Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI
Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is highly informative yet technically challenging. Until recently, there has been little information about EEG data quality and safety when used with newer multi-band (MB) fMRI sequences. Here, we mea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0238485 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0238485 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Egan, Maximillian K Larsen, Ryan Wirsich, Jonathan Sutton, Brad P Sadaghiani, Sepideh |
description | Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is highly informative yet technically challenging. Until recently, there has been little information about EEG data quality and safety when used with newer multi-band (MB) fMRI sequences. Here, we measure the relative heating of a MB protocol compared with a standard single-band (SB) protocol considered to be safe. We also evaluated EEG quality recorded concurrently with the MB protocol on humans.
We compared radiofrequency (RF)-related heating at multiple electrodes and magnetic field magnitude, B1+RMS, of a MB fMRI sequence with whole-brain coverage (TR = 440 ms, MB factor = 4) against a previously recommended, safe SB sequence using a phantom outfitted with a 64-channel EEG cap. Next, 9 human subjects underwent eyes-closed resting state EEG-fMRI using the MB sequence. Additionally, in three of the subjects resting state EEG was recorded also during the SB sequence and in an fMRI-free condition to directly compare EEG data quality across scanning conditions. EEG data quality was assessed by the ability to remove gradient and cardioballistic artifacts along with a clean spectrogram.
The heating induced by the MB sequence was lower than that of the SB sequence by a factor of 0.73 ± 0.38. This is consistent with an expected heating ratio of 0.64, calculated from the square of the ratio of B1+RMS values of the sequences. In the resting state EEG data, gradient and cardioballistic artifacts were successfully removed using traditional template subtraction. All subjects showed an individual alpha peak in the spectrogram with a posterior topography characteristic of eyes-closed EEG. The success of artifact rejection for the MB sequence was comparable to that in traditional SB sequences.
Our study shows that B1+RMS is a useful indication of the relative heating of fMRI protocols. This observation indicates that simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings using this MB sequence can be safe in terms of RF-related heating, and that EEG data recorded using this sequence is of acceptable quality after traditional artifact removal techniques. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0238485 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2547898140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A667214937</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c7e4416e0bce443f9332337a9c27ad01</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A667214937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ae5c3ef0836c8b54d1d06897041e55623f8eadc5791a6821d0f03a33a58e60ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYn_gGyCIhITgocX2TRznBWmayqgYmrQBr9at47Su3LiLHUa_PQ7NpgbtAeUh1vXvHPtenyR5RcmUQkE_rl3XNminW9foKWEgMpE_SY5pCWzCGYGnB-uj5MT7NSE5CM6fJ0eQMZqREo6TrzdY67BLsanSCgOmtx1aEwuuTmezi7TVyrWVrlJvNp0N2GjXebtL70xYpX3FTBa9tv52PX-RPKvRev1y-J8mPz7Pvp9_mVxeXczPzy4nipcsTFDnCnRNBHAlFnlW0YpwURYkozrPOYNaaKxUXpQUuWBxtyaAAJgLzYlGOE3e7H231nk5zMFLlmeFKEVsLBLzPVE5XMttazbY7qRDI_8WXLuU2AajrJaq0FlGuSYLFRdQlwAMoMBSsQIrQqPXp-G0brHRldJNaNGOTMc7jVnJpfslBcsho_1l3g8GrbvttA9yY7zS1u6H2d9bZJRBySL69h_08e4GaomxAdPULp6relN5xnkRn7aEIlLTR6j4VXpjVAxNbWJ9JPgwEkQm6N9hiZ33cn5z_f_s1c8x--6AXWm0YeWd7YJxjR-D2R5UrfO-1fXDkCmRfebvpyH7zMsh81H2-vCBHkT3IYc_94f6Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547898140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Egan, Maximillian K ; Larsen, Ryan ; Wirsich, Jonathan ; Sutton, Brad P ; Sadaghiani, Sepideh</creator><contributor>Chen, Xi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Egan, Maximillian K ; Larsen, Ryan ; Wirsich, Jonathan ; Sutton, Brad P ; Sadaghiani, Sepideh ; Chen, Xi</creatorcontrib><description>Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is highly informative yet technically challenging. Until recently, there has been little information about EEG data quality and safety when used with newer multi-band (MB) fMRI sequences. Here, we measure the relative heating of a MB protocol compared with a standard single-band (SB) protocol considered to be safe. We also evaluated EEG quality recorded concurrently with the MB protocol on humans.
We compared radiofrequency (RF)-related heating at multiple electrodes and magnetic field magnitude, B1+RMS, of a MB fMRI sequence with whole-brain coverage (TR = 440 ms, MB factor = 4) against a previously recommended, safe SB sequence using a phantom outfitted with a 64-channel EEG cap. Next, 9 human subjects underwent eyes-closed resting state EEG-fMRI using the MB sequence. Additionally, in three of the subjects resting state EEG was recorded also during the SB sequence and in an fMRI-free condition to directly compare EEG data quality across scanning conditions. EEG data quality was assessed by the ability to remove gradient and cardioballistic artifacts along with a clean spectrogram.
The heating induced by the MB sequence was lower than that of the SB sequence by a factor of 0.73 ± 0.38. This is consistent with an expected heating ratio of 0.64, calculated from the square of the ratio of B1+RMS values of the sequences. In the resting state EEG data, gradient and cardioballistic artifacts were successfully removed using traditional template subtraction. All subjects showed an individual alpha peak in the spectrogram with a posterior topography characteristic of eyes-closed EEG. The success of artifact rejection for the MB sequence was comparable to that in traditional SB sequences.
Our study shows that B1+RMS is a useful indication of the relative heating of fMRI protocols. This observation indicates that simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings using this MB sequence can be safe in terms of RF-related heating, and that EEG data recorded using this sequence is of acceptable quality after traditional artifact removal techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34214093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Brain mapping ; Data Accuracy ; Data security ; EEG ; Electrodes ; Electroencephalography ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Engineering and Technology ; Evaluation ; Female ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Heating ; Humans ; Information management ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Management ; Medical records ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Neuroimaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Physical Sciences ; Quality assessment ; Radio frequency ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Safety ; Social Sciences ; Subtraction ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0238485</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Egan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Egan et al 2021 Egan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ae5c3ef0836c8b54d1d06897041e55623f8eadc5791a6821d0f03a33a58e60ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ae5c3ef0836c8b54d1d06897041e55623f8eadc5791a6821d0f03a33a58e60ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8443-0408 ; 0000-0003-1260-5157</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253410/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253410/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Xi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Egan, Maximillian K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirsich, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Brad P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadaghiani, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is highly informative yet technically challenging. Until recently, there has been little information about EEG data quality and safety when used with newer multi-band (MB) fMRI sequences. Here, we measure the relative heating of a MB protocol compared with a standard single-band (SB) protocol considered to be safe. We also evaluated EEG quality recorded concurrently with the MB protocol on humans.
We compared radiofrequency (RF)-related heating at multiple electrodes and magnetic field magnitude, B1+RMS, of a MB fMRI sequence with whole-brain coverage (TR = 440 ms, MB factor = 4) against a previously recommended, safe SB sequence using a phantom outfitted with a 64-channel EEG cap. Next, 9 human subjects underwent eyes-closed resting state EEG-fMRI using the MB sequence. Additionally, in three of the subjects resting state EEG was recorded also during the SB sequence and in an fMRI-free condition to directly compare EEG data quality across scanning conditions. EEG data quality was assessed by the ability to remove gradient and cardioballistic artifacts along with a clean spectrogram.
The heating induced by the MB sequence was lower than that of the SB sequence by a factor of 0.73 ± 0.38. This is consistent with an expected heating ratio of 0.64, calculated from the square of the ratio of B1+RMS values of the sequences. In the resting state EEG data, gradient and cardioballistic artifacts were successfully removed using traditional template subtraction. All subjects showed an individual alpha peak in the spectrogram with a posterior topography characteristic of eyes-closed EEG. The success of artifact rejection for the MB sequence was comparable to that in traditional SB sequences.
Our study shows that B1+RMS is a useful indication of the relative heating of fMRI protocols. This observation indicates that simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings using this MB sequence can be safe in terms of RF-related heating, and that EEG data recorded using this sequence is of acceptable quality after traditional artifact removal techniques.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>Data security</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Subtraction</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYn_gGyCIhITgocX2TRznBWmayqgYmrQBr9at47Su3LiLHUa_PQ7NpgbtAeUh1vXvHPtenyR5RcmUQkE_rl3XNminW9foKWEgMpE_SY5pCWzCGYGnB-uj5MT7NSE5CM6fJ0eQMZqREo6TrzdY67BLsanSCgOmtx1aEwuuTmezi7TVyrWVrlJvNp0N2GjXebtL70xYpX3FTBa9tv52PX-RPKvRev1y-J8mPz7Pvp9_mVxeXczPzy4nipcsTFDnCnRNBHAlFnlW0YpwURYkozrPOYNaaKxUXpQUuWBxtyaAAJgLzYlGOE3e7H231nk5zMFLlmeFKEVsLBLzPVE5XMttazbY7qRDI_8WXLuU2AajrJaq0FlGuSYLFRdQlwAMoMBSsQIrQqPXp-G0brHRldJNaNGOTMc7jVnJpfslBcsho_1l3g8GrbvttA9yY7zS1u6H2d9bZJRBySL69h_08e4GaomxAdPULp6relN5xnkRn7aEIlLTR6j4VXpjVAxNbWJ9JPgwEkQm6N9hiZ33cn5z_f_s1c8x--6AXWm0YeWd7YJxjR-D2R5UrfO-1fXDkCmRfebvpyH7zMsh81H2-vCBHkT3IYc_94f6Cw</recordid><startdate>20210702</startdate><enddate>20210702</enddate><creator>Egan, Maximillian K</creator><creator>Larsen, Ryan</creator><creator>Wirsich, Jonathan</creator><creator>Sutton, Brad P</creator><creator>Sadaghiani, Sepideh</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-0408</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-5157</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210702</creationdate><title>Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI</title><author>Egan, Maximillian K ; Larsen, Ryan ; Wirsich, Jonathan ; Sutton, Brad P ; Sadaghiani, Sepideh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ae5c3ef0836c8b54d1d06897041e55623f8eadc5791a6821d0f03a33a58e60ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>Data security</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Subtraction</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Egan, Maximillian K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirsich, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Brad P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadaghiani, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Egan, Maximillian K</au><au>Larsen, Ryan</au><au>Wirsich, Jonathan</au><au>Sutton, Brad P</au><au>Sadaghiani, Sepideh</au><au>Chen, Xi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-07-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0238485</spage><pages>e0238485-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Simultaneously recorded electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is highly informative yet technically challenging. Until recently, there has been little information about EEG data quality and safety when used with newer multi-band (MB) fMRI sequences. Here, we measure the relative heating of a MB protocol compared with a standard single-band (SB) protocol considered to be safe. We also evaluated EEG quality recorded concurrently with the MB protocol on humans.
We compared radiofrequency (RF)-related heating at multiple electrodes and magnetic field magnitude, B1+RMS, of a MB fMRI sequence with whole-brain coverage (TR = 440 ms, MB factor = 4) against a previously recommended, safe SB sequence using a phantom outfitted with a 64-channel EEG cap. Next, 9 human subjects underwent eyes-closed resting state EEG-fMRI using the MB sequence. Additionally, in three of the subjects resting state EEG was recorded also during the SB sequence and in an fMRI-free condition to directly compare EEG data quality across scanning conditions. EEG data quality was assessed by the ability to remove gradient and cardioballistic artifacts along with a clean spectrogram.
The heating induced by the MB sequence was lower than that of the SB sequence by a factor of 0.73 ± 0.38. This is consistent with an expected heating ratio of 0.64, calculated from the square of the ratio of B1+RMS values of the sequences. In the resting state EEG data, gradient and cardioballistic artifacts were successfully removed using traditional template subtraction. All subjects showed an individual alpha peak in the spectrogram with a posterior topography characteristic of eyes-closed EEG. The success of artifact rejection for the MB sequence was comparable to that in traditional SB sequences.
Our study shows that B1+RMS is a useful indication of the relative heating of fMRI protocols. This observation indicates that simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings using this MB sequence can be safe in terms of RF-related heating, and that EEG data recorded using this sequence is of acceptable quality after traditional artifact removal techniques.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34214093</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0238485</doi><tpages>e0238485</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-0408</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-5157</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0238485 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2547898140 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Biology and Life Sciences Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - physiology Brain mapping Data Accuracy Data security EEG Electrodes Electroencephalography Electroencephalography - methods Engineering and Technology Evaluation Female Functional magnetic resonance imaging Heating Humans Information management Magnetic fields Magnetic resonance Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Management Medical records Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Neuroimaging Phantoms, Imaging Physical Sciences Quality assessment Radio frequency Research and Analysis Methods Safety Social Sciences Subtraction Young Adult |
title | Safety and data quality of EEG recorded simultaneously with multi-band fMRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20data%20quality%20of%20EEG%20recorded%20simultaneously%20with%20multi-band%20fMRI&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Egan,%20Maximillian%20K&rft.date=2021-07-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0238485&rft.pages=e0238485-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0238485&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA667214937%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547898140&rft_id=info:pmid/34214093&rft_galeid=A667214937&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c7e4416e0bce443f9332337a9c27ad01&rfr_iscdi=true |