Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study

The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0252615-e0252615
Hauptverfasser: Bammann, Karin, Thomson, Nicola K, Albrecht, Birte Marie, Buchan, Duncan S, Easton, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0252615
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0252615
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Bammann, Karin
Thomson, Nicola K
Albrecht, Birte Marie
Buchan, Duncan S
Easton, Chris
description The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was to generate placement-specific cut-points of ActiGraph GT3X+ activity counts and raw measures of acceleration to determine physical activity intensity in older adults. A further aim was to compare the validity of the generated cut-points for a range of different physical activities. The study was a single experimental trial using a convenience sample. Study participants were 20 adults aged 59 to 73 years. Accelerometers were worn at six different placements (one on each wrist, one on each ankle, and two at the hip) and breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry was used as the reference for energy. The experiment comprised of two parts; a) The first required participants to walk on a treadmill at incremental speeds (3.0-5.0 km·h.sup.-1 ), and b) Five different everyday activities (reading, cleaning, shopping, cycling, aerobics) were staged in the laboratory setting. Accelerometer cut-points (activity counts, raw data) were derived for each of the investigated placements by linear regression using the treadmill part. Performance of the cut-points was assessed by applying the cut-points to the everyday activities. We provide cut-points for six placements and two accelerometer metrics in the specific age group. However, the derived cut-points did not outperform published ones. More research and innovative approaches are needed for improving internal and external validity of research results across populations and age groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0252615
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2536786448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A663983569</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e841a845256c4c169dbce896f57b3090</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A663983569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-c653f0545ce561aacff485c91740f0473288121408f1db3dd29b74788dfb75303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uLEzEUxwdR3LX6DQQDgijSOplcJvMilLrWwkJh7S6-hTSXNiWddJNMsd_HD2q6rdLKPkgg19_5n5yTnKJ4DcsBRDX8tPJdaIUbbHyrB2VFKgrJk-ISNqjq06pET0_mF8WLGFdlSRCj9HlxgXDJYA3JZfFrrFsdRLK-BaJVYCucVYelN2Aokx0HsVmC8Qz9-AiElNrp4Nc66QBkl_obb9sUgfEBiBh1jLZdgM1yF60ULvPJbm3agQzpNh5mwDuVrYXqXIoDMFtqML2dfZlOb8BwNJvcXZ1eIqZO7V4Wz4xwUb86jr3i9uvVbPStfz0dT0bD676ktEm5J8iUBBOpCYVCSGMwI7KBNS5NiWtUMQYrmGM3UM2RUlUzr3HNmDLzmqAS9Yo3B92N85EfExx5RRCtGcWYZWJyIJQXK74Jdi3Cjnth-cOGDwsuQrLSaa4ZhoJhUhEqsYS0UXOpWUMNqeeobPbePh-9dfO1VlK3KQh3Jnp-0tolX_gtz0-HaYOywPujQPD3nY6Jr23MD-REq333cO-aoqqmdUbf_oM-Ht2RWogcgG2Nz37lXpQPKUUNQyT77RWDR6jclF5bmX-jsXn_zODDmUFmkv6ZFqKLkU--3_w_O707Z9-dsEstXFpG77r9x4nnID6AMvgYgzZ_kwxLvi-mP9ng-2Lix2JCvwFHMhCv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2536786448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Bammann, Karin ; Thomson, Nicola K ; Albrecht, Birte Marie ; Buchan, Duncan S ; Easton, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Bammann, Karin ; Thomson, Nicola K ; Albrecht, Birte Marie ; Buchan, Duncan S ; Easton, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was to generate placement-specific cut-points of ActiGraph GT3X+ activity counts and raw measures of acceleration to determine physical activity intensity in older adults. A further aim was to compare the validity of the generated cut-points for a range of different physical activities. The study was a single experimental trial using a convenience sample. Study participants were 20 adults aged 59 to 73 years. Accelerometers were worn at six different placements (one on each wrist, one on each ankle, and two at the hip) and breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry was used as the reference for energy. The experiment comprised of two parts; a) The first required participants to walk on a treadmill at incremental speeds (3.0-5.0 km·h.sup.-1 ), and b) Five different everyday activities (reading, cleaning, shopping, cycling, aerobics) were staged in the laboratory setting. Accelerometer cut-points (activity counts, raw data) were derived for each of the investigated placements by linear regression using the treadmill part. Performance of the cut-points was assessed by applying the cut-points to the everyday activities. We provide cut-points for six placements and two accelerometer metrics in the specific age group. However, the derived cut-points did not outperform published ones. More research and innovative approaches are needed for improving internal and external validity of research results across populations and age groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252615</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34081715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Adults ; Ankle ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood pressure ; Body mass ; Cardiovascular system ; Digital media ; Energy expenditure ; Engineering and Technology ; Epidemiology ; Exercise ; Fitness equipment ; Health sciences ; Laboratories ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metabolism ; Older people ; People and Places ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Population ; Population studies ; Public health ; Quality of life ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Social networks ; Validity ; Walking ; Working groups ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0252615-e0252615</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Bammann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Bammann et al 2021 Bammann et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-c653f0545ce561aacff485c91740f0473288121408f1db3dd29b74788dfb75303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-c653f0545ce561aacff485c91740f0473288121408f1db3dd29b74788dfb75303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5623-8160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174693/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174693/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bammann, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Nicola K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Birte Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchan, Duncan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easton, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was to generate placement-specific cut-points of ActiGraph GT3X+ activity counts and raw measures of acceleration to determine physical activity intensity in older adults. A further aim was to compare the validity of the generated cut-points for a range of different physical activities. The study was a single experimental trial using a convenience sample. Study participants were 20 adults aged 59 to 73 years. Accelerometers were worn at six different placements (one on each wrist, one on each ankle, and two at the hip) and breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry was used as the reference for energy. The experiment comprised of two parts; a) The first required participants to walk on a treadmill at incremental speeds (3.0-5.0 km·h.sup.-1 ), and b) Five different everyday activities (reading, cleaning, shopping, cycling, aerobics) were staged in the laboratory setting. Accelerometer cut-points (activity counts, raw data) were derived for each of the investigated placements by linear regression using the treadmill part. Performance of the cut-points was assessed by applying the cut-points to the everyday activities. We provide cut-points for six placements and two accelerometer metrics in the specific age group. However, the derived cut-points did not outperform published ones. More research and innovative approaches are needed for improving internal and external validity of research results across populations and age groups.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Energy expenditure</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uLEzEUxwdR3LX6DQQDgijSOplcJvMilLrWwkJh7S6-hTSXNiWddJNMsd_HD2q6rdLKPkgg19_5n5yTnKJ4DcsBRDX8tPJdaIUbbHyrB2VFKgrJk-ISNqjq06pET0_mF8WLGFdlSRCj9HlxgXDJYA3JZfFrrFsdRLK-BaJVYCucVYelN2Aokx0HsVmC8Qz9-AiElNrp4Nc66QBkl_obb9sUgfEBiBh1jLZdgM1yF60ULvPJbm3agQzpNh5mwDuVrYXqXIoDMFtqML2dfZlOb8BwNJvcXZ1eIqZO7V4Wz4xwUb86jr3i9uvVbPStfz0dT0bD676ktEm5J8iUBBOpCYVCSGMwI7KBNS5NiWtUMQYrmGM3UM2RUlUzr3HNmDLzmqAS9Yo3B92N85EfExx5RRCtGcWYZWJyIJQXK74Jdi3Cjnth-cOGDwsuQrLSaa4ZhoJhUhEqsYS0UXOpWUMNqeeobPbePh-9dfO1VlK3KQh3Jnp-0tolX_gtz0-HaYOywPujQPD3nY6Jr23MD-REq333cO-aoqqmdUbf_oM-Ht2RWogcgG2Nz37lXpQPKUUNQyT77RWDR6jclF5bmX-jsXn_zODDmUFmkv6ZFqKLkU--3_w_O707Z9-dsEstXFpG77r9x4nnID6AMvgYgzZ_kwxLvi-mP9ng-2Lix2JCvwFHMhCv</recordid><startdate>20210603</startdate><enddate>20210603</enddate><creator>Bammann, Karin</creator><creator>Thomson, Nicola K</creator><creator>Albrecht, Birte Marie</creator><creator>Buchan, Duncan S</creator><creator>Easton, Chris</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-8160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210603</creationdate><title>Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study</title><author>Bammann, Karin ; Thomson, Nicola K ; Albrecht, Birte Marie ; Buchan, Duncan S ; Easton, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-c653f0545ce561aacff485c91740f0473288121408f1db3dd29b74788dfb75303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Energy expenditure</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bammann, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Nicola K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Birte Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchan, Duncan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easton, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bammann, Karin</au><au>Thomson, Nicola K</au><au>Albrecht, Birte Marie</au><au>Buchan, Duncan S</au><au>Easton, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-06-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0252615</spage><epage>e0252615</epage><pages>e0252615-e0252615</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The study of physical activity in older adults is becoming more and more relevant. For evaluation of physical activity recommendations, intensity-specific accelerometer cut-points are utilized. However, research on accelerometer cut-points for older adults is still scarce. The aim of the study was to generate placement-specific cut-points of ActiGraph GT3X+ activity counts and raw measures of acceleration to determine physical activity intensity in older adults. A further aim was to compare the validity of the generated cut-points for a range of different physical activities. The study was a single experimental trial using a convenience sample. Study participants were 20 adults aged 59 to 73 years. Accelerometers were worn at six different placements (one on each wrist, one on each ankle, and two at the hip) and breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry was used as the reference for energy. The experiment comprised of two parts; a) The first required participants to walk on a treadmill at incremental speeds (3.0-5.0 km·h.sup.-1 ), and b) Five different everyday activities (reading, cleaning, shopping, cycling, aerobics) were staged in the laboratory setting. Accelerometer cut-points (activity counts, raw data) were derived for each of the investigated placements by linear regression using the treadmill part. Performance of the cut-points was assessed by applying the cut-points to the everyday activities. We provide cut-points for six placements and two accelerometer metrics in the specific age group. However, the derived cut-points did not outperform published ones. More research and innovative approaches are needed for improving internal and external validity of research results across populations and age groups.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34081715</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0252615</doi><tpages>e0252615</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-8160</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0252615-e0252615
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2536786448
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Accelerometers
Adults
Ankle
Biology and Life Sciences
Blood pressure
Body mass
Cardiovascular system
Digital media
Energy expenditure
Engineering and Technology
Epidemiology
Exercise
Fitness equipment
Health sciences
Laboratories
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metabolism
Older people
People and Places
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Population
Population studies
Public health
Quality of life
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Social networks
Validity
Walking
Working groups
Wrist
title Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generation%20and%20validation%20of%20ActiGraph%20GT3X+%20accelerometer%20cut-points%20for%20assessing%20physical%20activity%20intensity%20in%20older%20adults.%20The%20OUTDOOR%20ACTIVE%20validation%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bammann,%20Karin&rft.date=2021-06-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0252615&rft.epage=e0252615&rft.pages=e0252615-e0252615&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0252615&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA663983569%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2536786448&rft_id=info:pmid/34081715&rft_galeid=A663983569&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e841a845256c4c169dbce896f57b3090&rfr_iscdi=true