Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis

Access to water is a critical aspect of livestock production, although the relationship between livestock weight gain and water quality remains poorly understood. Previous work has shown that water quality of poorly managed farm dams can be improved by fencing and constructing hardened watering poin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e0256089
Hauptverfasser: Dobes, Leo, Crane, Mason, Higgins, Tim, Van Dijk, Albert I J M, Lindenmayer, David B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0256089
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Dobes, Leo
Crane, Mason
Higgins, Tim
Van Dijk, Albert I J M
Lindenmayer, David B
description Access to water is a critical aspect of livestock production, although the relationship between livestock weight gain and water quality remains poorly understood. Previous work has shown that water quality of poorly managed farm dams can be improved by fencing and constructing hardened watering points to limit stock access to the dam, and revegetation to filter contaminant inflow. Here we use cattle weight gain data from three North American studies to develop a cost-benefit analysis for the renovation of farm dams to improve water quality and, in turn, promote cattle weight gain on farms in south-eastern Australia. Our analysis indicated a strong likelihood of positive results and suggested there may be substantial net economic benefit from renovating dams in poor condition to improve water quality. The average per-farm Benefit-Cost Ratios based on deterministic assumptions was 1.5 for New South Wales (NSW) and 3.0 for Victoria in areas where rainfall exceeds 600mm annually. Our analyses suggested that cattle on farms in NSW and Victoria would need to experience additional weight gain from switching to clean water of at least 6.5% and 1.8% per annum respectively, to break even in present value terms. Monte Carlo simulation based on conservative assumptions indicated that the probability of per-farm benefits exceeding costs was greater than 70%. We recommend localised experiments to assess the impact of improved water quality on livestock weight gain in Australian conditions to confirm these expectations empirically.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0256089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2561893855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A672245570</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2f0670e27bf2432880e70a14c10761f9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A672245570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3dc0e75323c770d6363c701170e532b6a41a91b2d3205ce54cebccd55fb5fdb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDguBFx3w0aeuFMCx-DCws-HUbTtO0k7FtZpN01vn3ZpzuMgUFyUXCyXPevLw5SfKc4AVhOXm7saMboFts7aAXmHKBi_JBck5KRlNBMXt4cj5Lnni_wZizQojHyRnLWFmUlJ0nsBqU0-B1jTqz0z5Y9RPdatOuA2rBDKhxtkem3zq7i8wtBO3QzQidCXt0uAbXoxp6_w4tkbI-pJUedGMCgmhu741_mjxqoPP62bRfJN8_fvh2-Tm9uv60ulxepUqUNKSsVljnnFGm8hzXgol4wITkWMdiJSAjUJKK1oxirjTPlK6UqjlvKt7UFWUXycuj7razXk7peBmDIUXJCs4jsToStYWN3DrTg9tLC0b-KVjXSnDBqE5L2mARX6Z51dCM0aKI3jCQTBGcC9KUUev99NpY9bpWeggOupno_GYwa9nanSyYEKU4mHk1CTh7M8bg_2F5olqIrszQ2CimeuOVXIqc0ozzHEdq8Rcqrlr3RtnDf8T6rOHNrCEyQf8KLYzey9XXL__PXv-Ys69P2LWGLqy97cZg7ODnYHYElbPeO93cJ0ewPIz3XRryMN5yGu_Y9uI09fumu3lmvwE4nvTv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561893855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dobes, Leo ; Crane, Mason ; Higgins, Tim ; Van Dijk, Albert I J M ; Lindenmayer, David B</creator><contributor>Hussain, Abid</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dobes, Leo ; Crane, Mason ; Higgins, Tim ; Van Dijk, Albert I J M ; Lindenmayer, David B ; Hussain, Abid</creatorcontrib><description>Access to water is a critical aspect of livestock production, although the relationship between livestock weight gain and water quality remains poorly understood. Previous work has shown that water quality of poorly managed farm dams can be improved by fencing and constructing hardened watering points to limit stock access to the dam, and revegetation to filter contaminant inflow. Here we use cattle weight gain data from three North American studies to develop a cost-benefit analysis for the renovation of farm dams to improve water quality and, in turn, promote cattle weight gain on farms in south-eastern Australia. Our analysis indicated a strong likelihood of positive results and suggested there may be substantial net economic benefit from renovating dams in poor condition to improve water quality. The average per-farm Benefit-Cost Ratios based on deterministic assumptions was 1.5 for New South Wales (NSW) and 3.0 for Victoria in areas where rainfall exceeds 600mm annually. Our analyses suggested that cattle on farms in NSW and Victoria would need to experience additional weight gain from switching to clean water of at least 6.5% and 1.8% per annum respectively, to break even in present value terms. Monte Carlo simulation based on conservative assumptions indicated that the probability of per-farm benefits exceeding costs was greater than 70%. We recommend localised experiments to assess the impact of improved water quality on livestock weight gain in Australian conditions to confirm these expectations empirically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34398923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Australia ; Benefit cost analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Contaminants ; Cost benefit analysis ; Dairying - methods ; Dams ; Drinking water ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economics ; Environmental aspects ; Farm management ; Farms ; Farms - economics ; Farms - standards ; Influence ; Livestock ; Livestock - growth &amp; development ; Livestock production ; Local government ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; People and Places ; Physical sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Rainfall ; Renovation ; Research and analysis methods ; Revegetation ; Water quality ; Water Quality - standards ; Water quality management ; Weight ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e0256089</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Dobes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Dobes et al 2021 Dobes et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3dc0e75323c770d6363c701170e532b6a41a91b2d3205ce54cebccd55fb5fdb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3dc0e75323c770d6363c701170e532b6a41a91b2d3205ce54cebccd55fb5fdb23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4766-4088 ; 0000-0002-9395-5660</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366965/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366965/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hussain, Abid</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dobes, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dijk, Albert I J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B</creatorcontrib><title>Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Access to water is a critical aspect of livestock production, although the relationship between livestock weight gain and water quality remains poorly understood. Previous work has shown that water quality of poorly managed farm dams can be improved by fencing and constructing hardened watering points to limit stock access to the dam, and revegetation to filter contaminant inflow. Here we use cattle weight gain data from three North American studies to develop a cost-benefit analysis for the renovation of farm dams to improve water quality and, in turn, promote cattle weight gain on farms in south-eastern Australia. Our analysis indicated a strong likelihood of positive results and suggested there may be substantial net economic benefit from renovating dams in poor condition to improve water quality. The average per-farm Benefit-Cost Ratios based on deterministic assumptions was 1.5 for New South Wales (NSW) and 3.0 for Victoria in areas where rainfall exceeds 600mm annually. Our analyses suggested that cattle on farms in NSW and Victoria would need to experience additional weight gain from switching to clean water of at least 6.5% and 1.8% per annum respectively, to break even in present value terms. Monte Carlo simulation based on conservative assumptions indicated that the probability of per-farm benefits exceeding costs was greater than 70%. We recommend localised experiments to assess the impact of improved water quality on livestock weight gain in Australian conditions to confirm these expectations empirically.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Farms - economics</subject><subject>Farms - standards</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Livestock production</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Renovation</subject><subject>Research and analysis methods</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water Quality - standards</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDguBFx3w0aeuFMCx-DCws-HUbTtO0k7FtZpN01vn3ZpzuMgUFyUXCyXPevLw5SfKc4AVhOXm7saMboFts7aAXmHKBi_JBck5KRlNBMXt4cj5Lnni_wZizQojHyRnLWFmUlJ0nsBqU0-B1jTqz0z5Y9RPdatOuA2rBDKhxtkem3zq7i8wtBO3QzQidCXt0uAbXoxp6_w4tkbI-pJUedGMCgmhu741_mjxqoPP62bRfJN8_fvh2-Tm9uv60ulxepUqUNKSsVljnnFGm8hzXgol4wITkWMdiJSAjUJKK1oxirjTPlK6UqjlvKt7UFWUXycuj7razXk7peBmDIUXJCs4jsToStYWN3DrTg9tLC0b-KVjXSnDBqE5L2mARX6Z51dCM0aKI3jCQTBGcC9KUUev99NpY9bpWeggOupno_GYwa9nanSyYEKU4mHk1CTh7M8bg_2F5olqIrszQ2CimeuOVXIqc0ozzHEdq8Rcqrlr3RtnDf8T6rOHNrCEyQf8KLYzey9XXL__PXv-Ys69P2LWGLqy97cZg7ODnYHYElbPeO93cJ0ewPIz3XRryMN5yGu_Y9uI09fumu3lmvwE4nvTv</recordid><startdate>20210816</startdate><enddate>20210816</enddate><creator>Dobes, Leo</creator><creator>Crane, Mason</creator><creator>Higgins, Tim</creator><creator>Van Dijk, Albert I J M</creator><creator>Lindenmayer, David B</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-5660</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210816</creationdate><title>Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis</title><author>Dobes, Leo ; Crane, Mason ; Higgins, Tim ; Van Dijk, Albert I J M ; Lindenmayer, David B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3dc0e75323c770d6363c701170e532b6a41a91b2d3205ce54cebccd55fb5fdb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Farms - economics</topic><topic>Farms - standards</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Livestock production</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Renovation</topic><topic>Research and analysis methods</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water Quality - standards</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobes, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dijk, Albert I J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobes, Leo</au><au>Crane, Mason</au><au>Higgins, Tim</au><au>Van Dijk, Albert I J M</au><au>Lindenmayer, David B</au><au>Hussain, Abid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-08-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0256089</spage><pages>e0256089-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Access to water is a critical aspect of livestock production, although the relationship between livestock weight gain and water quality remains poorly understood. Previous work has shown that water quality of poorly managed farm dams can be improved by fencing and constructing hardened watering points to limit stock access to the dam, and revegetation to filter contaminant inflow. Here we use cattle weight gain data from three North American studies to develop a cost-benefit analysis for the renovation of farm dams to improve water quality and, in turn, promote cattle weight gain on farms in south-eastern Australia. Our analysis indicated a strong likelihood of positive results and suggested there may be substantial net economic benefit from renovating dams in poor condition to improve water quality. The average per-farm Benefit-Cost Ratios based on deterministic assumptions was 1.5 for New South Wales (NSW) and 3.0 for Victoria in areas where rainfall exceeds 600mm annually. Our analyses suggested that cattle on farms in NSW and Victoria would need to experience additional weight gain from switching to clean water of at least 6.5% and 1.8% per annum respectively, to break even in present value terms. Monte Carlo simulation based on conservative assumptions indicated that the probability of per-farm benefits exceeding costs was greater than 70%. We recommend localised experiments to assess the impact of improved water quality on livestock weight gain in Australian conditions to confirm these expectations empirically.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34398923</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0256089</doi><tpages>e0256089</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-5660</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e0256089
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2561893855
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agricultural economics
Agriculture
Animals
Australia
Benefit cost analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Cattle
Contaminants
Cost benefit analysis
Dairying - methods
Dams
Drinking water
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Economics
Environmental aspects
Farm management
Farms
Farms - economics
Farms - standards
Influence
Livestock
Livestock - growth & development
Livestock production
Local government
Management
Medicine and Health Sciences
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo simulation
People and Places
Physical sciences
Physiological aspects
Rainfall
Renovation
Research and analysis methods
Revegetation
Water quality
Water Quality - standards
Water quality management
Weight
Weight Gain
title Increased livestock weight gain from improved water quality in farm dams: A cost-benefit analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A53%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20livestock%20weight%20gain%20from%20improved%20water%20quality%20in%20farm%20dams:%20A%20cost-benefit%20analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dobes,%20Leo&rft.date=2021-08-16&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0256089&rft.pages=e0256089-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0256089&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA672245570%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561893855&rft_id=info:pmid/34398923&rft_galeid=A672245570&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2f0670e27bf2432880e70a14c10761f9&rfr_iscdi=true