The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine
To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs). SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Cit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256833-e0256833 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0256833 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0256833 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Schellinger, Jana Sewell, Kerry Bloss, Jamie E Ebron, Tristan Forbes, Carrie |
| description | To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).
SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.
Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.
Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0256833 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2568280529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A673946948</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A673946948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-adfcee5c95c4be80e7b848021c53169fd84e2efccf8aca1992cc7cc3d2636d483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxLFvkKaJj0qTJsHghgvLdY5bV07c2Umh_x5nzaYG7QL5Iv54znvyHvtk2UuM5phW-MPG96FVbr71LcwRKRmn9FF2igUlM0YQfXw0P8mexbhBqKScsafZCS0KJgpenWa_rteQgzGgu9yb3NllUMGqNrftzrsdNNCmgzbvEnbTK2e7_cDFfeygUZ3VeYCdhd8xBeR1gpXLG6itti08z54Y5SK8GL9n2Y_Pn64vvs4ur74sLs4vZ5oJ0s1UbTRAqUWpiyVwBNWSFxwRrEuKmTA1L4CA0dpwpRUWgmhdaU1rwiirC07PstcH3a3zUY51iXIoCeGoJCIRiwNRe7WR22AbFfbSKytvN3xYSRWSGQeSsyU3KakpGS0QFUrXOK21waRUBeCk9XHM1i-TU508B-UmotOT1q7lyu8kL5BguEwC70aB4G96iJ1sbNTgnGrB94f_ZkjQqkrom3_Qh92N1EolA7Y1PuXVg6g8ZxUVt3edqPkDVBo1NFanR2Rs2p8EvJ8EJKaDP91K9THKxfdv_89e_Zyyb4_YNSjXraN3fWd9G6dgcQB18DEGMPdFxkgOPXBXDTn0gBx7IIW9Or6g-6C7R0__AsjoA3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568280529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Schellinger, Jana ; Sewell, Kerry ; Bloss, Jamie E ; Ebron, Tristan ; Forbes, Carrie</creator><contributor>Wieland, Lisa Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schellinger, Jana ; Sewell, Kerry ; Bloss, Jamie E ; Ebron, Tristan ; Forbes, Carrie ; Wieland, Lisa Susan</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).
SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.
Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.
Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34469487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Collaboration ; Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data ; Dental Research ; Dentistry ; Evaluation ; Grey literature ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Influence ; Librarians ; Libraries ; Library Services - organization & administration ; Literature reviews ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Methods ; Peer review ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Professional Role ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Reviews ; Searching ; Statistical analysis ; Study and teaching ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Therapeutics, Dental</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256833-e0256833</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Schellinger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Schellinger et al 2021 Schellinger et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-adfcee5c95c4be80e7b848021c53169fd84e2efccf8aca1992cc7cc3d2636d483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-adfcee5c95c4be80e7b848021c53169fd84e2efccf8aca1992cc7cc3d2636d483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0706-7684 ; 0000-0001-5571-4754 ; 0000-0001-5605-1526</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409615/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409615/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34469487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wieland, Lisa Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schellinger, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sewell, Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloss, Jamie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebron, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Carrie</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).
SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.
Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.
Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dental Research</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Grey literature</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Library Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Professional Role</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Therapeutics, Dental</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxLFvkKaJj0qTJsHghgvLdY5bV07c2Umh_x5nzaYG7QL5Iv54znvyHvtk2UuM5phW-MPG96FVbr71LcwRKRmn9FF2igUlM0YQfXw0P8mexbhBqKScsafZCS0KJgpenWa_rteQgzGgu9yb3NllUMGqNrftzrsdNNCmgzbvEnbTK2e7_cDFfeygUZ3VeYCdhd8xBeR1gpXLG6itti08z54Y5SK8GL9n2Y_Pn64vvs4ur74sLs4vZ5oJ0s1UbTRAqUWpiyVwBNWSFxwRrEuKmTA1L4CA0dpwpRUWgmhdaU1rwiirC07PstcH3a3zUY51iXIoCeGoJCIRiwNRe7WR22AbFfbSKytvN3xYSRWSGQeSsyU3KakpGS0QFUrXOK21waRUBeCk9XHM1i-TU508B-UmotOT1q7lyu8kL5BguEwC70aB4G96iJ1sbNTgnGrB94f_ZkjQqkrom3_Qh92N1EolA7Y1PuXVg6g8ZxUVt3edqPkDVBo1NFanR2Rs2p8EvJ8EJKaDP91K9THKxfdv_89e_Zyyb4_YNSjXraN3fWd9G6dgcQB18DEGMPdFxkgOPXBXDTn0gBx7IIW9Or6g-6C7R0__AsjoA3A</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Schellinger, Jana</creator><creator>Sewell, Kerry</creator><creator>Bloss, Jamie E</creator><creator>Ebron, Tristan</creator><creator>Forbes, Carrie</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-7684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-4754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-1526</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine</title><author>Schellinger, Jana ; Sewell, Kerry ; Bloss, Jamie E ; Ebron, Tristan ; Forbes, Carrie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-adfcee5c95c4be80e7b848021c53169fd84e2efccf8aca1992cc7cc3d2636d483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dental Research</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Grey literature</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Library Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Professional Role</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Therapeutics, Dental</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schellinger, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sewell, Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloss, Jamie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebron, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Carrie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schellinger, Jana</au><au>Sewell, Kerry</au><au>Bloss, Jamie E</au><au>Ebron, Tristan</au><au>Forbes, Carrie</au><au>Wieland, Lisa Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0256833</spage><epage>e0256833</epage><pages>e0256833-e0256833</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).
SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.
Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.
Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34469487</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0256833</doi><tpages>e0256833</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-7684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-4754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-1526</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0256833-e0256833 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2568280529 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Collaboration Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data Dental Research Dentistry Evaluation Grey literature Health sciences Humans Influence Librarians Libraries Library Services - organization & administration Literature reviews Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Medicine, Experimental Meta-analysis Methods Peer review People and Places Physical Sciences Professional Role Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Research and Analysis Methods Reviews Searching Statistical analysis Study and teaching Systematic Reviews as Topic Therapeutics, Dental |
| title | The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A29%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20librarian%20involvement%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20systematic%20reviews%20in%20dental%20medicine&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Schellinger,%20Jana&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0256833&rft.epage=e0256833&rft.pages=e0256833-e0256833&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0256833&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA673946948%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568280529&rft_id=info:pmid/34469487&rft_galeid=A673946948&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e1&rfr_iscdi=true |