Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies
The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biolog...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257327 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0257327 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Karabin, James Mansfield, Izaac Frow, Emma K |
| description | The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0257327 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2573822464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A675872120</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f92</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A675872120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c06102a60675aaee6007d4e5280080708a918f9b5bd4d3dc38eb50daf9d35e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbF39BqIDguDDrvkzyWRehFJaXSwUrPU1ZJI7s1lmJ2uSke63b7Y7LTugIHlISH735ObkZNlbjBaYlvjz2g2-V91i63pYIMJKSspn2SmuKJlzgujzo_VJ9iqENUKMCs5fZie0YLQgBTnNvl_cbTvnbd_mWw8B-qiidX3IXZOHIURle1XbzsZdXu_y25s87Pq4gmh1XlvXuXaXa7fZqt5CeJ29aFQX4M04z7Lby4uf59_mV9dfl-dnV3PNKxLnlUYcI6I44iVTCoAjVJoCGBEICVQioSosmqpmtSkMNZoKqBkyqqkMZVDRWfb-oJs6D3L0Ici9BYKQgheJWB4I49Rabr3dKL-TTln5sOF8K5VPb-hAchAaECKcARS8popwAGZKDAbjpiJJ68t421BvwOhkkVfdRHR60tuVbN0fKYpCUM6SwIdRwLvfA4T4j5ZHqlWpK9s3LonpjQ1aniWfRElw-shZtvgLlYaBjdUpCY1N-5OCT5OCxES4i60aQpDLmx__z17_mrIfj9gVqC6uguuGh_BMweIAau9C8NA8OYeR3Af50Q25D7Icg5zK3h27_lT0mFx6D4lH7kU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573822464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Karabin, James ; Mansfield, Izaac ; Frow, Emma K</creator><contributor>Gutiérrez-Pérez, José</contributor><creatorcontrib>Karabin, James ; Mansfield, Izaac ; Frow, Emma K ; Gutiérrez-Pérez, José</creatorcontrib><description>The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34534242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bioengineering ; Bioengineering - methods ; Biology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Business enterprises ; Commerce ; Conservation of Energy Resources ; Data collection ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Environment ; Environmental protection ; Evaluation ; Genetic engineering ; Humans ; Industry ; Internet ; Leadership ; Life sciences ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Nature ; Pilot Projects ; Public Policy ; Social factors ; Social Sciences ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development ; Synthetic biology ; Synthetic Biology - organization & administration ; Synthetic Biology - trends ; United States ; Websites</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257327</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Karabin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Karabin et al 2021 Karabin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c06102a60675aaee6007d4e5280080708a918f9b5bd4d3dc38eb50daf9d35e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c06102a60675aaee6007d4e5280080708a918f9b5bd4d3dc38eb50daf9d35e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8067-7182</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448365/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448365/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34534242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gutiérrez-Pérez, José</contributor><creatorcontrib>Karabin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Izaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frow, Emma K</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.</description><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Bioengineering - methods</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Business enterprises</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Conservation of Energy Resources</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Synthetic biology</subject><subject>Synthetic Biology - organization & administration</subject><subject>Synthetic Biology - trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9rFDEUxQdRbF39BqIDguDDrvkzyWRehFJaXSwUrPU1ZJI7s1lmJ2uSke63b7Y7LTugIHlISH735ObkZNlbjBaYlvjz2g2-V91i63pYIMJKSspn2SmuKJlzgujzo_VJ9iqENUKMCs5fZie0YLQgBTnNvl_cbTvnbd_mWw8B-qiidX3IXZOHIURle1XbzsZdXu_y25s87Pq4gmh1XlvXuXaXa7fZqt5CeJ29aFQX4M04z7Lby4uf59_mV9dfl-dnV3PNKxLnlUYcI6I44iVTCoAjVJoCGBEICVQioSosmqpmtSkMNZoKqBkyqqkMZVDRWfb-oJs6D3L0Ici9BYKQgheJWB4I49Rabr3dKL-TTln5sOF8K5VPb-hAchAaECKcARS8popwAGZKDAbjpiJJ68t421BvwOhkkVfdRHR60tuVbN0fKYpCUM6SwIdRwLvfA4T4j5ZHqlWpK9s3LonpjQ1aniWfRElw-shZtvgLlYaBjdUpCY1N-5OCT5OCxES4i60aQpDLmx__z17_mrIfj9gVqC6uguuGh_BMweIAau9C8NA8OYeR3Af50Q25D7Icg5zK3h27_lT0mFx6D4lH7kU</recordid><startdate>20210917</startdate><enddate>20210917</enddate><creator>Karabin, James</creator><creator>Mansfield, Izaac</creator><creator>Frow, Emma K</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8067-7182</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210917</creationdate><title>Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies</title><author>Karabin, James ; Mansfield, Izaac ; Frow, Emma K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9c06102a60675aaee6007d4e5280080708a918f9b5bd4d3dc38eb50daf9d35e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Bioengineering - methods</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Business enterprises</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Conservation of Energy Resources</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Synthetic biology</topic><topic>Synthetic Biology - organization & administration</topic><topic>Synthetic Biology - trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karabin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Izaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frow, Emma K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karabin, James</au><au>Mansfield, Izaac</au><au>Frow, Emma K</au><au>Gutiérrez-Pérez, José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-09-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0257327</spage><pages>e0257327-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34534242</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0257327</doi><tpages>e0257327</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8067-7182</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257327 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2573822464 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Bioengineering Bioengineering - methods Biology Biology and Life Sciences Business enterprises Commerce Conservation of Energy Resources Data collection Ecology and Environmental Sciences Engineering and Technology Environment Environmental protection Evaluation Genetic engineering Humans Industry Internet Leadership Life sciences Management Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Nature Pilot Projects Public Policy Social factors Social Sciences Sustainability Sustainable Development Synthetic biology Synthetic Biology - organization & administration Synthetic Biology - trends United States Websites |
| title | Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20presentations%20of%20sustainability%20by%20US%20synthetic%20biology%20companies&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Karabin,%20James&rft.date=2021-09-17&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0257327&rft.pages=e0257327-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0257327&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA675872120%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573822464&rft_id=info:pmid/34534242&rft_galeid=A675872120&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6e8ce00265ee46b3a26ee5d71ed11f92&rfr_iscdi=true |