Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan
Sarcopenia and muscle weakness in elderly are contributed burden of public health and impact on quality of life. Weak grip strength was key role in diagnosis of sarcopenia and reported increased mortality, function declined in elderly. This study evaluated the association between GS and each common...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260763-e0260763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0260763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0260763 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Lin, Ming-Hsun Chang, Chun-Yung Lu, Chieh-Hua Wu, Der-Min Kuo, Feng-Chih Kuo, Che-Chun Chu, Nain-Feng |
description | Sarcopenia and muscle weakness in elderly are contributed burden of public health and impact on quality of life. Weak grip strength was key role in diagnosis of sarcopenia and reported increased mortality, function declined in elderly. This study evaluated the association between GS and each common anthropometric characteristic in community-dwelling elderly.
From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a community-based health survey among the elderly in Chiayi county, Taiwan. Participants were 65 years old or older, and total of 3,739 elderly subjects (1,600 males and 2,139 females) with a mean age of 76 years (range 65-85 years old) were recruited. General demographic data and lifestyle patterns were measured using a standard questionnaire. Anthropometric characteristics such as body height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), body waist and hip circumference, and body fat were measured by standard methods. GS was measured using a digital dynamometers (TKK5101) method.
The mean GS was 32.8 ± 7.1 kg for males and 21.6 ± 4.8 kg for females (p < 0.001). For both sexes, elderly subjects with the same body weight but smaller body waist circumference had greater GS. The subjects with the same body waist size but heavier weight had greater GS. Furthermore, after adjusting for age, lifestyles, disease status, and potential anthropometric variable, multivariate regression analyses indicated that BMI was positively associated with GS (for males, beta = 0.310 and for females beta = 0.143, both p < 0.001) and body waist was negatively associated with GS (for males, beta = -0.108, p < 0.001; for females, beta = -0.030, p = 0.061).
This study suggested that old adults with higher waist circumstance had weaker GS. Waist circumstance was negatively associated with GS, body weight was positively associated with GS in contrast. It may implies that central obesity was more important than overweight for GS in elderly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0260763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2610897254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A687101166</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_01a6ee65261941f08dc2352123d808ea</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A687101166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8a3595058fe5298b53c503c2d9651ea60cb61f0e46852107c6b4cc120be3969d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlo0vZGGBY_BhYWdPU2pOmZNkObdJPUdfDPm9npLlPZCymlIX3e9-05zUmSlxgtMc3xh60dnZHdcrAGlohwlHP6KDnFJSULThB9fLQ-SZ55v0WI0YLzp8kJzUqc5YydJn9W3lulZdDWpBWEGwCTNk4PqQ8OTBPaVJo63qF1drA9BKdVqlrppArgtA9a-VSbNLSQKtv3o9Fht6hvoOu0aVLoanDdLh3sMHaHlAhfSX0jzfPkyUZ2Hl5Mz7Pkx-dPV-dfFxeXX9bnq4uF4iUJi0JSVjLEig0wUhYVo4ohqkhdcoZBcqQqjjcIMl4wglGueJUphQmqgJa8rOlZ8vrgO3TWi6lvXhCOUVHmhGWRWB-I2sqtGJzupdsJK7W43bCuEdLFSjsQCEsOwFlUl1mMLWpFaMwltC5QATJ6fZzSxqqHWoEJTnYz0_kbo1vR2F-i4DnjJY8G7yYDZ69H8EH02qvYT2nAjrffjTnLMMkj-uYf9OHqJqqRsQBtNjbmqr2pWPEixyj67WOXD1DxqqHXKh6yjY77M8H7mSAyAX6HRo7ei_X3b__PXv6cs2-P2BZkF1pvu3F_ePwczA6gctZ7B5v7JmMk9jNy1w2xnxExzUiUvTr-Qfeiu6GgfwEOhA1O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610897254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lin, Ming-Hsun ; Chang, Chun-Yung ; Lu, Chieh-Hua ; Wu, Der-Min ; Kuo, Feng-Chih ; Kuo, Che-Chun ; Chu, Nain-Feng</creator><contributor>Sanada, Kiyoshi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ming-Hsun ; Chang, Chun-Yung ; Lu, Chieh-Hua ; Wu, Der-Min ; Kuo, Feng-Chih ; Kuo, Che-Chun ; Chu, Nain-Feng ; Sanada, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Sarcopenia and muscle weakness in elderly are contributed burden of public health and impact on quality of life. Weak grip strength was key role in diagnosis of sarcopenia and reported increased mortality, function declined in elderly. This study evaluated the association between GS and each common anthropometric characteristic in community-dwelling elderly.
From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a community-based health survey among the elderly in Chiayi county, Taiwan. Participants were 65 years old or older, and total of 3,739 elderly subjects (1,600 males and 2,139 females) with a mean age of 76 years (range 65-85 years old) were recruited. General demographic data and lifestyle patterns were measured using a standard questionnaire. Anthropometric characteristics such as body height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), body waist and hip circumference, and body fat were measured by standard methods. GS was measured using a digital dynamometers (TKK5101) method.
The mean GS was 32.8 ± 7.1 kg for males and 21.6 ± 4.8 kg for females (p < 0.001). For both sexes, elderly subjects with the same body weight but smaller body waist circumference had greater GS. The subjects with the same body waist size but heavier weight had greater GS. Furthermore, after adjusting for age, lifestyles, disease status, and potential anthropometric variable, multivariate regression analyses indicated that BMI was positively associated with GS (for males, beta = 0.310 and for females beta = 0.143, both p < 0.001) and body waist was negatively associated with GS (for males, beta = -0.108, p < 0.001; for females, beta = -0.030, p = 0.061).
This study suggested that old adults with higher waist circumstance had weaker GS. Waist circumstance was negatively associated with GS, body weight was positively associated with GS in contrast. It may implies that central obesity was more important than overweight for GS in elderly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34914755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Anthropometry ; Armed forces ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Body height ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Body measurements ; Body size ; Body weight ; Care and treatment ; Complications and side effects ; Diabetes ; Diagnosis ; Dynamometers ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Females ; Frailty - epidemiology ; Grip strength ; Hand Strength ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Independent Living - statistics & numerical data ; Insulin resistance ; Internal medicine ; Male ; Males ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metabolism ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Muscle strength ; Muscles ; Obesity ; Obesity - physiopathology ; Older people ; Overweight ; Overweight - physiopathology ; People and Places ; Physiological aspects ; Population ; Public health ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Sarcopenia ; Taiwan - epidemiology ; Waist Circumference ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260763-e0260763</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Lin et al 2021 Lin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8a3595058fe5298b53c503c2d9651ea60cb61f0e46852107c6b4cc120be3969d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8a3595058fe5298b53c503c2d9651ea60cb61f0e46852107c6b4cc120be3969d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1513-4995</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675696/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675696/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,2098,2917,23853,27911,27912,53778,53780,79355,79356</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sanada, Kiyoshi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ming-Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Yung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chieh-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Der-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Feng-Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Che-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Nain-Feng</creatorcontrib><title>Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Sarcopenia and muscle weakness in elderly are contributed burden of public health and impact on quality of life. Weak grip strength was key role in diagnosis of sarcopenia and reported increased mortality, function declined in elderly. This study evaluated the association between GS and each common anthropometric characteristic in community-dwelling elderly.
From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a community-based health survey among the elderly in Chiayi county, Taiwan. Participants were 65 years old or older, and total of 3,739 elderly subjects (1,600 males and 2,139 females) with a mean age of 76 years (range 65-85 years old) were recruited. General demographic data and lifestyle patterns were measured using a standard questionnaire. Anthropometric characteristics such as body height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), body waist and hip circumference, and body fat were measured by standard methods. GS was measured using a digital dynamometers (TKK5101) method.
The mean GS was 32.8 ± 7.1 kg for males and 21.6 ± 4.8 kg for females (p < 0.001). For both sexes, elderly subjects with the same body weight but smaller body waist circumference had greater GS. The subjects with the same body waist size but heavier weight had greater GS. Furthermore, after adjusting for age, lifestyles, disease status, and potential anthropometric variable, multivariate regression analyses indicated that BMI was positively associated with GS (for males, beta = 0.310 and for females beta = 0.143, both p < 0.001) and body waist was negatively associated with GS (for males, beta = -0.108, p < 0.001; for females, beta = -0.030, p = 0.061).
This study suggested that old adults with higher waist circumstance had weaker GS. Waist circumstance was negatively associated with GS, body weight was positively associated with GS in contrast. It may implies that central obesity was more important than overweight for GS in elderly.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body height</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body measurements</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dynamometers</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Frailty - epidemiology</subject><subject>Grip strength</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent Living - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insulin resistance</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Overweight - physiopathology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sarcopenia</subject><subject>Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjPlo0vZGGBY_BhYWdPU2pOmZNkObdJPUdfDPm9npLlPZCymlIX3e9-05zUmSlxgtMc3xh60dnZHdcrAGlohwlHP6KDnFJSULThB9fLQ-SZ55v0WI0YLzp8kJzUqc5YydJn9W3lulZdDWpBWEGwCTNk4PqQ8OTBPaVJo63qF1drA9BKdVqlrppArgtA9a-VSbNLSQKtv3o9Fht6hvoOu0aVLoanDdLh3sMHaHlAhfSX0jzfPkyUZ2Hl5Mz7Pkx-dPV-dfFxeXX9bnq4uF4iUJi0JSVjLEig0wUhYVo4ohqkhdcoZBcqQqjjcIMl4wglGueJUphQmqgJa8rOlZ8vrgO3TWi6lvXhCOUVHmhGWRWB-I2sqtGJzupdsJK7W43bCuEdLFSjsQCEsOwFlUl1mMLWpFaMwltC5QATJ6fZzSxqqHWoEJTnYz0_kbo1vR2F-i4DnjJY8G7yYDZ69H8EH02qvYT2nAjrffjTnLMMkj-uYf9OHqJqqRsQBtNjbmqr2pWPEixyj67WOXD1DxqqHXKh6yjY77M8H7mSAyAX6HRo7ei_X3b__PXv6cs2-P2BZkF1pvu3F_ePwczA6gctZ7B5v7JmMk9jNy1w2xnxExzUiUvTr-Qfeiu6GgfwEOhA1O</recordid><startdate>20211216</startdate><enddate>20211216</enddate><creator>Lin, Ming-Hsun</creator><creator>Chang, Chun-Yung</creator><creator>Lu, Chieh-Hua</creator><creator>Wu, Der-Min</creator><creator>Kuo, Feng-Chih</creator><creator>Kuo, Che-Chun</creator><creator>Chu, Nain-Feng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-4995</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211216</creationdate><title>Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan</title><author>Lin, Ming-Hsun ; Chang, Chun-Yung ; Lu, Chieh-Hua ; Wu, Der-Min ; Kuo, Feng-Chih ; Kuo, Che-Chun ; Chu, Nain-Feng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8a3595058fe5298b53c503c2d9651ea60cb61f0e46852107c6b4cc120be3969d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body height</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body measurements</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dynamometers</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Frailty - epidemiology</topic><topic>Grip strength</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent Living - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insulin resistance</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Overweight - physiopathology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sarcopenia</topic><topic>Taiwan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ming-Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Yung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chieh-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Der-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Feng-Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Che-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Nain-Feng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Ming-Hsun</au><au>Chang, Chun-Yung</au><au>Lu, Chieh-Hua</au><au>Wu, Der-Min</au><au>Kuo, Feng-Chih</au><au>Kuo, Che-Chun</au><au>Chu, Nain-Feng</au><au>Sanada, Kiyoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-12-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0260763</spage><epage>e0260763</epage><pages>e0260763-e0260763</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Sarcopenia and muscle weakness in elderly are contributed burden of public health and impact on quality of life. Weak grip strength was key role in diagnosis of sarcopenia and reported increased mortality, function declined in elderly. This study evaluated the association between GS and each common anthropometric characteristic in community-dwelling elderly.
From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a community-based health survey among the elderly in Chiayi county, Taiwan. Participants were 65 years old or older, and total of 3,739 elderly subjects (1,600 males and 2,139 females) with a mean age of 76 years (range 65-85 years old) were recruited. General demographic data and lifestyle patterns were measured using a standard questionnaire. Anthropometric characteristics such as body height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), body waist and hip circumference, and body fat were measured by standard methods. GS was measured using a digital dynamometers (TKK5101) method.
The mean GS was 32.8 ± 7.1 kg for males and 21.6 ± 4.8 kg for females (p < 0.001). For both sexes, elderly subjects with the same body weight but smaller body waist circumference had greater GS. The subjects with the same body waist size but heavier weight had greater GS. Furthermore, after adjusting for age, lifestyles, disease status, and potential anthropometric variable, multivariate regression analyses indicated that BMI was positively associated with GS (for males, beta = 0.310 and for females beta = 0.143, both p < 0.001) and body waist was negatively associated with GS (for males, beta = -0.108, p < 0.001; for females, beta = -0.030, p = 0.061).
This study suggested that old adults with higher waist circumstance had weaker GS. Waist circumstance was negatively associated with GS, body weight was positively associated with GS in contrast. It may implies that central obesity was more important than overweight for GS in elderly.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34914755</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0260763</doi><tpages>e0260763</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-4995</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260763-e0260763 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2610897254 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Anthropometry Armed forces Biology and Life Sciences Body Composition Body fat Body height Body mass Body Mass Index Body measurements Body size Body weight Care and treatment Complications and side effects Diabetes Diagnosis Dynamometers Endocrinology Female Females Frailty - epidemiology Grip strength Hand Strength Health aspects Hospitals Humans Independent Living - statistics & numerical data Insulin resistance Internal medicine Male Males Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Metabolism Methods Middle Aged Muscle strength Muscles Obesity Obesity - physiopathology Older people Overweight Overweight - physiopathology People and Places Physiological aspects Population Public health Quality of Life Questionnaires Regression analysis Risk factors Sarcopenia Taiwan - epidemiology Waist Circumference Working groups |
title | Association between grip strength and anthropometric characteristics in the community-dwelling elderly population in Taiwan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20grip%20strength%20and%20anthropometric%20characteristics%20in%20the%20community-dwelling%20elderly%20population%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lin,%20Ming-Hsun&rft.date=2021-12-16&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0260763&rft.epage=e0260763&rft.pages=e0260763-e0260763&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0260763&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA687101166%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610897254&rft_id=info:pmid/34914755&rft_galeid=A687101166&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_01a6ee65261941f08dc2352123d808ea&rfr_iscdi=true |