Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study

This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild ste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930
Hauptverfasser: Arita, Satoshi, Ishimoto, Yuyu, Hashizume, Hiroshi, Nagata, Keiji, Muraki, Shigeyuki, Oka, Hiroyuki, Takami, Masanari, Tsutsui, Shunji, Iwasaki, Hiroshi, Yukawa, Yasutsugu, Akune, Toru, Kawaguchi, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Sakae, Nakamura, Kozo, Yoshida, Munehito, Yoshimura, Noriko, Yamada, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0263930
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0263930
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Arita, Satoshi
Ishimoto, Yuyu
Hashizume, Hiroshi
Nagata, Keiji
Muraki, Shigeyuki
Oka, Hiroyuki
Takami, Masanari
Tsutsui, Shunji
Iwasaki, Hiroshi
Yukawa, Yasutsugu
Akune, Toru
Kawaguchi, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Sakae
Nakamura, Kozo
Yoshida, Munehito
Yoshimura, Noriko
Yamada, Hiroshi
description This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with > 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship. Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group. In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0263930
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2629811430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A694065605</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_718bba877d474677983afdfe78e16ad1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A694065605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0BgCQnBocWOP5JwAK1WfFRaaSW6wNGa2E7jksTd2AH673FpdtWgPSAfbI2feccznkmSpwQvCM3Im40b-g6axdZ1ZoFTQQuK7yWnpKDpXKSY3j86nySPvN9gzGkuxMPkhHKSCZzlp4lZetSDtm7dw7a2CjVDW0KP_NZGceSD6Zy3HoH3TlkIRqNfNtQo1AZdD9DYsEOuQo2tzPu36Cpav8MP2EELaBUlDFqFQe8eJw8qaLx5Mu6z5OvHD1fnn-cXl5-W52cXcyUYCfOqyEFwlaa4UoplJOc4JxUjmnFQHAhlSuRFSljJmNY6pZyDINxUwErNcUlnyfOD7rZxXo4V8jIVaZETwiiOxPJAaAcbue1tC_1OOrDyr8H1awl9sKoxMsYvS8izTLOMiSwrcgqVrkyWGyJAk6j1bow2lK3RynShh2YiOr3pbC3X7qfMc045plHg1SjQu-vB-CBb65VpGuiMG_bvpjimm-H9u1_8g96d3UitISZgu8rFuGovKs9EwbDgIvbALFncQcWlTWtVbKfKRvvE4fXEITLB_A5rGLyXy9WX_2cvv03Zl0dsbaAJtXfNEKzr_BRkB1D1zvveVLdFJljup-GmGnI_DXKchuj27PiDbp1u2p_-AWcMBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629811430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi</creator><contributor>Özden, Fatih</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi ; Consortium ; Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with &gt; 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship. Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group. In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263930</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35176078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alcohol ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Bone surgery ; Confidence intervals ; Consortia ; Decompression, Surgical - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gender ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Low back pain ; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Mean ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pacemakers ; Pain ; Patients ; People with disabilities ; Physiological aspects ; Population ; Population studies ; Preventive medicine ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Rehabilitation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal canal ; Spinal stenosis ; Spinal Stenosis - pathology ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Spine ; Spine (lumbar) ; Statistical analysis ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Variance analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Arita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Arita et al 2022 Arita et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853503/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853503/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35176078$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Özden, Fatih</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Masanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsui, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akune, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sakae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Munehito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with &gt; 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship. Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group. In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal canal</subject><subject>Spinal stenosis</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk02P0zAQhiMEYpfCP0BgCQnBocWOP5JwAK1WfFRaaSW6wNGa2E7jksTd2AH673FpdtWgPSAfbI2feccznkmSpwQvCM3Im40b-g6axdZ1ZoFTQQuK7yWnpKDpXKSY3j86nySPvN9gzGkuxMPkhHKSCZzlp4lZetSDtm7dw7a2CjVDW0KP_NZGceSD6Zy3HoH3TlkIRqNfNtQo1AZdD9DYsEOuQo2tzPu36Cpav8MP2EELaBUlDFqFQe8eJw8qaLx5Mu6z5OvHD1fnn-cXl5-W52cXcyUYCfOqyEFwlaa4UoplJOc4JxUjmnFQHAhlSuRFSljJmNY6pZyDINxUwErNcUlnyfOD7rZxXo4V8jIVaZETwiiOxPJAaAcbue1tC_1OOrDyr8H1awl9sKoxMsYvS8izTLOMiSwrcgqVrkyWGyJAk6j1bow2lK3RynShh2YiOr3pbC3X7qfMc045plHg1SjQu-vB-CBb65VpGuiMG_bvpjimm-H9u1_8g96d3UitISZgu8rFuGovKs9EwbDgIvbALFncQcWlTWtVbKfKRvvE4fXEITLB_A5rGLyXy9WX_2cvv03Zl0dsbaAJtXfNEKzr_BRkB1D1zvveVLdFJljup-GmGnI_DXKchuj27PiDbp1u2p_-AWcMBEA</recordid><startdate>20220217</startdate><enddate>20220217</enddate><creator>Arita, Satoshi</creator><creator>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creator><creator>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Nagata, Keiji</creator><creator>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creator><creator>Oka, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Takami, Masanari</creator><creator>Tsutsui, Shunji</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creator><creator>Akune, Toru</creator><creator>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Sakae</creator><creator>Nakamura, Kozo</creator><creator>Yoshida, Munehito</creator><creator>Yoshimura, Noriko</creator><creator>Yamada, Hiroshi</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220217</creationdate><title>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</title><author>Arita, Satoshi ; Ishimoto, Yuyu ; Hashizume, Hiroshi ; Nagata, Keiji ; Muraki, Shigeyuki ; Oka, Hiroyuki ; Takami, Masanari ; Tsutsui, Shunji ; Iwasaki, Hiroshi ; Yukawa, Yasutsugu ; Akune, Toru ; Kawaguchi, Hiroshi ; Tanaka, Sakae ; Nakamura, Kozo ; Yoshida, Munehito ; Yoshimura, Noriko ; Yamada, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-f98a65c220fcc47185081f41d45ac5a134c689214b44ddd2355a615efa4bd50b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal canal</topic><topic>Spinal stenosis</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arita, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishimoto, Yuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Masanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsui, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akune, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Sakae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Munehito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arita, Satoshi</au><au>Ishimoto, Yuyu</au><au>Hashizume, Hiroshi</au><au>Nagata, Keiji</au><au>Muraki, Shigeyuki</au><au>Oka, Hiroyuki</au><au>Takami, Masanari</au><au>Tsutsui, Shunji</au><au>Iwasaki, Hiroshi</au><au>Yukawa, Yasutsugu</au><au>Akune, Toru</au><au>Kawaguchi, Hiroshi</au><au>Tanaka, Sakae</au><au>Nakamura, Kozo</au><au>Yoshida, Munehito</au><au>Yoshimura, Noriko</au><au>Yamada, Hiroshi</au><au>Özden, Fatih</au><aucorp>Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-02-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0263930</spage><epage>e0263930</epage><pages>e0263930-e0263930</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population. The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with &gt; 2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship. Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group. In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35176078</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0263930</doi><tpages>e0263930</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263930-e0263930
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2629811430
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alcohol
Biology and Life Sciences
Body mass
Body mass index
Body size
Bone surgery
Confidence intervals
Consortia
Decompression, Surgical - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gender
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Low back pain
Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Mean
Medicine and Health Sciences
Men
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Pacemakers
Pain
Patients
People with disabilities
Physiological aspects
Population
Population studies
Preventive medicine
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Rehabilitation
Research and Analysis Methods
Severity of Illness Index
Spinal canal
Spinal stenosis
Spinal Stenosis - pathology
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Spine
Spine (lumbar)
Statistical analysis
Stenosis
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Variance analysis
Young Adult
title Is radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with the quality of life?: The Wakayama Spine Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A17%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20radiographic%20lumbar%20spinal%20stenosis%20associated%20with%20the%20quality%20of%20life?:%20The%20Wakayama%20Spine%20Study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Arita,%20Satoshi&rft.aucorp=Consortium&rft.date=2022-02-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0263930&rft.epage=e0263930&rft.pages=e0263930-e0263930&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0263930&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA694065605%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629811430&rft_id=info:pmid/35176078&rft_galeid=A694065605&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_718bba877d474677983afdfe78e16ad1&rfr_iscdi=true