Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services

A proportionate universal (PU) approach to early years' service provision has been advocated to improve children's health and development and to reduce health inequality, by ensuring that services provide timely and high-quality parenting support commensurate with need. Process-oriented re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.e0265946
Hauptverfasser: Berry, Vashti, Mitchell, Siobhan B, Blower, Sarah, Whittaker, Karen, Wilkinson, Kath, McGilloway, Sinead, Mason-Jones, Amanda, Carr, Rachel Margaret, Bywater, Tracey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0265946
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Berry, Vashti
Mitchell, Siobhan B
Blower, Sarah
Whittaker, Karen
Wilkinson, Kath
McGilloway, Sinead
Mason-Jones, Amanda
Carr, Rachel Margaret
Bywater, Tracey
description A proportionate universal (PU) approach to early years' service provision has been advocated to improve children's health and development and to reduce health inequality, by ensuring that services provide timely and high-quality parenting support commensurate with need. Process-oriented research is critical to examine the factors that contribute to, or hinder, the effective delivery/implementation of such a model in community-based family services. This study aimed to assess the delivery, acceptability and feasibility of a new PU parenting intervention model (called E-SEE Steps), using the Incredible Years® (IY) parent program, when delivered by trained health/family service staff in three "steps"-one universal step (the IY Babies Book), and two targeted steps (group-based IY Infant and Toddler programs). An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation within a pragmatic parallel two-arm, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in community services in four local authorities in England. The process evaluation used qualitative data gathered via interviews and focus groups with intervention arm parents who were offered the targeted steps (n = 29), practitioners (n = 50), service managers (n = 7) and IY program mentors (n = 3). This was supplemented by quantitative data collected using group leader pre-training (n = 50) and post-delivery (n = 39) questionnaires, and research notes of service design decisions. The E-SEE Steps model was acceptable to most parents, particularly when it was accompanied by engagement strategies that supported attendance, such as providing childcare. Practitioners also highlighted the positive development opportunities provided by the IY training and supervision. However, participant views did not support the provision of the IY Babies book as a standalone universal component, and there were barriers to eligible parents-particularly those with low mood-taking up the targeted programs. Service providers struggled to align the PU model with their commissioned service contracts and with their staff capacity to engage appropriate parents, including tackling common barriers to attendance. Despite general enthusiasm and support for delivering high-quality parenting programs in community services in the England, several barriers exist to successfully delivering IY in a proportionate universal model within current services/systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0265946
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686268218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A707006850</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_847c85bf8bf246e8a46827a2a57a3f7d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A707006850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-a1522ea2b56944bffaef07433454a6274e3bccd5aff2a51dd581b43b4c45cf493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUt1u0zAYjRCIjcIbILDEzbho8b-TG6QxFZg0iYvBtfXFsTtXSRzstFIfgbfGodm0oimKEn0-P_6OTlG8JXhFmCKftmEXe2hXQ-jtClMpKi6fFeekYnQpKWbPH_2fFa9S2mIsWCnly-KMCVlJpsR58ecLxOhtTAj6BjkwvvUjjCEPfI_GO4sa2_q9jQcUHAI0xDCEOPrQw2jRrp-OErRogGj70febCbGJ0KEuZCa6WC9v12t0O9ohfZwkTei6TBsP2azz7QElG_fe2PS6eOGgTfbN_F0Uv76uf159X978-HZ9dXmzNKJi4xKIoNQCrfMKnNfOgXVYcca44CCp4pbVxjQCnKMgSNOIktSc1dxwYRyv2KJ4f9Qd2pD0nGLSVJYyv5SUGXF9RDQBtnqIvoN40AG8_jcIcaMhR2Baq0uuTClqV9aOcmlL4FlCQXZWwJxqstbn2W1Xd7YxOaQI7Yno6Unv7_Qm7HVFKqIwzwIXs0AMv3c2jbrzydi2hd6G3XRvJarsmRNYFB_-gz693YzaQF7A9y5kXzOJ6kuFFcayFDijVk-g8tPYzptcOefz_ITAjwQTQ0rRuocdCdZTYe8vo6fC6rmwmfbucT4PpPuGsr-AVeqd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686268218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Berry, Vashti ; Mitchell, Siobhan B ; Blower, Sarah ; Whittaker, Karen ; Wilkinson, Kath ; McGilloway, Sinead ; Mason-Jones, Amanda ; Carr, Rachel Margaret ; Bywater, Tracey</creator><contributor>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berry, Vashti ; Mitchell, Siobhan B ; Blower, Sarah ; Whittaker, Karen ; Wilkinson, Kath ; McGilloway, Sinead ; Mason-Jones, Amanda ; Carr, Rachel Margaret ; Bywater, Tracey ; Mordaunt, Dylan A.</creatorcontrib><description>A proportionate universal (PU) approach to early years' service provision has been advocated to improve children's health and development and to reduce health inequality, by ensuring that services provide timely and high-quality parenting support commensurate with need. Process-oriented research is critical to examine the factors that contribute to, or hinder, the effective delivery/implementation of such a model in community-based family services. This study aimed to assess the delivery, acceptability and feasibility of a new PU parenting intervention model (called E-SEE Steps), using the Incredible Years® (IY) parent program, when delivered by trained health/family service staff in three "steps"-one universal step (the IY Babies Book), and two targeted steps (group-based IY Infant and Toddler programs). An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation within a pragmatic parallel two-arm, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in community services in four local authorities in England. The process evaluation used qualitative data gathered via interviews and focus groups with intervention arm parents who were offered the targeted steps (n = 29), practitioners (n = 50), service managers (n = 7) and IY program mentors (n = 3). This was supplemented by quantitative data collected using group leader pre-training (n = 50) and post-delivery (n = 39) questionnaires, and research notes of service design decisions. The E-SEE Steps model was acceptable to most parents, particularly when it was accompanied by engagement strategies that supported attendance, such as providing childcare. Practitioners also highlighted the positive development opportunities provided by the IY training and supervision. However, participant views did not support the provision of the IY Babies book as a standalone universal component, and there were barriers to eligible parents-particularly those with low mood-taking up the targeted programs. Service providers struggled to align the PU model with their commissioned service contracts and with their staff capacity to engage appropriate parents, including tackling common barriers to attendance. Despite general enthusiasm and support for delivering high-quality parenting programs in community services in the England, several barriers exist to successfully delivering IY in a proportionate universal model within current services/systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265946</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35696375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Cost analysis ; Design ; Evaluation ; Families &amp; family life ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Infant ; Intervention ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Modelling ; Parenting ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Parents - education ; People and Places ; Qualitative analysis ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Social service ; Social Welfare ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Training ; Universalism</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.e0265946</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Berry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Berry et al 2022 Berry et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-a1522ea2b56944bffaef07433454a6274e3bccd5aff2a51dd581b43b4c45cf493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-a1522ea2b56944bffaef07433454a6274e3bccd5aff2a51dd581b43b4c45cf493</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6438-3731 ; 0000-0001-8962-0991 ; 0000-0001-6972-0100 ; 0000-0003-0988-3201</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9191704/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9191704/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696375$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berry, Vashti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Siobhan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blower, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGilloway, Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason-Jones, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Rachel Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bywater, Tracey</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A proportionate universal (PU) approach to early years' service provision has been advocated to improve children's health and development and to reduce health inequality, by ensuring that services provide timely and high-quality parenting support commensurate with need. Process-oriented research is critical to examine the factors that contribute to, or hinder, the effective delivery/implementation of such a model in community-based family services. This study aimed to assess the delivery, acceptability and feasibility of a new PU parenting intervention model (called E-SEE Steps), using the Incredible Years® (IY) parent program, when delivered by trained health/family service staff in three "steps"-one universal step (the IY Babies Book), and two targeted steps (group-based IY Infant and Toddler programs). An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation within a pragmatic parallel two-arm, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in community services in four local authorities in England. The process evaluation used qualitative data gathered via interviews and focus groups with intervention arm parents who were offered the targeted steps (n = 29), practitioners (n = 50), service managers (n = 7) and IY program mentors (n = 3). This was supplemented by quantitative data collected using group leader pre-training (n = 50) and post-delivery (n = 39) questionnaires, and research notes of service design decisions. The E-SEE Steps model was acceptable to most parents, particularly when it was accompanied by engagement strategies that supported attendance, such as providing childcare. Practitioners also highlighted the positive development opportunities provided by the IY training and supervision. However, participant views did not support the provision of the IY Babies book as a standalone universal component, and there were barriers to eligible parents-particularly those with low mood-taking up the targeted programs. Service providers struggled to align the PU model with their commissioned service contracts and with their staff capacity to engage appropriate parents, including tackling common barriers to attendance. Despite general enthusiasm and support for delivering high-quality parenting programs in community services in the England, several barriers exist to successfully delivering IY in a proportionate universal model within current services/systems.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Parenting</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Parents - education</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social service</subject><subject>Social Welfare</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Universalism</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUt1u0zAYjRCIjcIbILDEzbho8b-TG6QxFZg0iYvBtfXFsTtXSRzstFIfgbfGodm0oimKEn0-P_6OTlG8JXhFmCKftmEXe2hXQ-jtClMpKi6fFeekYnQpKWbPH_2fFa9S2mIsWCnly-KMCVlJpsR58ecLxOhtTAj6BjkwvvUjjCEPfI_GO4sa2_q9jQcUHAI0xDCEOPrQw2jRrp-OErRogGj70febCbGJ0KEuZCa6WC9v12t0O9ohfZwkTei6TBsP2azz7QElG_fe2PS6eOGgTfbN_F0Uv76uf159X978-HZ9dXmzNKJi4xKIoNQCrfMKnNfOgXVYcca44CCp4pbVxjQCnKMgSNOIktSc1dxwYRyv2KJ4f9Qd2pD0nGLSVJYyv5SUGXF9RDQBtnqIvoN40AG8_jcIcaMhR2Baq0uuTClqV9aOcmlL4FlCQXZWwJxqstbn2W1Xd7YxOaQI7Yno6Unv7_Qm7HVFKqIwzwIXs0AMv3c2jbrzydi2hd6G3XRvJarsmRNYFB_-gz693YzaQF7A9y5kXzOJ6kuFFcayFDijVk-g8tPYzptcOefz_ITAjwQTQ0rRuocdCdZTYe8vo6fC6rmwmfbucT4PpPuGsr-AVeqd</recordid><startdate>20220613</startdate><enddate>20220613</enddate><creator>Berry, Vashti</creator><creator>Mitchell, Siobhan B</creator><creator>Blower, Sarah</creator><creator>Whittaker, Karen</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Kath</creator><creator>McGilloway, Sinead</creator><creator>Mason-Jones, Amanda</creator><creator>Carr, Rachel Margaret</creator><creator>Bywater, Tracey</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-3731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8962-0991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-0100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-3201</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220613</creationdate><title>Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services</title><author>Berry, Vashti ; Mitchell, Siobhan B ; Blower, Sarah ; Whittaker, Karen ; Wilkinson, Kath ; McGilloway, Sinead ; Mason-Jones, Amanda ; Carr, Rachel Margaret ; Bywater, Tracey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-a1522ea2b56944bffaef07433454a6274e3bccd5aff2a51dd581b43b4c45cf493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Parenting</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Parents - education</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social service</topic><topic>Social Welfare</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Universalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, Vashti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Siobhan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blower, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGilloway, Sinead</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason-Jones, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Rachel Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bywater, Tracey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, Vashti</au><au>Mitchell, Siobhan B</au><au>Blower, Sarah</au><au>Whittaker, Karen</au><au>Wilkinson, Kath</au><au>McGilloway, Sinead</au><au>Mason-Jones, Amanda</au><au>Carr, Rachel Margaret</au><au>Bywater, Tracey</au><au>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-06-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0265946</spage><pages>e0265946-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A proportionate universal (PU) approach to early years' service provision has been advocated to improve children's health and development and to reduce health inequality, by ensuring that services provide timely and high-quality parenting support commensurate with need. Process-oriented research is critical to examine the factors that contribute to, or hinder, the effective delivery/implementation of such a model in community-based family services. This study aimed to assess the delivery, acceptability and feasibility of a new PU parenting intervention model (called E-SEE Steps), using the Incredible Years® (IY) parent program, when delivered by trained health/family service staff in three "steps"-one universal step (the IY Babies Book), and two targeted steps (group-based IY Infant and Toddler programs). An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation within a pragmatic parallel two-arm, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in community services in four local authorities in England. The process evaluation used qualitative data gathered via interviews and focus groups with intervention arm parents who were offered the targeted steps (n = 29), practitioners (n = 50), service managers (n = 7) and IY program mentors (n = 3). This was supplemented by quantitative data collected using group leader pre-training (n = 50) and post-delivery (n = 39) questionnaires, and research notes of service design decisions. The E-SEE Steps model was acceptable to most parents, particularly when it was accompanied by engagement strategies that supported attendance, such as providing childcare. Practitioners also highlighted the positive development opportunities provided by the IY training and supervision. However, participant views did not support the provision of the IY Babies book as a standalone universal component, and there were barriers to eligible parents-particularly those with low mood-taking up the targeted programs. Service providers struggled to align the PU model with their commissioned service contracts and with their staff capacity to engage appropriate parents, including tackling common barriers to attendance. Despite general enthusiasm and support for delivering high-quality parenting programs in community services in the England, several barriers exist to successfully delivering IY in a proportionate universal model within current services/systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35696375</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0265946</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-3731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8962-0991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-0100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-3201</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-06, Vol.17 (6), p.e0265946
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686268218
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acceptability
Biology and Life Sciences
Children
Children & youth
Cost analysis
Design
Evaluation
Families & family life
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Infant
Intervention
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Modelling
Parenting
Parents
Parents & parenting
Parents - education
People and Places
Qualitative analysis
Questionnaires
Research and Analysis Methods
Social Sciences
Social service
Social Welfare
Surveys and Questionnaires
Training
Universalism
title Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A43%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20and%20facilitators%20in%20the%20delivery%20of%20a%20proportionate%20universal%20parenting%20program%20model%20(E-SEE%20Steps)%20in%20community%20family%20services&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Berry,%20Vashti&rft.date=2022-06-13&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0265946&rft.pages=e0265946-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0265946&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA707006850%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686268218&rft_id=info:pmid/35696375&rft_galeid=A707006850&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_847c85bf8bf246e8a46827a2a57a3f7d&rfr_iscdi=true