Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review
One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254527 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0254527 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hamel, Candyce Garritty, Chantelle Hersi, Mona Butler, Claire Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Rice, Danielle Straus, Sharon Skidmore, Becky Hutton, Brian |
description | One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.
We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.
A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.
Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0254527 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2552276676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A668718408</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A668718408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3557daf3ce99c746e3e14c3319a1302a9dac2e5d188991adf2c38f9cbce2097d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluLEzEUxwdR3HX1G4gOCKIPrblMbj4IZfFSWFnw9hrS5EybZToZk5mq3950O7t0ZB8kDwknv_M_OSf_oniK0RxTgd9chSG2ppl3oYU5IqxiRNwrTrGiZMYJovePzifFo5SuEGJUcv6wOKEVEYgJeVosPgcHTSpDXXYx7LyDWFoTofRt2YR2Peshbq8jb8tFGU3nXZls6Hy7LiPsPPx6XDyoTZPgybifFd8_vP92_ml2cflxeb64mFmuSD-jjAlnampBKSsqDhRwZSnFymCKiFHOWALMYSmVwsbVxFJZK7uyQJASjp4Vzw-6XROSHrtPmjBGiOBc8EwsD4QL5kp30W9N_KOD8fo6EOJam9h724C2qmLGWGwRzyeGjKhgVSMiKa8ccpC13o3VhtUWnIW2j6aZiE5vWr_R67DTkshKYpwFXo0CMfwcIPV665OFpjEthOHwbiVZRUVGX_yD3t3dSK1NbsC3dch17V5ULziXAssKyUzN76DycrD1Nlul9jk-SXg9SchMD7_7tRlS0suvX_6fvfwxZV8esRswTb9JoRl6H9o0BasDaGNIKUJ9O2SM9N7pN9PQe6fr0ek57dnxB90m3Vib_gUOO_ce</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552276676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hamel, Candyce ; Garritty, Chantelle ; Hersi, Mona ; Butler, Claire ; Esmaeilisaraji, Leila ; Rice, Danielle ; Straus, Sharon ; Skidmore, Becky ; Hutton, Brian</creator><contributor>Mathes, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Candyce ; Garritty, Chantelle ; Hersi, Mona ; Butler, Claire ; Esmaeilisaraji, Leila ; Rice, Danielle ; Straus, Sharon ; Skidmore, Becky ; Hutton, Brian ; Mathes, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.
We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.
A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.
Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34270578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Care and treatment ; Caregivers ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Delivery of Health Care ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Evaluation ; Health care ; Health Personnel ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Literature reviews ; Long term health care ; Long-Term Care ; Long-term care of the sick ; Medical care ; Medicare ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nursing Homes ; Older people ; Patients ; People and Places ; Pharmacists ; Physicians ; Professionals ; Quality management ; Quality of Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Services</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254527</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Hamel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Hamel et al 2021 Hamel et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3557daf3ce99c746e3e14c3319a1302a9dac2e5d188991adf2c38f9cbce2097d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3557daf3ce99c746e3e14c3319a1302a9dac2e5d188991adf2c38f9cbce2097d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8293-9238 ; 0000-0002-5871-2137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284811/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284811/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mathes, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Candyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garritty, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersi, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaeilisaraji, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straus, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutton, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.
We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.
A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.
Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Long-Term Care</subject><subject>Long-term care of the sick</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Services</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluLEzEUxwdR3HX1G4gOCKIPrblMbj4IZfFSWFnw9hrS5EybZToZk5mq3950O7t0ZB8kDwknv_M_OSf_oniK0RxTgd9chSG2ppl3oYU5IqxiRNwrTrGiZMYJovePzifFo5SuEGJUcv6wOKEVEYgJeVosPgcHTSpDXXYx7LyDWFoTofRt2YR2Peshbq8jb8tFGU3nXZls6Hy7LiPsPPx6XDyoTZPgybifFd8_vP92_ml2cflxeb64mFmuSD-jjAlnampBKSsqDhRwZSnFymCKiFHOWALMYSmVwsbVxFJZK7uyQJASjp4Vzw-6XROSHrtPmjBGiOBc8EwsD4QL5kp30W9N_KOD8fo6EOJam9h724C2qmLGWGwRzyeGjKhgVSMiKa8ccpC13o3VhtUWnIW2j6aZiE5vWr_R67DTkshKYpwFXo0CMfwcIPV665OFpjEthOHwbiVZRUVGX_yD3t3dSK1NbsC3dch17V5ULziXAssKyUzN76DycrD1Nlul9jk-SXg9SchMD7_7tRlS0suvX_6fvfwxZV8esRswTb9JoRl6H9o0BasDaGNIKUJ9O2SM9N7pN9PQe6fr0ek57dnxB90m3Vib_gUOO_ce</recordid><startdate>20210716</startdate><enddate>20210716</enddate><creator>Hamel, Candyce</creator><creator>Garritty, Chantelle</creator><creator>Hersi, Mona</creator><creator>Butler, Claire</creator><creator>Esmaeilisaraji, Leila</creator><creator>Rice, Danielle</creator><creator>Straus, Sharon</creator><creator>Skidmore, Becky</creator><creator>Hutton, Brian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8293-9238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-2137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210716</creationdate><title>Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review</title><author>Hamel, Candyce ; Garritty, Chantelle ; Hersi, Mona ; Butler, Claire ; Esmaeilisaraji, Leila ; Rice, Danielle ; Straus, Sharon ; Skidmore, Becky ; Hutton, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-3557daf3ce99c746e3e14c3319a1302a9dac2e5d188991adf2c38f9cbce2097d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Long-Term Care</topic><topic>Long-term care of the sick</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Candyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garritty, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersi, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaeilisaraji, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straus, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutton, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamel, Candyce</au><au>Garritty, Chantelle</au><au>Hersi, Mona</au><au>Butler, Claire</au><au>Esmaeilisaraji, Leila</au><au>Rice, Danielle</au><au>Straus, Sharon</au><au>Skidmore, Becky</au><au>Hutton, Brian</au><au>Mathes, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-07-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0254527</spage><pages>e0254527-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.
We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.
A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.
Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34270578</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0254527</doi><tpages>e0254527</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8293-9238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-2137</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254527 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2552276676 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Activities of daily living Care and treatment Caregivers Coronaviruses COVID-19 Delivery of Health Care Dementia Dementia disorders Evaluation Health care Health Personnel Hospitals Humans Knowledge Literature reviews Long term health care Long-Term Care Long-term care of the sick Medical care Medicare Medicine and Health Sciences Nursing Homes Older people Patients People and Places Pharmacists Physicians Professionals Quality management Quality of Health Care Quality of Life Services |
title | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Models%20of%20provider%20care%20in%20long-term%20care:%20A%20rapid%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hamel,%20Candyce&rft.date=2021-07-16&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0254527&rft.pages=e0254527-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0254527&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA668718408%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552276676&rft_id=info:pmid/34270578&rft_galeid=A668718408&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c945aac1c0694550a74ebf028364d0de&rfr_iscdi=true |