Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia

Public health and social interventions are critical to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ethiopia has implemented a variety of public health and social measures to control the pandemic. This study aimed to assess social distancing and public health preventive p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257112-e0257112
Hauptverfasser: Deressa, Wakgari, Worku, Alemayehu, Abebe, Workeabeba, Getachew, Sefonias, Amogne, Wondwossen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0257112
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0257112
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Deressa, Wakgari
Worku, Alemayehu
Abebe, Workeabeba
Getachew, Sefonias
Amogne, Wondwossen
description Public health and social interventions are critical to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ethiopia has implemented a variety of public health and social measures to control the pandemic. This study aimed to assess social distancing and public health preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,573 government employees selected from 46 public institutions located in Addis Ababa. Data were collected from 8.sup.th to 19.sup.th June 2020 using a paper-based self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcome variables (perceived effectiveness of facemask wearing to prevent coronavirus infection, and COVID-19 testing). Majority of the participants reported facemask wearing (96%), avoiding close contact with people including handshaking (94.8%), consistently followed government recommendations (95.6%), frequent handwashing (94.5%), practiced physical distancing (89.5%), avoided mass gatherings and crowded places (88.1%), restricting movement and travelling (71.8%), and stayed home (35.6%). More than 80% of the participants perceived that consistently wearing a facemask is highly effective in preventing coronavirus infection. Respondents from Oromia perceived less about the effectiveness of wearing facemask in preventing coronavirus infection (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.17-0.45). About 19% of the respondents reported that they had ever tested for COVID-19. Respondents between 40-49 years old (adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI:0.22-0.76) and 50-66 years (adjusted OR = 0.43, 95% CI:0.19-0.95) were less likely tested for coronavirus than the younger age groups. Similarly, respondents from Oromia were less likely to test for coronavirus (adjusted OR = 0.26, 95% CI:0.12-0.56) than those from national level. Participants who were sure about the availability of COVID-19 testing were more likely to test for coronavirus. About 57% of the respondents perceived that the policy measures in response to the pandemic were inadequate. The findings showed higher social distancing and preventive practices among the government employees in response to COVID-19. Rules and regulations imposed by the government should be enforced and people should properly apply wearing facemasks, frequent handwashing, social and physical
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0257112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2570021382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A674600466</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_dcb86b338d584bdc88847b6d7753ed14</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A674600466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9f393225f0d05c9053670eec80af355ce8f13c0a9cba00a014addd664fddcaa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1GL1DAUhYso7rr6DwQLgujDjEmTpumLsIyrDiwMuLqv4Ta5ncnQNmPSDu6_N3WqbGUfpA8NN19Ozj3kJslLSpaUFfT93g2-g2Z5cB0uSZYXlGaPknNasmwhMsIe31ufJc9C2BOSMynE0-SMcV5mRJbnSX3jtIUmNTb00GnbbVPoTHrweMSut0eMS9C91RhSV6dbd0TftXErxfbQuDuMddulHkP0ETDtXbra3K4_Lmg51q_6nXUHC8-TJzU0AV9M_4vk-6erb6svi-vN5_Xq8nqhhSj7RVmzaDnLa2JIrsvoVxQEUUsCNctzjbKmTBModQWEAKEcjDFC8NoYDZCxi-TVSTd6C2qKKKiYDiEZZXIk1ifCONirg7ct-DvlwKrfBee3Cnzst0FldCVFxZg0ueSV0VJKXlTCFEXO0FAetT5Mtw1Vi0bHWDw0M9H5Tmd3KkaoJM9YJsso8HYS8O7HgKFXrQ0amwY6dMPJNyt4wUhEX_-DPtzdRG0hNmC72sV79SiqLkXBBSFciEgtH6DiZ7C1Or6n2sb67MC72YHI9Piz38IQglrffP1_dnM7Z9_cY3cITb8Lrhl6Gx_THOQnUHsXgsf6b8iUqHEc_qShxnFQ0ziwX-9d-1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570021382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Deressa, Wakgari ; Worku, Alemayehu ; Abebe, Workeabeba ; Getachew, Sefonias ; Amogne, Wondwossen</creator><creatorcontrib>Deressa, Wakgari ; Worku, Alemayehu ; Abebe, Workeabeba ; Getachew, Sefonias ; Amogne, Wondwossen</creatorcontrib><description>Public health and social interventions are critical to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ethiopia has implemented a variety of public health and social measures to control the pandemic. This study aimed to assess social distancing and public health preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,573 government employees selected from 46 public institutions located in Addis Ababa. Data were collected from 8.sup.th to 19.sup.th June 2020 using a paper-based self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcome variables (perceived effectiveness of facemask wearing to prevent coronavirus infection, and COVID-19 testing). Majority of the participants reported facemask wearing (96%), avoiding close contact with people including handshaking (94.8%), consistently followed government recommendations (95.6%), frequent handwashing (94.5%), practiced physical distancing (89.5%), avoided mass gatherings and crowded places (88.1%), restricting movement and travelling (71.8%), and stayed home (35.6%). More than 80% of the participants perceived that consistently wearing a facemask is highly effective in preventing coronavirus infection. Respondents from Oromia perceived less about the effectiveness of wearing facemask in preventing coronavirus infection (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.17-0.45). About 19% of the respondents reported that they had ever tested for COVID-19. Respondents between 40-49 years old (adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI:0.22-0.76) and 50-66 years (adjusted OR = 0.43, 95% CI:0.19-0.95) were less likely tested for coronavirus than the younger age groups. Similarly, respondents from Oromia were less likely to test for coronavirus (adjusted OR = 0.26, 95% CI:0.12-0.56) than those from national level. Participants who were sure about the availability of COVID-19 testing were more likely to test for coronavirus. About 57% of the respondents perceived that the policy measures in response to the pandemic were inadequate. The findings showed higher social distancing and preventive practices among the government employees in response to COVID-19. Rules and regulations imposed by the government should be enforced and people should properly apply wearing facemasks, frequent handwashing, social and physical distancing measures as a comprehensive package of COVID-19 prevention and control strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34492089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and life sciences ; Control ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease control ; Employees ; Epidemics ; Health risks ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Pandemics ; People and Places ; Preventive medicine ; Public employees ; Public health ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257112-e0257112</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Deressa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Deressa et al 2021 Deressa et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9f393225f0d05c9053670eec80af355ce8f13c0a9cba00a014addd664fddcaa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9f393225f0d05c9053670eec80af355ce8f13c0a9cba00a014addd664fddcaa23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9712-2375 ; 0000-0001-9506-1196</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423289/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423289/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deressa, Wakgari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worku, Alemayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abebe, Workeabeba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getachew, Sefonias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amogne, Wondwossen</creatorcontrib><title>Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Public health and social interventions are critical to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ethiopia has implemented a variety of public health and social measures to control the pandemic. This study aimed to assess social distancing and public health preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,573 government employees selected from 46 public institutions located in Addis Ababa. Data were collected from 8.sup.th to 19.sup.th June 2020 using a paper-based self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcome variables (perceived effectiveness of facemask wearing to prevent coronavirus infection, and COVID-19 testing). Majority of the participants reported facemask wearing (96%), avoiding close contact with people including handshaking (94.8%), consistently followed government recommendations (95.6%), frequent handwashing (94.5%), practiced physical distancing (89.5%), avoided mass gatherings and crowded places (88.1%), restricting movement and travelling (71.8%), and stayed home (35.6%). More than 80% of the participants perceived that consistently wearing a facemask is highly effective in preventing coronavirus infection. Respondents from Oromia perceived less about the effectiveness of wearing facemask in preventing coronavirus infection (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.17-0.45). About 19% of the respondents reported that they had ever tested for COVID-19. Respondents between 40-49 years old (adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI:0.22-0.76) and 50-66 years (adjusted OR = 0.43, 95% CI:0.19-0.95) were less likely tested for coronavirus than the younger age groups. Similarly, respondents from Oromia were less likely to test for coronavirus (adjusted OR = 0.26, 95% CI:0.12-0.56) than those from national level. Participants who were sure about the availability of COVID-19 testing were more likely to test for coronavirus. About 57% of the respondents perceived that the policy measures in response to the pandemic were inadequate. The findings showed higher social distancing and preventive practices among the government employees in response to COVID-19. Rules and regulations imposed by the government should be enforced and people should properly apply wearing facemasks, frequent handwashing, social and physical distancing measures as a comprehensive package of COVID-19 prevention and control strategies.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public employees</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1GL1DAUhYso7rr6DwQLgujDjEmTpumLsIyrDiwMuLqv4Ta5ncnQNmPSDu6_N3WqbGUfpA8NN19Ozj3kJslLSpaUFfT93g2-g2Z5cB0uSZYXlGaPknNasmwhMsIe31ufJc9C2BOSMynE0-SMcV5mRJbnSX3jtIUmNTb00GnbbVPoTHrweMSut0eMS9C91RhSV6dbd0TftXErxfbQuDuMddulHkP0ETDtXbra3K4_Lmg51q_6nXUHC8-TJzU0AV9M_4vk-6erb6svi-vN5_Xq8nqhhSj7RVmzaDnLa2JIrsvoVxQEUUsCNctzjbKmTBModQWEAKEcjDFC8NoYDZCxi-TVSTd6C2qKKKiYDiEZZXIk1ifCONirg7ct-DvlwKrfBee3Cnzst0FldCVFxZg0ueSV0VJKXlTCFEXO0FAetT5Mtw1Vi0bHWDw0M9H5Tmd3KkaoJM9YJsso8HYS8O7HgKFXrQ0amwY6dMPJNyt4wUhEX_-DPtzdRG0hNmC72sV79SiqLkXBBSFciEgtH6DiZ7C1Or6n2sb67MC72YHI9Piz38IQglrffP1_dnM7Z9_cY3cITb8Lrhl6Gx_THOQnUHsXgsf6b8iUqHEc_qShxnFQ0ziwX-9d-1E</recordid><startdate>20210907</startdate><enddate>20210907</enddate><creator>Deressa, Wakgari</creator><creator>Worku, Alemayehu</creator><creator>Abebe, Workeabeba</creator><creator>Getachew, Sefonias</creator><creator>Amogne, Wondwossen</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-2375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9506-1196</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210907</creationdate><title>Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia</title><author>Deressa, Wakgari ; Worku, Alemayehu ; Abebe, Workeabeba ; Getachew, Sefonias ; Amogne, Wondwossen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-9f393225f0d05c9053670eec80af355ce8f13c0a9cba00a014addd664fddcaa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public employees</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deressa, Wakgari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worku, Alemayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abebe, Workeabeba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getachew, Sefonias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amogne, Wondwossen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deressa, Wakgari</au><au>Worku, Alemayehu</au><au>Abebe, Workeabeba</au><au>Getachew, Sefonias</au><au>Amogne, Wondwossen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-09-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0257112</spage><epage>e0257112</epage><pages>e0257112-e0257112</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Public health and social interventions are critical to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Ethiopia has implemented a variety of public health and social measures to control the pandemic. This study aimed to assess social distancing and public health preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,573 government employees selected from 46 public institutions located in Addis Ababa. Data were collected from 8.sup.th to 19.sup.th June 2020 using a paper-based self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcome variables (perceived effectiveness of facemask wearing to prevent coronavirus infection, and COVID-19 testing). Majority of the participants reported facemask wearing (96%), avoiding close contact with people including handshaking (94.8%), consistently followed government recommendations (95.6%), frequent handwashing (94.5%), practiced physical distancing (89.5%), avoided mass gatherings and crowded places (88.1%), restricting movement and travelling (71.8%), and stayed home (35.6%). More than 80% of the participants perceived that consistently wearing a facemask is highly effective in preventing coronavirus infection. Respondents from Oromia perceived less about the effectiveness of wearing facemask in preventing coronavirus infection (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI:0.17-0.45). About 19% of the respondents reported that they had ever tested for COVID-19. Respondents between 40-49 years old (adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI:0.22-0.76) and 50-66 years (adjusted OR = 0.43, 95% CI:0.19-0.95) were less likely tested for coronavirus than the younger age groups. Similarly, respondents from Oromia were less likely to test for coronavirus (adjusted OR = 0.26, 95% CI:0.12-0.56) than those from national level. Participants who were sure about the availability of COVID-19 testing were more likely to test for coronavirus. About 57% of the respondents perceived that the policy measures in response to the pandemic were inadequate. The findings showed higher social distancing and preventive practices among the government employees in response to COVID-19. Rules and regulations imposed by the government should be enforced and people should properly apply wearing facemasks, frequent handwashing, social and physical distancing measures as a comprehensive package of COVID-19 prevention and control strategies.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34492089</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0257112</doi><tpages>e0257112</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-2375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9506-1196</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257112-e0257112
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2570021382
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Behavior
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biology and life sciences
Control
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease control
Employees
Epidemics
Health risks
Infections
Laboratories
Medicine and Health Sciences
Pandemics
People and Places
Preventive medicine
Public employees
Public health
Viral diseases
title Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20distancing%20and%20preventive%20practices%20of%20government%20employees%20in%20response%20to%20COVID-19%20in%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Deressa,%20Wakgari&rft.date=2021-09-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0257112&rft.epage=e0257112&rft.pages=e0257112-e0257112&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0257112&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA674600466%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570021382&rft_id=info:pmid/34492089&rft_galeid=A674600466&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_dcb86b338d584bdc88847b6d7753ed14&rfr_iscdi=true