We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations
There has been resistance to COVID-19 public health restrictions partly due to changes and reductions in work, resulting in financial stress. Psychological reactance theory posits that such restrictions to personal freedoms result in anger, defiance, and motivation to restore freedom. In an online s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260782-e0260782 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0260782 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0260782 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Knapp, Michael E Partington, Lindsey C Hodge, Ryan T Ugarte, Elisa Hastings, Paul D |
description | There has been resistance to COVID-19 public health restrictions partly due to changes and reductions in work, resulting in financial stress. Psychological reactance theory posits that such restrictions to personal freedoms result in anger, defiance, and motivation to restore freedom. In an online study (N = 301), we manipulated the target of COVID-19 restrictions as impacting self or community. We hypothesized that (a) greater pandemic-related financial stress would predict greater reactance, (b) the self-focused restriction condition would elicit greater reactance than the community-focused restriction condition, (c) reactance would be greatest for financially-stressed individuals in the self-focused condition, and (d) greater reactance would predict lower adherence to social distancing guidelines. Independent of political orientation and sense of community, greater financial stress predicted greater reactance only in the self-focused condition; the community-focused condition attenuated this association. Additionally, greater reactance was associated with lower social distancing behavior. These findings suggest that economic hardship exacerbates negative responses to continued personal freedom loss. Community-focused COVID-19 health messaging may be better received during continued pandemic conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0260782 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2613259322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A687760094</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_829bc464ed9248ad8302d15a3022b34c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A687760094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-da9626946531e1e11bfa1c11cb8e56bd31c1354c5fb41b21b7a2da9d6348dd763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsIXG42CW2EyfmAqkqFFaqVIlDubQce7LxymsvtoPos_CyeA-tdlEvkC8cz3zzTzyeKYqnuJxi2uC3Cz8GJ-105R1MS8LKpiX3imPMKZkwUtL7e99HxaMYF2VZ05axh8URrXiFW46Piz8_4FUAJK1FxqE0mIiSn0MaILxD516NEXmHlF8uR2fSNZIpgRtlgoig70Gl7O_RSjoNS6MmAWz2adQbJ50y0qJBBh0Hs1rLBJAqZTvkHOjs8mr2YYI5Wo2dNQoNIG0aMjMfs4bxLj4uHvTSRniy20-K7-cfv519nlxcfpqdnV5MFOMkTbTkjDBesZpiyAt3vcQKY9W1ULNO03ygdaXqvqtwR3DXSJJjNKNVq3XD6EnxfKu7sj6KXV2jIAxTUucSkkzMtoT2ciFWwSxluBZeGrEx-DAXMiSjLIiW8E5VrALNSdVK3dKSaFzLvJGOViprvd9lG7slaAUuBWkPRA89zgxi7n-JlnHOcJMFXu8Egv85QkxiaaICa6UDP27-uyKUYL5GX_yD3n27HTWX-QLG9T7nVWtRccrapmFlyatMTe-g8tq8fG7C3mT7QcCbg4DMJPid5nKMUcy-fvl_9vLqkH25x27bJno7bnrmEKy2oAo-xgD9bZFxKdYzdFMNsZ4hsZuhHPZs_4Fug26Ghv4FhWAX0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613259322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Knapp, Michael E ; Partington, Lindsey C ; Hodge, Ryan T ; Ugarte, Elisa ; Hastings, Paul D</creator><contributor>John-Henderson, Neha</contributor><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Michael E ; Partington, Lindsey C ; Hodge, Ryan T ; Ugarte, Elisa ; Hastings, Paul D ; John-Henderson, Neha</creatorcontrib><description>There has been resistance to COVID-19 public health restrictions partly due to changes and reductions in work, resulting in financial stress. Psychological reactance theory posits that such restrictions to personal freedoms result in anger, defiance, and motivation to restore freedom. In an online study (N = 301), we manipulated the target of COVID-19 restrictions as impacting self or community. We hypothesized that (a) greater pandemic-related financial stress would predict greater reactance, (b) the self-focused restriction condition would elicit greater reactance than the community-focused restriction condition, (c) reactance would be greatest for financially-stressed individuals in the self-focused condition, and (d) greater reactance would predict lower adherence to social distancing guidelines. Independent of political orientation and sense of community, greater financial stress predicted greater reactance only in the self-focused condition; the community-focused condition attenuated this association. Additionally, greater reactance was associated with lower social distancing behavior. These findings suggest that economic hardship exacerbates negative responses to continued personal freedom loss. Community-focused COVID-19 health messaging may be better received during continued pandemic conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260782</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34941891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anger ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Constrictions ; Control ; Cooperation ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - economics ; COVID-19 - psychology ; Disease control ; Disease transmission ; Economic aspects ; Epidemics ; Female ; Financial management ; Financial Stress - economics ; Freedom ; Freedoms ; Health behavior ; Health Policy - economics ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Medical supplies ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Pandemics ; Pandemics - economics ; Physical Distancing ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Public health ; Public Health - methods ; Public Health - trends ; Reactance ; Restrictions ; SARS-CoV-2 - pathogenicity ; Social behavior ; Social distancing ; Social Sciences ; Stress ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260782-e0260782</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Knapp et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Knapp et al 2021 Knapp et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-da9626946531e1e11bfa1c11cb8e56bd31c1354c5fb41b21b7a2da9d6348dd763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-da9626946531e1e11bfa1c11cb8e56bd31c1354c5fb41b21b7a2da9d6348dd763</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2978-7364 ; 0000-0003-2612-2674</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699617/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699617/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>John-Henderson, Neha</contributor><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partington, Lindsey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugarte, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Paul D</creatorcontrib><title>We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>There has been resistance to COVID-19 public health restrictions partly due to changes and reductions in work, resulting in financial stress. Psychological reactance theory posits that such restrictions to personal freedoms result in anger, defiance, and motivation to restore freedom. In an online study (N = 301), we manipulated the target of COVID-19 restrictions as impacting self or community. We hypothesized that (a) greater pandemic-related financial stress would predict greater reactance, (b) the self-focused restriction condition would elicit greater reactance than the community-focused restriction condition, (c) reactance would be greatest for financially-stressed individuals in the self-focused condition, and (d) greater reactance would predict lower adherence to social distancing guidelines. Independent of political orientation and sense of community, greater financial stress predicted greater reactance only in the self-focused condition; the community-focused condition attenuated this association. Additionally, greater reactance was associated with lower social distancing behavior. These findings suggest that economic hardship exacerbates negative responses to continued personal freedom loss. Community-focused COVID-19 health messaging may be better received during continued pandemic conditions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Constrictions</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - economics</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Financial Stress - economics</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Freedoms</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Policy - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical supplies</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pandemics - economics</subject><subject>Physical Distancing</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health - methods</subject><subject>Public Health - trends</subject><subject>Reactance</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social distancing</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsIXG42CW2EyfmAqkqFFaqVIlDubQce7LxymsvtoPos_CyeA-tdlEvkC8cz3zzTzyeKYqnuJxi2uC3Cz8GJ-105R1MS8LKpiX3imPMKZkwUtL7e99HxaMYF2VZ05axh8URrXiFW46Piz8_4FUAJK1FxqE0mIiSn0MaILxD516NEXmHlF8uR2fSNZIpgRtlgoig70Gl7O_RSjoNS6MmAWz2adQbJ50y0qJBBh0Hs1rLBJAqZTvkHOjs8mr2YYI5Wo2dNQoNIG0aMjMfs4bxLj4uHvTSRniy20-K7-cfv519nlxcfpqdnV5MFOMkTbTkjDBesZpiyAt3vcQKY9W1ULNO03ygdaXqvqtwR3DXSJJjNKNVq3XD6EnxfKu7sj6KXV2jIAxTUucSkkzMtoT2ciFWwSxluBZeGrEx-DAXMiSjLIiW8E5VrALNSdVK3dKSaFzLvJGOViprvd9lG7slaAUuBWkPRA89zgxi7n-JlnHOcJMFXu8Egv85QkxiaaICa6UDP27-uyKUYL5GX_yD3n27HTWX-QLG9T7nVWtRccrapmFlyatMTe-g8tq8fG7C3mT7QcCbg4DMJPid5nKMUcy-fvl_9vLqkH25x27bJno7bnrmEKy2oAo-xgD9bZFxKdYzdFMNsZ4hsZuhHPZs_4Fug26Ghv4FhWAX0w</recordid><startdate>20211223</startdate><enddate>20211223</enddate><creator>Knapp, Michael E</creator><creator>Partington, Lindsey C</creator><creator>Hodge, Ryan T</creator><creator>Ugarte, Elisa</creator><creator>Hastings, Paul D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2978-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-2674</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211223</creationdate><title>We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations</title><author>Knapp, Michael E ; Partington, Lindsey C ; Hodge, Ryan T ; Ugarte, Elisa ; Hastings, Paul D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-da9626946531e1e11bfa1c11cb8e56bd31c1354c5fb41b21b7a2da9d6348dd763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Constrictions</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - economics</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Financial Stress - economics</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Freedoms</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Policy - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical supplies</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pandemics - economics</topic><topic>Physical Distancing</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health - methods</topic><topic>Public Health - trends</topic><topic>Reactance</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social distancing</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partington, Lindsey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugarte, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Paul D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knapp, Michael E</au><au>Partington, Lindsey C</au><au>Hodge, Ryan T</au><au>Ugarte, Elisa</au><au>Hastings, Paul D</au><au>John-Henderson, Neha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-12-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0260782</spage><epage>e0260782</epage><pages>e0260782-e0260782</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>There has been resistance to COVID-19 public health restrictions partly due to changes and reductions in work, resulting in financial stress. Psychological reactance theory posits that such restrictions to personal freedoms result in anger, defiance, and motivation to restore freedom. In an online study (N = 301), we manipulated the target of COVID-19 restrictions as impacting self or community. We hypothesized that (a) greater pandemic-related financial stress would predict greater reactance, (b) the self-focused restriction condition would elicit greater reactance than the community-focused restriction condition, (c) reactance would be greatest for financially-stressed individuals in the self-focused condition, and (d) greater reactance would predict lower adherence to social distancing guidelines. Independent of political orientation and sense of community, greater financial stress predicted greater reactance only in the self-focused condition; the community-focused condition attenuated this association. Additionally, greater reactance was associated with lower social distancing behavior. These findings suggest that economic hardship exacerbates negative responses to continued personal freedom loss. Community-focused COVID-19 health messaging may be better received during continued pandemic conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34941891</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0260782</doi><tpages>e0260782</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2978-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-2674</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260782-e0260782 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2613259322 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Aged Anger Biology and Life Sciences Constrictions Control Cooperation Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - economics COVID-19 - psychology Disease control Disease transmission Economic aspects Epidemics Female Financial management Financial Stress - economics Freedom Freedoms Health behavior Health Policy - economics Humans Intention Male Medical supplies Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Middle Aged Motivation Pandemics Pandemics - economics Physical Distancing Psychological Theory Psychology Public health Public Health - methods Public Health - trends Reactance Restrictions SARS-CoV-2 - pathogenicity Social behavior Social distancing Social Sciences Stress Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | We're all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=We're%20all%20in%20this%20together:%20Focus%20on%20community%20attenuates%20effects%20of%20pandemic-related%20financial%20hardship%20on%20reactance%20to%20COVID-19%20public%20health%20regulations&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Knapp,%20Michael%20E&rft.date=2021-12-23&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0260782&rft.epage=e0260782&rft.pages=e0260782-e0260782&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0260782&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA687760094%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613259322&rft_id=info:pmid/34941891&rft_galeid=A687760094&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_829bc464ed9248ad8302d15a3022b34c&rfr_iscdi=true |