Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review
To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs. This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from Jul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266338-e0266338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0266338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0266338 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Elliott, Cara G Murji, Ally Matelski, John Adekola, Adebanke Bianca Chrzanowski, Jessica Shirreff, Lindsay |
description | To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs.
This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from July 2016 to December 2019 at 7 Ontario, Canada hospitals (4 academic, 3 community). Hysterectomies for invasive placentation, malignant, and premalignant indications were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of unexpected malignancy as defined by the number of patients with malignancy on final pathology divided by the total number of hysterectomy cases. Data was extracted from health records and electronic charts. Patient, surgical, and surgeon characteristics were compared between benign and UM groups using bivariate methods. Associations between UM status and perioperative variables were assessed using bivariate logistic regression.
In the study period, 2779 hysterectomies were performed. UM incidence was 1.8% (51 malignancies/2779 cases), with one patient having two malignancies (total UMs = 52). The most common UM types were endometrial (27/52, 51.9%) and sarcoma (13/52, 25%). Patients with UM were older (57.2 ± 11.4 years vs. 52.8 ± 12.5 years, p = .015), had more previous laparotomies (2 (1.25, 2.0) vs. 1 (1.0, 1.0), p < .001), and higher BMI (29.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = .049) and ASA class (p < .028). Regarding surgical factors, patients with UM had more adhesions (p = .001), transfusions (p = .020), and blood loss (p = .006) compared to those with benign pathology. Patient characteristics most strongly associated with UM were age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78-3.72, p < .001) and preoperative diagnosis of pelvic mass (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.11-6.20, p = .019).
Incidence of UM at hysterectomy for benign indication was 1.8%. Several perioperative variables are associated with an increased chance of UM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0266338 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2646134033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A699042767</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_136329115638435fb1dc795750c67001</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A699042767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c1dc16642b38a8667ddffd0c30151682f83afbe66ffe7da40b439e7670a8fef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhITgocWOEyfhAama-FFp0iRgvFquc249krjYTln_ey40mxq0B5QHx87nvnf3jS9JnjM6Z7xg765d7zvVzLeugzlNheC8fJCcsoqnM5FS_vDo_SR5EsI1pTkvhXicnPCcC16m2Wny86qDmy3oCDVpVWPXner0nqhI4gZItC0QZ8hmHyJ4pFy7J1vwxvkWA3AhiqygwzBiu9pqFa3r3pMF8RC9C4Ow3QHudhZ-P00eGdUEeDauZ8nVp4_fz7_MLi4_L88XFzMtqjTONKs1EyJLV7xUWG9R18bUVHPKcibK1JRcmRUIYQwUtcroKuMVFKKgqjRgUn6WvDzobhsX5OhTkKnIBOMZ5RyJ5YGonbqWW29b5ffSKSv_Hji_lspHqxuQDJ1KK8ZyNCzjuVlhdUWVFznVmJEy1PowZutXaIqGLnrVTESnXzq7kWu3k2VVDP2gwJtRwLtfPYQoWxs0NI3qwPWHuosUK88RffUPen93I7VW2IDtjMO8ehCVC1FVNEvRLKTm91D41NBajZfKWDyfBLydBCAT4SauVR-CXH77-v_s5Y8p-_qI3YBq4ia4ph-uUpiC2QHUeLWCB3NnMqNymIlbN-QwE3KcCQx7cfyD7oJuh4D_ATlcBvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646134033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Elliott, Cara G ; Murji, Ally ; Matelski, John ; Adekola, Adebanke Bianca ; Chrzanowski, Jessica ; Shirreff, Lindsay</creator><contributor>Raimondo, Diego</contributor><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Cara G ; Murji, Ally ; Matelski, John ; Adekola, Adebanke Bianca ; Chrzanowski, Jessica ; Shirreff, Lindsay ; Raimondo, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs.
This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from July 2016 to December 2019 at 7 Ontario, Canada hospitals (4 academic, 3 community). Hysterectomies for invasive placentation, malignant, and premalignant indications were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of unexpected malignancy as defined by the number of patients with malignancy on final pathology divided by the total number of hysterectomy cases. Data was extracted from health records and electronic charts. Patient, surgical, and surgeon characteristics were compared between benign and UM groups using bivariate methods. Associations between UM status and perioperative variables were assessed using bivariate logistic regression.
In the study period, 2779 hysterectomies were performed. UM incidence was 1.8% (51 malignancies/2779 cases), with one patient having two malignancies (total UMs = 52). The most common UM types were endometrial (27/52, 51.9%) and sarcoma (13/52, 25%). Patients with UM were older (57.2 ± 11.4 years vs. 52.8 ± 12.5 years, p = .015), had more previous laparotomies (2 (1.25, 2.0) vs. 1 (1.0, 1.0), p < .001), and higher BMI (29.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = .049) and ASA class (p < .028). Regarding surgical factors, patients with UM had more adhesions (p = .001), transfusions (p = .020), and blood loss (p = .006) compared to those with benign pathology. Patient characteristics most strongly associated with UM were age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78-3.72, p < .001) and preoperative diagnosis of pelvic mass (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.11-6.20, p = .019).
Incidence of UM at hysterectomy for benign indication was 1.8%. Several perioperative variables are associated with an increased chance of UM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35363824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Benign ; Bivariate analysis ; Body mass index ; Care and treatment ; Cervical cancer ; Complications and side effects ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrium ; Fallopian tubes ; Female ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - adverse effects ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Incidence ; Indication ; Invasiveness ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Malignancy ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Obstetrics ; Ontario - epidemiology ; Ovarian cancer ; Pathology ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; People and Places ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcoma ; Sarcoma - diagnosis ; Surgery ; Uterine cancer ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266338-e0266338</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Elliott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Elliott et al 2022 Elliott et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c1dc16642b38a8667ddffd0c30151682f83afbe66ffe7da40b439e7670a8fef23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c1dc16642b38a8667ddffd0c30151682f83afbe66ffe7da40b439e7670a8fef23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6854-0888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975168/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Raimondo, Diego</contributor><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Cara G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murji, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matelski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adekola, Adebanke Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrzanowski, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirreff, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><title>Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs.
This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from July 2016 to December 2019 at 7 Ontario, Canada hospitals (4 academic, 3 community). Hysterectomies for invasive placentation, malignant, and premalignant indications were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of unexpected malignancy as defined by the number of patients with malignancy on final pathology divided by the total number of hysterectomy cases. Data was extracted from health records and electronic charts. Patient, surgical, and surgeon characteristics were compared between benign and UM groups using bivariate methods. Associations between UM status and perioperative variables were assessed using bivariate logistic regression.
In the study period, 2779 hysterectomies were performed. UM incidence was 1.8% (51 malignancies/2779 cases), with one patient having two malignancies (total UMs = 52). The most common UM types were endometrial (27/52, 51.9%) and sarcoma (13/52, 25%). Patients with UM were older (57.2 ± 11.4 years vs. 52.8 ± 12.5 years, p = .015), had more previous laparotomies (2 (1.25, 2.0) vs. 1 (1.0, 1.0), p < .001), and higher BMI (29.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = .049) and ASA class (p < .028). Regarding surgical factors, patients with UM had more adhesions (p = .001), transfusions (p = .020), and blood loss (p = .006) compared to those with benign pathology. Patient characteristics most strongly associated with UM were age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78-3.72, p < .001) and preoperative diagnosis of pelvic mass (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.11-6.20, p = .019).
Incidence of UM at hysterectomy for benign indication was 1.8%. Several perioperative variables are associated with an increased chance of UM.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Fallopian tubes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcoma</subject><subject>Sarcoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Uterine cancer</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhITgocWOEyfhAama-FFp0iRgvFquc249krjYTln_ey40mxq0B5QHx87nvnf3jS9JnjM6Z7xg765d7zvVzLeugzlNheC8fJCcsoqnM5FS_vDo_SR5EsI1pTkvhXicnPCcC16m2Wny86qDmy3oCDVpVWPXner0nqhI4gZItC0QZ8hmHyJ4pFy7J1vwxvkWA3AhiqygwzBiu9pqFa3r3pMF8RC9C4Ow3QHudhZ-P00eGdUEeDauZ8nVp4_fz7_MLi4_L88XFzMtqjTONKs1EyJLV7xUWG9R18bUVHPKcibK1JRcmRUIYQwUtcroKuMVFKKgqjRgUn6WvDzobhsX5OhTkKnIBOMZ5RyJ5YGonbqWW29b5ffSKSv_Hji_lspHqxuQDJ1KK8ZyNCzjuVlhdUWVFznVmJEy1PowZutXaIqGLnrVTESnXzq7kWu3k2VVDP2gwJtRwLtfPYQoWxs0NI3qwPWHuosUK88RffUPen93I7VW2IDtjMO8ehCVC1FVNEvRLKTm91D41NBajZfKWDyfBLydBCAT4SauVR-CXH77-v_s5Y8p-_qI3YBq4ia4ph-uUpiC2QHUeLWCB3NnMqNymIlbN-QwE3KcCQx7cfyD7oJuh4D_ATlcBvQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Elliott, Cara G</creator><creator>Murji, Ally</creator><creator>Matelski, John</creator><creator>Adekola, Adebanke Bianca</creator><creator>Chrzanowski, Jessica</creator><creator>Shirreff, Lindsay</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-0888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review</title><author>Elliott, Cara G ; Murji, Ally ; Matelski, John ; Adekola, Adebanke Bianca ; Chrzanowski, Jessica ; Shirreff, Lindsay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c1dc16642b38a8667ddffd0c30151682f83afbe66ffe7da40b439e7670a8fef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Fallopian tubes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcoma</topic><topic>Sarcoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Uterine cancer</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Cara G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murji, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matelski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adekola, Adebanke Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrzanowski, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirreff, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Cara G</au><au>Murji, Ally</au><au>Matelski, John</au><au>Adekola, Adebanke Bianca</au><au>Chrzanowski, Jessica</au><au>Shirreff, Lindsay</au><au>Raimondo, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0266338</spage><epage>e0266338</epage><pages>e0266338-e0266338</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs.
This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from July 2016 to December 2019 at 7 Ontario, Canada hospitals (4 academic, 3 community). Hysterectomies for invasive placentation, malignant, and premalignant indications were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of unexpected malignancy as defined by the number of patients with malignancy on final pathology divided by the total number of hysterectomy cases. Data was extracted from health records and electronic charts. Patient, surgical, and surgeon characteristics were compared between benign and UM groups using bivariate methods. Associations between UM status and perioperative variables were assessed using bivariate logistic regression.
In the study period, 2779 hysterectomies were performed. UM incidence was 1.8% (51 malignancies/2779 cases), with one patient having two malignancies (total UMs = 52). The most common UM types were endometrial (27/52, 51.9%) and sarcoma (13/52, 25%). Patients with UM were older (57.2 ± 11.4 years vs. 52.8 ± 12.5 years, p = .015), had more previous laparotomies (2 (1.25, 2.0) vs. 1 (1.0, 1.0), p < .001), and higher BMI (29.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = .049) and ASA class (p < .028). Regarding surgical factors, patients with UM had more adhesions (p = .001), transfusions (p = .020), and blood loss (p = .006) compared to those with benign pathology. Patient characteristics most strongly associated with UM were age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78-3.72, p < .001) and preoperative diagnosis of pelvic mass (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.11-6.20, p = .019).
Incidence of UM at hysterectomy for benign indication was 1.8%. Several perioperative variables are associated with an increased chance of UM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35363824</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0266338</doi><tpages>e0266338</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-0888</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-04, Vol.17 (4), p.e0266338-e0266338 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2646134033 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Abdomen Benign Bivariate analysis Body mass index Care and treatment Cervical cancer Complications and side effects Endometrial cancer Endometrium Fallopian tubes Female Gynecology Hospitals Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - adverse effects Hysterectomy - methods Incidence Indication Invasiveness Laparoscopy Laparotomy Malignancy Medicine and Health Sciences Obstetrics Ontario - epidemiology Ovarian cancer Pathology Patient outcomes Patients People and Places Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Sarcoma Sarcoma - diagnosis Surgery Uterine cancer Vagina |
title | Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unexpected%20malignancy%20at%20the%20time%20of%20hysterectomy%20performed%20for%20a%20benign%20indication:%20A%20retrospective%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Elliott,%20Cara%20G&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0266338&rft.epage=e0266338&rft.pages=e0266338-e0266338&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0266338&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA699042767%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646134033&rft_id=info:pmid/35363824&rft_galeid=A699042767&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_136329115638435fb1dc795750c67001&rfr_iscdi=true |