Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence

Brazilian legal system prescribes means of ensuring the prompt processing of court cases, such as the principle of reasonable process duration, the principle of celerity, procedural economy, and due legal process, with a view to optimizing procedural progress. In this context, one of the great chall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0269008-e0269008
Hauptverfasser: de Oliveira, Raphael Souza, Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales, Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0269008
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0269008
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator de Oliveira, Raphael Souza
Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales
Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani
description Brazilian legal system prescribes means of ensuring the prompt processing of court cases, such as the principle of reasonable process duration, the principle of celerity, procedural economy, and due legal process, with a view to optimizing procedural progress. In this context, one of the great challenges of the Brazilian judiciary is to predict the duration of legal cases based on information such as the judge, lawyers, parties involved, subject, monetary values of the case, starting date of the case, etc. Recently, there has been great interest in estimating the duration of various types of events using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict future behaviors based on time series. Thus, this study presents a proof-of-concept for creating and demonstrating a mechanism for predicting the amount of time, after the case is argued in court (time when a case is made available for the magistrate to make the decision), for the magistrate to issue a ruling. Cases from a Regional Labor Court were used as the database, with preparation data in two ways (original and discretization), to test seven machine learning techniques (i) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP); (ii) Gradient Boosting; (iii) Adaboost; (iv) Regressive Stacking; (v) Stacking Regressor with MLP; (vi) Regressive Stacking with Gradient Boosting; and (vii) Support Vector Regression (SVR), and determine which gives the best results. After executing the runs, it was identified that the adaboost technique excelled in the task of estimating the duration for issuing a ruling, as it had the best performance among the tested techniques. Thus, this study shows that it is possible to use machine learning techniques to perform this type of prediction, for the test data set, with an R2 of 0.819 and when transformed into levels, an accuracy of 84%.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0269008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686265844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A705025469</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c27ab6eb496247e2920538003b100256</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A705025469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6da5cb6ddfcc1216f1f47234c74da4541beec2ae0eafed044127701d83661773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjEmaJu2LsCz-GVlY0cXXkCa3nQxtMiapuN_e1OkuU9kH6UNL8rvn3nt6suw5RmtccPxu50ZvZb_eOwtrRFiNUPUgO8V1QVaMoOLh0fdJ9iSEHUJlUTH2ODspSoY5qcrT7MtXD9qoaGyXxy3kdhwa8Llrcy1vQm5srlKfmCsZIORjmDjpo2mNMrJP9xH63nRgFTzNHrWyD_Bsfp9l1x8_XF98Xl1efdpcnF-uFKtJXDEtS9UwrVulMMGsxS3lpKCKUy1pSXEDoIgEBLIFjSjFhHOEdVWwNDQvzrKXB9l974KYXQiCsIoRVlaUJmJzILSTO7H3ZpD-RjhpxN8D5zsxraB6EIpw2TBoaM0I5UBqMnmEUNFghEjJktb7udvYDKAV2OhlvxBd3lizFZ37JWpclKSaxn0zC3j3c4QQxWCCSqZJC26c5uYIMUxIldBX_6D3bzdTnUwLGNu61FdNouKcozJNTVmdqPU9VHo0DEalyLQmnS8K3i4KEhPhd-zkGILYfP_2_-zVjyX7-ojdguzjNrh-jMbZsATpAVTeheChvTMZIzEl_tYNMSVezIlPZS-Of9Bd0W3Eiz8WYPnr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686265844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza ; Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales ; Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</creator><contributor>P.P. Abdul Majeed, Anwar</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza ; Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales ; Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani ; P.P. Abdul Majeed, Anwar</creatorcontrib><description>Brazilian legal system prescribes means of ensuring the prompt processing of court cases, such as the principle of reasonable process duration, the principle of celerity, procedural economy, and due legal process, with a view to optimizing procedural progress. In this context, one of the great challenges of the Brazilian judiciary is to predict the duration of legal cases based on information such as the judge, lawyers, parties involved, subject, monetary values of the case, starting date of the case, etc. Recently, there has been great interest in estimating the duration of various types of events using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict future behaviors based on time series. Thus, this study presents a proof-of-concept for creating and demonstrating a mechanism for predicting the amount of time, after the case is argued in court (time when a case is made available for the magistrate to make the decision), for the magistrate to issue a ruling. Cases from a Regional Labor Court were used as the database, with preparation data in two ways (original and discretization), to test seven machine learning techniques (i) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP); (ii) Gradient Boosting; (iii) Adaboost; (iv) Regressive Stacking; (v) Stacking Regressor with MLP; (vi) Regressive Stacking with Gradient Boosting; and (vii) Support Vector Regression (SVR), and determine which gives the best results. After executing the runs, it was identified that the adaboost technique excelled in the task of estimating the duration for issuing a ruling, as it had the best performance among the tested techniques. Thus, this study shows that it is possible to use machine learning techniques to perform this type of prediction, for the test data set, with an R2 of 0.819 and when transformed into levels, an accuracy of 84%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35617285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Actions and defenses ; Algorithms ; Analysis ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Databases, Factual ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Engineering and Technology ; Evaluation ; Learning algorithms ; Literature reviews ; Machine Learning ; Management ; Mean square errors ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Neural networks ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Physical Sciences ; Portuguese language ; Principles ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Stacking ; Support vector machines ; Time series</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0269008-e0269008</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 de Oliveira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 de Oliveira et al 2022 de Oliveira et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6da5cb6ddfcc1216f1f47234c74da4541beec2ae0eafed044127701d83661773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6da5cb6ddfcc1216f1f47234c74da4541beec2ae0eafed044127701d83661773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7757-9175 ; 0000-0003-2219-0290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135287/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135287/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>P.P. Abdul Majeed, Anwar</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Brazilian legal system prescribes means of ensuring the prompt processing of court cases, such as the principle of reasonable process duration, the principle of celerity, procedural economy, and due legal process, with a view to optimizing procedural progress. In this context, one of the great challenges of the Brazilian judiciary is to predict the duration of legal cases based on information such as the judge, lawyers, parties involved, subject, monetary values of the case, starting date of the case, etc. Recently, there has been great interest in estimating the duration of various types of events using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict future behaviors based on time series. Thus, this study presents a proof-of-concept for creating and demonstrating a mechanism for predicting the amount of time, after the case is argued in court (time when a case is made available for the magistrate to make the decision), for the magistrate to issue a ruling. Cases from a Regional Labor Court were used as the database, with preparation data in two ways (original and discretization), to test seven machine learning techniques (i) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP); (ii) Gradient Boosting; (iii) Adaboost; (iv) Regressive Stacking; (v) Stacking Regressor with MLP; (vi) Regressive Stacking with Gradient Boosting; and (vii) Support Vector Regression (SVR), and determine which gives the best results. After executing the runs, it was identified that the adaboost technique excelled in the task of estimating the duration for issuing a ruling, as it had the best performance among the tested techniques. Thus, this study shows that it is possible to use machine learning techniques to perform this type of prediction, for the test data set, with an R2 of 0.819 and when transformed into levels, an accuracy of 84%.</description><subject>Actions and defenses</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mean square errors</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Portuguese language</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Stacking</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjEmaJu2LsCz-GVlY0cXXkCa3nQxtMiapuN_e1OkuU9kH6UNL8rvn3nt6suw5RmtccPxu50ZvZb_eOwtrRFiNUPUgO8V1QVaMoOLh0fdJ9iSEHUJlUTH2ODspSoY5qcrT7MtXD9qoaGyXxy3kdhwa8Llrcy1vQm5srlKfmCsZIORjmDjpo2mNMrJP9xH63nRgFTzNHrWyD_Bsfp9l1x8_XF98Xl1efdpcnF-uFKtJXDEtS9UwrVulMMGsxS3lpKCKUy1pSXEDoIgEBLIFjSjFhHOEdVWwNDQvzrKXB9l974KYXQiCsIoRVlaUJmJzILSTO7H3ZpD-RjhpxN8D5zsxraB6EIpw2TBoaM0I5UBqMnmEUNFghEjJktb7udvYDKAV2OhlvxBd3lizFZ37JWpclKSaxn0zC3j3c4QQxWCCSqZJC26c5uYIMUxIldBX_6D3bzdTnUwLGNu61FdNouKcozJNTVmdqPU9VHo0DEalyLQmnS8K3i4KEhPhd-zkGILYfP_2_-zVjyX7-ojdguzjNrh-jMbZsATpAVTeheChvTMZIzEl_tYNMSVezIlPZS-Of9Bd0W3Eiz8WYPnr</recordid><startdate>20220526</startdate><enddate>20220526</enddate><creator>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza</creator><creator>Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales</creator><creator>Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7757-9175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-0290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220526</creationdate><title>Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence</title><author>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza ; Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales ; Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-6da5cb6ddfcc1216f1f47234c74da4541beec2ae0eafed044127701d83661773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Actions and defenses</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mean square errors</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Portuguese language</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Stacking</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Oliveira, Raphael Souza</au><au>Reis, Jr, Amilton Sales</au><au>Sperandio Nascimento, Erick Giovani</au><au>P.P. Abdul Majeed, Anwar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-05-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0269008</spage><epage>e0269008</epage><pages>e0269008-e0269008</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Brazilian legal system prescribes means of ensuring the prompt processing of court cases, such as the principle of reasonable process duration, the principle of celerity, procedural economy, and due legal process, with a view to optimizing procedural progress. In this context, one of the great challenges of the Brazilian judiciary is to predict the duration of legal cases based on information such as the judge, lawyers, parties involved, subject, monetary values of the case, starting date of the case, etc. Recently, there has been great interest in estimating the duration of various types of events using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict future behaviors based on time series. Thus, this study presents a proof-of-concept for creating and demonstrating a mechanism for predicting the amount of time, after the case is argued in court (time when a case is made available for the magistrate to make the decision), for the magistrate to issue a ruling. Cases from a Regional Labor Court were used as the database, with preparation data in two ways (original and discretization), to test seven machine learning techniques (i) Multilayer Perceptron (MLP); (ii) Gradient Boosting; (iii) Adaboost; (iv) Regressive Stacking; (v) Stacking Regressor with MLP; (vi) Regressive Stacking with Gradient Boosting; and (vii) Support Vector Regression (SVR), and determine which gives the best results. After executing the runs, it was identified that the adaboost technique excelled in the task of estimating the duration for issuing a ruling, as it had the best performance among the tested techniques. Thus, this study shows that it is possible to use machine learning techniques to perform this type of prediction, for the test data set, with an R2 of 0.819 and when transformed into levels, an accuracy of 84%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35617285</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0269008</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7757-9175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-0290</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0269008-e0269008
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686265844
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Actions and defenses
Algorithms
Analysis
Artificial Intelligence
Computer and Information Sciences
Databases, Factual
Datasets
Decision making
Engineering and Technology
Evaluation
Learning algorithms
Literature reviews
Machine Learning
Management
Mean square errors
Multilayer perceptrons
Neural networks
Neural Networks, Computer
Physical Sciences
Portuguese language
Principles
Research and Analysis Methods
Stacking
Support vector machines
Time series
title Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20number%20of%20days%20in%20court%20cases%20using%20artificial%20intelligence&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=de%20Oliveira,%20Raphael%20Souza&rft.date=2022-05-26&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0269008&rft.epage=e0269008&rft.pages=e0269008-e0269008&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0269008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA705025469%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686265844&rft_id=info:pmid/35617285&rft_galeid=A705025469&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c27ab6eb496247e2920538003b100256&rfr_iscdi=true