An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care

To determine the association between intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics and clinicians' decision to decline eligible patients for randomization into a multicentered pragmatic comparative-effectiveness controlled trial. Screening logs from the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Septic S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0255361-e0255361
Hauptverfasser: Ramanan, Mahesh, Billot, Laurent, Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn, Myburgh, John, Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0255361
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0255361
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Ramanan, Mahesh
Billot, Laurent
Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn
Myburgh, John
Venkatesh, Balasubramanian
description To determine the association between intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics and clinicians' decision to decline eligible patients for randomization into a multicentered pragmatic comparative-effectiveness controlled trial. Screening logs from the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Septic Shock Trial (ADRENAL) and site-level data from the College of Intensive Care Medicine and Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society were examined. The effects of ICU characteristics such as tertiary academic status, research coordinator availability, number of admissions, and ICU affiliations on clinicians declining to randomize eligible patients were calculated using mixed effects logistic regression modelling. There were 21,818 patients screened for inclusion in the ADRENAL trial at 69 sites across five countries, out of which 5,501 were eligible, 3,800 were randomized and 659 eligible patients were declined for randomization by the treating clinician. The proportion of eligible patients declined by clinicians at individual ICUs ranged from 0 to41%. In the multivariable model, none of the ICU characteristics were significantly associated with higher clinician decline rate. Neither tertiary academic status, nor other site-level variables were significantly associated with increased rate of clinicians declining eligible patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0255361
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2555623330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A669789012</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4458010f4fb04b769c2713dded1ecc1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A669789012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-80fc6a53cf13860c33a28e1ee3becb4e417cc1993e666960d1c936bba7ba93b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgh8XMyZNmrY3wrD4MbCw4NdtSNPTmQxpMibp4voP_NemTneZyl5IL1JOnvfNOSc5WfaU4CWhJXm7c4O30iz3zsIS50VBObmXnZKa5gueY3r_6P8kexTCDuOCVpw_zE4oo4QxVp9mv1cWwZU0g4zaWeQ61EkVnQ8obmVEvbxG2nZmAKsAKaOtVlra8Aq1oHRIkoCsiyg6BNY7YxAYvdGNAbRPjmBjSPq066VtXa9_QYui19KMYaS8jlpJg5T08Dh70KU4PJnWs-zbh_dfzz8tLi4_rs9XFwvF6zwuKtwpLguqOpKKwYpSmVdAAGgDqmHASKkUqWsKnPOa45aomvKmkWUja9pwepY9P_jujQti6mIQqYEFzymlOBHrA9E6uRN7r3vpr4WTWvwNOL8R0qfEDQjGigoT3LGuwawpea3yktC2hZZASkMlr3fTaUPTQ6tSR7w0M9P5jtVbsXFXoqIkXemYzOvJwLsfA4Qoeh0UGCMtuOGQd83LvGAJffEPend1E7WRqYB0uS6dq0ZTsUodK6sakzxRyzuo9LXQa5WeXKdTfCZ4MxMkJsLPuJFDCGL95fP_s5ff5-zLI3YL0sRtcGYYn2uYg-wAKu9C8NDdNplgMU7MTTfEODFimpgke3Z8QbeimxGhfwBJDhMq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555623330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ramanan, Mahesh ; Billot, Laurent ; Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn ; Myburgh, John ; Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</creator><contributor>Maerz, Linda L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramanan, Mahesh ; Billot, Laurent ; Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn ; Myburgh, John ; Venkatesh, Balasubramanian ; Maerz, Linda L.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the association between intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics and clinicians' decision to decline eligible patients for randomization into a multicentered pragmatic comparative-effectiveness controlled trial. Screening logs from the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Septic Shock Trial (ADRENAL) and site-level data from the College of Intensive Care Medicine and Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society were examined. The effects of ICU characteristics such as tertiary academic status, research coordinator availability, number of admissions, and ICU affiliations on clinicians declining to randomize eligible patients were calculated using mixed effects logistic regression modelling. There were 21,818 patients screened for inclusion in the ADRENAL trial at 69 sites across five countries, out of which 5,501 were eligible, 3,800 were randomized and 659 eligible patients were declined for randomization by the treating clinician. The proportion of eligible patients declined by clinicians at individual ICUs ranged from 0 to41%. In the multivariable model, none of the ICU characteristics were significantly associated with higher clinician decline rate. Neither tertiary academic status, nor other site-level variables were significantly associated with increased rate of clinicians declining eligible patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34314449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Clinical Decision-Making ; Clinical trials ; Consent ; Critical Care ; Critical care medicine ; Decision-making ; Enrollments ; Evaluation ; Glucocorticoids ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Intervention ; Logistic Models ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Patients ; People and places ; Physicians - psychology ; Randomization ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sepsis ; Septic shock ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0255361-e0255361</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Ramanan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Ramanan et al 2021 Ramanan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-80fc6a53cf13860c33a28e1ee3becb4e417cc1993e666960d1c936bba7ba93b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-80fc6a53cf13860c33a28e1ee3becb4e417cc1993e666960d1c936bba7ba93b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4509-4015</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315530/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315530/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Maerz, Linda L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ramanan, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billot, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myburgh, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To determine the association between intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics and clinicians' decision to decline eligible patients for randomization into a multicentered pragmatic comparative-effectiveness controlled trial. Screening logs from the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Septic Shock Trial (ADRENAL) and site-level data from the College of Intensive Care Medicine and Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society were examined. The effects of ICU characteristics such as tertiary academic status, research coordinator availability, number of admissions, and ICU affiliations on clinicians declining to randomize eligible patients were calculated using mixed effects logistic regression modelling. There were 21,818 patients screened for inclusion in the ADRENAL trial at 69 sites across five countries, out of which 5,501 were eligible, 3,800 were randomized and 659 eligible patients were declined for randomization by the treating clinician. The proportion of eligible patients declined by clinicians at individual ICUs ranged from 0 to41%. In the multivariable model, none of the ICU characteristics were significantly associated with higher clinician decline rate. Neither tertiary academic status, nor other site-level variables were significantly associated with increased rate of clinicians declining eligible patients.</description><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical care medicine</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Septic shock</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgh8XMyZNmrY3wrD4MbCw4NdtSNPTmQxpMibp4voP_NemTneZyl5IL1JOnvfNOSc5WfaU4CWhJXm7c4O30iz3zsIS50VBObmXnZKa5gueY3r_6P8kexTCDuOCVpw_zE4oo4QxVp9mv1cWwZU0g4zaWeQ61EkVnQ8obmVEvbxG2nZmAKsAKaOtVlra8Aq1oHRIkoCsiyg6BNY7YxAYvdGNAbRPjmBjSPq066VtXa9_QYui19KMYaS8jlpJg5T08Dh70KU4PJnWs-zbh_dfzz8tLi4_rs9XFwvF6zwuKtwpLguqOpKKwYpSmVdAAGgDqmHASKkUqWsKnPOa45aomvKmkWUja9pwepY9P_jujQti6mIQqYEFzymlOBHrA9E6uRN7r3vpr4WTWvwNOL8R0qfEDQjGigoT3LGuwawpea3yktC2hZZASkMlr3fTaUPTQ6tSR7w0M9P5jtVbsXFXoqIkXemYzOvJwLsfA4Qoeh0UGCMtuOGQd83LvGAJffEPend1E7WRqYB0uS6dq0ZTsUodK6sakzxRyzuo9LXQa5WeXKdTfCZ4MxMkJsLPuJFDCGL95fP_s5ff5-zLI3YL0sRtcGYYn2uYg-wAKu9C8NDdNplgMU7MTTfEODFimpgke3Z8QbeimxGhfwBJDhMq</recordid><startdate>20210727</startdate><enddate>20210727</enddate><creator>Ramanan, Mahesh</creator><creator>Billot, Laurent</creator><creator>Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn</creator><creator>Myburgh, John</creator><creator>Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-4015</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210727</creationdate><title>An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care</title><author>Ramanan, Mahesh ; Billot, Laurent ; Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn ; Myburgh, John ; Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-80fc6a53cf13860c33a28e1ee3becb4e417cc1993e666960d1c936bba7ba93b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical care medicine</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Septic shock</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramanan, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billot, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myburgh, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramanan, Mahesh</au><au>Billot, Laurent</au><au>Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn</au><au>Myburgh, John</au><au>Venkatesh, Balasubramanian</au><au>Maerz, Linda L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-07-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0255361</spage><epage>e0255361</epage><pages>e0255361-e0255361</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To determine the association between intensive care unit (ICU) characteristics and clinicians' decision to decline eligible patients for randomization into a multicentered pragmatic comparative-effectiveness controlled trial. Screening logs from the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Septic Shock Trial (ADRENAL) and site-level data from the College of Intensive Care Medicine and Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society were examined. The effects of ICU characteristics such as tertiary academic status, research coordinator availability, number of admissions, and ICU affiliations on clinicians declining to randomize eligible patients were calculated using mixed effects logistic regression modelling. There were 21,818 patients screened for inclusion in the ADRENAL trial at 69 sites across five countries, out of which 5,501 were eligible, 3,800 were randomized and 659 eligible patients were declined for randomization by the treating clinician. The proportion of eligible patients declined by clinicians at individual ICUs ranged from 0 to41%. In the multivariable model, none of the ICU characteristics were significantly associated with higher clinician decline rate. Neither tertiary academic status, nor other site-level variables were significantly associated with increased rate of clinicians declining eligible patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34314449</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0255361</doi><tpages>e0255361</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-4015</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0255361-e0255361
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2555623330
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Clinical Decision-Making
Clinical trials
Consent
Critical Care
Critical care medicine
Decision-making
Enrollments
Evaluation
Glucocorticoids
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Intervention
Logistic Models
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Patients
People and places
Physicians - psychology
Randomization
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research and Analysis Methods
Sepsis
Septic shock
Tertiary Care Centers
Variables
title An evaluation of factors that may influence clinicians' decisions not to enroll eligible patients into randomized trials in critical care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A28%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20factors%20that%20may%20influence%20clinicians'%20decisions%20not%20to%20enroll%20eligible%20patients%20into%20randomized%20trials%20in%20critical%20care&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ramanan,%20Mahesh&rft.date=2021-07-27&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0255361&rft.epage=e0255361&rft.pages=e0255361-e0255361&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0255361&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA669789012%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555623330&rft_id=info:pmid/34314449&rft_galeid=A669789012&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4458010f4fb04b769c2713dded1ecc1c&rfr_iscdi=true