And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020)
In a recent paper, we presented new evidence and provided new insights on the status of Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations, relevant for this species conservation. Namely, we revealed the likely phylogeographic relation between eastern Cantabrian subpopulation and the historical Pyrenean populatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0256432-e0256432 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0256432 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0256432 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ferreira, Eduardo Gregório, Inês Barros, Tânia Pando, Doriana Morante, Joaquín Barbosa, Ana Hartasánchez, Roberto Fonseca, Carlos |
description | In a recent paper, we presented new evidence and provided new insights on the status of Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations, relevant for this species conservation. Namely, we revealed the likely phylogeographic relation between eastern Cantabrian subpopulation and the historical Pyrenean population. We have also detected an asymmetric flow of alleles and individuals from the eastern to the western subpopulation, including seven first-generation male migrants. Based on our results and on those of previous studies, we called the attention to the fact that Eastern Cantabrian brown bears might be taking advantage of increased connectivity to avoid higher human pressure and direct persecution in the areas occupied by the eastern Cantabrian subpopulation. In reply, Blanco et al (2020) [11] have criticized our ecological interpretation of the data presented in our paper. Namely, Blanco and co-authors criticize: (1) the use of the exodus concept in the title and discussion of the paper; (2) the apparent contradiction with source-sink theory; (3) the apparent overlooking of historical demographic data on Cantabrian brown bear and the use of the expression of population decline when referring to eastern subpopulation. Rather than contradicting the long and growing body of knowledge on the two brown bear subpopulations, the results presented in our paper allow a new perspective on the causes of the distinct pace of population growth of the two brown bear subpopulations in the last decades. Here, we reply to the criticisms by: clarifying our ecological interpretation of the results; refocusing the discussion on how the new genetic data suggest that currently, the flow of individuals and alleles is stronger westward, and how it may be linked to direct persecution and killing of brown bears. We provide detailed data on brown bear mortality in the Cantabrian Mountains and show that neither migration, gene flow, population increase nor mortality are balanced among the two subpopulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0256432 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2581753291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A679440102</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_784d0a0586ae4efa9d86aa0bd4dde0bc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A679440102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-770253c74e0712bca0b4733215518f32b5672f0f20342cd548088a04f2fe63f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DQQDguzCzphbby_COHgZWFhYL6_htE07WdKmm6TqfAc_tOlM1a3sgwSSQ_I7_5NzkhNFzwleEZaS1zdmsB3oVW86ucI0TjijD6JTkjO6TChmD-_YJ9ET524wjlmWJI-jE8YTzhkmp9HPdVehvfQXqFWNBa9Md4F60w_6YKPGmu9-h4xFrbEetPJ7BFaiznhUgIaulBWC1nQN2kDnobAKOlQErzBLsMgNxV85t0LXstd75A16OzobJD0Cjc4opvj8afSoBu3ks2ldRF_ev_u8-bi8vPqw3awvl2Wc536ZpiFdVqZc4pTQogRc8JQxSuKYZDWjRZyktMZ1SJzTsop5hrMMMK9pLRNWM7aIXhx1e22cmArpBI0zksaM5iQQ2yNRGbgRvVUt2L0woMRhw9hGgPWq1FKkGa8w4DhLQHJZQ14FK1yp4lUlcVEGrTdTtKFoZVXKzlvQM9H5Sad2ojHfRBYTlhMaBM4mAWtuB-m8aJUrpQ4FlGY43JsSwsYnXUQv_0Hvz26iGggJqK42IW45iop1kuacY4LHsKt7qDAq2aoy_Lpahf2Zw_nMITBe_vANDM6J7afr_2evvs7ZV3fYnQTtd87o4fCj5iA_gqU1zllZ_ykywWJsmt_VEGPTiKlp2C_46QcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581753291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ferreira, Eduardo ; Gregório, Inês ; Barros, Tânia ; Pando, Doriana ; Morante, Joaquín ; Barbosa, Ana ; Hartasánchez, Roberto ; Fonseca, Carlos</creator><contributor>Baca, Mateusz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Eduardo ; Gregório, Inês ; Barros, Tânia ; Pando, Doriana ; Morante, Joaquín ; Barbosa, Ana ; Hartasánchez, Roberto ; Fonseca, Carlos ; Baca, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent paper, we presented new evidence and provided new insights on the status of Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations, relevant for this species conservation. Namely, we revealed the likely phylogeographic relation between eastern Cantabrian subpopulation and the historical Pyrenean population. We have also detected an asymmetric flow of alleles and individuals from the eastern to the western subpopulation, including seven first-generation male migrants. Based on our results and on those of previous studies, we called the attention to the fact that Eastern Cantabrian brown bears might be taking advantage of increased connectivity to avoid higher human pressure and direct persecution in the areas occupied by the eastern Cantabrian subpopulation. In reply, Blanco et al (2020) [11] have criticized our ecological interpretation of the data presented in our paper. Namely, Blanco and co-authors criticize: (1) the use of the exodus concept in the title and discussion of the paper; (2) the apparent contradiction with source-sink theory; (3) the apparent overlooking of historical demographic data on Cantabrian brown bear and the use of the expression of population decline when referring to eastern subpopulation. Rather than contradicting the long and growing body of knowledge on the two brown bear subpopulations, the results presented in our paper allow a new perspective on the causes of the distinct pace of population growth of the two brown bear subpopulations in the last decades. Here, we reply to the criticisms by: clarifying our ecological interpretation of the results; refocusing the discussion on how the new genetic data suggest that currently, the flow of individuals and alleles is stronger westward, and how it may be linked to direct persecution and killing of brown bears. We provide detailed data on brown bear mortality in the Cantabrian Mountains and show that neither migration, gene flow, population increase nor mortality are balanced among the two subpopulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256432</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34644301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Analysis ; Animal migration ; Animal populations ; Bears ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brown bear ; Connectivity ; Conservation ; Demography ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological effects ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Formal Comment ; Gene flow ; Growth ; Haplotypes ; Immigration ; Methods ; Migration ; Mortality ; Mountains ; Population ; Population decline ; Population genetics ; Population growth ; Protection and preservation ; Social Sciences ; Subpopulations ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0256432-e0256432</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Ferreira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Ferreira et al 2021 Ferreira et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-770253c74e0712bca0b4733215518f32b5672f0f20342cd548088a04f2fe63f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-770253c74e0712bca0b4733215518f32b5672f0f20342cd548088a04f2fe63f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0497-6118</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513912/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513912/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Baca, Mateusz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregório, Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Tânia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pando, Doriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morante, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartasánchez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020)</title><title>PloS one</title><description>In a recent paper, we presented new evidence and provided new insights on the status of Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations, relevant for this species conservation. Namely, we revealed the likely phylogeographic relation between eastern Cantabrian subpopulation and the historical Pyrenean population. We have also detected an asymmetric flow of alleles and individuals from the eastern to the western subpopulation, including seven first-generation male migrants. Based on our results and on those of previous studies, we called the attention to the fact that Eastern Cantabrian brown bears might be taking advantage of increased connectivity to avoid higher human pressure and direct persecution in the areas occupied by the eastern Cantabrian subpopulation. In reply, Blanco et al (2020) [11] have criticized our ecological interpretation of the data presented in our paper. Namely, Blanco and co-authors criticize: (1) the use of the exodus concept in the title and discussion of the paper; (2) the apparent contradiction with source-sink theory; (3) the apparent overlooking of historical demographic data on Cantabrian brown bear and the use of the expression of population decline when referring to eastern subpopulation. Rather than contradicting the long and growing body of knowledge on the two brown bear subpopulations, the results presented in our paper allow a new perspective on the causes of the distinct pace of population growth of the two brown bear subpopulations in the last decades. Here, we reply to the criticisms by: clarifying our ecological interpretation of the results; refocusing the discussion on how the new genetic data suggest that currently, the flow of individuals and alleles is stronger westward, and how it may be linked to direct persecution and killing of brown bears. We provide detailed data on brown bear mortality in the Cantabrian Mountains and show that neither migration, gene flow, population increase nor mortality are balanced among the two subpopulations.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brown bear</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Formal Comment</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7jr6DQQDguzCzphbby_COHgZWFhYL6_htE07WdKmm6TqfAc_tOlM1a3sgwSSQ_I7_5NzkhNFzwleEZaS1zdmsB3oVW86ucI0TjijD6JTkjO6TChmD-_YJ9ET524wjlmWJI-jE8YTzhkmp9HPdVehvfQXqFWNBa9Md4F60w_6YKPGmu9-h4xFrbEetPJ7BFaiznhUgIaulBWC1nQN2kDnobAKOlQErzBLsMgNxV85t0LXstd75A16OzobJD0Cjc4opvj8afSoBu3ks2ldRF_ev_u8-bi8vPqw3awvl2Wc536ZpiFdVqZc4pTQogRc8JQxSuKYZDWjRZyktMZ1SJzTsop5hrMMMK9pLRNWM7aIXhx1e22cmArpBI0zksaM5iQQ2yNRGbgRvVUt2L0woMRhw9hGgPWq1FKkGa8w4DhLQHJZQ14FK1yp4lUlcVEGrTdTtKFoZVXKzlvQM9H5Sad2ojHfRBYTlhMaBM4mAWtuB-m8aJUrpQ4FlGY43JsSwsYnXUQv_0Hvz26iGggJqK42IW45iop1kuacY4LHsKt7qDAq2aoy_Lpahf2Zw_nMITBe_vANDM6J7afr_2evvs7ZV3fYnQTtd87o4fCj5iA_gqU1zllZ_ykywWJsmt_VEGPTiKlp2C_46QcY</recordid><startdate>20211013</startdate><enddate>20211013</enddate><creator>Ferreira, Eduardo</creator><creator>Gregório, Inês</creator><creator>Barros, Tânia</creator><creator>Pando, Doriana</creator><creator>Morante, Joaquín</creator><creator>Barbosa, Ana</creator><creator>Hartasánchez, Roberto</creator><creator>Fonseca, Carlos</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-6118</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211013</creationdate><title>And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020)</title><author>Ferreira, Eduardo ; Gregório, Inês ; Barros, Tânia ; Pando, Doriana ; Morante, Joaquín ; Barbosa, Ana ; Hartasánchez, Roberto ; Fonseca, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-770253c74e0712bca0b4733215518f32b5672f0f20342cd548088a04f2fe63f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brown bear</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Formal Comment</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregório, Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Tânia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pando, Doriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morante, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartasánchez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferreira, Eduardo</au><au>Gregório, Inês</au><au>Barros, Tânia</au><au>Pando, Doriana</au><au>Morante, Joaquín</au><au>Barbosa, Ana</au><au>Hartasánchez, Roberto</au><au>Fonseca, Carlos</au><au>Baca, Mateusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-10-13</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0256432</spage><epage>e0256432</epage><pages>e0256432-e0256432</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In a recent paper, we presented new evidence and provided new insights on the status of Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations, relevant for this species conservation. Namely, we revealed the likely phylogeographic relation between eastern Cantabrian subpopulation and the historical Pyrenean population. We have also detected an asymmetric flow of alleles and individuals from the eastern to the western subpopulation, including seven first-generation male migrants. Based on our results and on those of previous studies, we called the attention to the fact that Eastern Cantabrian brown bears might be taking advantage of increased connectivity to avoid higher human pressure and direct persecution in the areas occupied by the eastern Cantabrian subpopulation. In reply, Blanco et al (2020) [11] have criticized our ecological interpretation of the data presented in our paper. Namely, Blanco and co-authors criticize: (1) the use of the exodus concept in the title and discussion of the paper; (2) the apparent contradiction with source-sink theory; (3) the apparent overlooking of historical demographic data on Cantabrian brown bear and the use of the expression of population decline when referring to eastern subpopulation. Rather than contradicting the long and growing body of knowledge on the two brown bear subpopulations, the results presented in our paper allow a new perspective on the causes of the distinct pace of population growth of the two brown bear subpopulations in the last decades. Here, we reply to the criticisms by: clarifying our ecological interpretation of the results; refocusing the discussion on how the new genetic data suggest that currently, the flow of individuals and alleles is stronger westward, and how it may be linked to direct persecution and killing of brown bears. We provide detailed data on brown bear mortality in the Cantabrian Mountains and show that neither migration, gene flow, population increase nor mortality are balanced among the two subpopulations.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34644301</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0256432</doi><tpages>e0256432</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-6118</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0256432-e0256432 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2581753291 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Alleles Analysis Animal migration Animal populations Bears Biology Biology and Life Sciences Brown bear Connectivity Conservation Demography Earth Sciences Ecological effects Ecology and Environmental Sciences Formal Comment Gene flow Growth Haplotypes Immigration Methods Migration Mortality Mountains Population Population decline Population genetics Population growth Protection and preservation Social Sciences Subpopulations Wildlife conservation |
title | And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=And%20yet,%20migration,%20population%20growth%20or%20mortality%20are%20not%20balanced%20among%20Cantabrian%20brown%20bear%20subpopulations.%20Reply%20to%20Blanco%20et%20al%20(2020)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ferreira,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2021-10-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0256432&rft.epage=e0256432&rft.pages=e0256432-e0256432&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0256432&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA679440102%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581753291&rft_id=info:pmid/34644301&rft_galeid=A679440102&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_784d0a0586ae4efa9d86aa0bd4dde0bc&rfr_iscdi=true |