Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation

The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS computational biology 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924
Hauptverfasser: Sukumaran, Jeet, Holder, Mark T, Knowles, L Lacey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1008924
container_issue 5
container_start_page e1008924
container_title PLoS computational biology
container_volume 17
creator Sukumaran, Jeet
Holder, Mark T
Knowles, L Lacey
description The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2541866546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8dd8797d4367407bb35c36cc89ecfda5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2528917483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFSGlSdP-g9AYeullt5IljaRLoIR8LAR6ac9ClsYbLV7LlbyB_vt6s05ISk8ajd68eQ89Qs4ZXTKu2LdN2uXedcvBN3HJKNWmFkfklEnJF4pLffyqPiEfStlQOpUG3pMTzo3mhulTcrnqfcpDym6M_boaH7AqA_o4XVNfDTl5LKWK_ZgOfSxVwC5u4_iE-Ejeta4r-Gk-z8ivm-ufV3eL-x-3q6vv9wsvaxgXwFkjAgTBnYJGcceoRgieNa6tGcoQ2hbA1cClcY1DkEwoUJqjpMCM4Wfk4sA7dKnY2XqxtRRMA0gBE2J1QITkNnbIcevyH5tctE-NlNfW5TH6Dq0OQSujJjWgBFVNw6Xn4L026Nvg5MR1OW_bNVsMHvsxu-4N6duXPj7YdXq0mjFdg54Ivs4EOf3eYRntNhaPXed6TLu97lobpoTmE_TLP9D_uxMHlM-plIztixhG7T4Oz1N2Hwc7x2Ea-_zayMvQ8__zv3-Ss8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541866546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</creator><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><description>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33983918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computational Biology ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Divergence ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Gene Flow ; Genetic Speciation ; Genetic structure ; Genetics, Population ; Heuristic ; Models, Genetic ; Models, Statistical ; Phylogeny ; Population genetics ; Population number ; Populations ; Restrictions ; Software ; Speciation ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924</ispartof><rights>2021 Sukumaran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Sukumaran et al 2021 Sukumaran et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118268/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118268/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holder, Mark T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Gene Flow</subject><subject>Genetic Speciation</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFSGlSdP-g9AYeullt5IljaRLoIR8LAR6ac9ClsYbLV7LlbyB_vt6s05ISk8ajd68eQ89Qs4ZXTKu2LdN2uXedcvBN3HJKNWmFkfklEnJF4pLffyqPiEfStlQOpUG3pMTzo3mhulTcrnqfcpDym6M_boaH7AqA_o4XVNfDTl5LKWK_ZgOfSxVwC5u4_iE-Ejeta4r-Gk-z8ivm-ufV3eL-x-3q6vv9wsvaxgXwFkjAgTBnYJGcceoRgieNa6tGcoQ2hbA1cClcY1DkEwoUJqjpMCM4Wfk4sA7dKnY2XqxtRRMA0gBE2J1QITkNnbIcevyH5tctE-NlNfW5TH6Dq0OQSujJjWgBFVNw6Xn4L026Nvg5MR1OW_bNVsMHvsxu-4N6duXPj7YdXq0mjFdg54Ivs4EOf3eYRntNhaPXed6TLu97lobpoTmE_TLP9D_uxMHlM-plIztixhG7T4Oz1N2Hwc7x2Ea-_zayMvQ8__zv3-Ss8Y</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Sukumaran, Jeet</creator><creator>Holder, Mark T</creator><creator>Knowles, L Lacey</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><author>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Gene Flow</topic><topic>Genetic Speciation</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holder, Mark T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sukumaran, Jeet</au><au>Holder, Mark T</au><au>Knowles, L Lacey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1008924</spage><epage>e1008924</epage><pages>e1008924-e1008924</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33983918</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-7358
ispartof PLoS computational biology, 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924
issn 1553-7358
1553-734X
1553-7358
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2541866546
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Computational Biology
Computer and Information Sciences
Computer Simulation
Divergence
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Engineering and Technology
Gene Flow
Genetic Speciation
Genetic structure
Genetics, Population
Heuristic
Models, Genetic
Models, Statistical
Phylogeny
Population genetics
Population number
Populations
Restrictions
Software
Speciation
Species
Species Specificity
Time Factors
title Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20the%20speciation%20process%20into%20species%20delimitation&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Sukumaran,%20Jeet&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1008924&rft.epage=e1008924&rft.pages=e1008924-e1008924&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2528917483%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541866546&rft_id=info:pmid/33983918&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8dd8797d4367407bb35c36cc89ecfda5&rfr_iscdi=true