Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark
A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250056-e0250056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0250056 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0250056 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rasmussen, Claus Dupont, Yoko L Madsen, Henning Bang Bogusch, Petr Goulson, Dave Herbertsson, Lina Maia, Kate Pereira Nielsen, Anders Olesen, Jens M Potts, Simon G Roberts, Stuart P M Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær Kryger, Per |
description | A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extirpation of wild bees. However, different species of bees show different preferences for forage plants. We here summarize known forage plants for honey bees and wild bee species at national scale in Denmark. Our focus is on floral resources shared by honey bees and wild bees, with an emphasis on both threatened wild bee species and foraging specialist species. Across all 292 known bee species from Denmark, a total of 410 plant genera were recorded as forage plants. These included 294 plant genera visited by honey bees and 292 plant genera visited by different species of wild bees. Honey bees and wild bees share 176 plant genera in Denmark. Comparing the pairwise niche overlap for individual bee species, no significant relationship was found between their overlap and forage specialization or conservation status. Network analysis of the bee-plant interactions placed honey bees aside from most other bee species, specifically the module containing the honey bee had fewer links to any other modules, while the remaining modules were more highly inter-connected. Despite the lack of predictive relationship from the pairwise niche overlap, data for individual species could be summarized. Consequently, we have identified a set of operational parameters that, based on a high foraging overlap (>70%) and unfavorable conservation status (Vulnerable+Endangered+Critically Endangered), can guide both conservation actions and land management decisions in proximity to known or suspected populations of these species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0250056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2656796619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A659957950</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3ca42125d829493e8b061893f370cbf1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A659957950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c785t-9eacc5a34ce88dd26912ab48f48bd5bb345fdf443fe54dad6dc572cbd3b042bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLv2DdI0xhQqdIkGNxa_krrktohTlb273FpOxq0CxRZiZ3nvD5-j09RPIdgCnEF363i0AXVTNsY3BQgCgBlD4pTKDCaMATww6Pvk-JJSqtMYM7Y4-IEYwEEY_C0uL68Uc2geh8WpYnr1vW-9zGUdey2Qy1c2TYq9KnUrt84F8pl3u82z1wqVbDlxjd2N_Oh_ODCWnU_nhaPatUk92z_Piu-fby8vvg8mV99ml2czyem4rSfCKeMoQoT4zi3FjEBkdKE14RrS7XGhNa2JgTXjhKrLLOGVshoizUgSBt8Vrzc6bZNTHJvSJKIUVZtjycyMdsRNqqVbDuf07uVUXn5ZyF2C6m63pvGSWwUQRBRy5EgAjuuAYNc4BpXwOgaZq35TittXDvokVoztHnoPGRyUlgADK-VpAwRSXLyUjFYSUR1xSrDMKh4lnu_T37Qa2eNC32nmpHq-E_wS7mIN5IDDrNXf09vOp9yAWXI9ZIQcIokp4LhTLzZb9HFn4NLvVz7ZFyTC-rikI2iUHBAIaky-uof9H4799RCZcd8qGPOzGxF5TmjQtBKUJCp6T1Ufqxbe5OvT-3z-ijg7SggM7371S_UkJKcff3y_-zV9zH7-ohdOtX0yxSbYXvD0xgkBytjSp2r78oAgdx228ENue02ue-2HPbiuIR3QYf2wr8BRb0i0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656796619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Rasmussen, Claus ; Dupont, Yoko L ; Madsen, Henning Bang ; Bogusch, Petr ; Goulson, Dave ; Herbertsson, Lina ; Maia, Kate Pereira ; Nielsen, Anders ; Olesen, Jens M ; Potts, Simon G ; Roberts, Stuart P M ; Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær ; Kryger, Per</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Claus ; Dupont, Yoko L ; Madsen, Henning Bang ; Bogusch, Petr ; Goulson, Dave ; Herbertsson, Lina ; Maia, Kate Pereira ; Nielsen, Anders ; Olesen, Jens M ; Potts, Simon G ; Roberts, Stuart P M ; Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær ; Kryger, Per</creatorcontrib><description>A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extirpation of wild bees. However, different species of bees show different preferences for forage plants. We here summarize known forage plants for honey bees and wild bee species at national scale in Denmark. Our focus is on floral resources shared by honey bees and wild bees, with an emphasis on both threatened wild bee species and foraging specialist species. Across all 292 known bee species from Denmark, a total of 410 plant genera were recorded as forage plants. These included 294 plant genera visited by honey bees and 292 plant genera visited by different species of wild bees. Honey bees and wild bees share 176 plant genera in Denmark. Comparing the pairwise niche overlap for individual bee species, no significant relationship was found between their overlap and forage specialization or conservation status. Network analysis of the bee-plant interactions placed honey bees aside from most other bee species, specifically the module containing the honey bee had fewer links to any other modules, while the remaining modules were more highly inter-connected. Despite the lack of predictive relationship from the pairwise niche overlap, data for individual species could be summarized. Consequently, we have identified a set of operational parameters that, based on a high foraging overlap (>70%) and unfavorable conservation status (Vulnerable+Endangered+Critically Endangered), can guide both conservation actions and land management decisions in proximity to known or suspected populations of these species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33909661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Apidae ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Biologi ; Biological Sciences ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Competition ; Conservation ; Conservation status ; Ecology ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ekologi ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered species ; Exhaust systems ; Forage ; Forage plants ; Forages ; Honey ; Land conservation ; Land management ; Modules ; Natural Sciences ; Nature conservation ; Naturvetenskap ; Network analysis ; Niche overlap ; Niches ; Parameter identification ; People and places ; Plant reproduction ; Social Sciences ; Threatened species</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250056-e0250056</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Rasmussen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>2021 Rasmussen et al 2021 Rasmussen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c785t-9eacc5a34ce88dd26912ab48f48bd5bb345fdf443fe54dad6dc572cbd3b042bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c785t-9eacc5a34ce88dd26912ab48f48bd5bb345fdf443fe54dad6dc572cbd3b042bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8802-1409 ; 0000-0002-4554-6141 ; 0000-0003-4421-2876 ; 0000-0003-1529-6548</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081269/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081269/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,26544,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/9d00c8fa-5624-454d-a617-25b767c63078$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Yoko L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Henning Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, Petr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulson, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbertsson, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Kate Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Jens M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Simon G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Stuart P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryger, Per</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extirpation of wild bees. However, different species of bees show different preferences for forage plants. We here summarize known forage plants for honey bees and wild bee species at national scale in Denmark. Our focus is on floral resources shared by honey bees and wild bees, with an emphasis on both threatened wild bee species and foraging specialist species. Across all 292 known bee species from Denmark, a total of 410 plant genera were recorded as forage plants. These included 294 plant genera visited by honey bees and 292 plant genera visited by different species of wild bees. Honey bees and wild bees share 176 plant genera in Denmark. Comparing the pairwise niche overlap for individual bee species, no significant relationship was found between their overlap and forage specialization or conservation status. Network analysis of the bee-plant interactions placed honey bees aside from most other bee species, specifically the module containing the honey bee had fewer links to any other modules, while the remaining modules were more highly inter-connected. Despite the lack of predictive relationship from the pairwise niche overlap, data for individual species could be summarized. Consequently, we have identified a set of operational parameters that, based on a high foraging overlap (>70%) and unfavorable conservation status (Vulnerable+Endangered+Critically Endangered), can guide both conservation actions and land management decisions in proximity to known or suspected populations of these species.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Apidae</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biologi</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Exhaust systems</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forage plants</subject><subject>Forages</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Natural Sciences</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Naturvetenskap</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eLv2DdI0xhQqdIkGNxa_krrktohTlb273FpOxq0CxRZiZ3nvD5-j09RPIdgCnEF363i0AXVTNsY3BQgCgBlD4pTKDCaMATww6Pvk-JJSqtMYM7Y4-IEYwEEY_C0uL68Uc2geh8WpYnr1vW-9zGUdey2Qy1c2TYq9KnUrt84F8pl3u82z1wqVbDlxjd2N_Oh_ODCWnU_nhaPatUk92z_Piu-fby8vvg8mV99ml2czyem4rSfCKeMoQoT4zi3FjEBkdKE14RrS7XGhNa2JgTXjhKrLLOGVshoizUgSBt8Vrzc6bZNTHJvSJKIUVZtjycyMdsRNqqVbDuf07uVUXn5ZyF2C6m63pvGSWwUQRBRy5EgAjuuAYNc4BpXwOgaZq35TittXDvokVoztHnoPGRyUlgADK-VpAwRSXLyUjFYSUR1xSrDMKh4lnu_T37Qa2eNC32nmpHq-E_wS7mIN5IDDrNXf09vOp9yAWXI9ZIQcIokp4LhTLzZb9HFn4NLvVz7ZFyTC-rikI2iUHBAIaky-uof9H4799RCZcd8qGPOzGxF5TmjQtBKUJCp6T1Ufqxbe5OvT-3z-ijg7SggM7371S_UkJKcff3y_-zV9zH7-ohdOtX0yxSbYXvD0xgkBytjSp2r78oAgdx228ENue02ue-2HPbiuIR3QYf2wr8BRb0i0g</recordid><startdate>20210428</startdate><enddate>20210428</enddate><creator>Rasmussen, Claus</creator><creator>Dupont, Yoko L</creator><creator>Madsen, Henning Bang</creator><creator>Bogusch, Petr</creator><creator>Goulson, Dave</creator><creator>Herbertsson, Lina</creator><creator>Maia, Kate Pereira</creator><creator>Nielsen, Anders</creator><creator>Olesen, Jens M</creator><creator>Potts, Simon G</creator><creator>Roberts, Stuart P M</creator><creator>Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær</creator><creator>Kryger, Per</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>PLOS</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AGCHP</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D95</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-1409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4554-6141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-2876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-6548</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210428</creationdate><title>Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark</title><author>Rasmussen, Claus ; Dupont, Yoko L ; Madsen, Henning Bang ; Bogusch, Petr ; Goulson, Dave ; Herbertsson, Lina ; Maia, Kate Pereira ; Nielsen, Anders ; Olesen, Jens M ; Potts, Simon G ; Roberts, Stuart P M ; Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær ; Kryger, Per</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c785t-9eacc5a34ce88dd26912ab48f48bd5bb345fdf443fe54dad6dc572cbd3b042bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Apidae</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biologi</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Exhaust systems</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forage plants</topic><topic>Forages</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Natural Sciences</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Naturvetenskap</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Yoko L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Henning Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, Petr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulson, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbertsson, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Kate Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olesen, Jens M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Simon G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Stuart P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryger, Per</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasmussen, Claus</au><au>Dupont, Yoko L</au><au>Madsen, Henning Bang</au><au>Bogusch, Petr</au><au>Goulson, Dave</au><au>Herbertsson, Lina</au><au>Maia, Kate Pereira</au><au>Nielsen, Anders</au><au>Olesen, Jens M</au><au>Potts, Simon G</au><au>Roberts, Stuart P M</au><au>Sydenham, Markus Arne Kjær</au><au>Kryger, Per</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-04-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0250056</spage><epage>e0250056</epage><pages>e0250056-e0250056</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extirpation of wild bees. However, different species of bees show different preferences for forage plants. We here summarize known forage plants for honey bees and wild bee species at national scale in Denmark. Our focus is on floral resources shared by honey bees and wild bees, with an emphasis on both threatened wild bee species and foraging specialist species. Across all 292 known bee species from Denmark, a total of 410 plant genera were recorded as forage plants. These included 294 plant genera visited by honey bees and 292 plant genera visited by different species of wild bees. Honey bees and wild bees share 176 plant genera in Denmark. Comparing the pairwise niche overlap for individual bee species, no significant relationship was found between their overlap and forage specialization or conservation status. Network analysis of the bee-plant interactions placed honey bees aside from most other bee species, specifically the module containing the honey bee had fewer links to any other modules, while the remaining modules were more highly inter-connected. Despite the lack of predictive relationship from the pairwise niche overlap, data for individual species could be summarized. Consequently, we have identified a set of operational parameters that, based on a high foraging overlap (>70%) and unfavorable conservation status (Vulnerable+Endangered+Critically Endangered), can guide both conservation actions and land management decisions in proximity to known or suspected populations of these species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33909661</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0250056</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-1409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4554-6141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-2876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-6548</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250056-e0250056 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2656796619 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SWEPUB Freely available online; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Analysis Apidae Apis mellifera Bees Biologi Biological Sciences Biology and Life Sciences Comparative analysis Competition Conservation Conservation status Ecology Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ekologi Endangered & extinct species Endangered species Exhaust systems Forage Forage plants Forages Honey Land conservation Land management Modules Natural Sciences Nature conservation Naturvetenskap Network analysis Niche overlap Niches Parameter identification People and places Plant reproduction Social Sciences Threatened species |
title | Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20competition%20for%20forage%20plants%20between%20honey%20bees%20and%20wild%20bees%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Rasmussen,%20Claus&rft.date=2021-04-28&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0250056&rft.epage=e0250056&rft.pages=e0250056-e0250056&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0250056&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA659957950%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656796619&rft_id=info:pmid/33909661&rft_galeid=A659957950&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3ca42125d829493e8b061893f370cbf1&rfr_iscdi=true |