Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation
The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS computational biology 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1008924 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e1008924 |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Sukumaran, Jeet Holder, Mark T Knowles, L Lacey |
description | The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2541866546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8dd8797d4367407bb35c36cc89ecfda5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2528917483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFSGlSdP-g9AYeullt5IljaRLoIR8LAR6ac9ClsYbLV7LlbyB_vt6s05ISk8ajd68eQ89Qs4ZXTKu2LdN2uXedcvBN3HJKNWmFkfklEnJF4pLffyqPiEfStlQOpUG3pMTzo3mhulTcrnqfcpDym6M_boaH7AqA_o4XVNfDTl5LKWK_ZgOfSxVwC5u4_iE-Ejeta4r-Gk-z8ivm-ufV3eL-x-3q6vv9wsvaxgXwFkjAgTBnYJGcceoRgieNa6tGcoQ2hbA1cClcY1DkEwoUJqjpMCM4Wfk4sA7dKnY2XqxtRRMA0gBE2J1QITkNnbIcevyH5tctE-NlNfW5TH6Dq0OQSujJjWgBFVNw6Xn4L026Nvg5MR1OW_bNVsMHvsxu-4N6duXPj7YdXq0mjFdg54Ivs4EOf3eYRntNhaPXed6TLu97lobpoTmE_TLP9D_uxMHlM-plIztixhG7T4Oz1N2Hwc7x2Ea-_zayMvQ8__zv3-Ss8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541866546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</creator><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><description>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33983918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computational Biology ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Divergence ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Gene Flow ; Genetic Speciation ; Genetic structure ; Genetics, Population ; Heuristic ; Models, Genetic ; Models, Statistical ; Phylogeny ; Population genetics ; Population number ; Populations ; Restrictions ; Software ; Speciation ; Species ; Species Specificity ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924</ispartof><rights>2021 Sukumaran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Sukumaran et al 2021 Sukumaran et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118268/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118268/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79569,79570</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holder, Mark T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Gene Flow</subject><subject>Genetic Speciation</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFSGlSdP-g9AYeullt5IljaRLoIR8LAR6ac9ClsYbLV7LlbyB_vt6s05ISk8ajd68eQ89Qs4ZXTKu2LdN2uXedcvBN3HJKNWmFkfklEnJF4pLffyqPiEfStlQOpUG3pMTzo3mhulTcrnqfcpDym6M_boaH7AqA_o4XVNfDTl5LKWK_ZgOfSxVwC5u4_iE-Ejeta4r-Gk-z8ivm-ufV3eL-x-3q6vv9wsvaxgXwFkjAgTBnYJGcceoRgieNa6tGcoQ2hbA1cClcY1DkEwoUJqjpMCM4Wfk4sA7dKnY2XqxtRRMA0gBE2J1QITkNnbIcevyH5tctE-NlNfW5TH6Dq0OQSujJjWgBFVNw6Xn4L026Nvg5MR1OW_bNVsMHvsxu-4N6duXPj7YdXq0mjFdg54Ivs4EOf3eYRntNhaPXed6TLu97lobpoTmE_TLP9D_uxMHlM-plIztixhG7T4Oz1N2Hwc7x2Ea-_zayMvQ8__zv3-Ss8Y</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Sukumaran, Jeet</creator><creator>Holder, Mark T</creator><creator>Knowles, L Lacey</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</title><author>Sukumaran, Jeet ; Holder, Mark T ; Knowles, L Lacey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-631b4d6d43a76b73a108e6dc1baf21e5ddff66a26359abae651476783e5061993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Gene Flow</topic><topic>Genetic Speciation</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sukumaran, Jeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holder, Mark T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L Lacey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sukumaran, Jeet</au><au>Holder, Mark T</au><au>Knowles, L Lacey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1008924</spage><epage>e1008924</epage><pages>e1008924-e1008924</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>The "multispecies" coalescent (MSC) model that underlies many genomic species-delimitation approaches is problematic because it does not distinguish between genetic structure associated with species versus that of populations within species. Consequently, as both the genomic and spatial resolution of data increases, a proliferation of artifactual species results as within-species population lineages, detected due to restrictions in gene flow, are identified as distinct species. The toll of this extends beyond systematic studies, getting magnified across the many disciplines that rely upon an accurate framework of identified species. Here we present the first of a new class of approaches that addresses this issue by incorporating an extended speciation process for species delimitation. We model the formation of population lineages and their subsequent development into independent species as separate processes and provide for a way to incorporate current understanding of the species boundaries in the system through specification of species identities of a subset of population lineages. As a result, species boundaries and within-species lineages boundaries can be discriminated across the entire system, and species identities can be assigned to the remaining lineages of unknown affinities with quantified probabilities. In addition to the identification of species units in nature, the primary goal of species delimitation, the incorporation of a speciation model also allows us insights into the links between population and species-level processes. By explicitly accounting for restrictions in gene flow not only between, but also within, species, we also address the limits of genetic data for delimiting species. Specifically, while genetic data alone is not sufficient for accurate delimitation, when considered in conjunction with other information we are able to not only learn about species boundaries, but also about the tempo of the speciation process itself.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33983918</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-9608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7358 |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2021-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e1008924-e1008924 |
issn | 1553-7358 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2541866546 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Animals Biology and Life Sciences Computational Biology Computer and Information Sciences Computer Simulation Divergence Ecology and Environmental Sciences Engineering and Technology Gene Flow Genetic Speciation Genetic structure Genetics, Population Heuristic Models, Genetic Models, Statistical Phylogeny Population genetics Population number Populations Restrictions Software Speciation Species Species Specificity Time Factors |
title | Incorporating the speciation process into species delimitation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20the%20speciation%20process%20into%20species%20delimitation&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Sukumaran,%20Jeet&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1008924&rft.epage=e1008924&rft.pages=e1008924-e1008924&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2528917483%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541866546&rft_id=info:pmid/33983918&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8dd8797d4367407bb35c36cc89ecfda5&rfr_iscdi=true |