Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study

Appropriate maxillofacial growth and development evaluation is important for effective orthodontic treatment. Growth evaluation is based on physiological age determined by individual development, but not chronological age. One strategy for determining physiological age is using the cervical vertebra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0265272-e0265272
Hauptverfasser: Manabe, Asuka, Ishida, Takayoshi, Kanda, Eiichiro, Ono, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0265272
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0265272
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Manabe, Asuka
Ishida, Takayoshi
Kanda, Eiichiro
Ono, Takashi
description Appropriate maxillofacial growth and development evaluation is important for effective orthodontic treatment. Growth evaluation is based on physiological age determined by individual development, but not chronological age. One strategy for determining physiological age is using the cervical vertebral bone age. This study aimed to clarify the standard size of the upper and lower jawbones in Japanese patients using the cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS) as an index and clarify the growth pattern. And to use the cervical spine age as a diagnostic aid in orthodontic treatment. Random sampling was performed from the outpatients who visited the Orthodontics department, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital, and 400 patients were enrolled before treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained to measure the height and length of the mandible and the maxilla length with cephalometric analysis. Standard values were calculated for each cervical-spine-age group to analyze changes during mandibular and maxillary growth. Furthermore, we compared the differences between males and females. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare cervical-spine-age groups, and the Steel-Dwass test was used for multiple comparisons. The reliability of CVMS was confirmed by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient (κ). κ for the degree of intra-evaluator agreement and the degree of the inter-evaluator agreement were calculated, and both indicated almost perfect agreement. We found that the distance between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) (i.e., ANS-PNS) increased significantly between CVMS II and CVMS III in males. The distance between Articulare (Ar) and Gonion (Go) (i.e., Ar-Go) and the distance between Go and Pogonion (Pog) (i.e., Go-Pog) increased significantly between CVMS III and CVMS IV in males. The findings suggested that CVMS is a reliable indicator of the growth stage of the maxilla and mandible.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0265272
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2647649755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A699589032</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8d5274b5adab4dc39dec1512a93af30a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A699589032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6072-73020677c942b3d5231f77cc0aaae2d0f27e9f60abeca54a33873218c408ab293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWxc3C4QFpVBRZVqsTp1po4k12vknhrO9vus_CyzB5a7aJeoFxkxv7mH3s8E0UvEzZORJF8WNjB9dCOl7bHMeN5xgv-KDpNSsFHOWfi8YF9Ej3zfsFYJmSeP41OBBlZKuVp9OdiBe0Awdg-tk3cwa1pW3DrGPqavL421UB-PHP2JszjJYSArvfxjSFP43IOre0wOKMpAtq1Nz6uwGMdk6BGtzIa2niFLmDlyOogDG6b7mM8ib_BEnr0GGtnvR951JsdwnwY6vXz6EkDrccX-_9Z9Ovzxc_zr6PLqy_T88nlSOes4KNCMM7yotBlyitRZ1wkDXmaAQDymjW8wLLJGVSoIUtBCFkInkidMgkVL8VZ9Hqnu2ytV_u6esXztMjTssgyIqY7orawUEtnOiqRsmDUdsG6mQIXjG5RSTpAkVYZ1FCltRZljTrJEg6lgEYwIK1P-2xD1WGtsQ9UmCPR453ezNXMrpQsZVbKlATe7QWcvR7QB9UZr5GerUc7bM8tWZ7yTBL65h_04dvtqRnQBUzfWMqrN6JqkpdlJksmOFHjByj6auyMpiZsDK0fBbw_CiAm4G2YweC9mv74_v_s1e9j9u0BO0dow9zbdti0jj8G0x247S6HzX2RE6Y2M3RXDbWZIbWfIQp7dfhA90F3QyP-AuLuGr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647649755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Manabe, Asuka ; Ishida, Takayoshi ; Kanda, Eiichiro ; Ono, Takashi</creator><contributor>Al-Moraissi, Essam</contributor><creatorcontrib>Manabe, Asuka ; Ishida, Takayoshi ; Kanda, Eiichiro ; Ono, Takashi ; Al-Moraissi, Essam</creatorcontrib><description>Appropriate maxillofacial growth and development evaluation is important for effective orthodontic treatment. Growth evaluation is based on physiological age determined by individual development, but not chronological age. One strategy for determining physiological age is using the cervical vertebral bone age. This study aimed to clarify the standard size of the upper and lower jawbones in Japanese patients using the cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS) as an index and clarify the growth pattern. And to use the cervical spine age as a diagnostic aid in orthodontic treatment. Random sampling was performed from the outpatients who visited the Orthodontics department, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital, and 400 patients were enrolled before treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained to measure the height and length of the mandible and the maxilla length with cephalometric analysis. Standard values were calculated for each cervical-spine-age group to analyze changes during mandibular and maxillary growth. Furthermore, we compared the differences between males and females. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare cervical-spine-age groups, and the Steel-Dwass test was used for multiple comparisons. The reliability of CVMS was confirmed by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient (κ). κ for the degree of intra-evaluator agreement and the degree of the inter-evaluator agreement were calculated, and both indicated almost perfect agreement. We found that the distance between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) (i.e., ANS-PNS) increased significantly between CVMS II and CVMS III in males. The distance between Articulare (Ar) and Gonion (Go) (i.e., Ar-Go) and the distance between Go and Pogonion (Pog) (i.e., Go-Pog) increased significantly between CVMS III and CVMS IV in males. The findings suggested that CVMS is a reliable indicator of the growth stage of the maxilla and mandible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265272</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35385488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cephalometry ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Chronology ; Craniofacial growth ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dental materials ; Evaluation ; Female ; Growth ; Growth patterns ; Growth stage ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Males ; Mandible ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mathematical analysis ; Maturation ; Maxilla ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Physiology ; Random sampling ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Spine ; Spine (cervical) ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical sampling ; Temporomandibular joint ; Vertebra ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0265272-e0265272</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Manabe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Manabe et al 2022 Manabe et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6072-73020677c942b3d5231f77cc0aaae2d0f27e9f60abeca54a33873218c408ab293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6072-73020677c942b3d5231f77cc0aaae2d0f27e9f60abeca54a33873218c408ab293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9868-2211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985984/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985984/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35385488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Al-Moraissi, Essam</contributor><creatorcontrib>Manabe, Asuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Eiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Takashi</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Appropriate maxillofacial growth and development evaluation is important for effective orthodontic treatment. Growth evaluation is based on physiological age determined by individual development, but not chronological age. One strategy for determining physiological age is using the cervical vertebral bone age. This study aimed to clarify the standard size of the upper and lower jawbones in Japanese patients using the cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS) as an index and clarify the growth pattern. And to use the cervical spine age as a diagnostic aid in orthodontic treatment. Random sampling was performed from the outpatients who visited the Orthodontics department, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital, and 400 patients were enrolled before treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained to measure the height and length of the mandible and the maxilla length with cephalometric analysis. Standard values were calculated for each cervical-spine-age group to analyze changes during mandibular and maxillary growth. Furthermore, we compared the differences between males and females. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare cervical-spine-age groups, and the Steel-Dwass test was used for multiple comparisons. The reliability of CVMS was confirmed by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient (κ). κ for the degree of intra-evaluator agreement and the degree of the inter-evaluator agreement were calculated, and both indicated almost perfect agreement. We found that the distance between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) (i.e., ANS-PNS) increased significantly between CVMS II and CVMS III in males. The distance between Articulare (Ar) and Gonion (Go) (i.e., Ar-Go) and the distance between Go and Pogonion (Pog) (i.e., Go-Pog) increased significantly between CVMS III and CVMS IV in males. The findings suggested that CVMS is a reliable indicator of the growth stage of the maxilla and mandible.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Chronology</subject><subject>Craniofacial growth</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Growth patterns</subject><subject>Growth stage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine (cervical)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical sampling</subject><subject>Temporomandibular joint</subject><subject>Vertebra</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWxc3C4QFpVBRZVqsTp1po4k12vknhrO9vus_CyzB5a7aJeoFxkxv7mH3s8E0UvEzZORJF8WNjB9dCOl7bHMeN5xgv-KDpNSsFHOWfi8YF9Ej3zfsFYJmSeP41OBBlZKuVp9OdiBe0Awdg-tk3cwa1pW3DrGPqavL421UB-PHP2JszjJYSArvfxjSFP43IOre0wOKMpAtq1Nz6uwGMdk6BGtzIa2niFLmDlyOogDG6b7mM8ib_BEnr0GGtnvR951JsdwnwY6vXz6EkDrccX-_9Z9Ovzxc_zr6PLqy_T88nlSOes4KNCMM7yotBlyitRZ1wkDXmaAQDymjW8wLLJGVSoIUtBCFkInkidMgkVL8VZ9Hqnu2ytV_u6esXztMjTssgyIqY7orawUEtnOiqRsmDUdsG6mQIXjG5RSTpAkVYZ1FCltRZljTrJEg6lgEYwIK1P-2xD1WGtsQ9UmCPR453ezNXMrpQsZVbKlATe7QWcvR7QB9UZr5GerUc7bM8tWZ7yTBL65h_04dvtqRnQBUzfWMqrN6JqkpdlJksmOFHjByj6auyMpiZsDK0fBbw_CiAm4G2YweC9mv74_v_s1e9j9u0BO0dow9zbdti0jj8G0x247S6HzX2RE6Y2M3RXDbWZIbWfIQp7dfhA90F3QyP-AuLuGr0</recordid><startdate>20220406</startdate><enddate>20220406</enddate><creator>Manabe, Asuka</creator><creator>Ishida, Takayoshi</creator><creator>Kanda, Eiichiro</creator><creator>Ono, Takashi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-2211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220406</creationdate><title>Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study</title><author>Manabe, Asuka ; Ishida, Takayoshi ; Kanda, Eiichiro ; Ono, Takashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6072-73020677c942b3d5231f77cc0aaae2d0f27e9f60abeca54a33873218c408ab293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Chronology</topic><topic>Craniofacial growth</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Growth patterns</topic><topic>Growth stage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine (cervical)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical sampling</topic><topic>Temporomandibular joint</topic><topic>Vertebra</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manabe, Asuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Takayoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanda, Eiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Takashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manabe, Asuka</au><au>Ishida, Takayoshi</au><au>Kanda, Eiichiro</au><au>Ono, Takashi</au><au>Al-Moraissi, Essam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-04-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0265272</spage><epage>e0265272</epage><pages>e0265272-e0265272</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Appropriate maxillofacial growth and development evaluation is important for effective orthodontic treatment. Growth evaluation is based on physiological age determined by individual development, but not chronological age. One strategy for determining physiological age is using the cervical vertebral bone age. This study aimed to clarify the standard size of the upper and lower jawbones in Japanese patients using the cervical vertebral maturation stages (CVMS) as an index and clarify the growth pattern. And to use the cervical spine age as a diagnostic aid in orthodontic treatment. Random sampling was performed from the outpatients who visited the Orthodontics department, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital, and 400 patients were enrolled before treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained to measure the height and length of the mandible and the maxilla length with cephalometric analysis. Standard values were calculated for each cervical-spine-age group to analyze changes during mandibular and maxillary growth. Furthermore, we compared the differences between males and females. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare cervical-spine-age groups, and the Steel-Dwass test was used for multiple comparisons. The reliability of CVMS was confirmed by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient (κ). κ for the degree of intra-evaluator agreement and the degree of the inter-evaluator agreement were calculated, and both indicated almost perfect agreement. We found that the distance between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) (i.e., ANS-PNS) increased significantly between CVMS II and CVMS III in males. The distance between Articulare (Ar) and Gonion (Go) (i.e., Ar-Go) and the distance between Go and Pogonion (Pog) (i.e., Go-Pog) increased significantly between CVMS III and CVMS IV in males. The findings suggested that CVMS is a reliable indicator of the growth stage of the maxilla and mandible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35385488</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0265272</doi><tpages>e0265272</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-2211</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0265272-e0265272
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2647649755
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Age
Biology and Life Sciences
Cephalometry
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Chronology
Craniofacial growth
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dental materials
Evaluation
Female
Growth
Growth patterns
Growth stage
Humans
Japan
Male
Males
Mandible
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Mathematical analysis
Maturation
Maxilla
Maxilla - diagnostic imaging
Medicine and Health Sciences
Orthodontics
Patients
Physiology
Random sampling
Reproducibility of Results
Research and Analysis Methods
Spine
Spine (cervical)
Statistical analysis
Statistical sampling
Temporomandibular joint
Vertebra
Vertebrae
title Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T08%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20maxillary%20and%20mandibular%20growth%20patterns%20with%20cephalometric%20analysis%20based%20on%20cervical%20vertebral%20maturation:%20A%20Japanese%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Manabe,%20Asuka&rft.date=2022-04-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0265272&rft.epage=e0265272&rft.pages=e0265272-e0265272&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0265272&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA699589032%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647649755&rft_id=info:pmid/35385488&rft_galeid=A699589032&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8d5274b5adab4dc39dec1512a93af30a&rfr_iscdi=true