Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects almost 2% of the population above the age of 65. To better quantify the effects of new medications, fast and objective methods are needed. Touchscreen-based tapping tasks are simple yet effective tools for quantify...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260783-e0260783 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0260783 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0260783 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Makai-Bölöni, Soma Thijssen, Eva van Brummelen, Emilie M J Groeneveld, Geert J Doll, Robert J |
description | Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects almost 2% of the population above the age of 65. To better quantify the effects of new medications, fast and objective methods are needed. Touchscreen-based tapping tasks are simple yet effective tools for quantifying drug effects on PD-related motor symptoms, especially bradykinesia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal task set-up. The present study compares four tapping tasks in 14 healthy participants. In alternate finger tapping (AFT), tapping occurred with the index and middle finger with 2.5 cm between targets, whereas in alternate side tapping (AST) the index finger with 20 cm between targets was used. Both configurations were tested with or without the presence of a visual cue. Moreover, for each tapping task, within- and between-day repeatability and (potential) sensitivity of the calculated parameters were assessed. Visual cueing reduced tapping speed and rhythm, and improved accuracy. This effect was most pronounced for AST. On average, AST had a lower tapping speed with impaired accuracy and improved rhythm compared to AFT. Of all parameters, the total number of taps and mean spatial error had the highest repeatability and sensitivity. The findings suggest against the use of visual cueing because it is crucial that parameters can vary freely to accurately capture medication effects. The choice for AFT or AST depends on the research question, as these tasks assess different aspects of movement. These results encourage further validation of non-cued AFT and AST in PD patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0260783 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2607590176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A685742463</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0fbfa01961614b828a9a1392cfc69319</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A685742463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c47f8c2a171c0c0d8b6036df3e50a4b63a6d9cb2981e40d69e92ab4971a45673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEomXhHyCIhITgsIs_EifhgFRVfKxUqVIpXM3EGe-6ysap7SD673G6abVBPaAcMrKfecfz2pMkLylZUV7QD1d2cB20q952uCJMkKLkj5JjWnG2FIzwxwfxUfLM-ytCcl4K8TQ54llZZFVRHCe_Lu2gtl45xG5Zg8cm1abboEsD9H2MPqYX2CMEqE1rwk0KXZMq22mzGRwEY7sUtUYVfBrDKSft0WnrdtApfJ480dB6fDH9F8mPL58vT78tz86_rk9PzpZKVCwsmcoKXSoGtKCKKNKUtSBcNJpjTiCrBQfRVKpmVUkxI42osGJQxyYoZLko-CJ5vdftW-vlZI6Xoy95RWghIrHeE42FK9k7swN3Iy0Yebtg3UaCC0a1KImuNRBaCSpoVpeshAoor5jS8bQ82rpIPk3VhnqHjcIuOGhnovOdzmzlxv6WpcgpJTwKvJsEnL0e0Ae5M15h20KHdrg9d0k5ywmN6Jt_0Ie7m6gNxAZMp22sq0ZReSLKvMhYJsayqweo-DW4M_FaUZu4Pkt4P0uITMA_YQOD93L9_eL_2fOfc_btAbtFaMPW23YYX5Sfg9keVM5671Dfm0yJHAfhzg05DoKcBiGmvTq8oPuku5fP_wI-0ANX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607590176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Makai-Bölöni, Soma ; Thijssen, Eva ; van Brummelen, Emilie M J ; Groeneveld, Geert J ; Doll, Robert J</creator><contributor>Virmani, Tuhin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Makai-Bölöni, Soma ; Thijssen, Eva ; van Brummelen, Emilie M J ; Groeneveld, Geert J ; Doll, Robert J ; Virmani, Tuhin</creatorcontrib><description>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects almost 2% of the population above the age of 65. To better quantify the effects of new medications, fast and objective methods are needed. Touchscreen-based tapping tasks are simple yet effective tools for quantifying drug effects on PD-related motor symptoms, especially bradykinesia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal task set-up. The present study compares four tapping tasks in 14 healthy participants. In alternate finger tapping (AFT), tapping occurred with the index and middle finger with 2.5 cm between targets, whereas in alternate side tapping (AST) the index finger with 20 cm between targets was used. Both configurations were tested with or without the presence of a visual cue. Moreover, for each tapping task, within- and between-day repeatability and (potential) sensitivity of the calculated parameters were assessed. Visual cueing reduced tapping speed and rhythm, and improved accuracy. This effect was most pronounced for AST. On average, AST had a lower tapping speed with impaired accuracy and improved rhythm compared to AFT. Of all parameters, the total number of taps and mean spatial error had the highest repeatability and sensitivity. The findings suggest against the use of visual cueing because it is crucial that parameters can vary freely to accurately capture medication effects. The choice for AFT or AST depends on the research question, as these tasks assess different aspects of movement. These results encourage further validation of non-cued AFT and AST in PD patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34874977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Configuration management ; Female ; Finger ; Fingers - physiology ; Humans ; Interactive computer systems ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Motor ability ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Motor task performance ; Movement ; Movement disorders ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Parameter sensitivity ; Parkinson Disease - therapy ; Parkinson's disease ; Performance evaluation ; Pharmacodynamics ; Physical Sciences ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reproducibility ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rhythm ; Signs and symptoms ; Touch screens ; Tremor (Muscular contraction) ; Validation studies ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260783-e0260783</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Makai-Bölöni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Makai-Bölöni et al 2021 Makai-Bölöni et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c47f8c2a171c0c0d8b6036df3e50a4b63a6d9cb2981e40d69e92ab4971a45673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c47f8c2a171c0c0d8b6036df3e50a4b63a6d9cb2981e40d69e92ab4971a45673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5971-381X ; 0000-0002-4655-6667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651103/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8651103/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34874977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Virmani, Tuhin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Makai-Bölöni, Soma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijssen, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Emilie M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Geert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects almost 2% of the population above the age of 65. To better quantify the effects of new medications, fast and objective methods are needed. Touchscreen-based tapping tasks are simple yet effective tools for quantifying drug effects on PD-related motor symptoms, especially bradykinesia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal task set-up. The present study compares four tapping tasks in 14 healthy participants. In alternate finger tapping (AFT), tapping occurred with the index and middle finger with 2.5 cm between targets, whereas in alternate side tapping (AST) the index finger with 20 cm between targets was used. Both configurations were tested with or without the presence of a visual cue. Moreover, for each tapping task, within- and between-day repeatability and (potential) sensitivity of the calculated parameters were assessed. Visual cueing reduced tapping speed and rhythm, and improved accuracy. This effect was most pronounced for AST. On average, AST had a lower tapping speed with impaired accuracy and improved rhythm compared to AFT. Of all parameters, the total number of taps and mean spatial error had the highest repeatability and sensitivity. The findings suggest against the use of visual cueing because it is crucial that parameters can vary freely to accurately capture medication effects. The choice for AFT or AST depends on the research question, as these tasks assess different aspects of movement. These results encourage further validation of non-cued AFT and AST in PD patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Configuration management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interactive computer systems</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rhythm</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Touch screens</subject><subject>Tremor (Muscular contraction)</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEomXhHyCIhITgsIs_EifhgFRVfKxUqVIpXM3EGe-6ysap7SD673G6abVBPaAcMrKfecfz2pMkLylZUV7QD1d2cB20q952uCJMkKLkj5JjWnG2FIzwxwfxUfLM-ytCcl4K8TQ54llZZFVRHCe_Lu2gtl45xG5Zg8cm1abboEsD9H2MPqYX2CMEqE1rwk0KXZMq22mzGRwEY7sUtUYVfBrDKSft0WnrdtApfJ480dB6fDH9F8mPL58vT78tz86_rk9PzpZKVCwsmcoKXSoGtKCKKNKUtSBcNJpjTiCrBQfRVKpmVUkxI42osGJQxyYoZLko-CJ5vdftW-vlZI6Xoy95RWghIrHeE42FK9k7swN3Iy0Yebtg3UaCC0a1KImuNRBaCSpoVpeshAoor5jS8bQ82rpIPk3VhnqHjcIuOGhnovOdzmzlxv6WpcgpJTwKvJsEnL0e0Ae5M15h20KHdrg9d0k5ywmN6Jt_0Ie7m6gNxAZMp22sq0ZReSLKvMhYJsayqweo-DW4M_FaUZu4Pkt4P0uITMA_YQOD93L9_eL_2fOfc_btAbtFaMPW23YYX5Sfg9keVM5671Dfm0yJHAfhzg05DoKcBiGmvTq8oPuku5fP_wI-0ANX</recordid><startdate>20211207</startdate><enddate>20211207</enddate><creator>Makai-Bölöni, Soma</creator><creator>Thijssen, Eva</creator><creator>van Brummelen, Emilie M J</creator><creator>Groeneveld, Geert J</creator><creator>Doll, Robert J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-381X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211207</creationdate><title>Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance</title><author>Makai-Bölöni, Soma ; Thijssen, Eva ; van Brummelen, Emilie M J ; Groeneveld, Geert J ; Doll, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2c47f8c2a171c0c0d8b6036df3e50a4b63a6d9cb2981e40d69e92ab4971a45673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Configuration management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interactive computer systems</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rhythm</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Touch screens</topic><topic>Tremor (Muscular contraction)</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makai-Bölöni, Soma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijssen, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Emilie M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Geert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makai-Bölöni, Soma</au><au>Thijssen, Eva</au><au>van Brummelen, Emilie M J</au><au>Groeneveld, Geert J</au><au>Doll, Robert J</au><au>Virmani, Tuhin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-12-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0260783</spage><epage>e0260783</epage><pages>e0260783-e0260783</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects almost 2% of the population above the age of 65. To better quantify the effects of new medications, fast and objective methods are needed. Touchscreen-based tapping tasks are simple yet effective tools for quantifying drug effects on PD-related motor symptoms, especially bradykinesia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal task set-up. The present study compares four tapping tasks in 14 healthy participants. In alternate finger tapping (AFT), tapping occurred with the index and middle finger with 2.5 cm between targets, whereas in alternate side tapping (AST) the index finger with 20 cm between targets was used. Both configurations were tested with or without the presence of a visual cue. Moreover, for each tapping task, within- and between-day repeatability and (potential) sensitivity of the calculated parameters were assessed. Visual cueing reduced tapping speed and rhythm, and improved accuracy. This effect was most pronounced for AST. On average, AST had a lower tapping speed with impaired accuracy and improved rhythm compared to AFT. Of all parameters, the total number of taps and mean spatial error had the highest repeatability and sensitivity. The findings suggest against the use of visual cueing because it is crucial that parameters can vary freely to accurately capture medication effects. The choice for AFT or AST depends on the research question, as these tasks assess different aspects of movement. These results encourage further validation of non-cued AFT and AST in PD patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34874977</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0260783</doi><tpages>e0260783</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-381X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6667</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260783-e0260783 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2607590176 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Configuration management Female Finger Fingers - physiology Humans Interactive computer systems Male Medicine and Health Sciences Motor ability Motor Skills - physiology Motor task performance Movement Movement disorders Neurodegenerative diseases Parameter sensitivity Parkinson Disease - therapy Parkinson's disease Performance evaluation Pharmacodynamics Physical Sciences Psychomotor Performance Reproducibility Research and Analysis Methods Rhythm Signs and symptoms Touch screens Tremor (Muscular contraction) Validation studies Visual stimuli |
title | Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Touchscreen-based%20finger%20tapping:%20Repeatability%20and%20configuration%20effects%20on%20tapping%20performance&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Makai-B%C3%B6l%C3%B6ni,%20Soma&rft.date=2021-12-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0260783&rft.epage=e0260783&rft.pages=e0260783-e0260783&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0260783&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA685742463%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607590176&rft_id=info:pmid/34874977&rft_galeid=A685742463&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0fbfa01961614b828a9a1392cfc69319&rfr_iscdi=true |