Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial
Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS medicine 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e1003590-e1003590 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1003590 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e1003590 |
container_title | PLoS medicine |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Persaud, Nav Bedard, Michael Boozary, Andrew Glazier, Richard H Gomes, Tara Hwang, Stephen W Juni, Peter Law, Michael R Mamdani, Muhammad Manns, Braden Martin, Danielle Morgan, Steven G Oh, Paul Pinto, Andrew D Shah, Baiju R Sullivan, Frank Umali, Norman Thorpe, Kevin E Tu, Karen Laupacis, Andreas |
description | Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted. We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports. In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2541852913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A664603088</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d0c06f422e334b1cbeb23e39a5a2962a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A664603088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c741t-6e55cb38856a47223357f7cbafc87d93f5df354b9aa0f82e603b340d790c5ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgujFjPlsm70QhmHVgXEXdPU2pOlpm6WTjEmrrr_ezIeyI3Oh5CIhec57ct7kZNlTgqeEFeT1jR-D0_10vYJ6SjBmQuJ72SkRXE5IXuT376xPskcx3mBMJZb4YXbCOCZScHyaDbO6gwDOANIDougWdIjoux06VNs4BFuNg_UO-QZBjOAGq3uUMlpjHcRNjPPIdDq0cI6uO0Dz5cXsEn2AOqKgXe1X9ifUyPTWWZNCk6LuH2cPGt1HeLKfz7LPby-u5-8ny6t3i_lsOTEFJ8MkByFMxcpS5JoXlDImiqYwlW5MWdSSNaJumOCV1Bo3JYUcsypVVhcSGwEg2Vn2bKe77n1Ue8OiooKTUlBJWCIWO6L2-katg13pcKu8tmq74UOrdBis6UHV2OC84ZQCY7wipoKKMmBSC01lTnXSerPPNlbJIZPMCro_ED08cbZTrf-mSsIkL8sk8HIvEPzXEeKgVjYa6HvtwI-bezNCCeGSJvT5X-jx6vZUq1MB1jU-5TUbUTXLc578wtu0kyNUCw7SJb2DxqbtA356hE-jhpU1RwNeHQQkZoAfQ6vHGNXi08f_YC__nb36csi-uMN2oPuhi77ffu54CPIdaIKPMUDz5wEJVpvG--202jSe2jce-wWw6Rx-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541852913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial</title><source>PLoS</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB*</source><creator>Persaud, Nav ; Bedard, Michael ; Boozary, Andrew ; Glazier, Richard H ; Gomes, Tara ; Hwang, Stephen W ; Juni, Peter ; Law, Michael R ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Manns, Braden ; Martin, Danielle ; Morgan, Steven G ; Oh, Paul ; Pinto, Andrew D ; Shah, Baiju R ; Sullivan, Frank ; Umali, Norman ; Thorpe, Kevin E ; Tu, Karen ; Laupacis, Andreas</creator><contributor>Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Nav ; Bedard, Michael ; Boozary, Andrew ; Glazier, Richard H ; Gomes, Tara ; Hwang, Stephen W ; Juni, Peter ; Law, Michael R ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Manns, Braden ; Martin, Danielle ; Morgan, Steven G ; Oh, Paul ; Pinto, Andrew D ; Shah, Baiju R ; Sullivan, Frank ; Umali, Norman ; Thorpe, Kevin E ; Tu, Karen ; Laupacis, Andreas ; for the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) study team ; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><description>Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted. We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports. In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34019540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Antihypertensives ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Cholesterol ; Chronic diseases ; Costs ; Domestic economic assistance ; Drug dosages ; Drug stores ; Drug therapy ; Economic aspects ; Emergency medical care ; Ethics ; Health aspects ; Heart attacks ; Hemoglobin ; Low density lipoprotein ; Management ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Myocardial infarction ; Patient compliance ; Patients ; People and places ; Primary care ; Psychotropic drugs ; Public health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Shores ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e1003590-e1003590</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Persaud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Persaud et al 2021 Persaud et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c741t-6e55cb38856a47223357f7cbafc87d93f5df354b9aa0f82e603b340d790c5ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c741t-6e55cb38856a47223357f7cbafc87d93f5df354b9aa0f82e603b340d790c5ee93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1276-1101 ; 0000-0002-5985-0670 ; 0000-0003-3327-5580 ; 0000-0003-0883-4934 ; 0000-0002-7952-8320 ; 0000-0003-3598-3628 ; 0000-0002-0603-6958 ; 0000-0002-5191-7180 ; 0000-0002-5637-6053 ; 0000-0002-7529-0028 ; 0000-0003-1841-9347 ; 0000-0002-1468-1965 ; 0000-0002-6623-4964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139488/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139488/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Nav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedard, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boozary, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazier, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juni, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamdani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Steven G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Baiju R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umali, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laupacis, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) study team</creatorcontrib><title>Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><description>Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted. We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports. In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years.</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Chronic diseases</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Domestic economic assistance</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Low density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Shores</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgujFjPlsm70QhmHVgXEXdPU2pOlpm6WTjEmrrr_ezIeyI3Oh5CIhec57ct7kZNlTgqeEFeT1jR-D0_10vYJ6SjBmQuJ72SkRXE5IXuT376xPskcx3mBMJZb4YXbCOCZScHyaDbO6gwDOANIDougWdIjoux06VNs4BFuNg_UO-QZBjOAGq3uUMlpjHcRNjPPIdDq0cI6uO0Dz5cXsEn2AOqKgXe1X9ifUyPTWWZNCk6LuH2cPGt1HeLKfz7LPby-u5-8ny6t3i_lsOTEFJ8MkByFMxcpS5JoXlDImiqYwlW5MWdSSNaJumOCV1Bo3JYUcsypVVhcSGwEg2Vn2bKe77n1Ue8OiooKTUlBJWCIWO6L2-katg13pcKu8tmq74UOrdBis6UHV2OC84ZQCY7wipoKKMmBSC01lTnXSerPPNlbJIZPMCro_ED08cbZTrf-mSsIkL8sk8HIvEPzXEeKgVjYa6HvtwI-bezNCCeGSJvT5X-jx6vZUq1MB1jU-5TUbUTXLc578wtu0kyNUCw7SJb2DxqbtA356hE-jhpU1RwNeHQQkZoAfQ6vHGNXi08f_YC__nb36csi-uMN2oPuhi77ffu54CPIdaIKPMUDz5wEJVpvG--202jSe2jce-wWw6Rx-</recordid><startdate>20210521</startdate><enddate>20210521</enddate><creator>Persaud, Nav</creator><creator>Bedard, Michael</creator><creator>Boozary, Andrew</creator><creator>Glazier, Richard H</creator><creator>Gomes, Tara</creator><creator>Hwang, Stephen W</creator><creator>Juni, Peter</creator><creator>Law, Michael R</creator><creator>Mamdani, Muhammad</creator><creator>Manns, Braden</creator><creator>Martin, Danielle</creator><creator>Morgan, Steven G</creator><creator>Oh, Paul</creator><creator>Pinto, Andrew D</creator><creator>Shah, Baiju R</creator><creator>Sullivan, Frank</creator><creator>Umali, Norman</creator><creator>Thorpe, Kevin E</creator><creator>Tu, Karen</creator><creator>Laupacis, Andreas</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3327-5580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-4934</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-8320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3598-3628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-6958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-7180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-6053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-9347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-1965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-4964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210521</creationdate><title>Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial</title><author>Persaud, Nav ; Bedard, Michael ; Boozary, Andrew ; Glazier, Richard H ; Gomes, Tara ; Hwang, Stephen W ; Juni, Peter ; Law, Michael R ; Mamdani, Muhammad ; Manns, Braden ; Martin, Danielle ; Morgan, Steven G ; Oh, Paul ; Pinto, Andrew D ; Shah, Baiju R ; Sullivan, Frank ; Umali, Norman ; Thorpe, Kevin E ; Tu, Karen ; Laupacis, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c741t-6e55cb38856a47223357f7cbafc87d93f5df354b9aa0f82e603b340d790c5ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Chronic diseases</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Domestic economic assistance</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Low density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Shores</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Nav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedard, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boozary, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazier, Richard H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juni, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamdani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Braden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Steven G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Baiju R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umali, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorpe, Kevin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laupacis, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) study team</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Persaud, Nav</au><au>Bedard, Michael</au><au>Boozary, Andrew</au><au>Glazier, Richard H</au><au>Gomes, Tara</au><au>Hwang, Stephen W</au><au>Juni, Peter</au><au>Law, Michael R</au><au>Mamdani, Muhammad</au><au>Manns, Braden</au><au>Martin, Danielle</au><au>Morgan, Steven G</au><au>Oh, Paul</au><au>Pinto, Andrew D</au><au>Shah, Baiju R</au><au>Sullivan, Frank</au><au>Umali, Norman</au><au>Thorpe, Kevin E</au><au>Tu, Karen</au><au>Laupacis, Andreas</au><au>Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D</au><aucorp>for the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medications (CLEAN Meds) study team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><date>2021-05-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1003590</spage><epage>e1003590</epage><pages>e1003590-e1003590</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted. We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports. In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34019540</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-1101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3327-5580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-4934</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-8320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3598-3628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-6958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-7180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-6053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-9347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-1965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-4964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-1676 |
ispartof | PLoS medicine, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e1003590-e1003590 |
issn | 1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2541852913 |
source | PLoS; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB* |
subjects | Analgesics Antihypertensives Blood pressure Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Cholesterol Chronic diseases Costs Domestic economic assistance Drug dosages Drug stores Drug therapy Economic aspects Emergency medical care Ethics Health aspects Heart attacks Hemoglobin Low density lipoprotein Management Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Myocardial infarction Patient compliance Patients People and places Primary care Psychotropic drugs Public health Research and Analysis Methods Shores Social Sciences |
title | Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence%20at%202%20years%20with%20distribution%20of%20essential%20medicines%20at%20no%20charge:%20The%20CLEAN%20Meds%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Persaud,%20Nav&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20Carefully%20seLected%20and%20Easily%20Accessible%20at%20No%20Charge%20Medications%20(CLEAN%20Meds)%20study%20team&rft.date=2021-05-21&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1003590&rft.epage=e1003590&rft.pages=e1003590-e1003590&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA664603088%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541852913&rft_id=info:pmid/34019540&rft_galeid=A664603088&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d0c06f422e334b1cbeb23e39a5a2962a&rfr_iscdi=true |