Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain

Spain was, together with Italy, the first European country severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After one month of strict lockdown and eight weeks of partial restrictions, Spanish residents are expected to have revised some of their beliefs. We conducted a survey one year before the pandemic,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254511-e0254511
Hauptverfasser: Bernacer, Javier, García-Manglano, Javier, Camina, Eduardo, Güell, Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0254511
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0254511
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Bernacer, Javier
García-Manglano, Javier
Camina, Eduardo
Güell, Francisco
description Spain was, together with Italy, the first European country severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After one month of strict lockdown and eight weeks of partial restrictions, Spanish residents are expected to have revised some of their beliefs. We conducted a survey one year before the pandemic, at its outbreak and during de-escalation (N = 1706). Despite the lockdown, most respondents tolerated being controlled by authorities, and acknowledged the importance of group necessities over individual rights. However, de-escalation resulted in a belief change towards the intrusiveness of authorities and the preeminence of individual rights. Besides, transcendental beliefs-God answering prayers and the existence of an afterlife-declined after the outbreak, but were strengthened in the de-escalation. Results were strongly influenced by political ideology: the proportion of left-sided voters who saw authorities as intrusive greatly decreased, and transcendental beliefs prevailed among right-sided voters. Our results point to a polarization of beliefs based on political ideology as a consequence of the pandemic.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0254511
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2551188884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A668375747</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6ae4741cd85b461cb0ebf79d3f6d4cf3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A668375747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de5a659b9edc8da1c202a38049c16a1acd7b1adbddef0e70c1f6cf116814fe6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjEk_ktYLYRm_BhZG3HFvw2lyMpMhk4xNK-qvN52pspW9sCm0nDx5z0feJHlKyZzmnL7e-b51YOcH73BOsrIoKb2XnNM6z2YsI_n9W_9nyaMQdoSUecXYw-QsL7Ky5BU9T9afvYXW_ILOeJd6nTZoDeqQQnxT6V3Abz06icNet8V0sbpZvpvROj2AU7g38k26jmEJ4YhcH8C4x8kDDTbgk_F7kXz98H69-DS7Wn1cLi6vZpKxupspLIGVdVOjkpUCKjOSQV6RopaUAQWpeENBNUqhJsiJpJpJTSmraKGR6fwieXbSPVgfxDiQIGJvlFbxKSKxPBHKw04cWrOH9qfwYMQx4NuNgLYz0qJggAUvqFRV2RSMyoZgo3mtcs1UIXUetd6O2fpmH0tG17VgJ6LTHWe2YuO_iyrjnGQ8CrwcBVofhxo6sTdBorXg0PenukvOSz7U_fwf9O7uRmoDsQHjtI955SAqLhmr8kFqSDu_g4rreH3RPdrE-OTAq8mByHT4o9tAH4JYXn_5f3Z1M2Vf3GK3CLbbBm_7wXphChYnULY-hBb13yFTIgbz_5mGGMwvRvPnvwGFpPS5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551188884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bernacer, Javier ; García-Manglano, Javier ; Camina, Eduardo ; Güell, Francisco</creator><contributor>Idler, Ellen L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bernacer, Javier ; García-Manglano, Javier ; Camina, Eduardo ; Güell, Francisco ; Idler, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><description>Spain was, together with Italy, the first European country severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After one month of strict lockdown and eight weeks of partial restrictions, Spanish residents are expected to have revised some of their beliefs. We conducted a survey one year before the pandemic, at its outbreak and during de-escalation (N = 1706). Despite the lockdown, most respondents tolerated being controlled by authorities, and acknowledged the importance of group necessities over individual rights. However, de-escalation resulted in a belief change towards the intrusiveness of authorities and the preeminence of individual rights. Besides, transcendental beliefs-God answering prayers and the existence of an afterlife-declined after the outbreak, but were strengthened in the de-escalation. Results were strongly influenced by political ideology: the proportion of left-sided voters who saw authorities as intrusive greatly decreased, and transcendental beliefs prevailed among right-sided voters. Our results point to a polarization of beliefs based on political ideology as a consequence of the pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34255781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain research ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Disease transmission ; Escalation ; Health aspects ; Human rights ; Immunization ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Outbreaks ; Pandemics ; People and places ; Physical Sciences ; Polarization ; Political ideologies ; Politics ; Population ; Religion ; Religious aspects ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Respondents ; Set (Psychology) ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Swine flu ; Voters</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254511-e0254511</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Bernacer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Bernacer et al 2021 Bernacer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de5a659b9edc8da1c202a38049c16a1acd7b1adbddef0e70c1f6cf116814fe6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de5a659b9edc8da1c202a38049c16a1acd7b1adbddef0e70c1f6cf116814fe6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4341-9763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277027/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277027/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,12845,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Idler, Ellen L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bernacer, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Manglano, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camina, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güell, Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Spain was, together with Italy, the first European country severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After one month of strict lockdown and eight weeks of partial restrictions, Spanish residents are expected to have revised some of their beliefs. We conducted a survey one year before the pandemic, at its outbreak and during de-escalation (N = 1706). Despite the lockdown, most respondents tolerated being controlled by authorities, and acknowledged the importance of group necessities over individual rights. However, de-escalation resulted in a belief change towards the intrusiveness of authorities and the preeminence of individual rights. Besides, transcendental beliefs-God answering prayers and the existence of an afterlife-declined after the outbreak, but were strengthened in the de-escalation. Results were strongly influenced by political ideology: the proportion of left-sided voters who saw authorities as intrusive greatly decreased, and transcendental beliefs prevailed among right-sided voters. Our results point to a polarization of beliefs based on political ideology as a consequence of the pandemic.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Escalation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Swine flu</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQLgujFjEk_ktYLYRm_BhZG3HFvw2lyMpMhk4xNK-qvN52pspW9sCm0nDx5z0feJHlKyZzmnL7e-b51YOcH73BOsrIoKb2XnNM6z2YsI_n9W_9nyaMQdoSUecXYw-QsL7Ky5BU9T9afvYXW_ILOeJd6nTZoDeqQQnxT6V3Abz06icNet8V0sbpZvpvROj2AU7g38k26jmEJ4YhcH8C4x8kDDTbgk_F7kXz98H69-DS7Wn1cLi6vZpKxupspLIGVdVOjkpUCKjOSQV6RopaUAQWpeENBNUqhJsiJpJpJTSmraKGR6fwieXbSPVgfxDiQIGJvlFbxKSKxPBHKw04cWrOH9qfwYMQx4NuNgLYz0qJggAUvqFRV2RSMyoZgo3mtcs1UIXUetd6O2fpmH0tG17VgJ6LTHWe2YuO_iyrjnGQ8CrwcBVofhxo6sTdBorXg0PenukvOSz7U_fwf9O7uRmoDsQHjtI955SAqLhmr8kFqSDu_g4rreH3RPdrE-OTAq8mByHT4o9tAH4JYXn_5f3Z1M2Vf3GK3CLbbBm_7wXphChYnULY-hBb13yFTIgbz_5mGGMwvRvPnvwGFpPS5</recordid><startdate>20210713</startdate><enddate>20210713</enddate><creator>Bernacer, Javier</creator><creator>García-Manglano, Javier</creator><creator>Camina, Eduardo</creator><creator>Güell, Francisco</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-9763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210713</creationdate><title>Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain</title><author>Bernacer, Javier ; García-Manglano, Javier ; Camina, Eduardo ; Güell, Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de5a659b9edc8da1c202a38049c16a1acd7b1adbddef0e70c1f6cf116814fe6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Escalation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Swine flu</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernacer, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Manglano, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camina, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güell, Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernacer, Javier</au><au>García-Manglano, Javier</au><au>Camina, Eduardo</au><au>Güell, Francisco</au><au>Idler, Ellen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-07-13</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0254511</spage><epage>e0254511</epage><pages>e0254511-e0254511</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Spain was, together with Italy, the first European country severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. After one month of strict lockdown and eight weeks of partial restrictions, Spanish residents are expected to have revised some of their beliefs. We conducted a survey one year before the pandemic, at its outbreak and during de-escalation (N = 1706). Despite the lockdown, most respondents tolerated being controlled by authorities, and acknowledged the importance of group necessities over individual rights. However, de-escalation resulted in a belief change towards the intrusiveness of authorities and the preeminence of individual rights. Besides, transcendental beliefs-God answering prayers and the existence of an afterlife-declined after the outbreak, but were strengthened in the de-escalation. Results were strongly influenced by political ideology: the proportion of left-sided voters who saw authorities as intrusive greatly decreased, and transcendental beliefs prevailed among right-sided voters. Our results point to a polarization of beliefs based on political ideology as a consequence of the pandemic.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34255781</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0254511</doi><tpages>e0254511</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-9763</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254511-e0254511
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2551188884
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Attitudes
Biology and Life Sciences
Brain research
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 vaccines
Disease transmission
Escalation
Health aspects
Human rights
Immunization
Medicine and Health Sciences
Outbreaks
Pandemics
People and places
Physical Sciences
Polarization
Political ideologies
Politics
Population
Religion
Religious aspects
Research and Analysis Methods
Respondents
Set (Psychology)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Social Sciences
Society
Swine flu
Voters
title Polarization of beliefs as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polarization%20of%20beliefs%20as%20a%20consequence%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20The%20case%20of%20Spain&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bernacer,%20Javier&rft.date=2021-07-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0254511&rft.epage=e0254511&rft.pages=e0254511-e0254511&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0254511&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA668375747%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551188884&rft_id=info:pmid/34255781&rft_galeid=A668375747&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6ae4741cd85b461cb0ebf79d3f6d4cf3&rfr_iscdi=true