Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry

Cross-pollination affects the fruit characteristics of many crops but the effects of cross-pollination on fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) are poorly known. This study determined how cross-pollination affects fruit quality of the strawberry cultivar, Redlands Joy, under contro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256964-e0256964
Hauptverfasser: Dung, Cao Dinh, Wallace, Helen M, Bai, Shahla Hosseini, Ogbourne, Steven M, Trueman, Stephen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0256964
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0256964
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Dung, Cao Dinh
Wallace, Helen M
Bai, Shahla Hosseini
Ogbourne, Steven M
Trueman, Stephen J
description Cross-pollination affects the fruit characteristics of many crops but the effects of cross-pollination on fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) are poorly known. This study determined how cross-pollination affects fruit quality of the strawberry cultivar, Redlands Joy, under controlled environment conditions. Plants were allocated to one of four treatments, with all flowers on each plant receiving either: (1) unassisted self-pollination (Autogamy); (2) hand-pollination with Redlands Joy pollen (Self); (3) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a small-fruited cultivar (Sugarbaby); or (4) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a large-fruited cultivar (Rubygem). Cross-pollination did not significantly affect plant yield or fruit mass, size, shape, firmness or shelf life. However, cross-pollination affected fruit colour and taste attributes. Cross-pollinated fruit were 3%-5% darker than self-pollinated fruit. They also had 26%-34% lower acidity and 43%-58% higher Brix:acid ratio. Cross-pollination by Sugarbaby increased fruit P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn, but decreased B, Cu and Zn, concentrations. Cross-pollination by Rubygem increased fruit Mn, but decreased K and Na, concentrations and reduced shelf life. Fruit mass, length, diameter and firmness within all treatments increased with increasing numbers of fertilized seeds per fruit. Hand self-pollinated fruit had a higher percentage of fertilized seeds than fruit arising from autogamy and they were also darker, redder, firmer, and had a longer shelf life, higher protein concentration, and lower Al and Na concentrations. The results indicate that strawberry fruit quality can be affected by both the source of pollen and the number of stigmas pollinated.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0256964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2570021526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A674600470</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b93740d55cf44ed5b9dea7952f9d4767</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A674600470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-89415a4677561c41b5b466d850248e56eabe360ca3623a91f6b4b7ad49d36ab63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7u7oNxAsCLLCdkxz6_RFWAYvAwsL3l5DmpzMZEibMWnV-famTpWt7IPJQ26_8z85h3Oy7FmJliWpytd7P4ROuuXBd7BEmPGa0wfZeVkTXHCMyMM7-7PsIsY9QoysOH-cnRFKa5xO55lZBx9jcfDO2U721ne5NAZUH3MTBtvnyrvk6CqXymrbH69yY0PbQYy57HQed-BM7qyB3Js8pkOhfHtIQo2DPPZB_mgghOOT7JGRLsLTaV1kX969_bz-UNzcvt-sr28KxXndF6ualkxSXlWMl4qWDWso53rFEKYrYBxkA4QjJQnHRNal4Q1tKqlprQmXDSeL7PlJ9-B8FFOKosCsQgiXDI_E5kRoL_fiEGwrw1F4acXvCx-2QobeKgeiqUlFkWZMGUpBs6bWIKuaYVNrWvEqab2ZvA1NC1pBlwJ2M9H5S2d3Yuu_ixXFBHOaBC4ngeC_DRB70dqowDnZgR9O_05_IGksshf_oPdHN1FbmQKwnfHJrxpFxTWvKEeIJsVFtryHSlNDa1WqJ2PT_czg1cwgMT387LdyiFFsPn38f_b265x9eYfdgXT9Lno3jHUY5yA9gWos1wDmb5JLJMZ2-JMNMbaDmNqB_ALTm_sb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570021526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dung, Cao Dinh ; Wallace, Helen M ; Bai, Shahla Hosseini ; Ogbourne, Steven M ; Trueman, Stephen J</creator><contributor>Borges, Renee M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dung, Cao Dinh ; Wallace, Helen M ; Bai, Shahla Hosseini ; Ogbourne, Steven M ; Trueman, Stephen J ; Borges, Renee M.</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-pollination affects the fruit characteristics of many crops but the effects of cross-pollination on fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) are poorly known. This study determined how cross-pollination affects fruit quality of the strawberry cultivar, Redlands Joy, under controlled environment conditions. Plants were allocated to one of four treatments, with all flowers on each plant receiving either: (1) unassisted self-pollination (Autogamy); (2) hand-pollination with Redlands Joy pollen (Self); (3) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a small-fruited cultivar (Sugarbaby); or (4) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a large-fruited cultivar (Rubygem). Cross-pollination did not significantly affect plant yield or fruit mass, size, shape, firmness or shelf life. However, cross-pollination affected fruit colour and taste attributes. Cross-pollinated fruit were 3%-5% darker than self-pollinated fruit. They also had 26%-34% lower acidity and 43%-58% higher Brix:acid ratio. Cross-pollination by Sugarbaby increased fruit P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn, but decreased B, Cu and Zn, concentrations. Cross-pollination by Rubygem increased fruit Mn, but decreased K and Na, concentrations and reduced shelf life. Fruit mass, length, diameter and firmness within all treatments increased with increasing numbers of fertilized seeds per fruit. Hand self-pollinated fruit had a higher percentage of fertilized seeds than fruit arising from autogamy and they were also darker, redder, firmer, and had a longer shelf life, higher protein concentration, and lower Al and Na concentrations. The results indicate that strawberry fruit quality can be affected by both the source of pollen and the number of stigmas pollinated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34492053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Agricultural production ; Autogamy ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Color ; Copper ; Cross-pollination ; Cultivars ; Environmental aspects ; Firmness ; Flowers ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Food security ; Fragaria ananassa ; Fruits ; Futures ; Manganese ; Ovaries ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Plant reproduction ; Plants (botany) ; Pollen ; Pollination ; Seeds ; Self-fertilization ; Shelf life ; Stigmas (botany) ; Strawberries</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256964-e0256964</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Dung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Dung et al 2021 Dung et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-89415a4677561c41b5b466d850248e56eabe360ca3623a91f6b4b7ad49d36ab63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-89415a4677561c41b5b466d850248e56eabe360ca3623a91f6b4b7ad49d36ab63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7105-7130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423264/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423264/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Borges, Renee M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dung, Cao Dinh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Shahla Hosseini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbourne, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trueman, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Cross-pollination affects the fruit characteristics of many crops but the effects of cross-pollination on fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) are poorly known. This study determined how cross-pollination affects fruit quality of the strawberry cultivar, Redlands Joy, under controlled environment conditions. Plants were allocated to one of four treatments, with all flowers on each plant receiving either: (1) unassisted self-pollination (Autogamy); (2) hand-pollination with Redlands Joy pollen (Self); (3) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a small-fruited cultivar (Sugarbaby); or (4) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a large-fruited cultivar (Rubygem). Cross-pollination did not significantly affect plant yield or fruit mass, size, shape, firmness or shelf life. However, cross-pollination affected fruit colour and taste attributes. Cross-pollinated fruit were 3%-5% darker than self-pollinated fruit. They also had 26%-34% lower acidity and 43%-58% higher Brix:acid ratio. Cross-pollination by Sugarbaby increased fruit P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn, but decreased B, Cu and Zn, concentrations. Cross-pollination by Rubygem increased fruit Mn, but decreased K and Na, concentrations and reduced shelf life. Fruit mass, length, diameter and firmness within all treatments increased with increasing numbers of fertilized seeds per fruit. Hand self-pollinated fruit had a higher percentage of fertilized seeds than fruit arising from autogamy and they were also darker, redder, firmer, and had a longer shelf life, higher protein concentration, and lower Al and Na concentrations. The results indicate that strawberry fruit quality can be affected by both the source of pollen and the number of stigmas pollinated.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Autogamy</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Cross-pollination</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Firmness</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Fragaria ananassa</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Futures</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Self-fertilization</subject><subject>Shelf life</subject><subject>Stigmas (botany)</subject><subject>Strawberries</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7u7oNxAsCLLCdkxz6_RFWAYvAwsL3l5DmpzMZEibMWnV-famTpWt7IPJQ26_8z85h3Oy7FmJliWpytd7P4ROuuXBd7BEmPGa0wfZeVkTXHCMyMM7-7PsIsY9QoysOH-cnRFKa5xO55lZBx9jcfDO2U721ne5NAZUH3MTBtvnyrvk6CqXymrbH69yY0PbQYy57HQed-BM7qyB3Js8pkOhfHtIQo2DPPZB_mgghOOT7JGRLsLTaV1kX969_bz-UNzcvt-sr28KxXndF6ualkxSXlWMl4qWDWso53rFEKYrYBxkA4QjJQnHRNal4Q1tKqlprQmXDSeL7PlJ9-B8FFOKosCsQgiXDI_E5kRoL_fiEGwrw1F4acXvCx-2QobeKgeiqUlFkWZMGUpBs6bWIKuaYVNrWvEqab2ZvA1NC1pBlwJ2M9H5S2d3Yuu_ixXFBHOaBC4ngeC_DRB70dqowDnZgR9O_05_IGksshf_oPdHN1FbmQKwnfHJrxpFxTWvKEeIJsVFtryHSlNDa1WqJ2PT_czg1cwgMT387LdyiFFsPn38f_b265x9eYfdgXT9Lno3jHUY5yA9gWos1wDmb5JLJMZ2-JMNMbaDmNqB_ALTm_sb</recordid><startdate>20210907</startdate><enddate>20210907</enddate><creator>Dung, Cao Dinh</creator><creator>Wallace, Helen M</creator><creator>Bai, Shahla Hosseini</creator><creator>Ogbourne, Steven M</creator><creator>Trueman, Stephen J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-7130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210907</creationdate><title>Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry</title><author>Dung, Cao Dinh ; Wallace, Helen M ; Bai, Shahla Hosseini ; Ogbourne, Steven M ; Trueman, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-89415a4677561c41b5b466d850248e56eabe360ca3623a91f6b4b7ad49d36ab63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Autogamy</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Cross-pollination</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Firmness</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Fragaria ananassa</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Futures</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Self-fertilization</topic><topic>Shelf life</topic><topic>Stigmas (botany)</topic><topic>Strawberries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dung, Cao Dinh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Shahla Hosseini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbourne, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trueman, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dung, Cao Dinh</au><au>Wallace, Helen M</au><au>Bai, Shahla Hosseini</au><au>Ogbourne, Steven M</au><au>Trueman, Stephen J</au><au>Borges, Renee M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-09-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0256964</spage><epage>e0256964</epage><pages>e0256964-e0256964</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Cross-pollination affects the fruit characteristics of many crops but the effects of cross-pollination on fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) are poorly known. This study determined how cross-pollination affects fruit quality of the strawberry cultivar, Redlands Joy, under controlled environment conditions. Plants were allocated to one of four treatments, with all flowers on each plant receiving either: (1) unassisted self-pollination (Autogamy); (2) hand-pollination with Redlands Joy pollen (Self); (3) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a small-fruited cultivar (Sugarbaby); or (4) hand-pollination with cross-pollen from a large-fruited cultivar (Rubygem). Cross-pollination did not significantly affect plant yield or fruit mass, size, shape, firmness or shelf life. However, cross-pollination affected fruit colour and taste attributes. Cross-pollinated fruit were 3%-5% darker than self-pollinated fruit. They also had 26%-34% lower acidity and 43%-58% higher Brix:acid ratio. Cross-pollination by Sugarbaby increased fruit P, K, Ca, Fe and Mn, but decreased B, Cu and Zn, concentrations. Cross-pollination by Rubygem increased fruit Mn, but decreased K and Na, concentrations and reduced shelf life. Fruit mass, length, diameter and firmness within all treatments increased with increasing numbers of fertilized seeds per fruit. Hand self-pollinated fruit had a higher percentage of fertilized seeds than fruit arising from autogamy and they were also darker, redder, firmer, and had a longer shelf life, higher protein concentration, and lower Al and Na concentrations. The results indicate that strawberry fruit quality can be affected by both the source of pollen and the number of stigmas pollinated.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34492053</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0256964</doi><tpages>e0256964</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-7130</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256964-e0256964
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2570021526
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acidity
Agricultural production
Autogamy
Biology and Life Sciences
Color
Copper
Cross-pollination
Cultivars
Environmental aspects
Firmness
Flowers
Flowers & plants
Food security
Fragaria ananassa
Fruits
Futures
Manganese
Ovaries
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Plant reproduction
Plants (botany)
Pollen
Pollination
Seeds
Self-fertilization
Shelf life
Stigmas (botany)
Strawberries
title Cross-pollination affects fruit colour, acidity, firmness and shelf life of self-compatible strawberry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-pollination%20affects%20fruit%20colour,%20acidity,%20firmness%20and%20shelf%20life%20of%20self-compatible%20strawberry&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dung,%20Cao%20Dinh&rft.date=2021-09-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0256964&rft.epage=e0256964&rft.pages=e0256964-e0256964&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0256964&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA674600470%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570021526&rft_id=info:pmid/34492053&rft_galeid=A674600470&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b93740d55cf44ed5b9dea7952f9d4767&rfr_iscdi=true