Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study

One of the mechanisms explaining perinatal health inequalities could be inadequate antenatal care among some immigrant groups. Few European studies compared antenatal care use between different groups of immigrants taking into account individual characteristics. This research investigates the associ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0267098
Hauptverfasser: Schönborn, Claudia, Castetbon, Katia, De Spiegelaere, Myriam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0267098
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Schönborn, Claudia
Castetbon, Katia
De Spiegelaere, Myriam
description One of the mechanisms explaining perinatal health inequalities could be inadequate antenatal care among some immigrant groups. Few European studies compared antenatal care use between different groups of immigrants taking into account individual characteristics. This research investigates the associations of three birth regions with the use of antenatal care, by also considering socioeconomic and migration-related determinants. We included 879 mothers born in Belgium, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, and interviewed them in four Brussels hospitals after they gave birth, using an adapted version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire. We additionally collected clinical data from hospital records. We carried out descriptive analyses and ran univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the associations of socioeconomic and migration characteristics with a) late start of antenatal care and b) less than minimum recommended number of consultations. The vast majority of women in this study had adequate care in terms of timing (93.9%), frequency of consultations (82.2%), and self-reported access (95.9%). Region of birth was an independent risk factor for late initiation of care, but not for infrequent consultations. Women born in Sub-Saharan Africa were more prone to accessing care late (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.5-7.7), but were not more at risk of infrequent consultations. Women born in North Africa, had similar adequacy of care compared to the Belgium-born population. The three groups also differed in terms of socioeconomic profiles and socioeconomic predictors of antenatal care use. Housing type, professional activity, and health insurance status were important predictors of both outcomes. This study showed that the region of birth was partly associated with adequacy of care, in terms of initiation, but not number of consultations. Further dimensions of adequacy of care (content, quality) should be studied in the future. Socioeconomic factors are also key determinants of antenatal care use.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0267098
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2650397158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A700580257</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_84510cd12f794adbbc0b6460cf2faad4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A700580257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c57333f65a423f064fe22f568a3e56bf493a035e222da999ccdd1961c209f37c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpfCGyCwhITgosWxE6e-QSoVh0orrcTp1po4dutVYndtZ6GvwFPjttlVg_YC5SL25Jt_Mqcse57jWU6r_N2V672FdrZ1Vs0wYRXm8wfZec4pmTKC6cOT81n2JIQrjEs6Z-xxdkbLglSU4_Psz9L1NvodchrVxscNgoAAbV1UNhpoUaOi8p2xYOOeSYdGXfcQFUoWZSEmRoJXqA_J1Dm7Rr9cpyxamxuTLkdRY9EH34eg2jBDCyS9C2EalIzGpRxQiH2ze5o90tAG9Wx4T7Ifnz5-X36ZXlx-Xi0XF1PJOIlTWVaUUs1KKAjVmBVaEaJLNgeqSlbrglPAtExG0gDnXMqmyTnLJcFc00rSSfbyqLttXRBDGYMgrMSUV3k5T8TqSDQOrsTWmw78Tjgw4mBwfi3ARyNbJeZFmWPZ5ERXvICmriWuWcGw1EQDNEXSej9E6-tONTKV1UM7Eh1_sWYj1u5GcJwTylkSeDMIeHfdqxBFZ4JUbQtWuf7w3zlLbS33sV79g96f3UCtISVgrHYprtyLikWVZmSOSSrxJJvdQ6WnUZ2Raea0SfaRw9uRQ2Ki-h3XkNouVt--_j97-XPMvj5hNwrauAmu7fejE8ZgcQQP0-WVvityjsV-ZW6rIfYrI4aVSW4vTht053S7I_QvkAgStg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650397158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Schönborn, Claudia ; Castetbon, Katia ; De Spiegelaere, Myriam</creator><creatorcontrib>Schönborn, Claudia ; Castetbon, Katia ; De Spiegelaere, Myriam</creatorcontrib><description>One of the mechanisms explaining perinatal health inequalities could be inadequate antenatal care among some immigrant groups. Few European studies compared antenatal care use between different groups of immigrants taking into account individual characteristics. This research investigates the associations of three birth regions with the use of antenatal care, by also considering socioeconomic and migration-related determinants. We included 879 mothers born in Belgium, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, and interviewed them in four Brussels hospitals after they gave birth, using an adapted version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire. We additionally collected clinical data from hospital records. We carried out descriptive analyses and ran univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the associations of socioeconomic and migration characteristics with a) late start of antenatal care and b) less than minimum recommended number of consultations. The vast majority of women in this study had adequate care in terms of timing (93.9%), frequency of consultations (82.2%), and self-reported access (95.9%). Region of birth was an independent risk factor for late initiation of care, but not for infrequent consultations. Women born in Sub-Saharan Africa were more prone to accessing care late (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.5-7.7), but were not more at risk of infrequent consultations. Women born in North Africa, had similar adequacy of care compared to the Belgium-born population. The three groups also differed in terms of socioeconomic profiles and socioeconomic predictors of antenatal care use. Housing type, professional activity, and health insurance status were important predictors of both outcomes. This study showed that the region of birth was partly associated with adequacy of care, in terms of initiation, but not number of consultations. Further dimensions of adequacy of care (content, quality) should be studied in the future. Socioeconomic factors are also key determinants of antenatal care use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267098</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35427390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Birth ; Country of birth ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data collection ; Demographic aspects ; Earth Sciences ; Emigrants and Immigrants ; Environmental aspects ; Female ; Health disparities ; Health insurance ; Health risks ; Humans ; Immigrants ; Maternal Health Services ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Migration ; Mothers ; People and Places ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Services ; Social factors ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomics ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0267098</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Schönborn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Schönborn et al 2022 Schönborn et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c57333f65a423f064fe22f568a3e56bf493a035e222da999ccdd1961c209f37c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c57333f65a423f064fe22f568a3e56bf493a035e222da999ccdd1961c209f37c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4524-7192</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012396/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012396/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schönborn, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castetbon, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Spiegelaere, Myriam</creatorcontrib><title>Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>One of the mechanisms explaining perinatal health inequalities could be inadequate antenatal care among some immigrant groups. Few European studies compared antenatal care use between different groups of immigrants taking into account individual characteristics. This research investigates the associations of three birth regions with the use of antenatal care, by also considering socioeconomic and migration-related determinants. We included 879 mothers born in Belgium, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, and interviewed them in four Brussels hospitals after they gave birth, using an adapted version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire. We additionally collected clinical data from hospital records. We carried out descriptive analyses and ran univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the associations of socioeconomic and migration characteristics with a) late start of antenatal care and b) less than minimum recommended number of consultations. The vast majority of women in this study had adequate care in terms of timing (93.9%), frequency of consultations (82.2%), and self-reported access (95.9%). Region of birth was an independent risk factor for late initiation of care, but not for infrequent consultations. Women born in Sub-Saharan Africa were more prone to accessing care late (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.5-7.7), but were not more at risk of infrequent consultations. Women born in North Africa, had similar adequacy of care compared to the Belgium-born population. The three groups also differed in terms of socioeconomic profiles and socioeconomic predictors of antenatal care use. Housing type, professional activity, and health insurance status were important predictors of both outcomes. This study showed that the region of birth was partly associated with adequacy of care, in terms of initiation, but not number of consultations. Further dimensions of adequacy of care (content, quality) should be studied in the future. Socioeconomic factors are also key determinants of antenatal care use.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Country of birth</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Emigrants and Immigrants</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpfCGyCwhITgosWxE6e-QSoVh0orrcTp1po4dutVYndtZ6GvwFPjttlVg_YC5SL25Jt_Mqcse57jWU6r_N2V672FdrZ1Vs0wYRXm8wfZec4pmTKC6cOT81n2JIQrjEs6Z-xxdkbLglSU4_Psz9L1NvodchrVxscNgoAAbV1UNhpoUaOi8p2xYOOeSYdGXfcQFUoWZSEmRoJXqA_J1Dm7Rr9cpyxamxuTLkdRY9EH34eg2jBDCyS9C2EalIzGpRxQiH2ze5o90tAG9Wx4T7Ifnz5-X36ZXlx-Xi0XF1PJOIlTWVaUUs1KKAjVmBVaEaJLNgeqSlbrglPAtExG0gDnXMqmyTnLJcFc00rSSfbyqLttXRBDGYMgrMSUV3k5T8TqSDQOrsTWmw78Tjgw4mBwfi3ARyNbJeZFmWPZ5ERXvICmriWuWcGw1EQDNEXSej9E6-tONTKV1UM7Eh1_sWYj1u5GcJwTylkSeDMIeHfdqxBFZ4JUbQtWuf7w3zlLbS33sV79g96f3UCtISVgrHYprtyLikWVZmSOSSrxJJvdQ6WnUZ2Raea0SfaRw9uRQ2Ki-h3XkNouVt--_j97-XPMvj5hNwrauAmu7fejE8ZgcQQP0-WVvityjsV-ZW6rIfYrI4aVSW4vTht053S7I_QvkAgStg</recordid><startdate>20220415</startdate><enddate>20220415</enddate><creator>Schönborn, Claudia</creator><creator>Castetbon, Katia</creator><creator>De Spiegelaere, Myriam</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-7192</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220415</creationdate><title>Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study</title><author>Schönborn, Claudia ; Castetbon, Katia ; De Spiegelaere, Myriam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c57333f65a423f064fe22f568a3e56bf493a035e222da999ccdd1961c209f37c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Country of birth</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Emigrants and Immigrants</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schönborn, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castetbon, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Spiegelaere, Myriam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schönborn, Claudia</au><au>Castetbon, Katia</au><au>De Spiegelaere, Myriam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-04-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0267098</spage><pages>e0267098-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>One of the mechanisms explaining perinatal health inequalities could be inadequate antenatal care among some immigrant groups. Few European studies compared antenatal care use between different groups of immigrants taking into account individual characteristics. This research investigates the associations of three birth regions with the use of antenatal care, by also considering socioeconomic and migration-related determinants. We included 879 mothers born in Belgium, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa, and interviewed them in four Brussels hospitals after they gave birth, using an adapted version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire. We additionally collected clinical data from hospital records. We carried out descriptive analyses and ran univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the associations of socioeconomic and migration characteristics with a) late start of antenatal care and b) less than minimum recommended number of consultations. The vast majority of women in this study had adequate care in terms of timing (93.9%), frequency of consultations (82.2%), and self-reported access (95.9%). Region of birth was an independent risk factor for late initiation of care, but not for infrequent consultations. Women born in Sub-Saharan Africa were more prone to accessing care late (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.5-7.7), but were not more at risk of infrequent consultations. Women born in North Africa, had similar adequacy of care compared to the Belgium-born population. The three groups also differed in terms of socioeconomic profiles and socioeconomic predictors of antenatal care use. Housing type, professional activity, and health insurance status were important predictors of both outcomes. This study showed that the region of birth was partly associated with adequacy of care, in terms of initiation, but not number of consultations. Further dimensions of adequacy of care (content, quality) should be studied in the future. Socioeconomic factors are also key determinants of antenatal care use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35427390</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0267098</doi><tpages>e0267098</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-7192</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0267098
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2650397158
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adequacy
Birth
Country of birth
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data collection
Demographic aspects
Earth Sciences
Emigrants and Immigrants
Environmental aspects
Female
Health disparities
Health insurance
Health risks
Humans
Immigrants
Maternal Health Services
Medicine and Health Sciences
Migration
Mothers
People and Places
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
Public health
Regression analysis
Regression models
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Services
Social factors
Social Sciences
Socioeconomic Factors
Socioeconomics
Womens health
title Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Country%20of%20birth%20as%20a%20potential%20determinant%20of%20inadequate%20antenatal%20care%20use%20among%20women%20giving%20birth%20in%20Brussels.%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sch%C3%B6nborn,%20Claudia&rft.date=2022-04-15&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0267098&rft.pages=e0267098-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0267098&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA700580257%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650397158&rft_id=info:pmid/35427390&rft_galeid=A700580257&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_84510cd12f794adbbc0b6460cf2faad4&rfr_iscdi=true