Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Schistosomiasis remains a global-health problem with over 90% of its burden concentrated in Africa. Field studies reflect the complex ways in which socio-cultural and socio-economic variables, affect the distribution of Schistosoma infections across different populations. This review set out to syst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2021-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0009083-e0009083
Hauptverfasser: Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria, Clark, Jessica, Bayley, Helena, Lamberton, Poppy H L, Toor, Jaspreet, Hollingsworth, T Deirdre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0009083
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0009083
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 15
creator Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria
Clark, Jessica
Bayley, Helena
Lamberton, Poppy H L
Toor, Jaspreet
Hollingsworth, T Deirdre
description Schistosomiasis remains a global-health problem with over 90% of its burden concentrated in Africa. Field studies reflect the complex ways in which socio-cultural and socio-economic variables, affect the distribution of Schistosoma infections across different populations. This review set out to systematically investigate and quantify the differences in Schistosoma infection burdens between males and females in Africa for two of the most prevalent Schistosoma species-Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium. We searched (from inception to 11th March 2020) Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant studies on schistosomiasis. We included studies that report S. mansoni and/or S. haematobium prevalence and/or intensity data distributed between males and females. We conducted meta-analyses on the male to female (M:F) prevalence of infection ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study baseline prevalence, sample size and the lower and upper age limit of study participants. We also present a descriptive analysis of differential risk and intensity of infection across males and females. Evidence for differences in the prevalence of schistosomiasis infection between males and females is presented, stratified by Schistosoma species. We identified 128 relevant studies, with over 200,000 participants across 23 countries. Of all the reported differences in the prevalence of infection between males and females, only 41% and 34% were statistically significant for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, respectively. Similar proportions of studies (27% and 34% for for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, respectively) of the reported differences in intensity of infection between males and females were statistically significant. The meta-analyses summarized a higher prevalence of infection in males; pooled random-effects weighted M:F prevalence of infection ratios were 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.29) for S. haematobium and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.22) for S. mansoni. However, females are underrespresented in some of the studies. Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity across studies (Higgins I2 statistic (p-values < 0.001, I2values>95%)). Results of the subgroup analysis showed that the baseline prevalence influenced the M:F prevalence ratios for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, with higher M:F prevalence of infection ratios in settings with a lower baseline prevalence of infection. Across the studies, we identified four major risk factors associated with i
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2610942321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A685870823</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_26c6141b7f1045149e348af3a8b7af27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A685870823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-18a2448a0b2f242eab15bcb8f8ddac64789159734b880666a696e434cca599ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUsGO0zAQjRCIXQp_gCASEuJAix07icMBqVrBstJKHICzNXHGrZfELra7qL_C1-Km2VWLVjkkdt57M2_mZdlLShaU1fTDjdt6C_1iY2O3IIQ0RLBH2TltWDkvalY-Pvo-y56FcENI2ZSCPs3OGK-FKAQ5z_5eou3Qzz32ELHLO6M1erQKQ25svvF4C_3--D4dI9pg4i4H2-UQglNm5HgTfuUaVHQ-5E7n39XahOiCGyCRNKponB3lltobBR_zZR52IeIA0ag8lTD4ZxQdMMIckqtdMOF59kRDH_DF9J5lP798_nHxdX797fLqYnk9V1XB45wKKDgXQNpCF7xAaGnZqlZo0XWgquS0oWVTM94KQaqqgqqpkDOuFJRN0wKbZa8PupveBTmNNciioqThBStoQlwdEJ2DG7nxZgC_kw6MHC-cX0nwyUqPiaUqymlba0p4SXmDLPWmGYi2Bp12Mcs-TdW27YCdQhs99Ceip3-sWcuVu5WiYiUbBd5NAt793mKIcjBBYd-DRbdNfSdXpCYV3UPf_Ad92N2EWqVNy7Qwl-qqvahcVqIUNREFS6jFA6j0dDgY5Sxqk-5PCG-PCGuEPq6D67djGE6B_ABU3oXgUd8PgxK5j_pd13IfdTlFPdFeHQ_ynnSXbfYPAkz8-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610942321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria ; Clark, Jessica ; Bayley, Helena ; Lamberton, Poppy H L ; Toor, Jaspreet ; Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</creator><contributor>Santos, Victor S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria ; Clark, Jessica ; Bayley, Helena ; Lamberton, Poppy H L ; Toor, Jaspreet ; Hollingsworth, T Deirdre ; Santos, Victor S.</creatorcontrib><description>Schistosomiasis remains a global-health problem with over 90% of its burden concentrated in Africa. Field studies reflect the complex ways in which socio-cultural and socio-economic variables, affect the distribution of Schistosoma infections across different populations. This review set out to systematically investigate and quantify the differences in Schistosoma infection burdens between males and females in Africa for two of the most prevalent Schistosoma species-Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium. We searched (from inception to 11th March 2020) Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant studies on schistosomiasis. We included studies that report S. mansoni and/or S. haematobium prevalence and/or intensity data distributed between males and females. We conducted meta-analyses on the male to female (M:F) prevalence of infection ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study baseline prevalence, sample size and the lower and upper age limit of study participants. We also present a descriptive analysis of differential risk and intensity of infection across males and females. Evidence for differences in the prevalence of schistosomiasis infection between males and females is presented, stratified by Schistosoma species. We identified 128 relevant studies, with over 200,000 participants across 23 countries. Of all the reported differences in the prevalence of infection between males and females, only 41% and 34% were statistically significant for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, respectively. Similar proportions of studies (27% and 34% for for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, respectively) of the reported differences in intensity of infection between males and females were statistically significant. The meta-analyses summarized a higher prevalence of infection in males; pooled random-effects weighted M:F prevalence of infection ratios were 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.29) for S. haematobium and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.22) for S. mansoni. However, females are underrespresented in some of the studies. Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity across studies (Higgins I2 statistic (p-values &lt; 0.001, I2values&gt;95%)). Results of the subgroup analysis showed that the baseline prevalence influenced the M:F prevalence ratios for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, with higher M:F prevalence of infection ratios in settings with a lower baseline prevalence of infection. Across the studies, we identified four major risk factors associated with infection rates: occupational and recreational water contact, knowledge, socio-economic factors and demographic factors. The effect of these risk factors on the burden of infection in males and females varied across studies. We find evidence of differences in prevalence of infection between males and females which may reflect differences in gender norms and water contact activities, suggesting that policy changes at the regional level may help ameliorate gender-related disparities in schistosomiasis infection burden. Collecting, robustly analysing, and reporting, sex-disaggregated epidemiological data, is currently lacking, but would be highly informative for planning effective treatment programmes and establishing those most at risk of schistosomiasis infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34788280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Africa - epidemiology ; Analysis ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Demographic aspects ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Females ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Health risks ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Identification ; Infections ; Male ; Males ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Morbidity ; Norms ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Population ; Programmes ; Ratios ; Recreational waters ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Schistosoma ; Schistosoma haematobium - genetics ; Schistosoma haematobium - physiology ; Schistosoma mansoni ; Schistosoma mansoni - genetics ; Schistosoma mansoni - physiology ; Schistosomiasis ; Schistosomiasis haematobia - epidemiology ; Schistosomiasis haematobia - parasitology ; Schistosomiasis mansoni - epidemiology ; Schistosomiasis mansoni - parasitology ; Science Policy ; Sex differences ; Sex Factors ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic aspects ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Statistical analysis ; Subgroups ; Systematic review ; Tropical diseases ; Women</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0009083-e0009083</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Ayabina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Ayabina et al 2021 Ayabina et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-18a2448a0b2f242eab15bcb8f8ddac64789159734b880666a696e434cca599ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-18a2448a0b2f242eab15bcb8f8ddac64789159734b880666a696e434cca599ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1510-397X ; 0000-0001-5962-4238 ; 0000-0003-1048-6318 ; 0000-0003-1692-899X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635327/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635327/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2101,2927,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79471,79472</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Santos, Victor S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayley, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberton, Poppy H L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toor, Jaspreet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</creatorcontrib><title>Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Schistosomiasis remains a global-health problem with over 90% of its burden concentrated in Africa. Field studies reflect the complex ways in which socio-cultural and socio-economic variables, affect the distribution of Schistosoma infections across different populations. This review set out to systematically investigate and quantify the differences in Schistosoma infection burdens between males and females in Africa for two of the most prevalent Schistosoma species-Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium. We searched (from inception to 11th March 2020) Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant studies on schistosomiasis. We included studies that report S. mansoni and/or S. haematobium prevalence and/or intensity data distributed between males and females. We conducted meta-analyses on the male to female (M:F) prevalence of infection ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study baseline prevalence, sample size and the lower and upper age limit of study participants. We also present a descriptive analysis of differential risk and intensity of infection across males and females. Evidence for differences in the prevalence of schistosomiasis infection between males and females is presented, stratified by Schistosoma species. We identified 128 relevant studies, with over 200,000 participants across 23 countries. Of all the reported differences in the prevalence of infection between males and females, only 41% and 34% were statistically significant for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, respectively. Similar proportions of studies (27% and 34% for for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, respectively) of the reported differences in intensity of infection between males and females were statistically significant. The meta-analyses summarized a higher prevalence of infection in males; pooled random-effects weighted M:F prevalence of infection ratios were 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.29) for S. haematobium and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.22) for S. mansoni. However, females are underrespresented in some of the studies. Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity across studies (Higgins I2 statistic (p-values &lt; 0.001, I2values&gt;95%)). Results of the subgroup analysis showed that the baseline prevalence influenced the M:F prevalence ratios for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, with higher M:F prevalence of infection ratios in settings with a lower baseline prevalence of infection. Across the studies, we identified four major risk factors associated with infection rates: occupational and recreational water contact, knowledge, socio-economic factors and demographic factors. The effect of these risk factors on the burden of infection in males and females varied across studies. We find evidence of differences in prevalence of infection between males and females which may reflect differences in gender norms and water contact activities, suggesting that policy changes at the regional level may help ameliorate gender-related disparities in schistosomiasis infection burden. Collecting, robustly analysing, and reporting, sex-disaggregated epidemiological data, is currently lacking, but would be highly informative for planning effective treatment programmes and establishing those most at risk of schistosomiasis infections.</description><subject>Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Programmes</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Recreational waters</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Schistosoma</subject><subject>Schistosoma haematobium - genetics</subject><subject>Schistosoma haematobium - physiology</subject><subject>Schistosoma mansoni</subject><subject>Schistosoma mansoni - genetics</subject><subject>Schistosoma mansoni - physiology</subject><subject>Schistosomiasis</subject><subject>Schistosomiasis haematobia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Schistosomiasis haematobia - parasitology</subject><subject>Schistosomiasis mansoni - epidemiology</subject><subject>Schistosomiasis mansoni - parasitology</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUsGO0zAQjRCIXQp_gCASEuJAix07icMBqVrBstJKHICzNXHGrZfELra7qL_C1-Km2VWLVjkkdt57M2_mZdlLShaU1fTDjdt6C_1iY2O3IIQ0RLBH2TltWDkvalY-Pvo-y56FcENI2ZSCPs3OGK-FKAQ5z_5eou3Qzz32ELHLO6M1erQKQ25svvF4C_3--D4dI9pg4i4H2-UQglNm5HgTfuUaVHQ-5E7n39XahOiCGyCRNKponB3lltobBR_zZR52IeIA0ag8lTD4ZxQdMMIckqtdMOF59kRDH_DF9J5lP798_nHxdX797fLqYnk9V1XB45wKKDgXQNpCF7xAaGnZqlZo0XWgquS0oWVTM94KQaqqgqqpkDOuFJRN0wKbZa8PupveBTmNNciioqThBStoQlwdEJ2DG7nxZgC_kw6MHC-cX0nwyUqPiaUqymlba0p4SXmDLPWmGYi2Bp12Mcs-TdW27YCdQhs99Ceip3-sWcuVu5WiYiUbBd5NAt793mKIcjBBYd-DRbdNfSdXpCYV3UPf_Ad92N2EWqVNy7Qwl-qqvahcVqIUNREFS6jFA6j0dDgY5Sxqk-5PCG-PCGuEPq6D67djGE6B_ABU3oXgUd8PgxK5j_pd13IfdTlFPdFeHQ_ynnSXbfYPAkz8-w</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria</creator><creator>Clark, Jessica</creator><creator>Bayley, Helena</creator><creator>Lamberton, Poppy H L</creator><creator>Toor, Jaspreet</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-4238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-6318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-899X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria ; Clark, Jessica ; Bayley, Helena ; Lamberton, Poppy H L ; Toor, Jaspreet ; Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-18a2448a0b2f242eab15bcb8f8ddac64789159734b880666a696e434cca599ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Programmes</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Recreational waters</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Schistosoma</topic><topic>Schistosoma haematobium - genetics</topic><topic>Schistosoma haematobium - physiology</topic><topic>Schistosoma mansoni</topic><topic>Schistosoma mansoni - genetics</topic><topic>Schistosoma mansoni - physiology</topic><topic>Schistosomiasis</topic><topic>Schistosomiasis haematobia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Schistosomiasis haematobia - parasitology</topic><topic>Schistosomiasis mansoni - epidemiology</topic><topic>Schistosomiasis mansoni - parasitology</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayley, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberton, Poppy H L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toor, Jaspreet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayabina, Diepreye Victoria</au><au>Clark, Jessica</au><au>Bayley, Helena</au><au>Lamberton, Poppy H L</au><au>Toor, Jaspreet</au><au>Hollingsworth, T Deirdre</au><au>Santos, Victor S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0009083</spage><epage>e0009083</epage><pages>e0009083-e0009083</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Schistosomiasis remains a global-health problem with over 90% of its burden concentrated in Africa. Field studies reflect the complex ways in which socio-cultural and socio-economic variables, affect the distribution of Schistosoma infections across different populations. This review set out to systematically investigate and quantify the differences in Schistosoma infection burdens between males and females in Africa for two of the most prevalent Schistosoma species-Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium. We searched (from inception to 11th March 2020) Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant studies on schistosomiasis. We included studies that report S. mansoni and/or S. haematobium prevalence and/or intensity data distributed between males and females. We conducted meta-analyses on the male to female (M:F) prevalence of infection ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study baseline prevalence, sample size and the lower and upper age limit of study participants. We also present a descriptive analysis of differential risk and intensity of infection across males and females. Evidence for differences in the prevalence of schistosomiasis infection between males and females is presented, stratified by Schistosoma species. We identified 128 relevant studies, with over 200,000 participants across 23 countries. Of all the reported differences in the prevalence of infection between males and females, only 41% and 34% were statistically significant for S. mansoni and S. haematobium, respectively. Similar proportions of studies (27% and 34% for for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, respectively) of the reported differences in intensity of infection between males and females were statistically significant. The meta-analyses summarized a higher prevalence of infection in males; pooled random-effects weighted M:F prevalence of infection ratios were 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.29) for S. haematobium and 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.22) for S. mansoni. However, females are underrespresented in some of the studies. Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity across studies (Higgins I2 statistic (p-values &lt; 0.001, I2values&gt;95%)). Results of the subgroup analysis showed that the baseline prevalence influenced the M:F prevalence ratios for S. haematobium and S. mansoni, with higher M:F prevalence of infection ratios in settings with a lower baseline prevalence of infection. Across the studies, we identified four major risk factors associated with infection rates: occupational and recreational water contact, knowledge, socio-economic factors and demographic factors. The effect of these risk factors on the burden of infection in males and females varied across studies. We find evidence of differences in prevalence of infection between males and females which may reflect differences in gender norms and water contact activities, suggesting that policy changes at the regional level may help ameliorate gender-related disparities in schistosomiasis infection burden. Collecting, robustly analysing, and reporting, sex-disaggregated epidemiological data, is currently lacking, but would be highly informative for planning effective treatment programmes and establishing those most at risk of schistosomiasis infections.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34788280</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0009083</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-397X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-4238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-6318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-899X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0009083-e0009083
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2610942321
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central
subjects Africa - epidemiology
Analysis
Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Demographic aspects
Economic factors
Economics
Epidemiology
Female
Females
Gender
Gender differences
Health risks
Heterogeneity
Humans
Identification
Infections
Male
Males
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Morbidity
Norms
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Population
Programmes
Ratios
Recreational waters
Research and Analysis Methods
Risk analysis
Risk Factors
Schistosoma
Schistosoma haematobium - genetics
Schistosoma haematobium - physiology
Schistosoma mansoni
Schistosoma mansoni - genetics
Schistosoma mansoni - physiology
Schistosomiasis
Schistosomiasis haematobia - epidemiology
Schistosomiasis haematobia - parasitology
Schistosomiasis mansoni - epidemiology
Schistosomiasis mansoni - parasitology
Science Policy
Sex differences
Sex Factors
Social factors
Socioeconomic aspects
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomics
Statistical analysis
Subgroups
Systematic review
Tropical diseases
Women
title Gender-related differences in prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of Schistosoma infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A59%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender-related%20differences%20in%20prevalence,%20intensity%20and%20associated%20risk%20factors%20of%20Schistosoma%20infections%20in%20Africa:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Ayabina,%20Diepreye%20Victoria&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0009083&rft.epage=e0009083&rft.pages=e0009083-e0009083&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009083&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA685870823%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610942321&rft_id=info:pmid/34788280&rft_galeid=A685870823&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_26c6141b7f1045149e348af3a8b7af27&rfr_iscdi=true