A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China
The leaf serves as an important assimilation organ of plants, and the anatomical structure of leaves can reflect the adaptability of the plant to the environment to a certain extent. The current study aimed to cultivate superior local cultivars, and 35 healthy individual plants were selected from th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262509-e0262509 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0262509 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0262509 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Hu, Yang Yang, Lu Gao, Chao Liao, Desheng Long, Li Qiu, Jie Wei, Hongli Deng, Quanen Zhou, Yunchao |
| description | The leaf serves as an important assimilation organ of plants, and the anatomical structure of leaves can reflect the adaptability of the plant to the environment to a certain extent. The current study aimed to cultivate superior local cultivars, and 35 healthy individual plants were selected from the Camellia oleifera germplasm resource nursery for a comparative study of the leaf structure. In July 2019, the leaves were collected from 35 selected healthy C. oleifera plants, and the leaf structure was observed by using the paraffin section method. Healthy individual plants were screened using variance analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis. The representative indices were selected according to the cluster membership, correlation indices and coefficient of variation (C/V) for a comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance via the membership function. There were extremely significant differences in 11 indices of leaf structure for these 35 healthy plants. C18 had the greatest leaf thickness, C7 the largest spongy tissue, and C38 the largest ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness (P/S). The clustering results of the healthy individual plants differed significantly. The membership function showed that the drought resistance of 35 C. oleifera plants was divided into five categories. C18 had very strong drought resistance, and C3, C7 and C40 had strong drought resistance. There were significant differences in terms of the upper epidermis, P/S ratio and spongy tissue among the C. oleifera plants. C18, C3, C7 and C40 exhibited satisfactory drought resistance. Although C39 and C26 had moderate drought resistance, their P/S ratios were high, which might be used to cultivate high-yield and drought-resistant C. oleifera varieties. The leaf P/S ratio of C. oleifera from low-hot valley areas was high. Among various leaf structures, spongy tissue, upper epidermis, P/S ratio and cuticle constitute the drought resistance evaluation indices for C. oleifera grown in low-hot valley areas. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0262509 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2621662494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689986056</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dc3c895a81e84b9caee14f34687cbdcc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A689986056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-ffe0bcbe1095e04d700dc07cc1545a5a40ce7def7c1f3734083a4e9458aa2c603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklGLEzEUhQdR3HX1H4gGBPHB1mQyycy8CKXourCgD_ocbjN3OlkySU1mKhX876bt7NKKTwm5X86993Cy7CWjc8ZL9uHOj8GBnW-8wznNZS5o_Si7ZDXPZzKn_PHJ_SJ7FuMdpYJXUj7NLrigguVcXmZ_FkT7fgMBBrNFEoex2RHvyNAhsQgtAQeD740Gm4ph1MMYkPiWLKFHaw0Qb9G0GIAYR4BY_2vW-YFswVrcEQh4KFyP5nfnR_It-K1xGt-TZWccPM-etGAjvpjOq-zH50_fl19mt1-vb5aL25kWlRhmbYt0pVfIaC2QFk1JaaNpqTUThQABBdVYNtiWmrW85AWtOBRYF6ICyLWk_Cp7fdTdWB_V5FxUyTQmZV7URSJujkTj4U5tgukh7JQHow4PPqwVhMFoi6rRXFe1gIphVaxqDYisaHkhq1KvGq2T1sep27jqsdHohgD2TPS84kyn1n6rqrIUXORJ4N0kEPzPEeOgehN1shsc-vEwd56XMtmR0Df_oP_fbqLWkBYwrvWpr96LqoWs6rqSVMhEvT2hOgQ7dNHbcTDexXOwOII6-BgDtg-7Mar24bwfQu3DqaZwpm-vTn15-HSfRv4XXmvi1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621662494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hu, Yang ; Yang, Lu ; Gao, Chao ; Liao, Desheng ; Long, Li ; Qiu, Jie ; Wei, Hongli ; Deng, Quanen ; Zhou, Yunchao</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yang ; Yang, Lu ; Gao, Chao ; Liao, Desheng ; Long, Li ; Qiu, Jie ; Wei, Hongli ; Deng, Quanen ; Zhou, Yunchao</creatorcontrib><description>The leaf serves as an important assimilation organ of plants, and the anatomical structure of leaves can reflect the adaptability of the plant to the environment to a certain extent. The current study aimed to cultivate superior local cultivars, and 35 healthy individual plants were selected from the Camellia oleifera germplasm resource nursery for a comparative study of the leaf structure. In July 2019, the leaves were collected from 35 selected healthy C. oleifera plants, and the leaf structure was observed by using the paraffin section method. Healthy individual plants were screened using variance analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis. The representative indices were selected according to the cluster membership, correlation indices and coefficient of variation (C/V) for a comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance via the membership function. There were extremely significant differences in 11 indices of leaf structure for these 35 healthy plants. C18 had the greatest leaf thickness, C7 the largest spongy tissue, and C38 the largest ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness (P/S). The clustering results of the healthy individual plants differed significantly. The membership function showed that the drought resistance of 35 C. oleifera plants was divided into five categories. C18 had very strong drought resistance, and C3, C7 and C40 had strong drought resistance. There were significant differences in terms of the upper epidermis, P/S ratio and spongy tissue among the C. oleifera plants. C18, C3, C7 and C40 exhibited satisfactory drought resistance. Although C39 and C26 had moderate drought resistance, their P/S ratios were high, which might be used to cultivate high-yield and drought-resistant C. oleifera varieties. The leaf P/S ratio of C. oleifera from low-hot valley areas was high. Among various leaf structures, spongy tissue, upper epidermis, P/S ratio and cuticle constitute the drought resistance evaluation indices for C. oleifera grown in low-hot valley areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35051236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Camellia ; Camellia - anatomy & histology ; Camellia oleifera ; China ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Coefficient of variation ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Cultivars ; Drought ; Drought index ; Drought resistance ; Droughts ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Environment ; Epidermis ; Foliar diagnosis ; Germplasm ; Leaves ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Paraffin ; Paraffins ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology ; Plants ; Seeds ; Soil erosion ; Stress, Physiological - physiology ; Thickness ; Tissues ; Valleys ; Variance analysis ; Varieties</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262509-e0262509</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Hu et al 2022 Hu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-ffe0bcbe1095e04d700dc07cc1545a5a40ce7def7c1f3734083a4e9458aa2c603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-ffe0bcbe1095e04d700dc07cc1545a5a40ce7def7c1f3734083a4e9458aa2c603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0167-0685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775352/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775352/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35051236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Desheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Quanen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yunchao</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The leaf serves as an important assimilation organ of plants, and the anatomical structure of leaves can reflect the adaptability of the plant to the environment to a certain extent. The current study aimed to cultivate superior local cultivars, and 35 healthy individual plants were selected from the Camellia oleifera germplasm resource nursery for a comparative study of the leaf structure. In July 2019, the leaves were collected from 35 selected healthy C. oleifera plants, and the leaf structure was observed by using the paraffin section method. Healthy individual plants were screened using variance analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis. The representative indices were selected according to the cluster membership, correlation indices and coefficient of variation (C/V) for a comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance via the membership function. There were extremely significant differences in 11 indices of leaf structure for these 35 healthy plants. C18 had the greatest leaf thickness, C7 the largest spongy tissue, and C38 the largest ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness (P/S). The clustering results of the healthy individual plants differed significantly. The membership function showed that the drought resistance of 35 C. oleifera plants was divided into five categories. C18 had very strong drought resistance, and C3, C7 and C40 had strong drought resistance. There were significant differences in terms of the upper epidermis, P/S ratio and spongy tissue among the C. oleifera plants. C18, C3, C7 and C40 exhibited satisfactory drought resistance. Although C39 and C26 had moderate drought resistance, their P/S ratios were high, which might be used to cultivate high-yield and drought-resistant C. oleifera varieties. The leaf P/S ratio of C. oleifera from low-hot valley areas was high. Among various leaf structures, spongy tissue, upper epidermis, P/S ratio and cuticle constitute the drought resistance evaluation indices for C. oleifera grown in low-hot valley areas.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Camellia</subject><subject>Camellia - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Camellia oleifera</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought index</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Epidermis</subject><subject>Foliar diagnosis</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Paraffins</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Varieties</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptklGLEzEUhQdR3HX1H4gGBPHB1mQyycy8CKXourCgD_ocbjN3OlkySU1mKhX876bt7NKKTwm5X86993Cy7CWjc8ZL9uHOj8GBnW-8wznNZS5o_Si7ZDXPZzKn_PHJ_SJ7FuMdpYJXUj7NLrigguVcXmZ_FkT7fgMBBrNFEoex2RHvyNAhsQgtAQeD740Gm4ph1MMYkPiWLKFHaw0Qb9G0GIAYR4BY_2vW-YFswVrcEQh4KFyP5nfnR_It-K1xGt-TZWccPM-etGAjvpjOq-zH50_fl19mt1-vb5aL25kWlRhmbYt0pVfIaC2QFk1JaaNpqTUThQABBdVYNtiWmrW85AWtOBRYF6ICyLWk_Cp7fdTdWB_V5FxUyTQmZV7URSJujkTj4U5tgukh7JQHow4PPqwVhMFoi6rRXFe1gIphVaxqDYisaHkhq1KvGq2T1sep27jqsdHohgD2TPS84kyn1n6rqrIUXORJ4N0kEPzPEeOgehN1shsc-vEwd56XMtmR0Df_oP_fbqLWkBYwrvWpr96LqoWs6rqSVMhEvT2hOgQ7dNHbcTDexXOwOII6-BgDtg-7Mar24bwfQu3DqaZwpm-vTn15-HSfRv4XXmvi1Q</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Hu, Yang</creator><creator>Yang, Lu</creator><creator>Gao, Chao</creator><creator>Liao, Desheng</creator><creator>Long, Li</creator><creator>Qiu, Jie</creator><creator>Wei, Hongli</creator><creator>Deng, Quanen</creator><creator>Zhou, Yunchao</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0167-0685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China</title><author>Hu, Yang ; Yang, Lu ; Gao, Chao ; Liao, Desheng ; Long, Li ; Qiu, Jie ; Wei, Hongli ; Deng, Quanen ; Zhou, Yunchao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-ffe0bcbe1095e04d700dc07cc1545a5a40ce7def7c1f3734083a4e9458aa2c603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Camellia</topic><topic>Camellia - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Camellia oleifera</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought index</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Epidermis</topic><topic>Foliar diagnosis</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Paraffins</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Varieties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Desheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Quanen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yunchao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yang</au><au>Yang, Lu</au><au>Gao, Chao</au><au>Liao, Desheng</au><au>Long, Li</au><au>Qiu, Jie</au><au>Wei, Hongli</au><au>Deng, Quanen</au><au>Zhou, Yunchao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0262509</spage><epage>e0262509</epage><pages>e0262509-e0262509</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The leaf serves as an important assimilation organ of plants, and the anatomical structure of leaves can reflect the adaptability of the plant to the environment to a certain extent. The current study aimed to cultivate superior local cultivars, and 35 healthy individual plants were selected from the Camellia oleifera germplasm resource nursery for a comparative study of the leaf structure. In July 2019, the leaves were collected from 35 selected healthy C. oleifera plants, and the leaf structure was observed by using the paraffin section method. Healthy individual plants were screened using variance analysis, correlation analysis and cluster analysis. The representative indices were selected according to the cluster membership, correlation indices and coefficient of variation (C/V) for a comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance via the membership function. There were extremely significant differences in 11 indices of leaf structure for these 35 healthy plants. C18 had the greatest leaf thickness, C7 the largest spongy tissue, and C38 the largest ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness (P/S). The clustering results of the healthy individual plants differed significantly. The membership function showed that the drought resistance of 35 C. oleifera plants was divided into five categories. C18 had very strong drought resistance, and C3, C7 and C40 had strong drought resistance. There were significant differences in terms of the upper epidermis, P/S ratio and spongy tissue among the C. oleifera plants. C18, C3, C7 and C40 exhibited satisfactory drought resistance. Although C39 and C26 had moderate drought resistance, their P/S ratios were high, which might be used to cultivate high-yield and drought-resistant C. oleifera varieties. The leaf P/S ratio of C. oleifera from low-hot valley areas was high. Among various leaf structures, spongy tissue, upper epidermis, P/S ratio and cuticle constitute the drought resistance evaluation indices for C. oleifera grown in low-hot valley areas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35051236</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0262509</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0167-0685</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262509-e0262509 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2621662494 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adaptability Biology and Life Sciences Camellia Camellia - anatomy & histology Camellia oleifera China Cluster analysis Clustering Coefficient of variation Comparative analysis Comparative studies Correlation Correlation analysis Cultivars Drought Drought index Drought resistance Droughts Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Environment Epidermis Foliar diagnosis Germplasm Leaves Medicine and Health Sciences Paraffin Paraffins Physical Sciences Physiological aspects Plant Leaves - anatomy & histology Plants Seeds Soil erosion Stress, Physiological - physiology Thickness Tissues Valleys Variance analysis Varieties |
| title | A comparative study on the leaf anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera in a low-hot valley area in Guizhou Province, China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A52%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20the%20leaf%20anatomical%20structure%20of%20Camellia%20oleifera%20in%20a%20low-hot%20valley%20area%20in%20Guizhou%20Province,%20China&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hu,%20Yang&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0262509&rft.epage=e0262509&rft.pages=e0262509-e0262509&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0262509&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA689986056%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621662494&rft_id=info:pmid/35051236&rft_galeid=A689986056&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_dc3c895a81e84b9caee14f34687cbdcc&rfr_iscdi=true |