Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden
Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-20...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0253236-e0253236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0253236 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0253236 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hemminki, Kari Försti, Asta Hemminki, Akseli Ljungberg, Börje Hemminki, Otto |
description | Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0253236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2544074556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A666063806</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_087cc32668694de4896935b1599092b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A666063806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-3f8f72950c5b736fac116468312077d5f4da57819d7ea59a7b0a12d36d8686ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk-9r1DAYx4sobk7_A9GCIPrizvxokuaNcEynB4OJ072TkDZpL0cvOZPm5v570103rrIXUtqG9PP9NHnaJ8teQjCHmMEPaxe9ld1866yeA0QwwvRRdgw5RjOKAH58MD7KnoWwBoDgktKn2REuIGGg4MfZr2_etV6HkBubh-h3Zie7Yex1kue17tJF-tpYt5F5v_IutqucgPxGSx9ynegoe62GyJmxnbQqH87La620fZ49aWQX9IvxfpL9PPv84_Tr7Pziy_J0cT6rGQb9DDdlwxAnoCYVw7SRNYS0oCWGCDCmSFMoSVgJuWJaEi5ZBSREClNV0pJKhU-y13vvtnNBjJUJApGiAKwghCZiuSeUk2ux9WYj_Y1w0ojbCedbIX1v6k4LULK6xogmNS-ULkpOOSYVJJwDjiqeXLO9K1zrbawmtk_manFri5soYEkowon_OK4uVhutam17L7tJbPrEmpVo3U6UCHJIYRK8GwXe_Y469GJjwvBppNUu7vdZUAjQsLY3_6APV2OkWpk2bGzj0nvrQSoWlFJAcQkGav4AlQ6lN6ZOv11j0vwk8H4SSEyv__StjCGI5eX3_2cvrqbs2wN2pWXXr4LrYm-cDVOw2IO1dyF43dwXGQIxdM1dNcTQNWLsmhR7dfiB7kN3bYL_AkV2D7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544074556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hemminki, Kari ; Försti, Asta ; Hemminki, Akseli ; Ljungberg, Börje ; Hemminki, Otto</creator><contributor>Sung, Wen-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Kari ; Försti, Asta ; Hemminki, Akseli ; Ljungberg, Börje ; Hemminki, Otto ; Sung, Wen-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34157049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age Distribution ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Renal cell ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality ; Care and treatment ; Cell survival ; Clinical trials ; Consortia ; Developed countries ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Finland - epidemiology ; Gene therapy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunology ; Kidney cancer ; Kidney Neoplasms - mortality ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Patients ; People and places ; Registries ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Research facilities ; Skin cancer ; Surgery ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Sweden - epidemiology ; Translation ; Trends ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0253236-e0253236</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Hemminki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Hemminki et al 2021 Hemminki et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-3f8f72950c5b736fac116468312077d5f4da57819d7ea59a7b0a12d36d8686ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-3f8f72950c5b736fac116468312077d5f4da57819d7ea59a7b0a12d36d8686ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2769-3316 ; 0000-0002-4121-3753</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219161/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219161/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,553,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23868,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-185623$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sung, Wen-Wei</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Försti, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Akseli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljungberg, Börje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Otto</creatorcontrib><title>Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.</description><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal cell</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cell survival</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Sweden - epidemiology</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk-9r1DAYx4sobk7_A9GCIPrizvxokuaNcEynB4OJ072TkDZpL0cvOZPm5v570103rrIXUtqG9PP9NHnaJ8teQjCHmMEPaxe9ld1866yeA0QwwvRRdgw5RjOKAH58MD7KnoWwBoDgktKn2REuIGGg4MfZr2_etV6HkBubh-h3Zie7Yex1kue17tJF-tpYt5F5v_IutqucgPxGSx9ynegoe62GyJmxnbQqH87La620fZ49aWQX9IvxfpL9PPv84_Tr7Pziy_J0cT6rGQb9DDdlwxAnoCYVw7SRNYS0oCWGCDCmSFMoSVgJuWJaEi5ZBSREClNV0pJKhU-y13vvtnNBjJUJApGiAKwghCZiuSeUk2ux9WYj_Y1w0ojbCedbIX1v6k4LULK6xogmNS-ULkpOOSYVJJwDjiqeXLO9K1zrbawmtk_manFri5soYEkowon_OK4uVhutam17L7tJbPrEmpVo3U6UCHJIYRK8GwXe_Y469GJjwvBppNUu7vdZUAjQsLY3_6APV2OkWpk2bGzj0nvrQSoWlFJAcQkGav4AlQ6lN6ZOv11j0vwk8H4SSEyv__StjCGI5eX3_2cvrqbs2wN2pWXXr4LrYm-cDVOw2IO1dyF43dwXGQIxdM1dNcTQNWLsmhR7dfiB7kN3bYL_AkV2D7w</recordid><startdate>20210622</startdate><enddate>20210622</enddate><creator>Hemminki, Kari</creator><creator>Försti, Asta</creator><creator>Hemminki, Akseli</creator><creator>Ljungberg, Börje</creator><creator>Hemminki, Otto</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADHXS</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-3316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4121-3753</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210622</creationdate><title>Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden</title><author>Hemminki, Kari ; Försti, Asta ; Hemminki, Akseli ; Ljungberg, Börje ; Hemminki, Otto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c730t-3f8f72950c5b736fac116468312077d5f4da57819d7ea59a7b0a12d36d8686ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal cell</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cell survival</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Sweden - epidemiology</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Försti, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Akseli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljungberg, Börje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Otto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemminki, Kari</au><au>Försti, Asta</au><au>Hemminki, Akseli</au><au>Ljungberg, Börje</au><au>Hemminki, Otto</au><au>Sung, Wen-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-06-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0253236</spage><epage>e0253236</epage><pages>e0253236-e0253236</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34157049</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0253236</doi><tpages>e0253236</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-3316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4121-3753</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0253236-e0253236 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2544074556 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SWEPUB Freely available online; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Age Distribution Aged Cancer Cancer therapies Carcinoma, Renal cell Carcinoma, Renal Cell - mortality Care and treatment Cell survival Clinical trials Consortia Developed countries Epidemiology Female Finland - epidemiology Gene therapy Hospitals Humans Immunology Kidney cancer Kidney Neoplasms - mortality Male Medical prognosis Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Metastasis Middle Aged Oncology Patients People and places Registries Renal cell carcinoma Research facilities Skin cancer Surgery Survival Survival Rate Sweden - epidemiology Translation Trends Tumors Urology |
title | Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A23%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress%20in%20survival%20in%20renal%20cell%20carcinoma%20through%2050%20years%20evaluated%20in%20Finland%20and%20Sweden&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hemminki,%20Kari&rft.date=2021-06-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0253236&rft.epage=e0253236&rft.pages=e0253236-e0253236&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0253236&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA666063806%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544074556&rft_id=info:pmid/34157049&rft_galeid=A666063806&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_087cc32668694de4896935b1599092b9&rfr_iscdi=true |