Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0262393 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ryckman, Mason D Kemink, Kaylan Felege, Christopher J Darby, Brian Vandeberg, Gregory S Ellis-Felege, Susan N |
description | Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spatula clypeata) (n = 46) on wetlands flown over with a rotary DJI Matrice 200 quadcopter and control wetlands without flights. Using a GoPro camera affixed to a spotting scope, we conducted focal individual surveys and recorded duck behaviors for 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after UAV flights to determine if ducks flushed or changed in specific activities. We also conducted scan surveys during flights to examine flushing and movement on the entire wetland. Between 24 April and 27 May 2020, we conducted 42 paired (control and flown) surveys. Both teal and shovelers increased proportion of time engaged in overhead vigilance on flown wetlands from pre-flight to during flight (0.008 to 0.020 and 0.006 to 0.032 of observation time, respectively). Both species left the wetland more frequently during flights than ducks on control wetlands. Despite similarities between species, we observed marked differences in time each species spent on active (e.g., feeding, courtship, swimming), resting, and vigilant behaviors during flights. Overall, teal became less active during flights (0.897 to 0.834 of time) while shovelers became more active during this period (0.724 to 0.906 of time). Based upon scan surveys, ducks flushed in 38.1% of surveys while control wetlands only had a single (2.4%) flush during the flight time. We found launch distance was the most important predictor of whether ducks swam for cover or away from the UAV which could result in inaccurate counts. Ducks appear aware of UAVs during flights, but minimal behavioral shifts suggest negative fitness consequences are unlikely. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0262393 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2621251599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A689909101</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_074336e0b5ac4f088bbe328c90b054ef</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A689909101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1536e83ddbcf41100b9a9a68aa841655055072b99d1dffd748d41a93a10a90253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshkFhF8kky3Kkm0FX9hEoFPZ1K46t41jBkVJJztp_P2VxSwwbDAkkjp7z6vDyZtlLSuaULei7tRu8hX6-dRbnpKgKJtmj7JRKVsyqgrDHR_eT7FkIa0I4E1X1NDthnJScEnGawQfsYGechz73GJJYwJC7Nq_7AWe_jF2hziOmV7A6t87HDr3NQ-d22KPPo8sHuwFrEwboTQJ32JmmxzwMfod34Xn2pIU-4IvxPMt-fPr4_fLL7Or68_Ly4mrWVLKIM8pZhYJpXTdtSSkhtQQJlQAQJa04J2kvilpKTXXb6kUpdElBMqAEJCk4O8teH3S3vQtqdCeoZAwtOOVSJmJ5ILSDtdp6swF_pxwY9afg_EqBj_vZFVmULM1Dag5N2RIh6hpZIRpJasJLbJPW-_G3od6gbtDGZOFEdPpiTadWbqfEopKsrJLAm1HAu5sBQ_zHyCO1gjSVsa1LYs3GhEZdVEJKIimhiZr_hUpL48Y0KR-tSfVJw9tJQ2Ii3sYVDCGo5bev_89e_5yy50dsl2ITu-D6IZqUqylYHsDGuxA8tg_OUaL28b53Q-3jrcZ4p7ZXx64_NN3nmf0GjYX1jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621251599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Ryckman, Mason D ; Kemink, Kaylan ; Felege, Christopher J ; Darby, Brian ; Vandeberg, Gregory S ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryckman, Mason D ; Kemink, Kaylan ; Felege, Christopher J ; Darby, Brian ; Vandeberg, Gregory S ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N</creatorcontrib><description>Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spatula clypeata) (n = 46) on wetlands flown over with a rotary DJI Matrice 200 quadcopter and control wetlands without flights. Using a GoPro camera affixed to a spotting scope, we conducted focal individual surveys and recorded duck behaviors for 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after UAV flights to determine if ducks flushed or changed in specific activities. We also conducted scan surveys during flights to examine flushing and movement on the entire wetland. Between 24 April and 27 May 2020, we conducted 42 paired (control and flown) surveys. Both teal and shovelers increased proportion of time engaged in overhead vigilance on flown wetlands from pre-flight to during flight (0.008 to 0.020 and 0.006 to 0.032 of observation time, respectively). Both species left the wetland more frequently during flights than ducks on control wetlands. Despite similarities between species, we observed marked differences in time each species spent on active (e.g., feeding, courtship, swimming), resting, and vigilant behaviors during flights. Overall, teal became less active during flights (0.897 to 0.834 of time) while shovelers became more active during this period (0.724 to 0.906 of time). Based upon scan surveys, ducks flushed in 38.1% of surveys while control wetlands only had a single (2.4%) flush during the flight time. We found launch distance was the most important predictor of whether ducks swam for cover or away from the UAV which could result in inaccurate counts. Ducks appear aware of UAVs during flights, but minimal behavioral shifts suggest negative fitness consequences are unlikely.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35045108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aerial surveys ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Aquatic birds ; Behavior ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Courtship ; Drone aircraft ; Ducks ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Flight ; Flight time ; Flushing ; Methods ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Spatula clypeata ; Spatula discors ; Spatulas ; Species ; Swimming ; Swimming behavior ; Unmanned Aerial Devices - ethics ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Vigilance ; Waterfowl ; Wetlands ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management ; Wildlife surveys</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262393</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Ryckman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Ryckman et al 2022 Ryckman et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1536e83ddbcf41100b9a9a68aa841655055072b99d1dffd748d41a93a10a90253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1536e83ddbcf41100b9a9a68aa841655055072b99d1dffd748d41a93a10a90253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4534-0055 ; 0000-0001-7975-219X ; 0000-0001-6658-086X ; 0000-0002-1404-0690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769346/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769346/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryckman, Mason D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemink, Kaylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felege, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandeberg, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis-Felege, Susan N</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spatula clypeata) (n = 46) on wetlands flown over with a rotary DJI Matrice 200 quadcopter and control wetlands without flights. Using a GoPro camera affixed to a spotting scope, we conducted focal individual surveys and recorded duck behaviors for 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after UAV flights to determine if ducks flushed or changed in specific activities. We also conducted scan surveys during flights to examine flushing and movement on the entire wetland. Between 24 April and 27 May 2020, we conducted 42 paired (control and flown) surveys. Both teal and shovelers increased proportion of time engaged in overhead vigilance on flown wetlands from pre-flight to during flight (0.008 to 0.020 and 0.006 to 0.032 of observation time, respectively). Both species left the wetland more frequently during flights than ducks on control wetlands. Despite similarities between species, we observed marked differences in time each species spent on active (e.g., feeding, courtship, swimming), resting, and vigilant behaviors during flights. Overall, teal became less active during flights (0.897 to 0.834 of time) while shovelers became more active during this period (0.724 to 0.906 of time). Based upon scan surveys, ducks flushed in 38.1% of surveys while control wetlands only had a single (2.4%) flush during the flight time. We found launch distance was the most important predictor of whether ducks swam for cover or away from the UAV which could result in inaccurate counts. Ducks appear aware of UAVs during flights, but minimal behavioral shifts suggest negative fitness consequences are unlikely.</description><subject>Aerial surveys</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Drone aircraft</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Flight time</subject><subject>Flushing</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Spatula clypeata</subject><subject>Spatula discors</subject><subject>Spatulas</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><subject>Swimming behavior</subject><subject>Unmanned Aerial Devices - ethics</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Vigilance</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife surveys</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshkFhF8kky3Kkm0FX9hEoFPZ1K46t41jBkVJJztp_P2VxSwwbDAkkjp7z6vDyZtlLSuaULei7tRu8hX6-dRbnpKgKJtmj7JRKVsyqgrDHR_eT7FkIa0I4E1X1NDthnJScEnGawQfsYGechz73GJJYwJC7Nq_7AWe_jF2hziOmV7A6t87HDr3NQ-d22KPPo8sHuwFrEwboTQJ32JmmxzwMfod34Xn2pIU-4IvxPMt-fPr4_fLL7Or68_Ly4mrWVLKIM8pZhYJpXTdtSSkhtQQJlQAQJa04J2kvilpKTXXb6kUpdElBMqAEJCk4O8teH3S3vQtqdCeoZAwtOOVSJmJ5ILSDtdp6swF_pxwY9afg_EqBj_vZFVmULM1Dag5N2RIh6hpZIRpJasJLbJPW-_G3od6gbtDGZOFEdPpiTadWbqfEopKsrJLAm1HAu5sBQ_zHyCO1gjSVsa1LYs3GhEZdVEJKIimhiZr_hUpL48Y0KR-tSfVJw9tJQ2Ii3sYVDCGo5bev_89e_5yy50dsl2ITu-D6IZqUqylYHsDGuxA8tg_OUaL28b53Q-3jrcZ4p7ZXx64_NN3nmf0GjYX1jw</recordid><startdate>20220119</startdate><enddate>20220119</enddate><creator>Ryckman, Mason D</creator><creator>Kemink, Kaylan</creator><creator>Felege, Christopher J</creator><creator>Darby, Brian</creator><creator>Vandeberg, Gregory S</creator><creator>Ellis-Felege, Susan N</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-0055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-086X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1404-0690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220119</creationdate><title>Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys</title><author>Ryckman, Mason D ; Kemink, Kaylan ; Felege, Christopher J ; Darby, Brian ; Vandeberg, Gregory S ; Ellis-Felege, Susan N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1536e83ddbcf41100b9a9a68aa841655055072b99d1dffd748d41a93a10a90253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aerial surveys</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Drone aircraft</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Flight time</topic><topic>Flushing</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Spatula clypeata</topic><topic>Spatula discors</topic><topic>Spatulas</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><topic>Swimming behavior</topic><topic>Unmanned Aerial Devices - ethics</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Vigilance</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryckman, Mason D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemink, Kaylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felege, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandeberg, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis-Felege, Susan N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryckman, Mason D</au><au>Kemink, Kaylan</au><au>Felege, Christopher J</au><au>Darby, Brian</au><au>Vandeberg, Gregory S</au><au>Ellis-Felege, Susan N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-01-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0262393</spage><pages>e0262393-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular wildlife survey tool. Most research has focused on detecting wildlife using UAVs with less known about behavioral responses. We compared the behavioral responses of breeding blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) (n = 151) and northern shovelers (Spatula clypeata) (n = 46) on wetlands flown over with a rotary DJI Matrice 200 quadcopter and control wetlands without flights. Using a GoPro camera affixed to a spotting scope, we conducted focal individual surveys and recorded duck behaviors for 30 minutes before, during, and 30 minutes after UAV flights to determine if ducks flushed or changed in specific activities. We also conducted scan surveys during flights to examine flushing and movement on the entire wetland. Between 24 April and 27 May 2020, we conducted 42 paired (control and flown) surveys. Both teal and shovelers increased proportion of time engaged in overhead vigilance on flown wetlands from pre-flight to during flight (0.008 to 0.020 and 0.006 to 0.032 of observation time, respectively). Both species left the wetland more frequently during flights than ducks on control wetlands. Despite similarities between species, we observed marked differences in time each species spent on active (e.g., feeding, courtship, swimming), resting, and vigilant behaviors during flights. Overall, teal became less active during flights (0.897 to 0.834 of time) while shovelers became more active during this period (0.724 to 0.906 of time). Based upon scan surveys, ducks flushed in 38.1% of surveys while control wetlands only had a single (2.4%) flush during the flight time. We found launch distance was the most important predictor of whether ducks swam for cover or away from the UAV which could result in inaccurate counts. Ducks appear aware of UAVs during flights, but minimal behavioral shifts suggest negative fitness consequences are unlikely.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35045108</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0262393</doi><tpages>e0262393</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-0055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-086X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1404-0690</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0262393 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2621251599 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Aerial surveys Animals Animals, Wild Aquatic birds Behavior Behavior, Animal - physiology Biology Biology and Life Sciences Birds Courtship Drone aircraft Ducks Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Environmental aspects Environmental Monitoring - methods Flight Flight time Flushing Methods Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Spatula clypeata Spatula discors Spatulas Species Swimming Swimming behavior Unmanned Aerial Devices - ethics Unmanned aerial vehicles Vigilance Waterfowl Wetlands Wildfowl Wildlife Wildlife management Wildlife surveys |
title | Behavioral responses of blue-winged teal and northern shoveler to unmanned aerial vehicle surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A48%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20responses%20of%20blue-winged%20teal%20and%20northern%20shoveler%20to%20unmanned%20aerial%20vehicle%20surveys&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ryckman,%20Mason%20D&rft.date=2022-01-19&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0262393&rft.pages=e0262393-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0262393&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA689909101%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621251599&rft_id=info:pmid/35045108&rft_galeid=A689909101&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_074336e0b5ac4f088bbe328c90b054ef&rfr_iscdi=true |