Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model
Since Health care workers (HCWs) are at high occupational risk for COVID-19, they are prioritized for immunization. This study aimed to assess the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and to identify its determinants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between10 and 31 Dec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0264128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0264128 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Youssef, Dalal Abou-Abbas, Linda Berry, Atika Youssef, Janet Hassan, Hamad |
description | Since Health care workers (HCWs) are at high occupational risk for COVID-19, they are prioritized for immunization. This study aimed to assess the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and to identify its determinants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between10 and 31 December 2020 among Lebanese HCWs. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical framework. Multivariable logistic analyses were carried out to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs. A total of 1800 HCWs have completed the survey. Around half (58.10%) of them were frontline HCWs and aged between (30-49) years old. Over two-thirds (67.33%) of the participants have received the seasonal influenza vaccine. The acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among surveyed HCWs was 58%. HCWs who were male (aOR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.41-2.80)), working in the frontlines (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI (1.17-2.21), and those who have received influenza vaccination for the current year (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI(0.99-1.92)) were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, factors such as living in rural areas (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.44-0.84)), and being previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (aOR = 0.66, 95%CI (0.45-0.96) were found negatively associated with vaccine acceptance. In terms of health beliefs items, concerns related to the novelty of vaccine (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.25-0.71)), side effects/vaccine safety (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.23-0.73), reliability of manufacturer (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.30-0.63)), and the number of required doses (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.40-0.84)) were also negatively associated with the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Remarkably, concerns such as the limited accessibility (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI (1.14-2.47)), and availability of vaccines (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.46-3.20)) were associated with an increased likelihood of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. With regards to cues of action, receiving reliable and adequate information about the vaccine (aOR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.36-2.88)), recommendation by health authorities (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI(1.33-2.81)), and recommendations from health facilities (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI(1.80-3.99)) were also positively associated with vaccine acceptance. Lastly, perception of COVID-19 vaccine benefits by HCWs in terms of protecting them and their close contacts (patients, family members, and friends) from COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI (2.78-7.11)) was associated wit |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0264128 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2631843188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A694552561</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3392486773874d93930d61f38cc8fd81</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A694552561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5088-ff10cf9486bd37a0053fd216fa054dac9f6dc8b736dcc8f3d760908049fe2af53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QDASm7JI8GPGY2-QqpRHpEjdAFvLsa8Thxk72DNB_ADfjaeZVg2qLMv29TnnPnSK4jVGc0wb_GEXhuhVO98HD3NEWIUJf1KcY0HJjBFEnz64nxUvUtohVFPO2PPijNZYEMaq8-LvNfQQO-eV71MZbKm0hn2vvIbxtQgxeHVwcUilcQlUghlBWJSXi5sfy-sZFu_LQ6Y4D6Xqgt-UK1grDwnKLai235ZaRSh_h_gTYiqH5DJk-llD68CWXTDQviyeWdUmeDWdF8X3z5--Lb7OVjdflour1UzXiPOZtRhpKyrO1oY2amzIGoKZVaiujNLCMqP5uqH50NxS0zAkEEeVsECUrelF8faou29DktMIkySMYl7lzTNieUSYoHZyH12n4h8ZlJO3gRA3UsXe6RYkpYLkUpqG8qYyggqKDMOW8jG34ThrfZyyDesOjAbfR9WeiJ7-eLeVm3CQnDNKCM0Cl5NADL8GSL3sXNLQtnnEYbitm-Aao7rJ0Hf_QR_vbkJtVG7AeRtyXj2KyismqromNRvrnj-CystA53T2m3U5fkKojgQdQ0oR7H2PGMnRrXfFyNGtcnJrpr15OJ970p096T9hZOYZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2631843188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Youssef, Dalal ; Abou-Abbas, Linda ; Berry, Atika ; Youssef, Janet ; Hassan, Hamad</creator><contributor>Tu, Wen-Jun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Dalal ; Abou-Abbas, Linda ; Berry, Atika ; Youssef, Janet ; Hassan, Hamad ; Tu, Wen-Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Since Health care workers (HCWs) are at high occupational risk for COVID-19, they are prioritized for immunization. This study aimed to assess the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and to identify its determinants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between10 and 31 December 2020 among Lebanese HCWs. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical framework. Multivariable logistic analyses were carried out to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs. A total of 1800 HCWs have completed the survey. Around half (58.10%) of them were frontline HCWs and aged between (30-49) years old. Over two-thirds (67.33%) of the participants have received the seasonal influenza vaccine. The acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among surveyed HCWs was 58%. HCWs who were male (aOR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.41-2.80)), working in the frontlines (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI (1.17-2.21), and those who have received influenza vaccination for the current year (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI(0.99-1.92)) were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, factors such as living in rural areas (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.44-0.84)), and being previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (aOR = 0.66, 95%CI (0.45-0.96) were found negatively associated with vaccine acceptance. In terms of health beliefs items, concerns related to the novelty of vaccine (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.25-0.71)), side effects/vaccine safety (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.23-0.73), reliability of manufacturer (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.30-0.63)), and the number of required doses (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.40-0.84)) were also negatively associated with the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Remarkably, concerns such as the limited accessibility (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI (1.14-2.47)), and availability of vaccines (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.46-3.20)) were associated with an increased likelihood of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. With regards to cues of action, receiving reliable and adequate information about the vaccine (aOR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.36-2.88)), recommendation by health authorities (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI(1.33-2.81)), and recommendations from health facilities (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI(1.80-3.99)) were also positively associated with vaccine acceptance. Lastly, perception of COVID-19 vaccine benefits by HCWs in terms of protecting them and their close contacts (patients, family members, and friends) from COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI (2.78-7.11)) was associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine uptake. The moderate acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs found in our study could have broader extents. Understanding and pointing out factors impairing vaccine acceptance such as concerns about the novelty of vaccine and manufacturers' reliability are required to reach a higher vaccination rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35192664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease transmission ; Epidemiology ; Evaluation ; Fatalities ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health behavior ; Health Belief Model ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infections ; Influenza ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Population ; Preventive medicine ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Rural areas ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Side effects ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0264128</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Youssef et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Youssef et al 2022 Youssef et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5088-ff10cf9486bd37a0053fd216fa054dac9f6dc8b736dcc8f3d760908049fe2af53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5088-ff10cf9486bd37a0053fd216fa054dac9f6dc8b736dcc8f3d760908049fe2af53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3085-6849</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863223/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863223/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35192664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Tu, Wen-Jun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Dalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Abbas, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Atika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Hamad</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Since Health care workers (HCWs) are at high occupational risk for COVID-19, they are prioritized for immunization. This study aimed to assess the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and to identify its determinants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between10 and 31 December 2020 among Lebanese HCWs. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical framework. Multivariable logistic analyses were carried out to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs. A total of 1800 HCWs have completed the survey. Around half (58.10%) of them were frontline HCWs and aged between (30-49) years old. Over two-thirds (67.33%) of the participants have received the seasonal influenza vaccine. The acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among surveyed HCWs was 58%. HCWs who were male (aOR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.41-2.80)), working in the frontlines (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI (1.17-2.21), and those who have received influenza vaccination for the current year (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI(0.99-1.92)) were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, factors such as living in rural areas (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.44-0.84)), and being previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (aOR = 0.66, 95%CI (0.45-0.96) were found negatively associated with vaccine acceptance. In terms of health beliefs items, concerns related to the novelty of vaccine (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.25-0.71)), side effects/vaccine safety (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.23-0.73), reliability of manufacturer (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.30-0.63)), and the number of required doses (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.40-0.84)) were also negatively associated with the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Remarkably, concerns such as the limited accessibility (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI (1.14-2.47)), and availability of vaccines (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.46-3.20)) were associated with an increased likelihood of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. With regards to cues of action, receiving reliable and adequate information about the vaccine (aOR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.36-2.88)), recommendation by health authorities (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI(1.33-2.81)), and recommendations from health facilities (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI(1.80-3.99)) were also positively associated with vaccine acceptance. Lastly, perception of COVID-19 vaccine benefits by HCWs in terms of protecting them and their close contacts (patients, family members, and friends) from COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI (2.78-7.11)) was associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine uptake. The moderate acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs found in our study could have broader extents. Understanding and pointing out factors impairing vaccine acceptance such as concerns about the novelty of vaccine and manufacturers' reliability are required to reach a higher vaccination rate.</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Belief Model</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstuEzEUHSEQLYU_QDASm7JI8GPGY2-QqpRHpEjdAFvLsa8Thxk72DNB_ADfjaeZVg2qLMv29TnnPnSK4jVGc0wb_GEXhuhVO98HD3NEWIUJf1KcY0HJjBFEnz64nxUvUtohVFPO2PPijNZYEMaq8-LvNfQQO-eV71MZbKm0hn2vvIbxtQgxeHVwcUilcQlUghlBWJSXi5sfy-sZFu_LQ6Y4D6Xqgt-UK1grDwnKLai235ZaRSh_h_gTYiqH5DJk-llD68CWXTDQviyeWdUmeDWdF8X3z5--Lb7OVjdflour1UzXiPOZtRhpKyrO1oY2amzIGoKZVaiujNLCMqP5uqH50NxS0zAkEEeVsECUrelF8faou29DktMIkySMYl7lzTNieUSYoHZyH12n4h8ZlJO3gRA3UsXe6RYkpYLkUpqG8qYyggqKDMOW8jG34ThrfZyyDesOjAbfR9WeiJ7-eLeVm3CQnDNKCM0Cl5NADL8GSL3sXNLQtnnEYbitm-Aao7rJ0Hf_QR_vbkJtVG7AeRtyXj2KyismqromNRvrnj-CystA53T2m3U5fkKojgQdQ0oR7H2PGMnRrXfFyNGtcnJrpr15OJ970p096T9hZOYZ</recordid><startdate>20220222</startdate><enddate>20220222</enddate><creator>Youssef, Dalal</creator><creator>Abou-Abbas, Linda</creator><creator>Berry, Atika</creator><creator>Youssef, Janet</creator><creator>Hassan, Hamad</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-6849</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220222</creationdate><title>Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model</title><author>Youssef, Dalal ; Abou-Abbas, Linda ; Berry, Atika ; Youssef, Janet ; Hassan, Hamad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5088-ff10cf9486bd37a0053fd216fa054dac9f6dc8b736dcc8f3d760908049fe2af53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Belief Model</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Dalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou-Abbas, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Atika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Hamad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Youssef, Dalal</au><au>Abou-Abbas, Linda</au><au>Berry, Atika</au><au>Youssef, Janet</au><au>Hassan, Hamad</au><au>Tu, Wen-Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-02-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0264128</spage><pages>e0264128-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Since Health care workers (HCWs) are at high occupational risk for COVID-19, they are prioritized for immunization. This study aimed to assess the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs and to identify its determinants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between10 and 31 December 2020 among Lebanese HCWs. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical framework. Multivariable logistic analyses were carried out to identify the factors associated with the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs. A total of 1800 HCWs have completed the survey. Around half (58.10%) of them were frontline HCWs and aged between (30-49) years old. Over two-thirds (67.33%) of the participants have received the seasonal influenza vaccine. The acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among surveyed HCWs was 58%. HCWs who were male (aOR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.41-2.80)), working in the frontlines (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI (1.17-2.21), and those who have received influenza vaccination for the current year (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI(0.99-1.92)) were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, factors such as living in rural areas (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.44-0.84)), and being previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (aOR = 0.66, 95%CI (0.45-0.96) were found negatively associated with vaccine acceptance. In terms of health beliefs items, concerns related to the novelty of vaccine (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.25-0.71)), side effects/vaccine safety (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.23-0.73), reliability of manufacturer (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.30-0.63)), and the number of required doses (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.40-0.84)) were also negatively associated with the willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Remarkably, concerns such as the limited accessibility (aOR = 1.68, 95% CI (1.14-2.47)), and availability of vaccines (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.46-3.20)) were associated with an increased likelihood of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. With regards to cues of action, receiving reliable and adequate information about the vaccine (aOR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.36-2.88)), recommendation by health authorities (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI(1.33-2.81)), and recommendations from health facilities (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI(1.80-3.99)) were also positively associated with vaccine acceptance. Lastly, perception of COVID-19 vaccine benefits by HCWs in terms of protecting them and their close contacts (patients, family members, and friends) from COVID-19 infection (aOR = 4.21, 95% CI (2.78-7.11)) was associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine uptake. The moderate acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among HCWs found in our study could have broader extents. Understanding and pointing out factors impairing vaccine acceptance such as concerns about the novelty of vaccine and manufacturers' reliability are required to reach a higher vaccination rate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35192664</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0264128</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-6849</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0264128 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2631843188 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acceptance tests Adolescent Adult Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Coronaviruses COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 Vaccines Cross-Sectional Studies Disease transmission Epidemiology Evaluation Fatalities Female Health aspects Health behavior Health Belief Model Health care Health care facilities Health Personnel Humans Immunization Infections Influenza Male Medical personnel Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Mortality Pharmaceutical industry Population Preventive medicine Public health Questionnaires Reliability Rural areas SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Side effects Vaccination Vaccines Viral diseases |
title | Determinants of acceptance of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccine among Lebanese health care workers using health belief model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20acceptance%20of%20Coronavirus%20disease-2019%20(COVID-19)%20vaccine%20among%20Lebanese%20health%20care%20workers%20using%20health%20belief%20model&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Youssef,%20Dalal&rft.date=2022-02-22&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0264128&rft.pages=e0264128-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0264128&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA694552561%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2631843188&rft_id=info:pmid/35192664&rft_galeid=A694552561&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3392486773874d93930d61f38cc8fd81&rfr_iscdi=true |