Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity
International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help ad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0258286-e0258286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0258286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0258286 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Faure, Marlyn C Munung, Nchangwi S Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B Pratt, Bridget de Vries, Jantina |
description | International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0258286 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2580001104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A678258800</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bb2fb36f0d304c35a1039cc5d6886a78</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A678258800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-ac0818f06dddf757a37beacae6082a2de0ffecf6d13419251f28f005057de363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2AwwWBsF8kky5blXgxC2EegUNjKbjVZOnIUFCuR7NL8-ymNN-rRi6ELSUePXh29nJNlrwmeE1qRjxs_hE66-c53MMd5yXPOnmTnpKb5jOWYPn2wPstexLjBuKScsefZGS0Y4ZwV59mvpe-i1RBs1yLYD7Y_INuh1vlGOrQG6fo1Ut452fgge5voS7RA-0E626f9LaDYD_qAfIfgbpd0oFMQkTej2svsmZEuwqtxvshuvny-WX6bXV1_XS0XVzPFWN3PpMKccIOZ1tpUZSVp1YBUEhjmucw1YGNAGaYJLUidl8TkicYlLisNlNGL7M1Jdud8FKM3USRbMMaE4CIRqxOhvdyIXbBbGQ7CSyvuAz60QobeKgeiaXLTUGawprhQtJQE01qpUrNkmqx40vo0vjY0W9AKuj5INxGdnnR2LVp_K3hRM16SJPB-FAh-P0DsxdZGBcnmDvxwypvVOSHHvN_-gz7-u5FqZfqA7YxP76qjqFiwiicyoYmaP0KloWFrVSokY1N8cuHD5EJierjrWznEKFY_vv8_e_1zyr57wJ7KLHo33BfYFCxOoAo-xgDmr8kEi2Mf_HFDHPtAjH1AfwNDB_n8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580001104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Faure, Marlyn C ; Munung, Nchangwi S ; Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B ; Pratt, Bridget ; de Vries, Jantina</creator><contributor>Amo-Adjei, Joshua</contributor><creatorcontrib>Faure, Marlyn C ; Munung, Nchangwi S ; Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B ; Pratt, Bridget ; de Vries, Jantina ; Amo-Adjei, Joshua</creatorcontrib><description>International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34618864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Collaboration ; Community involvement ; Consortia ; Decision making ; Earth Sciences ; Evaluation ; Global health ; Health sciences ; Income ; Institutions ; International aspects ; International standardization ; Local communities ; Medical ethics ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Public health ; Public health administration ; Qualitative research ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research ethics ; Research management ; Research projects ; Researchers ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences ; World health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0258286-e0258286</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Faure et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Faure et al 2021 Faure et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-ac0818f06dddf757a37beacae6082a2de0ffecf6d13419251f28f005057de363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-ac0818f06dddf757a37beacae6082a2de0ffecf6d13419251f28f005057de363</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4135-8925 ; 0000-0001-7192-2633 ; 0000-0003-1498-3602</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496851/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496851/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Amo-Adjei, Joshua</contributor><creatorcontrib>Faure, Marlyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munung, Nchangwi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jantina</creatorcontrib><title>Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity</title><title>PloS one</title><description>International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>International standardization</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health administration</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Research management</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>World health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2AwwWBsF8kky5blXgxC2EegUNjKbjVZOnIUFCuR7NL8-ymNN-rRi6ELSUePXh29nJNlrwmeE1qRjxs_hE66-c53MMd5yXPOnmTnpKb5jOWYPn2wPstexLjBuKScsefZGS0Y4ZwV59mvpe-i1RBs1yLYD7Y_INuh1vlGOrQG6fo1Ut452fgge5voS7RA-0E626f9LaDYD_qAfIfgbpd0oFMQkTej2svsmZEuwqtxvshuvny-WX6bXV1_XS0XVzPFWN3PpMKccIOZ1tpUZSVp1YBUEhjmucw1YGNAGaYJLUidl8TkicYlLisNlNGL7M1Jdud8FKM3USRbMMaE4CIRqxOhvdyIXbBbGQ7CSyvuAz60QobeKgeiaXLTUGawprhQtJQE01qpUrNkmqx40vo0vjY0W9AKuj5INxGdnnR2LVp_K3hRM16SJPB-FAh-P0DsxdZGBcnmDvxwypvVOSHHvN_-gz7-u5FqZfqA7YxP76qjqFiwiicyoYmaP0KloWFrVSokY1N8cuHD5EJierjrWznEKFY_vv8_e_1zyr57wJ7KLHo33BfYFCxOoAo-xgDmr8kEi2Mf_HFDHPtAjH1AfwNDB_n8</recordid><startdate>20211007</startdate><enddate>20211007</enddate><creator>Faure, Marlyn C</creator><creator>Munung, Nchangwi S</creator><creator>Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B</creator><creator>Pratt, Bridget</creator><creator>de Vries, Jantina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-8925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-3602</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211007</creationdate><title>Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity</title><author>Faure, Marlyn C ; Munung, Nchangwi S ; Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B ; Pratt, Bridget ; de Vries, Jantina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-ac0818f06dddf757a37beacae6082a2de0ffecf6d13419251f28f005057de363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>International standardization</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health administration</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Research management</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>World health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faure, Marlyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munung, Nchangwi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Jantina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faure, Marlyn C</au><au>Munung, Nchangwi S</au><au>Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B</au><au>Pratt, Bridget</au><au>de Vries, Jantina</au><au>Amo-Adjei, Joshua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-10-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0258286</spage><epage>e0258286</epage><pages>e0258286-e0258286</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>International collaborations have become the standard model for global health research and often include researchers and institutions from high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While such collaborations are important for generating new knowledge that will help address global health inequities, there is evidence to suggest that current forms of collaboration may reproduce unequal power relations. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study with scientists, researchers and those involved in research management, working in international health collaborations. Interviews were conducted between October 2019 and March 2020. We conducted 13 interviews with 15 participants. From our findings, we derive three major themes. First, our results reflect characteristics of equitable, collaborative research relationships. Here we find both relational features, specifically trust and belonging, and structural features, including clear contractual agreements, capacity building, inclusive divisions of labour, and the involvement of local communities. Second, we discuss obstacles to develop equitable collaborations. These include exclusionary labour practices, donor-driven research agendas, overall research culture, lack of accountability and finally, the inadequate financing of indirect costs for LMIC institutions. Third, we discuss the responsibilities for promoting science equity of funders, LMIC researchers, LMIC institutions, and LMIC governments. While other empirical studies have suggested similar features of equity, our findings extend these features to include local communities as collaborators in research projects and not only as beneficiaries. We also suggest the importance of funders paying for indirect costs, without which the capacity of LMIC institutions will continually erode. And finally, our study shows the responsibilities of LMIC actors in developing equitable collaborations, which have largely been absent from the literature.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34618864</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0258286</doi><tpages>e0258286</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-8925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-3602</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0258286-e0258286 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2580001104 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Bibliometrics Collaboration Community involvement Consortia Decision making Earth Sciences Evaluation Global health Health sciences Income Institutions International aspects International standardization Local communities Medical ethics Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Public health Public health administration Qualitative research Research and Analysis Methods Research ethics Research management Research projects Researchers Science Policy Social Sciences World health |
title | Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considering%20equity%20in%20global%20health%20collaborations:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20on%20experiences%20of%20equity&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Faure,%20Marlyn%20C&rft.date=2021-10-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0258286&rft.epage=e0258286&rft.pages=e0258286-e0258286&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0258286&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA678258800%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580001104&rft_id=info:pmid/34618864&rft_galeid=A678258800&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_bb2fb36f0d304c35a1039cc5d6886a78&rfr_iscdi=true |