Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study

Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0259775-e0259775
Hauptverfasser: Hyde, Daniel C, Mou, Yi, Berteletti, Ilaria, Spelke, Elizabeth S, Dehaene, Stanislas, Piazza, Manuela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0259775
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0259775
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Hyde, Daniel C
Mou, Yi
Berteletti, Ilaria
Spelke, Elizabeth S
Dehaene, Stanislas
Piazza, Manuela
description Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children's mastery of symbols influences children's developing mastery of numeracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0259775
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2598034950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A682570987</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0c0ba67ba2e64a26ad3dc0f167037cf9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A682570987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-40731806437980a9ce8bcb4fcc7968cadca8cc82f813f7692746b57b8d86be143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjGnSJqkXwrD4MbCwoKu3IU1PZ7KkSU3aZeffm3G6y1T2QnKRkDzvm5yTc7LsZY6XOeX5h2s_BqfssvcOlpiUFeflo-w0ryhZMILp46P1SfYsxmuMSyoYe5qd0IILXBJ2mjVXEAfjNmjYAgreAvItiruu9jYi41AfIOqt9xa5sYOg9O4jWjkEtz0E04EblEXad_04QFjUKkKTVGl9k46MdygOY7N7nj1plY3wYprPsp9fPl-df1tcXH5dn68uFppVZFgUmNNcYFZQXgmsKg2i1nXRas0rJrRqtBJaC9KKnLY8SXjB6pLXohGshrygZ9nrg29vfZRTgqJMuRGYFlWJE7E-EI1X17JPIaiwk14Z-XfDh41UYTDagsQa14rxWhFghSJMNbTRuM0Zx5Trtkpen6bbxrqDRqeIg7Iz0_mJM1u58TdSlBUpaJ4M3k0Gwf8e0z_IzkQN1ioHfpzezQWhJKFv_kEfjm6iNioFYFzr0716bypXTJCS40rwRC0foNJooDM6VVNr0v5M8H4mSMwAt8NGjTHK9Y_v_89e_pqzb4_YLSg7bKO3475w4hwsDqAOPsYA7X2Scyz3zXCXDblvBjk1Q5K9Ov6ge9Fd9dM_jf8F3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2598034950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Hyde, Daniel C ; Mou, Yi ; Berteletti, Ilaria ; Spelke, Elizabeth S ; Dehaene, Stanislas ; Piazza, Manuela</creator><contributor>Prado, Jérôme</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Daniel C ; Mou, Yi ; Berteletti, Ilaria ; Spelke, Elizabeth S ; Dehaene, Stanislas ; Piazza, Manuela ; Prado, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><description>Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children's mastery of symbols influences children's developing mastery of numeracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259775</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34780526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Arithmetic ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Children ; Data Collection ; Educational Status ; Empirical analysis ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Intervention ; Learning disabilities ; Mathematics ; Neurosciences ; Number systems ; Numeracy ; Numeration ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Preschool children ; Psychological aspects ; Social Sciences ; Software ; Symbols ; Training ; Transformation ; Transformations</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0259775-e0259775</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Hyde et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Hyde et al 2021 Hyde et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-40731806437980a9ce8bcb4fcc7968cadca8cc82f813f7692746b57b8d86be143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-40731806437980a9ce8bcb4fcc7968cadca8cc82f813f7692746b57b8d86be143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9888-5916</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592431/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592431/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Prado, Jérôme</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berteletti, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spelke, Elizabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehaene, Stanislas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Manuela</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children's mastery of symbols influences children's developing mastery of numeracy.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Number systems</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Numeration</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Symbols</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjGnSJqkXwrD4MbCwoKu3IU1PZ7KkSU3aZeffm3G6y1T2QnKRkDzvm5yTc7LsZY6XOeX5h2s_BqfssvcOlpiUFeflo-w0ryhZMILp46P1SfYsxmuMSyoYe5qd0IILXBJ2mjVXEAfjNmjYAgreAvItiruu9jYi41AfIOqt9xa5sYOg9O4jWjkEtz0E04EblEXad_04QFjUKkKTVGl9k46MdygOY7N7nj1plY3wYprPsp9fPl-df1tcXH5dn68uFppVZFgUmNNcYFZQXgmsKg2i1nXRas0rJrRqtBJaC9KKnLY8SXjB6pLXohGshrygZ9nrg29vfZRTgqJMuRGYFlWJE7E-EI1X17JPIaiwk14Z-XfDh41UYTDagsQa14rxWhFghSJMNbTRuM0Zx5Trtkpen6bbxrqDRqeIg7Iz0_mJM1u58TdSlBUpaJ4M3k0Gwf8e0z_IzkQN1ioHfpzezQWhJKFv_kEfjm6iNioFYFzr0716bypXTJCS40rwRC0foNJooDM6VVNr0v5M8H4mSMwAt8NGjTHK9Y_v_89e_pqzb4_YLSg7bKO3475w4hwsDqAOPsYA7X2Scyz3zXCXDblvBjk1Q5K9Ov6ge9Fd9dM_jf8F3Q</recordid><startdate>20211115</startdate><enddate>20211115</enddate><creator>Hyde, Daniel C</creator><creator>Mou, Yi</creator><creator>Berteletti, Ilaria</creator><creator>Spelke, Elizabeth S</creator><creator>Dehaene, Stanislas</creator><creator>Piazza, Manuela</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9888-5916</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211115</creationdate><title>Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study</title><author>Hyde, Daniel C ; Mou, Yi ; Berteletti, Ilaria ; Spelke, Elizabeth S ; Dehaene, Stanislas ; Piazza, Manuela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-40731806437980a9ce8bcb4fcc7968cadca8cc82f813f7692746b57b8d86be143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Number systems</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Numeration</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Symbols</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berteletti, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spelke, Elizabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehaene, Stanislas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, Manuela</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyde, Daniel C</au><au>Mou, Yi</au><au>Berteletti, Ilaria</au><au>Spelke, Elizabeth S</au><au>Dehaene, Stanislas</au><au>Piazza, Manuela</au><au>Prado, Jérôme</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-11-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0259775</spage><epage>e0259775</epage><pages>e0259775-e0259775</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children's mastery of symbols influences children's developing mastery of numeracy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34780526</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0259775</doi><tpages>e0259775</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9888-5916</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0259775-e0259775
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2598034950
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Analysis
Arithmetic
Biology and Life Sciences
Children
Data Collection
Educational Status
Empirical analysis
Evaluation
Humans
Intervention
Learning disabilities
Mathematics
Neurosciences
Number systems
Numeracy
Numeration
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Preschool children
Psychological aspects
Social Sciences
Software
Symbols
Training
Transformation
Transformations
title Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20role%20of%20symbols%20in%20preschool%20numeracy:%20An%20experimental%20computer-based%20intervention%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hyde,%20Daniel%20C&rft.date=2021-11-15&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0259775&rft.epage=e0259775&rft.pages=e0259775-e0259775&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0259775&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA682570987%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2598034950&rft_id=info:pmid/34780526&rft_galeid=A682570987&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0c0ba67ba2e64a26ad3dc0f167037cf9&rfr_iscdi=true