Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0259110-e0259110 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0259110 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0259110 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Antoniou, Rea Romero-Kornblum, Heather Young, J Clayton You, Michelle Kramer, Joel H Chiong, Winston |
| description | The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0259110 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2584688417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A679909725</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A679909725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1376a435bdc7cd8b25b8094398d30cf16da3d0a9b521120c26a59e9512d950d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbF39B6IDgujFrvmYzCQ3Qlm_FgoLtdTLkEkysynZZE0yVf-92e607EgvJBcJyXPOyXvOWxQvIVhA3MAP134ITtjFzju9AIgwCMGj4hQyjOY1Avjx0fmkeBbjNQAE07p-Wpzgqm4YRNVp8eNCq0FqVQ7JWJNEMMKVv4y1xvVOx1gmX94Yb0XS5U6H6HPJMph-k2KphpCpMm10uVxfrT7NISt3wim9NfJ58aQTNuoX4z4rLr98vlx-m5-vv66WZ-dzWTOU5llJLSpMWiUbqWiLSEsBqzCjCgPZwVoJrIBgLUEQIiBRLQjTjECkGAEKz4rXh7Q76yMfWxI5IrSqKa1gk4nVgVBeXPNdMFsR_nAvDL-98KHnIiQjreYIwRZ1ikoMcMWgElJ3FNddIxrUMbmv9nGsNrRbraR2KQg7STp9cWbDe3_DKcEEZ1mz4t2YIPifg46Jb02U2lrhtB8O_24oyPIy-uYf9GF1I9WLLMC4zue6cp-Un-URM8AaRDK1eIDK63ZU2T-dyfeTgPeTgMwk_Tv1YoiRr75f_D-7vpqyb4_YjRY2baK32XvexSlYHUAZfIxBd_dNhoDv7X_XDb63Px_tn8NeHQ_oPujO7_gvd5f_FQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584688417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Antoniou, Rea ; Romero-Kornblum, Heather ; Young, J Clayton ; You, Michelle ; Kramer, Joel H ; Chiong, Winston</creator><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Rea ; Romero-Kornblum, Heather ; Young, J Clayton ; You, Michelle ; Kramer, Joel H ; Chiong, Winston ; Capraro, Valerio</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34679124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Civil rights ; Cognition & reasoning ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Emotions ; Ethical Theory ; Health aspects ; Health risks ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Morality ; Morals ; Older people ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social aspects ; United States</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0259110-e0259110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Antoniou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Antoniou et al 2021 Antoniou et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1376a435bdc7cd8b25b8094398d30cf16da3d0a9b521120c26a59e9512d950d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1376a435bdc7cd8b25b8094398d30cf16da3d0a9b521120c26a59e9512d950d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3563-425X ; 0000-0002-3654-9834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535394/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8535394/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Kornblum, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, J Clayton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Joel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiong, Winston</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Ethical Theory</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbF39B6IDgujFrvmYzCQ3Qlm_FgoLtdTLkEkysynZZE0yVf-92e607EgvJBcJyXPOyXvOWxQvIVhA3MAP134ITtjFzju9AIgwCMGj4hQyjOY1Avjx0fmkeBbjNQAE07p-Wpzgqm4YRNVp8eNCq0FqVQ7JWJNEMMKVv4y1xvVOx1gmX94Yb0XS5U6H6HPJMph-k2KphpCpMm10uVxfrT7NISt3wim9NfJ58aQTNuoX4z4rLr98vlx-m5-vv66WZ-dzWTOU5llJLSpMWiUbqWiLSEsBqzCjCgPZwVoJrIBgLUEQIiBRLQjTjECkGAEKz4rXh7Q76yMfWxI5IrSqKa1gk4nVgVBeXPNdMFsR_nAvDL-98KHnIiQjreYIwRZ1ikoMcMWgElJ3FNddIxrUMbmv9nGsNrRbraR2KQg7STp9cWbDe3_DKcEEZ1mz4t2YIPifg46Jb02U2lrhtB8O_24oyPIy-uYf9GF1I9WLLMC4zue6cp-Un-URM8AaRDK1eIDK63ZU2T-dyfeTgPeTgMwk_Tv1YoiRr75f_D-7vpqyb4_YjRY2baK32XvexSlYHUAZfIxBd_dNhoDv7X_XDb63Px_tn8NeHQ_oPujO7_gvd5f_FQ</recordid><startdate>20211022</startdate><enddate>20211022</enddate><creator>Antoniou, Rea</creator><creator>Romero-Kornblum, Heather</creator><creator>Young, J Clayton</creator><creator>You, Michelle</creator><creator>Kramer, Joel H</creator><creator>Chiong, Winston</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-425X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-9834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211022</creationdate><title>Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic</title><author>Antoniou, Rea ; Romero-Kornblum, Heather ; Young, J Clayton ; You, Michelle ; Kramer, Joel H ; Chiong, Winston</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1376a435bdc7cd8b25b8094398d30cf16da3d0a9b521120c26a59e9512d950d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Ethical Theory</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Rea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Kornblum, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, J Clayton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Joel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiong, Winston</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antoniou, Rea</au><au>Romero-Kornblum, Heather</au><au>Young, J Clayton</au><au>You, Michelle</au><au>Kramer, Joel H</au><au>Chiong, Winston</au><au>Capraro, Valerio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-10-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0259110</spage><epage>e0259110</epage><pages>e0259110-e0259110</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic poses many real-world moral dilemmas, which can pit the needs and rights of the many against the needs and rights of the few. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. We hypothesized that during this pandemic, individuals would give fewer utilitarian responses to hypothetical dilemmas, accompanied by higher levels of confidence and emotion elicitation. Our pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/g2wtp) involved two waves of data collection, before (2014) and during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic, regarding three categories of moral dilemmas (personal rights, agent-centered permissions, and special obligations). While utilitarian responses considered across all categories of dilemma did not differ, participants during the 2020 wave gave fewer utilitarian responses to dilemmas involving personal rights; that is, they were less willing to violate the personal rights of others to produce the best overall outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34679124</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0259110</doi><tpages>e0259110</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-425X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-9834</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0259110-e0259110 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2584688417 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Aged Civil rights Cognition & reasoning Coronaviruses COVID-19 Data collection Decision making Emotions Ethical Theory Health aspects Health risks Humans Judgment Male Morality Morals Older people Pandemics SARS-CoV-2 Social aspects United States |
| title | Reduced utilitarian willingness to violate personal rights during the COVID-19 pandemic |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20utilitarian%20willingness%20to%20violate%20personal%20rights%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Antoniou,%20Rea&rft.date=2021-10-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0259110&rft.epage=e0259110&rft.pages=e0259110-e0259110&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0259110&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA679909725%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584688417&rft_id=info:pmid/34679124&rft_galeid=A679909725&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_221b2fd8c303491dacef836f7a72f9cd&rfr_iscdi=true |