Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny

The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS biology 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.e3001544-e3001544
Hauptverfasser: Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira, Chapple, David G, Grenyer, Richard, Raz, Tal, Rosenblatt, Jonathan, Tingley, Reid, Böhm, Monika, Meiri, Shai, Roll, Uri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e3001544
container_issue 5
container_start_page e3001544
container_title PLoS biology
container_volume 20
creator Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira
Chapple, David G
Grenyer, Richard
Raz, Tal
Rosenblatt, Jonathan
Tingley, Reid
Böhm, Monika
Meiri, Shai
Roll, Uri
description The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinction risk category. Moreover, the Red Listing process is subject to various sources of uncertainty and bias. The development of robust automated assessment methods could serve as an efficient and highly useful tool to accelerate the assessment process and offer provisional assessments. Here, we aimed to (1) present a machine learning-based automated extinction risk assessment method that can be used on less known species; (2) offer provisional assessments for all reptiles-the only major tetrapod group without a comprehensive Red List assessment; and (3) evaluate potential effects of human decision biases on the outcome of assessments. We use the method presented here to assess 4,369 reptile species that are currently unassessed or classified as Data Deficient by the IUCN. The models used in our predictions were 90% accurate in classifying species as threatened/nonthreatened, and 84% accurate in predicting specific extinction risk categories. Unassessed and Data Deficient reptiles were considerably more likely to be threatened than assessed species, adding to mounting evidence that these species warrant more conservation attention. The overall proportion of threatened species greatly increased when we included our provisional assessments. Assessor identities strongly affected prediction outcomes, suggesting that assessor effects need to be carefully considered in extinction risk assessments. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap for other less known taxa.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001544
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2677631112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A707095614</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0668ba9ac2dd4b438c84d692c9c531d1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A707095614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-a0acb72fa751101459cdedc666882e8da327b3e441f1a0e710ef2005076c99a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstuEzEUhkcIREvhDRBYYsMmwdfxzAYpqlqoVIkNrC2PfSZxmNiD7Snk7XGSadUiNj6W_fs7F_9V9ZbgJWGSfNqGKXo9LMfOhSXDmAjOn1XnJYiFbBrx_NH-rHqV0hZjSlvavKzOmKiJLMt5Na2mHHY6g0U6JUhpBz6jCHegh4TyRueyAII_2XmTXfAouvQThb5oxuwGSMgl9NtZGPZo8hYipOxmoIkhJZRGbQBpb9G42Q9hDX7_unrRFz68meNF9eP66vvl18Xtty83l6vbhRGC54XG2nSS9loKQjDhojUWrKnrumkoNFYzKjsGnJOeaAySYOgpxgLL2rStFuyien_ijkNIap5YUrSWsmaEEFoUNyeFDXqrxlhKj3sVtFPHgxDXSsfszAAKl7SdbrWh1vKOs8Y03NYtNa0RjFhSWJ_nbFO3K3WWSUY9PIE-vfFuo9bhTrWECSoOgI8zIIZfUxmk2rlkYBi0hzAd6ya0FuQo_fCP9P_dzaq1Lg0434eS1xygaiWxxG3xAS8qflId_ytC_1AywergtXu2OnhNzV4rz949bvfh0b252F_4U9OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677631112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira ; Chapple, David G ; Grenyer, Richard ; Raz, Tal ; Rosenblatt, Jonathan ; Tingley, Reid ; Böhm, Monika ; Meiri, Shai ; Roll, Uri</creator><creatorcontrib>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira ; Chapple, David G ; Grenyer, Richard ; Raz, Tal ; Rosenblatt, Jonathan ; Tingley, Reid ; Böhm, Monika ; Meiri, Shai ; Roll, Uri</creatorcontrib><description>The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinction risk category. Moreover, the Red Listing process is subject to various sources of uncertainty and bias. The development of robust automated assessment methods could serve as an efficient and highly useful tool to accelerate the assessment process and offer provisional assessments. Here, we aimed to (1) present a machine learning-based automated extinction risk assessment method that can be used on less known species; (2) offer provisional assessments for all reptiles-the only major tetrapod group without a comprehensive Red List assessment; and (3) evaluate potential effects of human decision biases on the outcome of assessments. We use the method presented here to assess 4,369 reptile species that are currently unassessed or classified as Data Deficient by the IUCN. The models used in our predictions were 90% accurate in classifying species as threatened/nonthreatened, and 84% accurate in predicting specific extinction risk categories. Unassessed and Data Deficient reptiles were considerably more likely to be threatened than assessed species, adding to mounting evidence that these species warrant more conservation attention. The overall proportion of threatened species greatly increased when we included our provisional assessments. Assessor identities strongly affected prediction outcomes, suggesting that assessor effects need to be carefully considered in extinction risk assessments. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap for other less known taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1544-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001544</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35617356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Animals ; Automation ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Classification ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Decision making ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered Species ; Engineering and Technology ; Extinction ; Extinction (Biology) ; Extinction, Biological ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Machine learning ; Methods ; Nature conservation ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Physical Sciences ; Protection and preservation ; Reptiles ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk assessment ; Species classification ; Species extinction ; Taxa ; Threatened species ; Trends ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PLoS biology, 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.e3001544-e3001544</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Caetano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Caetano et al 2022 Caetano et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-a0acb72fa751101459cdedc666882e8da327b3e441f1a0e710ef2005076c99a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-a0acb72fa751101459cdedc666882e8da327b3e441f1a0e710ef2005076c99a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5418-1164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135251/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135251/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapple, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raz, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingley, Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiri, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roll, Uri</creatorcontrib><title>Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny</title><title>PLoS biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><description>The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinction risk category. Moreover, the Red Listing process is subject to various sources of uncertainty and bias. The development of robust automated assessment methods could serve as an efficient and highly useful tool to accelerate the assessment process and offer provisional assessments. Here, we aimed to (1) present a machine learning-based automated extinction risk assessment method that can be used on less known species; (2) offer provisional assessments for all reptiles-the only major tetrapod group without a comprehensive Red List assessment; and (3) evaluate potential effects of human decision biases on the outcome of assessments. We use the method presented here to assess 4,369 reptile species that are currently unassessed or classified as Data Deficient by the IUCN. The models used in our predictions were 90% accurate in classifying species as threatened/nonthreatened, and 84% accurate in predicting specific extinction risk categories. Unassessed and Data Deficient reptiles were considerably more likely to be threatened than assessed species, adding to mounting evidence that these species warrant more conservation attention. The overall proportion of threatened species greatly increased when we included our provisional assessments. Assessor identities strongly affected prediction outcomes, suggesting that assessor effects need to be carefully considered in extinction risk assessments. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap for other less known taxa.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction (Biology)</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Species classification</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><issn>1545-7885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstuEzEUhkcIREvhDRBYYsMmwdfxzAYpqlqoVIkNrC2PfSZxmNiD7Snk7XGSadUiNj6W_fs7F_9V9ZbgJWGSfNqGKXo9LMfOhSXDmAjOn1XnJYiFbBrx_NH-rHqV0hZjSlvavKzOmKiJLMt5Na2mHHY6g0U6JUhpBz6jCHegh4TyRueyAII_2XmTXfAouvQThb5oxuwGSMgl9NtZGPZo8hYipOxmoIkhJZRGbQBpb9G42Q9hDX7_unrRFz68meNF9eP66vvl18Xtty83l6vbhRGC54XG2nSS9loKQjDhojUWrKnrumkoNFYzKjsGnJOeaAySYOgpxgLL2rStFuyien_ijkNIap5YUrSWsmaEEFoUNyeFDXqrxlhKj3sVtFPHgxDXSsfszAAKl7SdbrWh1vKOs8Y03NYtNa0RjFhSWJ_nbFO3K3WWSUY9PIE-vfFuo9bhTrWECSoOgI8zIIZfUxmk2rlkYBi0hzAd6ya0FuQo_fCP9P_dzaq1Lg0434eS1xygaiWxxG3xAS8qflId_ytC_1AywergtXu2OnhNzV4rz949bvfh0b252F_4U9OA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira</creator><creator>Chapple, David G</creator><creator>Grenyer, Richard</creator><creator>Raz, Tal</creator><creator>Rosenblatt, Jonathan</creator><creator>Tingley, Reid</creator><creator>Böhm, Monika</creator><creator>Meiri, Shai</creator><creator>Roll, Uri</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-1164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny</title><author>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira ; Chapple, David G ; Grenyer, Richard ; Raz, Tal ; Rosenblatt, Jonathan ; Tingley, Reid ; Böhm, Monika ; Meiri, Shai ; Roll, Uri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-a0acb72fa751101459cdedc666882e8da327b3e441f1a0e710ef2005076c99a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction (Biology)</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Species classification</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapple, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raz, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tingley, Reid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhm, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meiri, Shai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roll, Uri</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Biology</collection><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caetano, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira</au><au>Chapple, David G</au><au>Grenyer, Richard</au><au>Raz, Tal</au><au>Rosenblatt, Jonathan</au><au>Tingley, Reid</au><au>Böhm, Monika</au><au>Meiri, Shai</au><au>Roll, Uri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny</atitle><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e3001544</spage><epage>e3001544</epage><pages>e3001544-e3001544</pages><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><eissn>1545-7885</eissn><abstract>The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinction risk category. Moreover, the Red Listing process is subject to various sources of uncertainty and bias. The development of robust automated assessment methods could serve as an efficient and highly useful tool to accelerate the assessment process and offer provisional assessments. Here, we aimed to (1) present a machine learning-based automated extinction risk assessment method that can be used on less known species; (2) offer provisional assessments for all reptiles-the only major tetrapod group without a comprehensive Red List assessment; and (3) evaluate potential effects of human decision biases on the outcome of assessments. We use the method presented here to assess 4,369 reptile species that are currently unassessed or classified as Data Deficient by the IUCN. The models used in our predictions were 90% accurate in classifying species as threatened/nonthreatened, and 84% accurate in predicting specific extinction risk categories. Unassessed and Data Deficient reptiles were considerably more likely to be threatened than assessed species, adding to mounting evidence that these species warrant more conservation attention. The overall proportion of threatened species greatly increased when we included our provisional assessments. Assessor identities strongly affected prediction outcomes, suggesting that assessor effects need to be carefully considered in extinction risk assessments. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap for other less known taxa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35617356</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pbio.3001544</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-1164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-7885
ispartof PLoS biology, 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.e3001544-e3001544
issn 1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2677631112
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Analysis
Animals
Automation
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Classification
Computer and Information Sciences
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Decision making
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered Species
Engineering and Technology
Extinction
Extinction (Biology)
Extinction, Biological
Humans
Identification and classification
Machine learning
Methods
Nature conservation
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Physical Sciences
Protection and preservation
Reptiles
Research and Analysis Methods
Risk assessment
Species classification
Species extinction
Taxa
Threatened species
Trends
Wildlife conservation
title Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20assessment%20reveals%20that%20the%20extinction%20risk%20of%20reptiles%20is%20widely%20underestimated%20across%20space%20and%20phylogeny&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20biology&rft.au=Caetano,%20Gabriel%20Henrique%20de%20Oliveira&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e3001544&rft.epage=e3001544&rft.pages=e3001544-e3001544&rft.issn=1545-7885&rft.eissn=1545-7885&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001544&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA707095614%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677631112&rft_id=info:pmid/35617356&rft_galeid=A707095614&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0668ba9ac2dd4b438c84d692c9c531d1&rfr_iscdi=true