Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan
Liver metastases from breast cancer are associated with poor prognosis, and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The impact of liver resection on metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether liver resection can offer better sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266960-e0266960 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0266960 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0266960 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Chen, Pin-Chun Lee, Yuan-Chi Su, Yu-Chieh Lee, Cheng-Hung Chen, Jian-Han Chen, Chung-Yen |
description | Liver metastases from breast cancer are associated with poor prognosis, and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The impact of liver resection on metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether liver resection can offer better survival outcomes in cases of isolated liver metastases from breast cancer.
We conducted a nationwide cohort study using a claims dataset from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We identified all patients with breast cancer (diagnostic code ICD-9: 174.x) from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database (RCIPD) of the NHIRD who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Patients with other malignancies (history, initially, or during follow-up), those with a history of metastasis prior to or at initial admission for mastectomy, and those without liver metastases were excluded. Patients with other metastases between mastectomy and liver metastasis and those who died at first admission for liver resection were also excluded. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2013, or withdraw from the database because of death.
Data were analyzed for 1,116 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (resection group: 89; non-resection group: 1,027). There were no differences in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or major coexisting diseases except renal disease between two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the liver resection group had significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-resection group. (1-year: 96.6% vs. 52.3%, 2-year: 86.8% vs. 35.4%, 3-year: 72.3% vs. 25.2%, 5-year: 51.6% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0266960 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2653253589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A701169922</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c01dc5774995438e8856ac88c89c6aa2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A701169922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-414ac051b63a0aea49510c9cbcc90877f414a72217a46fcb95855faaf189279d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0WI7sWPfgKrxVWnSJBjcWqeO07pK4mI7K5X48ThrNzVoFygXts553tfHJz5Z9pzgKclL8m7tet9BM924zkwx5Vxy_CA7JTKnE05x_vBof5I9CWGNMcsF54-zk5wVBReSnGZ_PjoT0MpsIBodXbtDtt14d22Q66N2bUq6Gi28gRCRhk4bj7Y2rlBjr9O2NTElINjwAc1QB9G6bmsrgyCVtkvhQZ3EzWTrfFOhCiIg26ErsFvonmaPamiCeXZYz7Ifnz9dnX-dXFx-mZ_PLiaalSROClKAxowseA4YDBSSEaylXmgtsSjLegBKSkkJBa_1QjLBWA1QEyFpKav8LHu59900LqhD44KinOWU5UzIRMz3ROVgrTbetuB3yoFVNwHnlwp8tLoxSmNSpbrKQkpW5MIIwThoIbSQmgPQ5PX-cFq_aE2lTRc9NCPTcaazK7V010piSgUmyeDNwcC7X70JUbU2aNM00BnX39RdUJkaUib01T_o_bc7UEtIF7Bd7dK5ejBVsxITwqWkQ93Te6j0Vaa1Or2y2qb4SPB2JEhMNL_jEvoQ1Pz7t_9nL3-O2ddH7Cq9nrgKrumHxxXGYLEHtXcheFPfNZlgNQzJbTfUMCTqMCRJ9uL4B92Jbqci_wvzVw0O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653253589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Chen, Pin-Chun ; Lee, Yuan-Chi ; Su, Yu-Chieh ; Lee, Cheng-Hung ; Chen, Jian-Han ; Chen, Chung-Yen</creator><contributor>Koniaris, Leonidas G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pin-Chun ; Lee, Yuan-Chi ; Su, Yu-Chieh ; Lee, Cheng-Hung ; Chen, Jian-Han ; Chen, Chung-Yen ; Koniaris, Leonidas G</creatorcontrib><description>Liver metastases from breast cancer are associated with poor prognosis, and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The impact of liver resection on metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether liver resection can offer better survival outcomes in cases of isolated liver metastases from breast cancer.
We conducted a nationwide cohort study using a claims dataset from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We identified all patients with breast cancer (diagnostic code ICD-9: 174.x) from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database (RCIPD) of the NHIRD who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Patients with other malignancies (history, initially, or during follow-up), those with a history of metastasis prior to or at initial admission for mastectomy, and those without liver metastases were excluded. Patients with other metastases between mastectomy and liver metastasis and those who died at first admission for liver resection were also excluded. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2013, or withdraw from the database because of death.
Data were analyzed for 1,116 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (resection group: 89; non-resection group: 1,027). There were no differences in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or major coexisting diseases except renal disease between two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the liver resection group had significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-resection group. (1-year: 96.6% vs. 52.3%, 2-year: 86.8% vs. 35.4%, 3-year: 72.3% vs. 25.2%, 5-year: 51.6% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p<0.001). Cox analysis revealed that the liver resection group exhibited a significant improvement in patient survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.321, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.234-0.440, p<0.001).
These findings indicate that liver resection may offer better survival benefit in patients with breast cancer who develop new liver metastases post mastectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266960</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35446891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Codes ; Cohort Studies ; Complications and side effects ; Confidence intervals ; Data analysis ; Female ; Health insurance ; Hepatectomy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Kidney diseases ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms ; Mastectomy ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metabolism ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Mortality ; Oncology ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266960-e0266960</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Chen et al 2022 Chen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-414ac051b63a0aea49510c9cbcc90877f414a72217a46fcb95855faaf189279d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5764-1736 ; 0000-0001-7360-2238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022801/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022801/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35446891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Koniaris, Leonidas G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pin-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yuan-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Yu-Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jian-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chung-Yen</creatorcontrib><title>Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Liver metastases from breast cancer are associated with poor prognosis, and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The impact of liver resection on metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether liver resection can offer better survival outcomes in cases of isolated liver metastases from breast cancer.
We conducted a nationwide cohort study using a claims dataset from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We identified all patients with breast cancer (diagnostic code ICD-9: 174.x) from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database (RCIPD) of the NHIRD who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Patients with other malignancies (history, initially, or during follow-up), those with a history of metastasis prior to or at initial admission for mastectomy, and those without liver metastases were excluded. Patients with other metastases between mastectomy and liver metastasis and those who died at first admission for liver resection were also excluded. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2013, or withdraw from the database because of death.
Data were analyzed for 1,116 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (resection group: 89; non-resection group: 1,027). There were no differences in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or major coexisting diseases except renal disease between two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the liver resection group had significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-resection group. (1-year: 96.6% vs. 52.3%, 2-year: 86.8% vs. 35.4%, 3-year: 72.3% vs. 25.2%, 5-year: 51.6% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p<0.001). Cox analysis revealed that the liver resection group exhibited a significant improvement in patient survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.321, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.234-0.440, p<0.001).
These findings indicate that liver resection may offer better survival benefit in patients with breast cancer who develop new liver metastases post mastectomy.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0WI7sWPfgKrxVWnSJBjcWqeO07pK4mI7K5X48ThrNzVoFygXts553tfHJz5Z9pzgKclL8m7tet9BM924zkwx5Vxy_CA7JTKnE05x_vBof5I9CWGNMcsF54-zk5wVBReSnGZ_PjoT0MpsIBodXbtDtt14d22Q66N2bUq6Gi28gRCRhk4bj7Y2rlBjr9O2NTElINjwAc1QB9G6bmsrgyCVtkvhQZ3EzWTrfFOhCiIg26ErsFvonmaPamiCeXZYz7Ifnz9dnX-dXFx-mZ_PLiaalSROClKAxowseA4YDBSSEaylXmgtsSjLegBKSkkJBa_1QjLBWA1QEyFpKav8LHu59900LqhD44KinOWU5UzIRMz3ROVgrTbetuB3yoFVNwHnlwp8tLoxSmNSpbrKQkpW5MIIwThoIbSQmgPQ5PX-cFq_aE2lTRc9NCPTcaazK7V010piSgUmyeDNwcC7X70JUbU2aNM00BnX39RdUJkaUib01T_o_bc7UEtIF7Bd7dK5ejBVsxITwqWkQ93Te6j0Vaa1Or2y2qb4SPB2JEhMNL_jEvoQ1Pz7t_9nL3-O2ddH7Cq9nrgKrumHxxXGYLEHtXcheFPfNZlgNQzJbTfUMCTqMCRJ9uL4B92Jbqci_wvzVw0O</recordid><startdate>20220421</startdate><enddate>20220421</enddate><creator>Chen, Pin-Chun</creator><creator>Lee, Yuan-Chi</creator><creator>Su, Yu-Chieh</creator><creator>Lee, Cheng-Hung</creator><creator>Chen, Jian-Han</creator><creator>Chen, Chung-Yen</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5764-1736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-2238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220421</creationdate><title>Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan</title><author>Chen, Pin-Chun ; Lee, Yuan-Chi ; Su, Yu-Chieh ; Lee, Cheng-Hung ; Chen, Jian-Han ; Chen, Chung-Yen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-414ac051b63a0aea49510c9cbcc90877f414a72217a46fcb95855faaf189279d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Taiwan - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Pin-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yuan-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Yu-Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jian-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chung-Yen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Pin-Chun</au><au>Lee, Yuan-Chi</au><au>Su, Yu-Chieh</au><au>Lee, Cheng-Hung</au><au>Chen, Jian-Han</au><au>Chen, Chung-Yen</au><au>Koniaris, Leonidas G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-04-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0266960</spage><epage>e0266960</epage><pages>e0266960-e0266960</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Liver metastases from breast cancer are associated with poor prognosis, and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The impact of liver resection on metastasis remains controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate whether liver resection can offer better survival outcomes in cases of isolated liver metastases from breast cancer.
We conducted a nationwide cohort study using a claims dataset from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We identified all patients with breast cancer (diagnostic code ICD-9: 174.x) from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database (RCIPD) of the NHIRD who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. Patients with other malignancies (history, initially, or during follow-up), those with a history of metastasis prior to or at initial admission for mastectomy, and those without liver metastases were excluded. Patients with other metastases between mastectomy and liver metastasis and those who died at first admission for liver resection were also excluded. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2013, or withdraw from the database because of death.
Data were analyzed for 1,116 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (resection group: 89; non-resection group: 1,027). There were no differences in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or major coexisting diseases except renal disease between two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the liver resection group had significantly better overall survival (OS) than the non-resection group. (1-year: 96.6% vs. 52.3%, 2-year: 86.8% vs. 35.4%, 3-year: 72.3% vs. 25.2%, 5-year: 51.6% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p<0.001). Cox analysis revealed that the liver resection group exhibited a significant improvement in patient survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.321, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.234-0.440, p<0.001).
These findings indicate that liver resection may offer better survival benefit in patients with breast cancer who develop new liver metastases post mastectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35446891</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0266960</doi><tpages>e0266960</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5764-1736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-2238</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266960-e0266960 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2653253589 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - pathology Cancer therapies Care and treatment Chemotherapy Codes Cohort Studies Complications and side effects Confidence intervals Data analysis Female Health insurance Hepatectomy Hospitals Humans Kidney diseases Liver Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms Mastectomy Medical schools Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Metabolism Metastases Metastasis Mortality Oncology Patient outcomes Patients Prognosis Retrospective Studies Surgery Survival Survival Rate Taiwan - epidemiology |
title | Does hepatectomy improve outcomes of breast cancer with liver metastasis? A nationwide analysis of real-world data in Taiwan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A22%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20hepatectomy%20improve%20outcomes%20of%20breast%20cancer%20with%20liver%20metastasis?%20A%20nationwide%20analysis%20of%20real-world%20data%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Chen,%20Pin-Chun&rft.date=2022-04-21&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0266960&rft.epage=e0266960&rft.pages=e0266960-e0266960&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0266960&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA701169922%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653253589&rft_id=info:pmid/35446891&rft_galeid=A701169922&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c01dc5774995438e8856ac88c89c6aa2&rfr_iscdi=true |