A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners
Understanding the perceived efficacy and ease of use of technologies will influence initial adoption and sustained utilization. The objectives of this study were to determine the metrics deemed important by runners for monitoring running-related injury (RRI) risk, and identify the facilitators and b...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0265475-e0265475 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0265475 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0265475 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Lacey, Aisling Whyte, Enda O'Keeffe, Sinéad O'Connor, Siobhán Moran, Kieran |
| description | Understanding the perceived efficacy and ease of use of technologies will influence initial adoption and sustained utilization. The objectives of this study were to determine the metrics deemed important by runners for monitoring running-related injury (RRI) risk, and identify the facilitators and barriers to their use of injury focused wearable technologies. A qualitative focus group study was undertaken. Nine semi-structured focus groups with male (n = 13) and female (n = 14) recreational runners took place. Focus groups were audio and video recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed. A critical friend approach was taken to data coding, and multiple methods of trustworthiness were executed. Excessive loading and inadequate recovery were deemed the most important risk factors to monitor for RRI risk. Other important factors included training activities, injury status and history, and running technique. The location and method of attachment of a wearable device, the design of a smartphone application, and receiving useful injury-related information will affect recreational runners' adoption of injury focused technologies. Overtraining, training-related and individual-related risk factors are essential metrics that need to be monitored for RRI risk. RRI apps should include the metrics deemed important by runners, once there is supporting evidence-based research. The difficulty and/or ease of use of a device, and receiving useful feedback will influence the adoption of injury focused running technologies. There is a clear willingness from recreational runners to adopt injury focused wearable technologies whilst running. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0265475 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686271705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709378535</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_60d8e5609f3c4172bc7d3295ce2dc682</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A709378535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9ea18d854bdd8159906ed29a724a6f3c165ce757f82a47640b6c1dcddf7bd373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbF39B4IDgujFrjPJJJm5EZbiR6FQ0OJtyCQnu1myyTbJ1PbKv252dyod6YXkIuGcJ-_54JyieF1Xixqz-uPGD8EJu9h5B4sKUdIw8qQ4rTuM5hRV-OmD90nxIsZNVRHcUvq8OMGEZVfbnBa_l-X1IKxJIpkbKOFWbI3Lb-9Kr8u0hlILmXyIpdAaZDJudbAK5Xf3lHGbIdyV2sshgip_gQiit1AmkGvnrV8ZiBkqA8gAB21hyzA4ByG-LJ5pYSO8Gu9ZcfXl89XZt_nF5dfzs-XFXFLapXkHom5VS5peqbYmXVdRUKgTDDWCaixrSiQwwnSLRMNoU_VU1koqpVmvMMOz4s1Rdmd95GPrIke0pYjVLDdmVpwfCeXFhu-C2Ypwx70w_GDwYcVFSEZa4LRSLRBadTlwUzPUS6Yw6nIGSEnaoqz1aYw29FtQElwKwk5Epx5n1nzlb3iHSJszygLvR4HgrweIiW9NlGCtcOCHQ96kaQjDbUbf_oM-Xt1IrUQuwDjtc1y5F-VLVnWYtQTvqcUjVD4KtkbmOdMm2ycfPkw-ZCbBbVqJIUZ-_uP7_7OXP6fsuwfsGoRN6-jtsJ-dOAWbIyiDjzGA_tvkuuL7NbnvBt-vCR_XBP8BWsgF7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686271705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lacey, Aisling ; Whyte, Enda ; O'Keeffe, Sinéad ; O'Connor, Siobhán ; Moran, Kieran</creator><contributor>Mourot, Laurent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Aisling ; Whyte, Enda ; O'Keeffe, Sinéad ; O'Connor, Siobhán ; Moran, Kieran ; Mourot, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the perceived efficacy and ease of use of technologies will influence initial adoption and sustained utilization. The objectives of this study were to determine the metrics deemed important by runners for monitoring running-related injury (RRI) risk, and identify the facilitators and barriers to their use of injury focused wearable technologies. A qualitative focus group study was undertaken. Nine semi-structured focus groups with male (n = 13) and female (n = 14) recreational runners took place. Focus groups were audio and video recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed. A critical friend approach was taken to data coding, and multiple methods of trustworthiness were executed. Excessive loading and inadequate recovery were deemed the most important risk factors to monitor for RRI risk. Other important factors included training activities, injury status and history, and running technique. The location and method of attachment of a wearable device, the design of a smartphone application, and receiving useful injury-related information will affect recreational runners' adoption of injury focused technologies. Overtraining, training-related and individual-related risk factors are essential metrics that need to be monitored for RRI risk. RRI apps should include the metrics deemed important by runners, once there is supporting evidence-based research. The difficulty and/or ease of use of a device, and receiving useful feedback will influence the adoption of injury focused running technologies. There is a clear willingness from recreational runners to adopt injury focused wearable technologies whilst running.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265475</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35793284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Data collection ; Engineering and Technology ; Focus groups ; Funding ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Grounded theory ; Health risks ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Overtraining ; Perceptions ; Physiological aspects ; Qualitative research ; Questionnaires ; Recreation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Runners (Sports) ; Running ; Smartphones ; Social Sciences ; Technology adoption ; Training ; Wearable computers ; Wearable technology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0265475-e0265475</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Lacey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Lacey et al 2022 Lacey et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9ea18d854bdd8159906ed29a724a6f3c165ce757f82a47640b6c1dcddf7bd373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9ea18d854bdd8159906ed29a724a6f3c165ce757f82a47640b6c1dcddf7bd373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3077-1044 ; 0000-0003-1242-8736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258862/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258862/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mourot, Laurent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, Enda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keeffe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Siobhán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Kieran</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Understanding the perceived efficacy and ease of use of technologies will influence initial adoption and sustained utilization. The objectives of this study were to determine the metrics deemed important by runners for monitoring running-related injury (RRI) risk, and identify the facilitators and barriers to their use of injury focused wearable technologies. A qualitative focus group study was undertaken. Nine semi-structured focus groups with male (n = 13) and female (n = 14) recreational runners took place. Focus groups were audio and video recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed. A critical friend approach was taken to data coding, and multiple methods of trustworthiness were executed. Excessive loading and inadequate recovery were deemed the most important risk factors to monitor for RRI risk. Other important factors included training activities, injury status and history, and running technique. The location and method of attachment of a wearable device, the design of a smartphone application, and receiving useful injury-related information will affect recreational runners' adoption of injury focused technologies. Overtraining, training-related and individual-related risk factors are essential metrics that need to be monitored for RRI risk. RRI apps should include the metrics deemed important by runners, once there is supporting evidence-based research. The difficulty and/or ease of use of a device, and receiving useful feedback will influence the adoption of injury focused running technologies. There is a clear willingness from recreational runners to adopt injury focused wearable technologies whilst running.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Grounded theory</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Overtraining</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Runners (Sports)</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Wearable computers</subject><subject>Wearable technology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbF39B4IDgujFrjPJJJm5EZbiR6FQ0OJtyCQnu1myyTbJ1PbKv252dyod6YXkIuGcJ-_54JyieF1Xixqz-uPGD8EJu9h5B4sKUdIw8qQ4rTuM5hRV-OmD90nxIsZNVRHcUvq8OMGEZVfbnBa_l-X1IKxJIpkbKOFWbI3Lb-9Kr8u0hlILmXyIpdAaZDJudbAK5Xf3lHGbIdyV2sshgip_gQiit1AmkGvnrV8ZiBkqA8gAB21hyzA4ByG-LJ5pYSO8Gu9ZcfXl89XZt_nF5dfzs-XFXFLapXkHom5VS5peqbYmXVdRUKgTDDWCaixrSiQwwnSLRMNoU_VU1koqpVmvMMOz4s1Rdmd95GPrIke0pYjVLDdmVpwfCeXFhu-C2Ypwx70w_GDwYcVFSEZa4LRSLRBadTlwUzPUS6Yw6nIGSEnaoqz1aYw29FtQElwKwk5Epx5n1nzlb3iHSJszygLvR4HgrweIiW9NlGCtcOCHQ96kaQjDbUbf_oM-Xt1IrUQuwDjtc1y5F-VLVnWYtQTvqcUjVD4KtkbmOdMm2ycfPkw-ZCbBbVqJIUZ-_uP7_7OXP6fsuwfsGoRN6-jtsJ-dOAWbIyiDjzGA_tvkuuL7NbnvBt-vCR_XBP8BWsgF7Q</recordid><startdate>20220706</startdate><enddate>20220706</enddate><creator>Lacey, Aisling</creator><creator>Whyte, Enda</creator><creator>O'Keeffe, Sinéad</creator><creator>O'Connor, Siobhán</creator><creator>Moran, Kieran</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3077-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-8736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220706</creationdate><title>A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners</title><author>Lacey, Aisling ; Whyte, Enda ; O'Keeffe, Sinéad ; O'Connor, Siobhán ; Moran, Kieran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9ea18d854bdd8159906ed29a724a6f3c165ce757f82a47640b6c1dcddf7bd373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Grounded theory</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Overtraining</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Runners (Sports)</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Wearable computers</topic><topic>Wearable technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Aisling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whyte, Enda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keeffe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Siobhán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Kieran</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lacey, Aisling</au><au>Whyte, Enda</au><au>O'Keeffe, Sinéad</au><au>O'Connor, Siobhán</au><au>Moran, Kieran</au><au>Mourot, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0265475</spage><epage>e0265475</epage><pages>e0265475-e0265475</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding the perceived efficacy and ease of use of technologies will influence initial adoption and sustained utilization. The objectives of this study were to determine the metrics deemed important by runners for monitoring running-related injury (RRI) risk, and identify the facilitators and barriers to their use of injury focused wearable technologies. A qualitative focus group study was undertaken. Nine semi-structured focus groups with male (n = 13) and female (n = 14) recreational runners took place. Focus groups were audio and video recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed. A critical friend approach was taken to data coding, and multiple methods of trustworthiness were executed. Excessive loading and inadequate recovery were deemed the most important risk factors to monitor for RRI risk. Other important factors included training activities, injury status and history, and running technique. The location and method of attachment of a wearable device, the design of a smartphone application, and receiving useful injury-related information will affect recreational runners' adoption of injury focused technologies. Overtraining, training-related and individual-related risk factors are essential metrics that need to be monitored for RRI risk. RRI apps should include the metrics deemed important by runners, once there is supporting evidence-based research. The difficulty and/or ease of use of a device, and receiving useful feedback will influence the adoption of injury focused running technologies. There is a clear willingness from recreational runners to adopt injury focused wearable technologies whilst running.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35793284</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0265475</doi><tpages>e0265475</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3077-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-8736</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0265475-e0265475 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2686271705 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Data collection Engineering and Technology Focus groups Funding Global positioning systems GPS Grounded theory Health risks Injuries Injury prevention Medicine and Health Sciences Overtraining Perceptions Physiological aspects Qualitative research Questionnaires Recreation Research and Analysis Methods Risk analysis Risk factors Runners (Sports) Running Smartphones Social Sciences Technology adoption Training Wearable computers Wearable technology |
| title | A qualitative examination of the factors affecting the adoption of injury focused wearable technologies in recreational runners |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20examination%20of%20the%20factors%20affecting%20the%20adoption%20of%20injury%20focused%20wearable%20technologies%20in%20recreational%20runners&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lacey,%20Aisling&rft.date=2022-07-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0265475&rft.epage=e0265475&rft.pages=e0265475-e0265475&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0265475&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA709378535%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686271705&rft_id=info:pmid/35793284&rft_galeid=A709378535&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_60d8e5609f3c4172bc7d3295ce2dc682&rfr_iscdi=true |