Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data

Environmental laws need sound data to protect species and ecosystems. In 1996, a proliferation of mountaintop removal coal mines in a region home to over 50 federally protected species was approved under the Endangered Species Act. Although this type of mining can degrade terrestrial and aquatic hab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0239691
Hauptverfasser: Evans, Michael J, Kay, Kathryn, Proctor, Chelsea, Thomas, Christian J, Malcom, Jacob W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0239691
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Evans, Michael J
Kay, Kathryn
Proctor, Chelsea
Thomas, Christian J
Malcom, Jacob W
description Environmental laws need sound data to protect species and ecosystems. In 1996, a proliferation of mountaintop removal coal mines in a region home to over 50 federally protected species was approved under the Endangered Species Act. Although this type of mining can degrade terrestrial and aquatic habitats, the available data and tools limited the ability to analyze spatially extensive, aggregate effects of such a program. We used two large, public datasets to quantify the relationship between mountaintop removal coal mining and water quality measures important to the survival of imperiled species at a landscape scale across Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We combined an annual map of the extent of surface mines in this region from 1985 to 2015 generated from Landsat satellite imagery with public water quality data collected over the same time period from 4,260 monitoring stations within the same area. The water quality data show that chronic and acute thresholds for levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, conductivity, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, pH, selenium, and zinc safe for aquatic life were exceeded thousands of times between 1985 and 2015 in streams that are important to the survival and recovery of species on the Endangered Species List. Linear mixed models showed that levels of manganese, sulfate, sulfur, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, and zinc increased by 6.73E+01 to 6.87E+05 μg/L and conductivity by 3.30E+06 μS /cm for one percent increase in the mined proportion of the area draining into a monitoring station. The proportion of a drainage area that was mined also increased the likelihood that chronic thresholds for copper, lead, and zinc required to sustain aquatic life were exceeded. Finally, the proportion of a watershed that was mined was positively related to the likelihood that a waterway would be designated as impaired under the Clean Water Act. Together these results demonstrate that the extent of mountaintop removal mining, which can be derived from public satellite data, is predictive of water quality measures important to imperiled species-effects that must be considered under environmental law. These findings and the public data used in our analyses are pertinent to ongoing re-evaluations of the effects of current mine permitting regulations to the recovery and survival of federally protected species.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0239691
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2593589523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A681288089</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_48b727d3cb244cd2a545562a87a92ceb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A681288089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-45481539806f23df5d7d8c2ed1b4d26dea867926b59dbc3481a46315434f05313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkltrFDEYhgdRbK3-A9EBQfBi18lxMjeFUjwsLBQ8XRoySWY3ayaZJplq_71Zd1p2QEFykZA835svb96ieA6qJUA1eLvzY3DCLgfv9LKCqKENeFCcggbBBYUVeni0PimexLirKoIYpY-LE4RrRDCuT4vva-N-GLcpez-6JIxLfiiD7v2NsGVv3P4o-fKnSDqU16OwJt2WnQ-l6QcdjNWqjIOWRsdyjHs4ZtJmSpdKJPG0eNQJG_WzaT4rvr5_9-Xy42J99WF1ebFeSNrAtMAEM0BQwyraQaQ6omrFJNQKtFhBqrRgtG4gbUmjWokyLDBFgGCEu_wogM6KlwfdwfrIJ2sih6RBhDUEokysDoTyYseHYHoRbrkXhv_Z8GHDRUhGWs0xa2tYKyRbiLFUUBBMCIWC1aKBUrdZ63y6bWx7raR2KQg7E52fOLPlG3_DGaEM4H27ryaB4K9HHdM_Wp6ojchdGdf5LCZ7EyW_yDqQsYo1mVr-hcpD6d7IHI4u_9K84M2sIDNJ_0obMcbIV58__T979W3Ovj5it1rYtI3ejsl4F-cgPoAy-BiD7u6dAxXfZ_vODb7PNp-yncteHLt-X3QXZvQbuWf0ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2593589523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Evans, Michael J ; Kay, Kathryn ; Proctor, Chelsea ; Thomas, Christian J ; Malcom, Jacob W</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Michael J ; Kay, Kathryn ; Proctor, Chelsea ; Thomas, Christian J ; Malcom, Jacob W</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental laws need sound data to protect species and ecosystems. In 1996, a proliferation of mountaintop removal coal mines in a region home to over 50 federally protected species was approved under the Endangered Species Act. Although this type of mining can degrade terrestrial and aquatic habitats, the available data and tools limited the ability to analyze spatially extensive, aggregate effects of such a program. We used two large, public datasets to quantify the relationship between mountaintop removal coal mining and water quality measures important to the survival of imperiled species at a landscape scale across Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We combined an annual map of the extent of surface mines in this region from 1985 to 2015 generated from Landsat satellite imagery with public water quality data collected over the same time period from 4,260 monitoring stations within the same area. The water quality data show that chronic and acute thresholds for levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, conductivity, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, pH, selenium, and zinc safe for aquatic life were exceeded thousands of times between 1985 and 2015 in streams that are important to the survival and recovery of species on the Endangered Species List. Linear mixed models showed that levels of manganese, sulfate, sulfur, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, and zinc increased by 6.73E+01 to 6.87E+05 μg/L and conductivity by 3.30E+06 μS /cm for one percent increase in the mined proportion of the area draining into a monitoring station. The proportion of a drainage area that was mined also increased the likelihood that chronic thresholds for copper, lead, and zinc required to sustain aquatic life were exceeded. Finally, the proportion of a watershed that was mined was positively related to the likelihood that a waterway would be designated as impaired under the Clean Water Act. Together these results demonstrate that the extent of mountaintop removal mining, which can be derived from public satellite data, is predictive of water quality measures important to imperiled species-effects that must be considered under environmental law. These findings and the public data used in our analyses are pertinent to ongoing re-evaluations of the effects of current mine permitting regulations to the recovery and survival of federally protected species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34735447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Appalachian Region ; Aquatic habitats ; Aquatic life ; Aquatic organisms ; Arsenic ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cadmium ; Clean Water Act-US ; Coal mines ; Coal Mining ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Conductivity ; Copper ; Dissolved solids ; Drainage ; Drainage area ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered Species ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental law ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental protection ; Environmental science ; Footprints ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Lead ; Manganese ; Mercury ; Mines ; Monitoring ; Mountains ; Mountaintop removal mining ; Physical Sciences ; Pollutants ; Protected species ; Protection and preservation ; Public waters ; Recovery ; Remote sensing ; Satellite data ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Selenium ; Social Sciences ; Solid suspensions ; Spacecraft ; Strip mining ; Sulfates ; Sulfur ; Surface mines ; Survival ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments ; Thresholds ; Total dissolved solids ; Total suspended solids ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Water Quality ; Water quality measurements ; Waterways ; Wildlife conservation ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0239691</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Evans et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Evans et al 2021 Evans et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-45481539806f23df5d7d8c2ed1b4d26dea867926b59dbc3481a46315434f05313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-45481539806f23df5d7d8c2ed1b4d26dea867926b59dbc3481a46315434f05313</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9048-6611</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568141/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568141/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kay, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcom, Jacob W</creatorcontrib><title>Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Environmental laws need sound data to protect species and ecosystems. In 1996, a proliferation of mountaintop removal coal mines in a region home to over 50 federally protected species was approved under the Endangered Species Act. Although this type of mining can degrade terrestrial and aquatic habitats, the available data and tools limited the ability to analyze spatially extensive, aggregate effects of such a program. We used two large, public datasets to quantify the relationship between mountaintop removal coal mining and water quality measures important to the survival of imperiled species at a landscape scale across Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We combined an annual map of the extent of surface mines in this region from 1985 to 2015 generated from Landsat satellite imagery with public water quality data collected over the same time period from 4,260 monitoring stations within the same area. The water quality data show that chronic and acute thresholds for levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, conductivity, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, pH, selenium, and zinc safe for aquatic life were exceeded thousands of times between 1985 and 2015 in streams that are important to the survival and recovery of species on the Endangered Species List. Linear mixed models showed that levels of manganese, sulfate, sulfur, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, and zinc increased by 6.73E+01 to 6.87E+05 μg/L and conductivity by 3.30E+06 μS /cm for one percent increase in the mined proportion of the area draining into a monitoring station. The proportion of a drainage area that was mined also increased the likelihood that chronic thresholds for copper, lead, and zinc required to sustain aquatic life were exceeded. Finally, the proportion of a watershed that was mined was positively related to the likelihood that a waterway would be designated as impaired under the Clean Water Act. Together these results demonstrate that the extent of mountaintop removal mining, which can be derived from public satellite data, is predictive of water quality measures important to imperiled species-effects that must be considered under environmental law. These findings and the public data used in our analyses are pertinent to ongoing re-evaluations of the effects of current mine permitting regulations to the recovery and survival of federally protected species.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Appalachian Region</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Aquatic organisms</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Clean Water Act-US</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal Mining</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Dissolved solids</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage area</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Footprints</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Mountaintop removal mining</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Public waters</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Solid suspensions</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Strip mining</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Surface mines</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Total dissolved solids</subject><subject>Total suspended solids</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water quality measurements</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkltrFDEYhgdRbK3-A9EBQfBi18lxMjeFUjwsLBQ8XRoySWY3ayaZJplq_71Zd1p2QEFykZA835svb96ieA6qJUA1eLvzY3DCLgfv9LKCqKENeFCcggbBBYUVeni0PimexLirKoIYpY-LE4RrRDCuT4vva-N-GLcpez-6JIxLfiiD7v2NsGVv3P4o-fKnSDqU16OwJt2WnQ-l6QcdjNWqjIOWRsdyjHs4ZtJmSpdKJPG0eNQJG_WzaT4rvr5_9-Xy42J99WF1ebFeSNrAtMAEM0BQwyraQaQ6omrFJNQKtFhBqrRgtG4gbUmjWokyLDBFgGCEu_wogM6KlwfdwfrIJ2sih6RBhDUEokysDoTyYseHYHoRbrkXhv_Z8GHDRUhGWs0xa2tYKyRbiLFUUBBMCIWC1aKBUrdZ63y6bWx7raR2KQg7E52fOLPlG3_DGaEM4H27ryaB4K9HHdM_Wp6ojchdGdf5LCZ7EyW_yDqQsYo1mVr-hcpD6d7IHI4u_9K84M2sIDNJ_0obMcbIV58__T979W3Ovj5it1rYtI3ejsl4F-cgPoAy-BiD7u6dAxXfZ_vODb7PNp-yncteHLt-X3QXZvQbuWf0ug</recordid><startdate>20211104</startdate><enddate>20211104</enddate><creator>Evans, Michael J</creator><creator>Kay, Kathryn</creator><creator>Proctor, Chelsea</creator><creator>Thomas, Christian J</creator><creator>Malcom, Jacob W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-6611</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211104</creationdate><title>Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data</title><author>Evans, Michael J ; Kay, Kathryn ; Proctor, Chelsea ; Thomas, Christian J ; Malcom, Jacob W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-45481539806f23df5d7d8c2ed1b4d26dea867926b59dbc3481a46315434f05313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Appalachian Region</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Aquatic organisms</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Clean Water Act-US</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal Mining</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Dissolved solids</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage area</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Footprints</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Mountaintop removal mining</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Public waters</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Solid suspensions</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Strip mining</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Surface mines</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Total dissolved solids</topic><topic>Total suspended solids</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water quality measurements</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kay, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcom, Jacob W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Michael J</au><au>Kay, Kathryn</au><au>Proctor, Chelsea</au><au>Thomas, Christian J</au><au>Malcom, Jacob W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-11-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0239691</spage><pages>e0239691-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Environmental laws need sound data to protect species and ecosystems. In 1996, a proliferation of mountaintop removal coal mines in a region home to over 50 federally protected species was approved under the Endangered Species Act. Although this type of mining can degrade terrestrial and aquatic habitats, the available data and tools limited the ability to analyze spatially extensive, aggregate effects of such a program. We used two large, public datasets to quantify the relationship between mountaintop removal coal mining and water quality measures important to the survival of imperiled species at a landscape scale across Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We combined an annual map of the extent of surface mines in this region from 1985 to 2015 generated from Landsat satellite imagery with public water quality data collected over the same time period from 4,260 monitoring stations within the same area. The water quality data show that chronic and acute thresholds for levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, conductivity, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, pH, selenium, and zinc safe for aquatic life were exceeded thousands of times between 1985 and 2015 in streams that are important to the survival and recovery of species on the Endangered Species List. Linear mixed models showed that levels of manganese, sulfate, sulfur, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, and zinc increased by 6.73E+01 to 6.87E+05 μg/L and conductivity by 3.30E+06 μS /cm for one percent increase in the mined proportion of the area draining into a monitoring station. The proportion of a drainage area that was mined also increased the likelihood that chronic thresholds for copper, lead, and zinc required to sustain aquatic life were exceeded. Finally, the proportion of a watershed that was mined was positively related to the likelihood that a waterway would be designated as impaired under the Clean Water Act. Together these results demonstrate that the extent of mountaintop removal mining, which can be derived from public satellite data, is predictive of water quality measures important to imperiled species-effects that must be considered under environmental law. These findings and the public data used in our analyses are pertinent to ongoing re-evaluations of the effects of current mine permitting regulations to the recovery and survival of federally protected species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34735447</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0239691</doi><tpages>e0239691</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-6611</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0239691
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2593589523
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aluminum
Appalachian Region
Aquatic habitats
Aquatic life
Aquatic organisms
Arsenic
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Cadmium
Clean Water Act-US
Coal mines
Coal Mining
Computer and Information Sciences
Conductivity
Copper
Dissolved solids
Drainage
Drainage area
Earth Sciences
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered Species
Environmental aspects
Environmental law
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental protection
Environmental science
Footprints
Landsat
Landsat satellites
Laws, regulations and rules
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Mines
Monitoring
Mountains
Mountaintop removal mining
Physical Sciences
Pollutants
Protected species
Protection and preservation
Public waters
Recovery
Remote sensing
Satellite data
Satellite imagery
Satellites
Selenium
Social Sciences
Solid suspensions
Spacecraft
Strip mining
Sulfates
Sulfur
Surface mines
Survival
Terrestrial ecosystems
Terrestrial environments
Thresholds
Total dissolved solids
Total suspended solids
Water Pollutants, Chemical - antagonists & inhibitors
Water Quality
Water quality measurements
Waterways
Wildlife conservation
Zinc
title Linking mountaintop removal mining to water quality for imperiled species using satellite data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A32%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20mountaintop%20removal%20mining%20to%20water%20quality%20for%20imperiled%20species%20using%20satellite%20data&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Evans,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2021-11-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0239691&rft.pages=e0239691-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0239691&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA681288089%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2593589523&rft_id=info:pmid/34735447&rft_galeid=A681288089&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_48b727d3cb244cd2a545562a87a92ceb&rfr_iscdi=true