A8UEDVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686273033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva ; Torres, Pedro ; Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida ; Filho, Vilmar Benetti ; Hauptli, Lucélia ; Wagner, Glauber ; Haese, Douglas ; Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila ; Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</creator><contributor>Kogut, Michael H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva ; Torres, Pedro ; Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida ; Filho, Vilmar Benetti ; Hauptli, Lucélia ; Wagner, Glauber ; Haese, Douglas ; Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila ; Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira ; Kogut, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p &lt; 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p &lt; 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35793288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Additives ; Age ; Age factors ; Animals ; Antibiotics ; Anticoccidials ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Body weight ; Body weight gain ; Care and treatment ; Castor oil ; Chickens ; Coccidiosis ; Complications and side effects ; Design of experiments ; Experimental design ; Feeds ; Health aspects ; Intestinal microflora ; Intestine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Monensin ; Oil ; Oocysts ; Patient outcomes ; Performance indices ; Poultry ; rRNA 16S ; Sodium ; Taxonomy ; Tylosin ; Virginiamycin</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270350-e0270350</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Pires et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Pires et al 2022 Pires et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e65d184c6ec4fefb10813e7e11d42ee2b8a26965e647755e24fb38c54276800e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e65d184c6ec4fefb10813e7e11d42ee2b8a26965e647755e24fb38c54276800e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6416-9436 ; 0000-0003-3026-6523 ; 0000-0003-0309-4877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258845/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258845/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kogut, Michael H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Vilmar Benetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptli, Lucélia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Glauber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haese, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis</title><title>PloS one</title><description>This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p &lt; 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p &lt; 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Anticoccidials</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Body weight gain</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Castor oil</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Coccidiosis</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Monensin</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oocysts</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Tylosin</subject><subject>Virginiamycin</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQLgujDjGnufRGWwcvAwoK315CmJzMZM82YtOJ-Dz-w6UyVreyDlNDk5Hf-Jzk5pyieVmhZEVG93oUhdtovD6GDJcICEYbuFedVTfCCY0Tu35qfFY9S2iHEiOT8YXFGmMhbUp4Xv1Zhf9DRpdCVwZZ26EzvQtZdBOfLxkPXlvo4emeCMa512h9XjQvZlEqwFkyfyixwgGhD3OvOwNFp70wMI6dH7SZmSYil2TrzDbqUJ9rnABtoy-amnNRDculx8cBqn-DJ9L8ovrx7-3n1YXF1_X69urxaGM7rfgGctZWkhoOhFmxTIVkREFBVLcUAuJEa85oz4FQIxgBT2xBpGMWCS4SAXBTPTroHH5KaEpoU5pJjQRAhmVifiDbonTpEt9fxRgXt1NEQ4kbpmNPgQTVctwIQRZJgimqQtMoGJnjdGAMaZa03U7Sh2UNroOuj9jPR-U7ntmoTfqgaMykpywIvJ4EYvg-QerV3yYD3uoMwHM_NKGW8rjP6_B_07ttN1EbnC7jOhhzXjKLqUqCaCMn4GHZ5B5W_FvID5-qz-VnnDq9mDpnp4We_0UNKav3p4_-z11_n7Itb7Ba077cp-GEs2DQH6QnM5ZdSBPs3yRVSY_P8yYYam0dNzUN-A8UEDVc</recordid><startdate>20220706</startdate><enddate>20220706</enddate><creator>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva</creator><creator>Torres, Pedro</creator><creator>Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida</creator><creator>Filho, Vilmar Benetti</creator><creator>Hauptli, Lucélia</creator><creator>Wagner, Glauber</creator><creator>Haese, Douglas</creator><creator>Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila</creator><creator>Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6416-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-6523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-4877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220706</creationdate><title>Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis</title><author>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva ; Torres, Pedro ; Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida ; Filho, Vilmar Benetti ; Hauptli, Lucélia ; Wagner, Glauber ; Haese, Douglas ; Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila ; Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-e65d184c6ec4fefb10813e7e11d42ee2b8a26965e647755e24fb38c54276800e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Anticoccidials</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Body weight gain</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Castor oil</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Coccidiosis</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Monensin</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oocysts</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Tylosin</topic><topic>Virginiamycin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filho, Vilmar Benetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauptli, Lucélia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Glauber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haese, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva</au><au>Torres, Pedro</au><au>Teixeira Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida</au><au>Filho, Vilmar Benetti</au><au>Hauptli, Lucélia</au><au>Wagner, Glauber</au><au>Haese, Douglas</au><au>Pozzatti, Carolina D'ávila</au><au>Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira</au><au>Kogut, Michael H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0270350</spage><epage>e0270350</epage><pages>e0270350-e0270350</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p &lt; 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p &lt; 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35793288</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0270350</doi><tpages>e0270350</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6416-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-6523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-4877</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270350-e0270350
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686273033
source PMC (PubMed Central); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Abundance
Additives
Age
Age factors
Animals
Antibiotics
Anticoccidials
Biology and Life Sciences
Birds
Body weight
Body weight gain
Care and treatment
Castor oil
Chickens
Coccidiosis
Complications and side effects
Design of experiments
Experimental design
Feeds
Health aspects
Intestinal microflora
Intestine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Monensin
Oil
Oocysts
Patient outcomes
Performance indices
Poultry
rRNA 16S
Sodium
Taxonomy
Tylosin
Virginiamycin
title Comparison of functional-oil blend and anticoccidial antibiotics effects on performance and microbiota of broiler chickens challenged by coccidiosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A22%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20functional-oil%20blend%20and%20anticoccidial%20antibiotics%20effects%20on%20performance%20and%20microbiota%20of%20broiler%20chickens%20challenged%20by%20coccidiosis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pires,%20Paula%20Gabriela%20da%20Silva&rft.date=2022-07-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0270350&rft.epage=e0270350&rft.pages=e0270350-e0270350&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0270350&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA709378565%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686273033&rft_id=info:pmid/35793288&rft_galeid=A709378565&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b6ad7e040832409e841ad75769bccea0&rfr_iscdi=true