For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19
Novel infectious diseases have the potential to both strengthen or weaken interpersonal relationships within a society. In a collectivist setting such as Thailand amplification of relationships may be particularly marked, but may be associated with individual factors, including personal values and p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0264614-e0264614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0264614 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0264614 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip Tuicomepee, Arunya Suttiwan, Panrapee Watakakosol, Rewadee Ben-Ezra, Menachem Goodwin, Robin |
description | Novel infectious diseases have the potential to both strengthen or weaken interpersonal relationships within a society. In a collectivist setting such as Thailand amplification of relationships may be particularly marked, but may be associated with individual factors, including personal values and perceived control over the virus.
A national on-street survey in Thailand (April 2020, N = 1,000), collected data from five regions across the country (response rate 82.6%). Participants reported demographics, anxiety, perceived control, and personal values of security and universalism, and indicated changes, from negative to positive, across four relationship types (relationship partners, family, friendships and neighbourhood).
While relationship changes were small overall, there was an improvement in close relations (partners, family members) but not amongst friends and neighbours. Respondents who were married without children recorded less enhancement of partnerships, friendships and neighbourhood relations. Those with less perceived control over the infection reported relationship decline, while single people reported fewer positive changes in their partnership or family relations. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the prioritisation of security was associated with a decline in each of the relationships, while universalism was positively associated with change in the family, in friendships and neighbourly relations.
Personal values and marital status may impact on relationship functioning during a national health crisis. These issues should be considered by clinicians and health practitioners when trying to assist those struggling with interpersonal relations during a pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0264614 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686263608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A704923423</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_01639793d8f5404096c05ac6dd2c66c6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A704923423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-da527339754f79fb859c0d69c010646d46b970e97b0e39b03ed35446fbadc293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLpzpy8fRLgYlXbdAIdCF3gpZkm0Fx0olex__fkrjlnj0YggkIT3n1TlHb5K8xmiGaYE_bdzgO9nOdq4zM0SAAWZPklPMKcmAIPr0aH-SvAhhg1BO5wDPkxOaA6YY09Pk4tL5tDR9b3wad7-cD-Zzem1a2VvXhcbuUtXIrjap7dJ1I20rO53qwduuTherm-VFhvnL5Fkl22BejetZsr78ul58z65W35aL86tMAcN9pmVOCkp5kbOq4FU5z7lCGuKEUUxfMyh5gQwvSmQoLxE1muaMQVVKrQinZ8nbg-yudUGM9QdBYA4EKKB5JJYHQju5ETtvt9L_EU5acXfgfC2k761qjUAYYiac6nmVM8QQB4VyqUBrogAURK0v42tDuTVama73sp2ITm8624ja_RQcU0J4EQU-jALe3Q4m9GJrgzJt7KBxwz5v4DnCBcURffcP-nh1I1XLWIDtKhffVXtRcV4gxgllhEZq9ggVhzZbq6JZKhvPJwEfJwGR6c3vvpZDCGL54_r_2dXNlH1_xDZGtn0TXDvcGWsKsgOovAvBm-qhyRiJvdfvuyH2Xhej12PYm-MPegi6Nzf9C3ka9X4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686263608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip ; Tuicomepee, Arunya ; Suttiwan, Panrapee ; Watakakosol, Rewadee ; Ben-Ezra, Menachem ; Goodwin, Robin</creator><contributor>Patel, Sanjay Kumar Singh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip ; Tuicomepee, Arunya ; Suttiwan, Panrapee ; Watakakosol, Rewadee ; Ben-Ezra, Menachem ; Goodwin, Robin ; Patel, Sanjay Kumar Singh</creatorcontrib><description>Novel infectious diseases have the potential to both strengthen or weaken interpersonal relationships within a society. In a collectivist setting such as Thailand amplification of relationships may be particularly marked, but may be associated with individual factors, including personal values and perceived control over the virus.
A national on-street survey in Thailand (April 2020, N = 1,000), collected data from five regions across the country (response rate 82.6%). Participants reported demographics, anxiety, perceived control, and personal values of security and universalism, and indicated changes, from negative to positive, across four relationship types (relationship partners, family, friendships and neighbourhood).
While relationship changes were small overall, there was an improvement in close relations (partners, family members) but not amongst friends and neighbours. Respondents who were married without children recorded less enhancement of partnerships, friendships and neighbourhood relations. Those with less perceived control over the infection reported relationship decline, while single people reported fewer positive changes in their partnership or family relations. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the prioritisation of security was associated with a decline in each of the relationships, while universalism was positively associated with change in the family, in friendships and neighbourly relations.
Personal values and marital status may impact on relationship functioning during a national health crisis. These issues should be considered by clinicians and health practitioners when trying to assist those struggling with interpersonal relations during a pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35613113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anxieties ; Anxiety ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Community relations ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Health aspects ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Interpersonal relations ; Interviews ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Multiple regression analysis ; Pandemics ; Partnerships ; People and Places ; Public health ; Security ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social Sciences ; Universalism ; Values ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0264614-e0264614</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Wiwattanapantuwong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Wiwattanapantuwong et al 2022 Wiwattanapantuwong et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-da527339754f79fb859c0d69c010646d46b970e97b0e39b03ed35446fbadc293</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1528-2250 ; 0000-0002-4527-5070</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132297/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9132297/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Patel, Sanjay Kumar Singh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuicomepee, Arunya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suttiwan, Panrapee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watakakosol, Rewadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ezra, Menachem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Robin</creatorcontrib><title>For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Novel infectious diseases have the potential to both strengthen or weaken interpersonal relationships within a society. In a collectivist setting such as Thailand amplification of relationships may be particularly marked, but may be associated with individual factors, including personal values and perceived control over the virus.
A national on-street survey in Thailand (April 2020, N = 1,000), collected data from five regions across the country (response rate 82.6%). Participants reported demographics, anxiety, perceived control, and personal values of security and universalism, and indicated changes, from negative to positive, across four relationship types (relationship partners, family, friendships and neighbourhood).
While relationship changes were small overall, there was an improvement in close relations (partners, family members) but not amongst friends and neighbours. Respondents who were married without children recorded less enhancement of partnerships, friendships and neighbourhood relations. Those with less perceived control over the infection reported relationship decline, while single people reported fewer positive changes in their partnership or family relations. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the prioritisation of security was associated with a decline in each of the relationships, while universalism was positively associated with change in the family, in friendships and neighbourly relations.
Personal values and marital status may impact on relationship functioning during a national health crisis. These issues should be considered by clinicians and health practitioners when trying to assist those struggling with interpersonal relations during a pandemic.</description><subject>Anxieties</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community relations</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Multiple regression analysis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Universalism</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLpzpy8fRLgYlXbdAIdCF3gpZkm0Fx0olex__fkrjlnj0YggkIT3n1TlHb5K8xmiGaYE_bdzgO9nOdq4zM0SAAWZPklPMKcmAIPr0aH-SvAhhg1BO5wDPkxOaA6YY09Pk4tL5tDR9b3wad7-cD-Zzem1a2VvXhcbuUtXIrjap7dJ1I20rO53qwduuTherm-VFhvnL5Fkl22BejetZsr78ul58z65W35aL86tMAcN9pmVOCkp5kbOq4FU5z7lCGuKEUUxfMyh5gQwvSmQoLxE1muaMQVVKrQinZ8nbg-yudUGM9QdBYA4EKKB5JJYHQju5ETtvt9L_EU5acXfgfC2k761qjUAYYiac6nmVM8QQB4VyqUBrogAURK0v42tDuTVama73sp2ITm8624ja_RQcU0J4EQU-jALe3Q4m9GJrgzJt7KBxwz5v4DnCBcURffcP-nh1I1XLWIDtKhffVXtRcV4gxgllhEZq9ggVhzZbq6JZKhvPJwEfJwGR6c3vvpZDCGL54_r_2dXNlH1_xDZGtn0TXDvcGWsKsgOovAvBm-qhyRiJvdfvuyH2Xhej12PYm-MPegi6Nzf9C3ka9X4</recordid><startdate>20220525</startdate><enddate>20220525</enddate><creator>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip</creator><creator>Tuicomepee, Arunya</creator><creator>Suttiwan, Panrapee</creator><creator>Watakakosol, Rewadee</creator><creator>Ben-Ezra, Menachem</creator><creator>Goodwin, Robin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1528-2250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-5070</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220525</creationdate><title>For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19</title><author>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip ; Tuicomepee, Arunya ; Suttiwan, Panrapee ; Watakakosol, Rewadee ; Ben-Ezra, Menachem ; Goodwin, Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-da527339754f79fb859c0d69c010646d46b970e97b0e39b03ed35446fbadc293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anxieties</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community relations</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Multiple regression analysis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Universalism</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuicomepee, Arunya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suttiwan, Panrapee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watakakosol, Rewadee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ezra, Menachem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiwattanapantuwong, Juthatip</au><au>Tuicomepee, Arunya</au><au>Suttiwan, Panrapee</au><au>Watakakosol, Rewadee</au><au>Ben-Ezra, Menachem</au><au>Goodwin, Robin</au><au>Patel, Sanjay Kumar Singh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-05-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0264614</spage><epage>e0264614</epage><pages>e0264614-e0264614</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Novel infectious diseases have the potential to both strengthen or weaken interpersonal relationships within a society. In a collectivist setting such as Thailand amplification of relationships may be particularly marked, but may be associated with individual factors, including personal values and perceived control over the virus.
A national on-street survey in Thailand (April 2020, N = 1,000), collected data from five regions across the country (response rate 82.6%). Participants reported demographics, anxiety, perceived control, and personal values of security and universalism, and indicated changes, from negative to positive, across four relationship types (relationship partners, family, friendships and neighbourhood).
While relationship changes were small overall, there was an improvement in close relations (partners, family members) but not amongst friends and neighbours. Respondents who were married without children recorded less enhancement of partnerships, friendships and neighbourhood relations. Those with less perceived control over the infection reported relationship decline, while single people reported fewer positive changes in their partnership or family relations. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the prioritisation of security was associated with a decline in each of the relationships, while universalism was positively associated with change in the family, in friendships and neighbourly relations.
Personal values and marital status may impact on relationship functioning during a national health crisis. These issues should be considered by clinicians and health practitioners when trying to assist those struggling with interpersonal relations during a pandemic.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35613113</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0264614</doi><tpages>e0264614</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1528-2250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-5070</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0264614-e0264614 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2686263608 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Anxieties Anxiety Biology and Life Sciences Community relations Coronaviruses COVID-19 Data collection Demographics Health aspects Infections Infectious diseases Interpersonal relations Interviews Medicine and Health Sciences Multiple regression analysis Pandemics Partnerships People and Places Public health Security Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social Sciences Universalism Values Viruses |
title | For better or worse: Relationship change in Thailand during COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T03%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=For%20better%20or%20worse:%20Relationship%20change%20in%20Thailand%20during%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wiwattanapantuwong,%20Juthatip&rft.date=2022-05-25&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0264614&rft.epage=e0264614&rft.pages=e0264614-e0264614&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0264614&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA704923423%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686263608&rft_id=info:pmid/35613113&rft_galeid=A704923423&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_01639793d8f5404096c05ac6dd2c66c6&rfr_iscdi=true |