Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis
Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 29...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261426-e0261426 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0261426 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0261426 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Ohmura, Hanako |
| description | Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 2975), the results of the descriptive analysis show that the most preferred strategy at the individual level was wait-and-see, allowing for a risk assessment of side effects. Via conjoint analysis, I also found that participants who recalled blood relatives as their familiar entities tended to prefer a wait-and-see strategy for themselves and their blood relatives. The results of these analyses suggest that wait-and-see strategies for vaccination are preferred in Japan, making it difficult to achieve early herd immunity through vaccination. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0261426 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2621915351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A690096016</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9cbe7ed00c9c405ab2aaf840da3d1cb0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A690096016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-cd0f63e9e535689b452078d52249fe16a3f6d010ce35ba0349592f9fd2c8aa4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0uP0zAQgCMEYpeFf4AgEhKCQ4sfiRNzQKrKApVWqsRjD1ysiR-tq8TuxknF_nvcNrtq0B5QDonG33yOZzxJ8hKjKaYF_rDxfeugnm6901NEGM4Ie5ScY07JhBFEH598nyXPQtgglNOSsafJGc0Rw4yj8-T3LDpugw2pN2nw0kKdSt9U1kFnvTuE58vrxecJ5ukOpBwWPqaXO6u0kzo1rW9SiFlu463rUhiMz5MnBuqgXwzvi-TXl8uf82-Tq-XXxXx2NZFFXnYTqZBhVHOd05yVvMpygopS5YRk3GjMgBqmEEZS07wCRDOec2K4UUSWAJmiF8nro3db-yCGsgRBGMEcRymOxOJIKA8bsW1tA-2t8GDFIeDblYC2s7LWgstKF1ohJLnMUA4VATBlhhRQhWWFouvTsFtfNVpJ7boW6pF0vOLsWqz8TpRFSUjJo-DdIGj9Ta9DJxobpK5rcNr3h_-OHCooi-ibf9CHTzdQK4gHsM74uK_cS8Us9hhxhvDeNX2Aio_SjY2908bG-Cjh_SghMp3-062gD0Esfnz_f3Z5PWbfnrBrDXW3Dr7uD9dtDGZHULY-hFab-yJjJPYjcFcNsR8BMYxATHt12qD7pLs7T_8CCooAPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621915351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ohmura, Hanako</creator><contributor>Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ohmura, Hanako ; Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat</creatorcontrib><description>Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 2975), the results of the descriptive analysis show that the most preferred strategy at the individual level was wait-and-see, allowing for a risk assessment of side effects. Via conjoint analysis, I also found that participants who recalled blood relatives as their familiar entities tended to prefer a wait-and-see strategy for themselves and their blood relatives. The results of these analyses suggest that wait-and-see strategies for vaccination are preferred in Japan, making it difficult to achieve early herd immunity through vaccination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261426</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35061690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Conjoint analysis ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 vaccines ; COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Disease transmission ; Education ; Female ; Health attitudes ; Herd immunity ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; People and Places ; Psychological aspects ; Risk Assessment ; Side effects ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Strategy ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vaccination ; Vaccination - psychology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261426-e0261426</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Hanako Ohmura. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Hanako Ohmura 2022 Hanako Ohmura</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-cd0f63e9e535689b452078d52249fe16a3f6d010ce35ba0349592f9fd2c8aa4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-cd0f63e9e535689b452078d52249fe16a3f6d010ce35ba0349592f9fd2c8aa4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9565-2137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782289/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8782289/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35061690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ohmura, Hanako</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 2975), the results of the descriptive analysis show that the most preferred strategy at the individual level was wait-and-see, allowing for a risk assessment of side effects. Via conjoint analysis, I also found that participants who recalled blood relatives as their familiar entities tended to prefer a wait-and-see strategy for themselves and their blood relatives. The results of these analyses suggest that wait-and-see strategies for vaccination are preferred in Japan, making it difficult to achieve early herd immunity through vaccination.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Conjoint analysis</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health attitudes</subject><subject>Herd immunity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - psychology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0uP0zAQgCMEYpeFf4AgEhKCQ4sfiRNzQKrKApVWqsRjD1ysiR-tq8TuxknF_nvcNrtq0B5QDonG33yOZzxJ8hKjKaYF_rDxfeugnm6901NEGM4Ie5ScY07JhBFEH598nyXPQtgglNOSsafJGc0Rw4yj8-T3LDpugw2pN2nw0kKdSt9U1kFnvTuE58vrxecJ5ukOpBwWPqaXO6u0kzo1rW9SiFlu463rUhiMz5MnBuqgXwzvi-TXl8uf82-Tq-XXxXx2NZFFXnYTqZBhVHOd05yVvMpygopS5YRk3GjMgBqmEEZS07wCRDOec2K4UUSWAJmiF8nro3db-yCGsgRBGMEcRymOxOJIKA8bsW1tA-2t8GDFIeDblYC2s7LWgstKF1ohJLnMUA4VATBlhhRQhWWFouvTsFtfNVpJ7boW6pF0vOLsWqz8TpRFSUjJo-DdIGj9Ta9DJxobpK5rcNr3h_-OHCooi-ibf9CHTzdQK4gHsM74uK_cS8Us9hhxhvDeNX2Aio_SjY2908bG-Cjh_SghMp3-062gD0Esfnz_f3Z5PWbfnrBrDXW3Dr7uD9dtDGZHULY-hFab-yJjJPYjcFcNsR8BMYxATHt12qD7pLs7T_8CCooAPg</recordid><startdate>20220121</startdate><enddate>20220121</enddate><creator>Ohmura, Hanako</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9565-2137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220121</creationdate><title>Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis</title><author>Ohmura, Hanako</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-cd0f63e9e535689b452078d52249fe16a3f6d010ce35ba0349592f9fd2c8aa4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Conjoint analysis</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health attitudes</topic><topic>Herd immunity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - psychology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohmura, Hanako</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohmura, Hanako</au><au>Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-01-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0261426</spage><epage>e0261426</epage><pages>e0261426-e0261426</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 2975), the results of the descriptive analysis show that the most preferred strategy at the individual level was wait-and-see, allowing for a risk assessment of side effects. Via conjoint analysis, I also found that participants who recalled blood relatives as their familiar entities tended to prefer a wait-and-see strategy for themselves and their blood relatives. The results of these analyses suggest that wait-and-see strategies for vaccination are preferred in Japan, making it difficult to achieve early herd immunity through vaccination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35061690</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0261426</doi><tpages>e0261426</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9565-2137</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261426-e0261426 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2621915351 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adult Aged Biology and Life Sciences Blood Conjoint analysis Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 vaccines COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use Disease transmission Education Female Health attitudes Herd immunity Humans Japan Male Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged People and Places Psychological aspects Risk Assessment Side effects Social aspects Social Sciences Society Strategy Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Vaccination Vaccination - psychology Young Adult |
| title | Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T01%3A18%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20social%20combinations%20of%20COVID-19%20vaccination:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20conjoint%20analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ohmura,%20Hanako&rft.date=2022-01-21&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0261426&rft.epage=e0261426&rft.pages=e0261426-e0261426&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0261426&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA690096016%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621915351&rft_id=info:pmid/35061690&rft_galeid=A690096016&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9cbe7ed00c9c405ab2aaf840da3d1cb0&rfr_iscdi=true |