Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective
Social context such as the relationship between a person experiencing pain and a caregiver has been shown to affect the experience of pain, yet, results are not consistent. Possibly, differential effects of interpersonal relationships are modulated by affective states expressed by social partners. V...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254069-e0254069 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0254069 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0254069 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hillmer, Katrin Kappesser, Judith Hermann, Christiane |
description | Social context such as the relationship between a person experiencing pain and a caregiver has been shown to affect the experience of pain, yet, results are not consistent. Possibly, differential effects of interpersonal relationships are modulated by affective states expressed by social partners. Viewing partner pictures in experimental designs is not only associated with lowered perceived pain intensity, but also affects neural responses. However, the role of affective modulation is not clear. The present study aimed to systematically examine the pain modulating effects of stimuli varying in affect and social content including personal relevance using subjective report and psychophysiological measures of facial and autonomic activity. Twenty-nine women underwent a tonic heat pain paradigm with simultaneous picture viewing to investigate the influence of their partners' faces with a neutral facial expression compared to strangers' happy, angry and neutral facial expressions on pain intensity and accompanying psychophysiological parameters (facial activity: corrugator muscle activity, autonomic activity: skin conductance level, heart rate). In addition to perceived partner support and relationship characteristics, the contribution of the affective value (valence, arousal) of the partner faces to the observed pain modulation was examined. Partner and happy faces reduced self-reported pain intensity and corrugator activity, the latter being lowest when viewing partner faces as compared to all other picture categories. As corrugator activity is indexing stimulus unpleasantness and a core feature of the facial pain expression, this physiological pattern matches well with the subjective ratings. Neutral objects, neutral and angry faces had no effect on pain self-report, although angry faces were rated as highly negative. Partner faces also led to increased skin conductance, being an index of motivational activation, and heart rate deceleration, possibly reflecting increased sensory intake. Partner-related pain modulation was primarily related to perceived arousal of the partner's picture, i.e., the intensity of the activation of approach motivation, and pain-related catastrophizing. Our results are partially consistent with emotional pain control models, especially regarding the modulatory influence of valence. Within the context of socially adaptive behavior, they particularly underline the social signal value of emotion and attachment figures. Clinically, our |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0254069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2554337342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A669333860</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d2a8bc76945546e0bdf98556f8c956b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A669333860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-bd7540c8afb70f2a2487304a4a4699c193ba2c57a24a68cd72df90fac9e228ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjGnSJo0XwrD4MbCw4tdtOE2TmQxpU5t22Pn3ntmpspW9kFw0JM95T963SZI8z8gyYyJ7uwtj34JfdqE1S0KLnHD5IDnPJKMLTgl7eGd-ljyJcUdIwUrOHydnLKeSSp6dJ9UXcG3ahHr0MLjQptUhPaBy2kE_tKZ_l67a1Nx0pneNaQfwqWv3Jg5uc8JtH5oU0hi0A78Aa40e3N6kWBC70_xp8siCj-bZ9L1Ifnz88P3y8-Lq-tP6cnW10JzLYVHVAj3oEmwliKVA81IwkgMOLqVGLxVQXQjcAF7qWtDaSmJBS0NpqYFdJC9Oup0PUU3xREWLImdMoGUk1ieiDrBTHVqC_qACOHW7EPqNQtdOe6NqCmWlBZc5lnNDKmxWFgW3pZYFryRqvZ-6jVVjao3h9OBnovOd1m3VJuxVSaUoxVHg9STQh18jRqoaF7XxHloTxttzF1lGKRGIvvwHvd_dRG0ADbjWBuyrj6JqhQkzhj-fILW8h8JRm8ZpvEvW4fqs4M2sAJnB3AwbGGNU629f_5-9_jlnX91htwb8sI3Bj8drFedgfgJ1H2Lsjf0bckbU8Sn8SUMdn4KangL7DRSW-vI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554337342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hillmer, Katrin ; Kappesser, Judith ; Hermann, Christiane</creator><contributor>Hinojosa, José A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hillmer, Katrin ; Kappesser, Judith ; Hermann, Christiane ; Hinojosa, José A.</creatorcontrib><description>Social context such as the relationship between a person experiencing pain and a caregiver has been shown to affect the experience of pain, yet, results are not consistent. Possibly, differential effects of interpersonal relationships are modulated by affective states expressed by social partners. Viewing partner pictures in experimental designs is not only associated with lowered perceived pain intensity, but also affects neural responses. However, the role of affective modulation is not clear. The present study aimed to systematically examine the pain modulating effects of stimuli varying in affect and social content including personal relevance using subjective report and psychophysiological measures of facial and autonomic activity. Twenty-nine women underwent a tonic heat pain paradigm with simultaneous picture viewing to investigate the influence of their partners' faces with a neutral facial expression compared to strangers' happy, angry and neutral facial expressions on pain intensity and accompanying psychophysiological parameters (facial activity: corrugator muscle activity, autonomic activity: skin conductance level, heart rate). In addition to perceived partner support and relationship characteristics, the contribution of the affective value (valence, arousal) of the partner faces to the observed pain modulation was examined. Partner and happy faces reduced self-reported pain intensity and corrugator activity, the latter being lowest when viewing partner faces as compared to all other picture categories. As corrugator activity is indexing stimulus unpleasantness and a core feature of the facial pain expression, this physiological pattern matches well with the subjective ratings. Neutral objects, neutral and angry faces had no effect on pain self-report, although angry faces were rated as highly negative. Partner faces also led to increased skin conductance, being an index of motivational activation, and heart rate deceleration, possibly reflecting increased sensory intake. Partner-related pain modulation was primarily related to perceived arousal of the partner's picture, i.e., the intensity of the activation of approach motivation, and pain-related catastrophizing. Our results are partially consistent with emotional pain control models, especially regarding the modulatory influence of valence. Within the context of socially adaptive behavior, they particularly underline the social signal value of emotion and attachment figures. Clinically, our results imply that just looking at pictures of one's partner when undergoing acute painful procedures can have a robust hypoalgesic effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34292961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Arousal ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Chronic pain ; Clinical psychology ; Conductance ; Context ; Coping ; Deceleration ; Emotional behavior ; Engineering and Technology ; Experiments ; Face ; Happiness ; Health aspects ; Heart rate ; Interpersonal relations ; Likert scale ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Modulation ; Motivation ; Muscles ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Physiology ; Pictures ; Psychophysiological measures ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Skin ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Social support ; Stress ; Viewing ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254069-e0254069</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Hillmer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Hillmer et al 2021 Hillmer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-bd7540c8afb70f2a2487304a4a4699c193ba2c57a24a68cd72df90fac9e228ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-bd7540c8afb70f2a2487304a4a4699c193ba2c57a24a68cd72df90fac9e228ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1008-2073 ; 0000-0002-3179-9287</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297879/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23847,27903,27904,53769,53771,79346,79347</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hinojosa, José A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hillmer, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappesser, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Social context such as the relationship between a person experiencing pain and a caregiver has been shown to affect the experience of pain, yet, results are not consistent. Possibly, differential effects of interpersonal relationships are modulated by affective states expressed by social partners. Viewing partner pictures in experimental designs is not only associated with lowered perceived pain intensity, but also affects neural responses. However, the role of affective modulation is not clear. The present study aimed to systematically examine the pain modulating effects of stimuli varying in affect and social content including personal relevance using subjective report and psychophysiological measures of facial and autonomic activity. Twenty-nine women underwent a tonic heat pain paradigm with simultaneous picture viewing to investigate the influence of their partners' faces with a neutral facial expression compared to strangers' happy, angry and neutral facial expressions on pain intensity and accompanying psychophysiological parameters (facial activity: corrugator muscle activity, autonomic activity: skin conductance level, heart rate). In addition to perceived partner support and relationship characteristics, the contribution of the affective value (valence, arousal) of the partner faces to the observed pain modulation was examined. Partner and happy faces reduced self-reported pain intensity and corrugator activity, the latter being lowest when viewing partner faces as compared to all other picture categories. As corrugator activity is indexing stimulus unpleasantness and a core feature of the facial pain expression, this physiological pattern matches well with the subjective ratings. Neutral objects, neutral and angry faces had no effect on pain self-report, although angry faces were rated as highly negative. Partner faces also led to increased skin conductance, being an index of motivational activation, and heart rate deceleration, possibly reflecting increased sensory intake. Partner-related pain modulation was primarily related to perceived arousal of the partner's picture, i.e., the intensity of the activation of approach motivation, and pain-related catastrophizing. Our results are partially consistent with emotional pain control models, especially regarding the modulatory influence of valence. Within the context of socially adaptive behavior, they particularly underline the social signal value of emotion and attachment figures. Clinically, our results imply that just looking at pictures of one's partner when undergoing acute painful procedures can have a robust hypoalgesic effect.</description><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pictures</subject><subject>Psychophysiological measures</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Viewing</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjGnSJo0XwrD4MbCw4tdtOE2TmQxpU5t22Pn3ntmpspW9kFw0JM95T963SZI8z8gyYyJ7uwtj34JfdqE1S0KLnHD5IDnPJKMLTgl7eGd-ljyJcUdIwUrOHydnLKeSSp6dJ9UXcG3ahHr0MLjQptUhPaBy2kE_tKZ_l67a1Nx0pneNaQfwqWv3Jg5uc8JtH5oU0hi0A78Aa40e3N6kWBC70_xp8siCj-bZ9L1Ifnz88P3y8-Lq-tP6cnW10JzLYVHVAj3oEmwliKVA81IwkgMOLqVGLxVQXQjcAF7qWtDaSmJBS0NpqYFdJC9Oup0PUU3xREWLImdMoGUk1ieiDrBTHVqC_qACOHW7EPqNQtdOe6NqCmWlBZc5lnNDKmxWFgW3pZYFryRqvZ-6jVVjao3h9OBnovOd1m3VJuxVSaUoxVHg9STQh18jRqoaF7XxHloTxttzF1lGKRGIvvwHvd_dRG0ADbjWBuyrj6JqhQkzhj-fILW8h8JRm8ZpvEvW4fqs4M2sAJnB3AwbGGNU629f_5-9_jlnX91htwb8sI3Bj8drFedgfgJ1H2Lsjf0bckbU8Sn8SUMdn4KangL7DRSW-vI</recordid><startdate>20210722</startdate><enddate>20210722</enddate><creator>Hillmer, Katrin</creator><creator>Kappesser, Judith</creator><creator>Hermann, Christiane</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-2073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-9287</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210722</creationdate><title>Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective</title><author>Hillmer, Katrin ; Kappesser, Judith ; Hermann, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-bd7540c8afb70f2a2487304a4a4699c193ba2c57a24a68cd72df90fac9e228ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pictures</topic><topic>Psychophysiological measures</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Viewing</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillmer, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappesser, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillmer, Katrin</au><au>Kappesser, Judith</au><au>Hermann, Christiane</au><au>Hinojosa, José A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-07-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0254069</spage><epage>e0254069</epage><pages>e0254069-e0254069</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Social context such as the relationship between a person experiencing pain and a caregiver has been shown to affect the experience of pain, yet, results are not consistent. Possibly, differential effects of interpersonal relationships are modulated by affective states expressed by social partners. Viewing partner pictures in experimental designs is not only associated with lowered perceived pain intensity, but also affects neural responses. However, the role of affective modulation is not clear. The present study aimed to systematically examine the pain modulating effects of stimuli varying in affect and social content including personal relevance using subjective report and psychophysiological measures of facial and autonomic activity. Twenty-nine women underwent a tonic heat pain paradigm with simultaneous picture viewing to investigate the influence of their partners' faces with a neutral facial expression compared to strangers' happy, angry and neutral facial expressions on pain intensity and accompanying psychophysiological parameters (facial activity: corrugator muscle activity, autonomic activity: skin conductance level, heart rate). In addition to perceived partner support and relationship characteristics, the contribution of the affective value (valence, arousal) of the partner faces to the observed pain modulation was examined. Partner and happy faces reduced self-reported pain intensity and corrugator activity, the latter being lowest when viewing partner faces as compared to all other picture categories. As corrugator activity is indexing stimulus unpleasantness and a core feature of the facial pain expression, this physiological pattern matches well with the subjective ratings. Neutral objects, neutral and angry faces had no effect on pain self-report, although angry faces were rated as highly negative. Partner faces also led to increased skin conductance, being an index of motivational activation, and heart rate deceleration, possibly reflecting increased sensory intake. Partner-related pain modulation was primarily related to perceived arousal of the partner's picture, i.e., the intensity of the activation of approach motivation, and pain-related catastrophizing. Our results are partially consistent with emotional pain control models, especially regarding the modulatory influence of valence. Within the context of socially adaptive behavior, they particularly underline the social signal value of emotion and attachment figures. Clinically, our results imply that just looking at pictures of one's partner when undergoing acute painful procedures can have a robust hypoalgesic effect.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34292961</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0254069</doi><tpages>e0254069</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-2073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-9287</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254069-e0254069 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2554337342 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Arousal Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Chronic pain Clinical psychology Conductance Context Coping Deceleration Emotional behavior Engineering and Technology Experiments Face Happiness Health aspects Heart rate Interpersonal relations Likert scale Medicine and Health Sciences Modulation Motivation Muscles Pain Pain perception Physiology Pictures Psychophysiological measures Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods Skin Social aspects Social Sciences Social support Stress Viewing Visual stimuli |
title | Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pain%20modulation%20by%20your%20partner:%20An%20experimental%20investigation%20from%20a%20social-affective%20perspective&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hillmer,%20Katrin&rft.date=2021-07-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0254069&rft.epage=e0254069&rft.pages=e0254069-e0254069&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0254069&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA669333860%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554337342&rft_id=info:pmid/34292961&rft_galeid=A669333860&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d2a8bc76945546e0bdf98556f8c956b9&rfr_iscdi=true |