Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study
This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild ste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0263930 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0263930 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Arita, Satoshi Ishimoto, Yuyu Hashizume, Hiroshi Nagata, Keiji Muraki, Shigeyuki Oka, Hiroyuki Takami, Masanari Tsutsui, Shunji Iwasaki, Hiroshi Yukawa, Yasutsugu Akune, Toru Kawaguchi, Hiroshi Tanaka, Sakae Nakamura, Kozo Yoshida, Munehito Yoshimura, Noriko Yamada, Hiroshi |
description | This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population.
The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with > 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship.
Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group.
In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0263930 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2629811430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A694065605</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_718bba877d474677983afdfe78e16ad1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A694065605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0BgCQnBocWOP5JwAK1WfFRaaSW6wNGa2E7jksTd2AH673FpdtWgPSAfbI2feccznkmSpwQvCM3Im40b-g6axdZ1ZoFTQQuK7yWnpKDpXKSY3j86nySPvN9gzGkuxMPkhHKSCZzlp4lZetSDtm7dw7a2CjVDW0KP_NZGceSD6Zy3HoH3TlkIRqNfNtQo1AZdD9DYsEOuQo2tzPu36Cpav8MP2EELaBUlDFqFQe8eJw8qaLx5Mu6z5OvHD1fnn-cXl5-W52cXcyUYCfOqyEFwlaa4UoplJOc4JxUjmnFQHAhlSuRFSljJmNY6pZyDINxUwErNcUlnyfOD7rZxXo4V8jIVaZETwiiOxPJAaAcbue1tC_1OOrDyr8H1awl9sKoxMsYvS8izTLOMiSwrcgqVrkyWGyJAk6j1bow2lK3RynShh2YiOr3pbC3X7qfMc045plHg1SjQu-vB-CBb65VpGuiMG_bvpjimm-H9u1_8g96d3UitISZgu8rFuGovKs9EwbDgIvbALFncQcWlTWtVbKfKRvvE4fXEITLB_A5rGLyXy9WX_2cvv03Zl0dsbaAJtXfNEKzr_BRkB1D1zvveVLdFJljup-GmGnI_DXKchuj27PiDbp1u2p_-AWcMBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629811430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi</creator><contributor>Özden, Fatih</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi ; Consortium ; Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population.
The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with > 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship.
Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group.
In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263930</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35176078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alcohol ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Bone surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Consortia ; Decompression, Surgical - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gender ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Low back pain ; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Mean ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pacemakers ; Pain ; Patients ; People with disabilities ; Physiological aspects ; Population ; Population studies ; Preventive medicine ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal canal ; Spinal stenosis ; Spinal Stenosis - pathology ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Spine ; Spine (lumbar) ; Statistical analysis ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Variance analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Arita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Arita et al 2022 Arita et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853503/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853503/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Özden, Fatih</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Masanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsui, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akune, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sakae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Munehito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population.
The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with > 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship.
Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group.
In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal canal</subject><subject>Spinal stenosis</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0BgCQnBocWOP5JwAK1WfFRaaSW6wNGa2E7jksTd2AH673FpdtWgPSAfbI2feccznkmSpwQvCM3Im40b-g6axdZ1ZoFTQQuK7yWnpKDpXKSY3j86nySPvN9gzGkuxMPkhHKSCZzlp4lZetSDtm7dw7a2CjVDW0KP_NZGceSD6Zy3HoH3TlkIRqNfNtQo1AZdD9DYsEOuQo2tzPu36Cpav8MP2EELaBUlDFqFQe8eJw8qaLx5Mu6z5OvHD1fnn-cXl5-W52cXcyUYCfOqyEFwlaa4UoplJOc4JxUjmnFQHAhlSuRFSljJmNY6pZyDINxUwErNcUlnyfOD7rZxXo4V8jIVaZETwiiOxPJAaAcbue1tC_1OOrDyr8H1awl9sKoxMsYvS8izTLOMiSwrcgqVrkyWGyJAk6j1bow2lK3RynShh2YiOr3pbC3X7qfMc045plHg1SjQu-vB-CBb65VpGuiMG_bvpjimm-H9u1_8g96d3UitISZgu8rFuGovKs9EwbDgIvbALFncQcWlTWtVbKfKRvvE4fXEITLB_A5rGLyXy9WX_2cvv03Zl0dsbaAJtXfNEKzr_BRkB1D1zvveVLdFJljup-GmGnI_DXKchuj27PiDbp1u2p_-AWcMBEA</recordid><startdate>20220217</startdate><enddate>20220217</enddate><creator>Arita, Satoshi</creator><creator>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creator><creator>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Nagata, Keiji</creator><creator>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creator><creator>Oka, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Takami, Masanari</creator><creator>Tsutsui, Shunji</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creator><creator>Akune, Toru</creator><creator>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Sakae</creator><creator>Nakamura, Kozo</creator><creator>Yoshida, Munehito</creator><creator>Yoshimura, Noriko</creator><creator>Yamada, Hiroshi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220217</creationdate><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><author>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal canal</topic><topic>Spinal stenosis</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Masanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsui, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akune, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sakae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Munehito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arita, Satoshi</au><au>Ishimoto, Yuyu</au><au>Hashizume, Hiroshi</au><au>Nagata, Keiji</au><au>Muraki, Shigeyuki</au><au>Oka, Hiroyuki</au><au>Takami, Masanari</au><au>Tsutsui, Shunji</au><au>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</au><au>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</au><au>Akune, Toru</au><au>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</au><au>Tanaka, Sakae</au><au>Nakamura, Kozo</au><au>Yoshida, Munehito</au><au>Yoshimura, Noriko</au><au>Yamada, Hiroshi</au><au>Özden, Fatih</au><aucorp>Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-02-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0263930</spage><epage>e0263930</epage><pages>e0263930-e0263930</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population.
The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with > 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship.
Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group.
In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35176078</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0263930</doi><tpages>e0263930</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2629811430 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Alcohol Biology and Life Sciences Body mass Body mass index Body size Bone surgery Confidence intervals Consortia Decompression, Surgical - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Gender Health aspects Hospitals Humans Low back pain Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Magnetic resonance Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Mean Medicine and Health Sciences Men Middle Aged Orthopedics Pacemakers Pain Patients People with disabilities Physiological aspects Population Population studies Preventive medicine Prognosis Prospective Studies Quality of life Questionnaires Regression analysis Rehabilitation Research and Analysis Methods Severity of Illness Index Spinal canal Spinal stenosis Spinal Stenosis - pathology Spinal Stenosis - surgery Spine Spine (lumbar) Statistical analysis Stenosis Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Variance analysis Young Adult |
title | Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A17%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20radiographic%20lumbar%20spinal%20stenosis%20associated%20with%20the%20quality%20of%20life?:%20The%20Wakayama%20Spine%20Study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Arita,%20Satoshi&rft.aucorp=Consortium&rft.date=2022-02-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0263930&rft.epage=e0263930&rft.pages=e0263930-e0263930&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0263930&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA694065605%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629811430&rft_id=info:pmid/35176078&rft_galeid=A694065605&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_718bba877d474677983afdfe78e16ad1&rfr_iscdi=true |