Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study
Hospitals face immense pressures in balancing patient throughput. Medical assessment units have emerged as a commonplace response to improve the flow of medical patients presenting to the emergency department requiring hospital admission and to ease overcrowding in the emergency department. The aim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263235-e0263235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0263235 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0263235 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cleak, Helen Osborne, Sonya R de Looze, Julian W M |
description | Hospitals face immense pressures in balancing patient throughput. Medical assessment units have emerged as a commonplace response to improve the flow of medical patients presenting to the emergency department requiring hospital admission and to ease overcrowding in the emergency department. The aim of this study was to understand factors influencing the decision-making behaviour of key stakeholders involved in the transfer of care of medical patients from one service to the other in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in Queensland, Australia.
We used a qualitative approach drawing on data from focus groups with key informant health and professional staff involved in the transfer of care. A theoretically-informed, semi-structured focus group guide was used to facilitate discussion and explore factors impacting on decisions made to transfer care of patients from the emergency department to the medical assessment unit. Thematic analysis was undertaken to look for patterns in the data.
Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 15 participants. Four main themes were identified: (1) we have a process-we just don't use it; (2) I can do it, but can they; (3) if only we could skype them; and (4) why can't they just go up. Patient flow relies on efficiency in two processes-the transfer of care and the physical re-location of the patient from one service to the other. The findings suggest that factors other than clinical reasoning are at play in influencing decision-making behaviour.
Acknowledgement of the interaction within and between professional and health staff (human factors) with the organisational imperatives, policies, and process (system factors) may be critical to improve efficiencies in the service and minimise the introduction of workarounds that might compromise patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0263235 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2625264924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A691678777</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_79663495ce2040c39fe632d492c082af</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A691678777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fc2f17a1c4d62072f7161df9f88213281e5f8509508757d73239b813ff0808853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BsgsI-LpLpw5blXQxC6bZAobCvW6HKR44y20oluTQ_Zv91cpKWZPRi-MLi-Hlf-bzSybKXBE8JK8mHpRt8r9rpyvUwxZQzyopH2TGpGJ1witnjvfVR9iyEJcYFE5w_zY5YQQircnqc_Tm_XbXOq2hdj5xBurW91Vb14S2qQduQ6pNO_bZ9gzw0ytfjKvoEGPCjYpW00EeklQdkvOtQXACCDnwDvV4nl5XysRuR6JBCHdRWqxapECCETX3obfyIZuh6UK2Nye8GUIhDvX6ePTGqDfBi9z7Jfn4-_3H2dXJx-WV-NruYaF7RODGaGlIqovM6dVtSUxJOalMZIShhVBAojChwVWBRFmVdpqiqK0GYMVhgIQp2kr3e-qYsgtwlGyTltKA8r2ieiPmWqJ1aypW3nfJr6ZSVm4LzjUxdWt2CLCvOWV4VGijOsWaVgXQ4dbLRWFBlkten3W7DVUpDpwi8ag9MD7_0diEbdyOFILRiJBm82xl4dz1AiLKzQUPbqh7csPlvjnHOijKhp_-gD3e3oxqVGrC9cWlfPZrKGa8IL0VZjl7TB6j01NBZna6hsal-IHh_IEhMhNvYqCEEOf_-7f_Zy1-H7Js9dgGqjYvg2mG8xOEQzLeg9i4ED-Y-ZILlOEV3achxiuRuipLs1f4B3Yvuxob9Bf3aGKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625264924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Cleak, Helen ; Osborne, Sonya R ; de Looze, Julian W M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleak, Helen ; Osborne, Sonya R ; de Looze, Julian W M</creatorcontrib><description>Hospitals face immense pressures in balancing patient throughput. Medical assessment units have emerged as a commonplace response to improve the flow of medical patients presenting to the emergency department requiring hospital admission and to ease overcrowding in the emergency department. The aim of this study was to understand factors influencing the decision-making behaviour of key stakeholders involved in the transfer of care of medical patients from one service to the other in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in Queensland, Australia.
We used a qualitative approach drawing on data from focus groups with key informant health and professional staff involved in the transfer of care. A theoretically-informed, semi-structured focus group guide was used to facilitate discussion and explore factors impacting on decisions made to transfer care of patients from the emergency department to the medical assessment unit. Thematic analysis was undertaken to look for patterns in the data.
Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 15 participants. Four main themes were identified: (1) we have a process-we just don't use it; (2) I can do it, but can they; (3) if only we could skype them; and (4) why can't they just go up. Patient flow relies on efficiency in two processes-the transfer of care and the physical re-location of the patient from one service to the other. The findings suggest that factors other than clinical reasoning are at play in influencing decision-making behaviour.
Acknowledgement of the interaction within and between professional and health staff (human factors) with the organisational imperatives, policies, and process (system factors) may be critical to improve efficiencies in the service and minimise the introduction of workarounds that might compromise patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35113942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Clinical Decision-Making - methods ; Communication ; Decision making ; Delivery of Health Care - standards ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Ethics ; Female ; Focus groups ; Focus Groups - statistics & numerical data ; Health risks ; Health services ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals ; Human factors ; Humans ; Male ; Management ; Medical care ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Needs assessment ; Nursing ; Overcrowding ; Patient Care - standards ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; People and Places ; Practice ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Queensland ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Tertiary ; Transitional care</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263235-e0263235</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Cleak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Cleak et al 2022 Cleak et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fc2f17a1c4d62072f7161df9f88213281e5f8509508757d73239b813ff0808853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fc2f17a1c4d62072f7161df9f88213281e5f8509508757d73239b813ff0808853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2084-0229 ; 0000-0002-2826-0627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812931/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812931/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleak, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Sonya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Looze, Julian W M</creatorcontrib><title>Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Hospitals face immense pressures in balancing patient throughput. Medical assessment units have emerged as a commonplace response to improve the flow of medical patients presenting to the emergency department requiring hospital admission and to ease overcrowding in the emergency department. The aim of this study was to understand factors influencing the decision-making behaviour of key stakeholders involved in the transfer of care of medical patients from one service to the other in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in Queensland, Australia.
We used a qualitative approach drawing on data from focus groups with key informant health and professional staff involved in the transfer of care. A theoretically-informed, semi-structured focus group guide was used to facilitate discussion and explore factors impacting on decisions made to transfer care of patients from the emergency department to the medical assessment unit. Thematic analysis was undertaken to look for patterns in the data.
Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 15 participants. Four main themes were identified: (1) we have a process-we just don't use it; (2) I can do it, but can they; (3) if only we could skype them; and (4) why can't they just go up. Patient flow relies on efficiency in two processes-the transfer of care and the physical re-location of the patient from one service to the other. The findings suggest that factors other than clinical reasoning are at play in influencing decision-making behaviour.
Acknowledgement of the interaction within and between professional and health staff (human factors) with the organisational imperatives, policies, and process (system factors) may be critical to improve efficiencies in the service and minimise the introduction of workarounds that might compromise patient safety.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making - methods</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Focus Groups - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Needs assessment</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Overcrowding</subject><subject>Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Queensland</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tertiary</subject><subject>Transitional care</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BsgsI-LpLpw5blXQxC6bZAobCvW6HKR44y20oluTQ_Zv91cpKWZPRi-MLi-Hlf-bzSybKXBE8JK8mHpRt8r9rpyvUwxZQzyopH2TGpGJ1witnjvfVR9iyEJcYFE5w_zY5YQQircnqc_Tm_XbXOq2hdj5xBurW91Vb14S2qQduQ6pNO_bZ9gzw0ytfjKvoEGPCjYpW00EeklQdkvOtQXACCDnwDvV4nl5XysRuR6JBCHdRWqxapECCETX3obfyIZuh6UK2Nye8GUIhDvX6ePTGqDfBi9z7Jfn4-_3H2dXJx-WV-NruYaF7RODGaGlIqovM6dVtSUxJOalMZIShhVBAojChwVWBRFmVdpqiqK0GYMVhgIQp2kr3e-qYsgtwlGyTltKA8r2ieiPmWqJ1aypW3nfJr6ZSVm4LzjUxdWt2CLCvOWV4VGijOsWaVgXQ4dbLRWFBlkten3W7DVUpDpwi8ag9MD7_0diEbdyOFILRiJBm82xl4dz1AiLKzQUPbqh7csPlvjnHOijKhp_-gD3e3oxqVGrC9cWlfPZrKGa8IL0VZjl7TB6j01NBZna6hsal-IHh_IEhMhNvYqCEEOf_-7f_Zy1-H7Js9dgGqjYvg2mG8xOEQzLeg9i4ED-Y-ZILlOEV3achxiuRuipLs1f4B3Yvuxob9Bf3aGKA</recordid><startdate>20220203</startdate><enddate>20220203</enddate><creator>Cleak, Helen</creator><creator>Osborne, Sonya R</creator><creator>de Looze, Julian W M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-0627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220203</creationdate><title>Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study</title><author>Cleak, Helen ; Osborne, Sonya R ; de Looze, Julian W M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-fc2f17a1c4d62072f7161df9f88213281e5f8509508757d73239b813ff0808853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making - methods</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Focus Groups - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Needs assessment</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Overcrowding</topic><topic>Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Queensland</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tertiary</topic><topic>Transitional care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleak, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Sonya R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Looze, Julian W M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleak, Helen</au><au>Osborne, Sonya R</au><au>de Looze, Julian W M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-02-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0263235</spage><epage>e0263235</epage><pages>e0263235-e0263235</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Hospitals face immense pressures in balancing patient throughput. Medical assessment units have emerged as a commonplace response to improve the flow of medical patients presenting to the emergency department requiring hospital admission and to ease overcrowding in the emergency department. The aim of this study was to understand factors influencing the decision-making behaviour of key stakeholders involved in the transfer of care of medical patients from one service to the other in a large, tertiary teaching hospital in Queensland, Australia.
We used a qualitative approach drawing on data from focus groups with key informant health and professional staff involved in the transfer of care. A theoretically-informed, semi-structured focus group guide was used to facilitate discussion and explore factors impacting on decisions made to transfer care of patients from the emergency department to the medical assessment unit. Thematic analysis was undertaken to look for patterns in the data.
Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 15 participants. Four main themes were identified: (1) we have a process-we just don't use it; (2) I can do it, but can they; (3) if only we could skype them; and (4) why can't they just go up. Patient flow relies on efficiency in two processes-the transfer of care and the physical re-location of the patient from one service to the other. The findings suggest that factors other than clinical reasoning are at play in influencing decision-making behaviour.
Acknowledgement of the interaction within and between professional and health staff (human factors) with the organisational imperatives, policies, and process (system factors) may be critical to improve efficiencies in the service and minimise the introduction of workarounds that might compromise patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35113942</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0263235</doi><tpages>e0263235</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-0627</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e0263235-e0263235 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2625264924 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Clinical Decision-Making - methods Communication Decision making Delivery of Health Care - standards Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Ethics Female Focus groups Focus Groups - statistics & numerical data Health risks Health services Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Hospitals Human factors Humans Male Management Medical care Medicine and Health Sciences Needs assessment Nursing Overcrowding Patient Care - standards Patient Safety Patients People and Places Practice Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Queensland Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Tertiary Transitional care |
title | Exploration of clinicians' decision-making regarding transfer of patient care from the emergency department to a medical assessment unit: A qualitative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A09%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploration%20of%20clinicians'%20decision-making%20regarding%20transfer%20of%20patient%20care%20from%20the%20emergency%20department%20to%20a%20medical%20assessment%20unit:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Cleak,%20Helen&rft.date=2022-02-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0263235&rft.epage=e0263235&rft.pages=e0263235-e0263235&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0263235&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA691678777%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625264924&rft_id=info:pmid/35113942&rft_galeid=A691678777&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_79663495ce2040c39fe632d492c082af&rfr_iscdi=true |