The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses

Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0252166-e0252166
Hauptverfasser: van Loon, Fredericus H. J, Korsten, Hendrikus H. M, Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M, Bouwman, Arthur R. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0252166
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0252166
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator van Loon, Fredericus H. J
Korsten, Hendrikus H. M
Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M
Bouwman, Arthur R. A
description Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first attempt success rate can be of added value in clinical. This study tries to give insight into the consideration that must be made when selecting the target vein and the type of catheter, and proved the null hypothesis that an optimal CVR would not be associated with increased first attempt cannulation success. This was a post-hoc analyses on adult patients admitted for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines, by applying the traditional landmark approach. The CVR was calculated afterwards for each individual patient by dividing the external diameter of the inserted catheter by the diameter of the target vein, which was multiplied by 100%. In total, 610 patients were included. The median CVR was 0.39 (0.15) in patients with a successful first attempt, whereas patients with an unsuccessful first attempt had a median CVR of 0.55 (0.20) (P
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0252166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2531526608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A662781708</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6cec0e44b06c4c3cb71ec6361e9e76fc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A662781708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-6fe481598ad631fb2d9360e701e51043c6d0fa2422f055a3506cdeebe8e4eeb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk2uL1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgijYMZc2bb8Iy-JlYGFBV7-GTHo6zZhJapIO7r833amylf0ghdz6nPckb3Ky7DnBK8Iq8m7nRm-lWQ3OwgrTkhLOH2SnpGE05xSzh3fGJ9mTEHYYl6zm_HF2wgpMG1by0-zHdQ9I7wepInIdimmmZGojeBQdOoC2yMuoHXIWDeD10IOXBmkbvTyAdWNIAdaOZoIsCqNSEMJbJNHgQsx7p5BM27wJEJ5mjzppAjyb-7Ps28cP1xef88urT-uL88tccd7EnHdQ1KRsatlyRroNbRvGMVSYQElwwRRvcSdpQWmHy1KyEnPVAmyghiJ1mJ1lL466g3FBzD4FQUtGSso5rhOxPhKtkzsxeL2X_kY4qcXtgvNbIX3UyoDgChSGotikLIVialMRUJxxAg1UvFNJ6_2cbdzsoVUwOWMWoss_Vvdi6w6iJgVjNU0Cr2cB736OEKLY66DAGGkh2Tvtm9Iy3S5P6Mt_0PtPN1NbmQ6gbedSXjWJinPOaVWT6pZa3UOlr4W9VulRdTqtLwLeLAISE-FX3MoxBLH--uX_2avvS_bVHbYHaWIfnBmn9xSWYHEElXcheOj-mkywmGrijxtiqgkx1wT7DQCa_gE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531526608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>van Loon, Fredericus H. J ; Korsten, Hendrikus H. M ; Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M ; Bouwman, Arthur R. A</creator><contributor>Chen, Robert Jeenchen</contributor><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Fredericus H. J ; Korsten, Hendrikus H. M ; Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M ; Bouwman, Arthur R. A ; Chen, Robert Jeenchen</creatorcontrib><description>Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first attempt success rate can be of added value in clinical. This study tries to give insight into the consideration that must be made when selecting the target vein and the type of catheter, and proved the null hypothesis that an optimal CVR would not be associated with increased first attempt cannulation success. This was a post-hoc analyses on adult patients admitted for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines, by applying the traditional landmark approach. The CVR was calculated afterwards for each individual patient by dividing the external diameter of the inserted catheter by the diameter of the target vein, which was multiplied by 100%. In total, 610 patients were included. The median CVR was 0.39 (0.15) in patients with a successful first attempt, whereas patients with an unsuccessful first attempt had a median CVR of 0.55 (0.20) (P&lt;0.001). The optimal cut-off point of the CVR was 0.41. First attempt cannulation was successful in 92% of patients with a CVR0.41 had a first attempt success rate of 65% (P&lt;0.001). This first introduction of the CVR in relation to cannulation success should be further investigated. Although, measuring the venous diameter or detection of a vein with a specific diameter prior to cannulation may increase first attempt cannulation success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34029356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cannulation ; Catheters ; Complications and side effects ; Datasets ; Electrical engineering ; Engineering and Technology ; Health risks ; Hospitals ; Hypotheses ; Intensive care ; Intravenous administration ; Intravenous catheterization ; Medical instruments ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Patients ; People and Places ; Risk factors ; Signal processing ; Success ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Veins ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0252166-e0252166</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 van Loon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 van Loon et al 2021 van Loon et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-6fe481598ad631fb2d9360e701e51043c6d0fa2422f055a3506cdeebe8e4eeb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-6fe481598ad631fb2d9360e701e51043c6d0fa2422f055a3506cdeebe8e4eeb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3854-6976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143382/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143382/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chen, Robert Jeenchen</contributor><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Fredericus H. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsten, Hendrikus H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Arthur R. A</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first attempt success rate can be of added value in clinical. This study tries to give insight into the consideration that must be made when selecting the target vein and the type of catheter, and proved the null hypothesis that an optimal CVR would not be associated with increased first attempt cannulation success. This was a post-hoc analyses on adult patients admitted for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines, by applying the traditional landmark approach. The CVR was calculated afterwards for each individual patient by dividing the external diameter of the inserted catheter by the diameter of the target vein, which was multiplied by 100%. In total, 610 patients were included. The median CVR was 0.39 (0.15) in patients with a successful first attempt, whereas patients with an unsuccessful first attempt had a median CVR of 0.55 (0.20) (P&lt;0.001). The optimal cut-off point of the CVR was 0.41. First attempt cannulation was successful in 92% of patients with a CVR0.41 had a first attempt success rate of 65% (P&lt;0.001). This first introduction of the CVR in relation to cannulation success should be further investigated. Although, measuring the venous diameter or detection of a vein with a specific diameter prior to cannulation may increase first attempt cannulation success.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cannulation</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Electrical engineering</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Intravenous catheterization</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Veins</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk2uL1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgijYMZc2bb8Iy-JlYGFBV7-GTHo6zZhJapIO7r833amylf0ghdz6nPckb3Ky7DnBK8Iq8m7nRm-lWQ3OwgrTkhLOH2SnpGE05xSzh3fGJ9mTEHYYl6zm_HF2wgpMG1by0-zHdQ9I7wepInIdimmmZGojeBQdOoC2yMuoHXIWDeD10IOXBmkbvTyAdWNIAdaOZoIsCqNSEMJbJNHgQsx7p5BM27wJEJ5mjzppAjyb-7Ps28cP1xef88urT-uL88tccd7EnHdQ1KRsatlyRroNbRvGMVSYQElwwRRvcSdpQWmHy1KyEnPVAmyghiJ1mJ1lL466g3FBzD4FQUtGSso5rhOxPhKtkzsxeL2X_kY4qcXtgvNbIX3UyoDgChSGotikLIVialMRUJxxAg1UvFNJ6_2cbdzsoVUwOWMWoss_Vvdi6w6iJgVjNU0Cr2cB736OEKLY66DAGGkh2Tvtm9Iy3S5P6Mt_0PtPN1NbmQ6gbedSXjWJinPOaVWT6pZa3UOlr4W9VulRdTqtLwLeLAISE-FX3MoxBLH--uX_2avvS_bVHbYHaWIfnBmn9xSWYHEElXcheOj-mkywmGrijxtiqgkx1wT7DQCa_gE</recordid><startdate>20210524</startdate><enddate>20210524</enddate><creator>van Loon, Fredericus H. J</creator><creator>Korsten, Hendrikus H. M</creator><creator>Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M</creator><creator>Bouwman, Arthur R. A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-6976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210524</creationdate><title>The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses</title><author>van Loon, Fredericus H. J ; Korsten, Hendrikus H. M ; Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M ; Bouwman, Arthur R. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-6fe481598ad631fb2d9360e701e51043c6d0fa2422f055a3506cdeebe8e4eeb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cannulation</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Electrical engineering</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Intravenous catheterization</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Veins</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Fredericus H. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsten, Hendrikus H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Arthur R. A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Loon, Fredericus H. J</au><au>Korsten, Hendrikus H. M</au><au>Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M</au><au>Bouwman, Arthur R. A</au><au>Chen, Robert Jeenchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2021-05-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0252166</spage><epage>e0252166</epage><pages>e0252166-e0252166</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Intravenous cannulation is usually the first procedure performed in modern healthcare, although establishing peripheral intravenous access is challenging in some patients. The impact of the ratio between venous diameter and the size of the inserted catheter (catheter to vein ratio, CVR) on the first attempt success rate can be of added value in clinical. This study tries to give insight into the consideration that must be made when selecting the target vein and the type of catheter, and proved the null hypothesis that an optimal CVR would not be associated with increased first attempt cannulation success. This was a post-hoc analyses on adult patients admitted for peripheral intravenous cannulation. Intravenous cannulation was performed according to practice guidelines, by applying the traditional landmark approach. The CVR was calculated afterwards for each individual patient by dividing the external diameter of the inserted catheter by the diameter of the target vein, which was multiplied by 100%. In total, 610 patients were included. The median CVR was 0.39 (0.15) in patients with a successful first attempt, whereas patients with an unsuccessful first attempt had a median CVR of 0.55 (0.20) (P&lt;0.001). The optimal cut-off point of the CVR was 0.41. First attempt cannulation was successful in 92% of patients with a CVR0.41 had a first attempt success rate of 65% (P&lt;0.001). This first introduction of the CVR in relation to cannulation success should be further investigated. Although, measuring the venous diameter or detection of a vein with a specific diameter prior to cannulation may increase first attempt cannulation success.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34029356</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0252166</doi><tpages>e0252166</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-6976</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0252166-e0252166
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2531526608
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Biology and Life Sciences
Cannulation
Catheters
Complications and side effects
Datasets
Electrical engineering
Engineering and Technology
Health risks
Hospitals
Hypotheses
Intensive care
Intravenous administration
Intravenous catheterization
Medical instruments
Medicine and Health Sciences
Patients
People and Places
Risk factors
Signal processing
Success
Ultrasonic imaging
Veins
Veins & arteries
title The impact of the catheter to vein ratio on peripheral intravenous cannulation success, a post-hoc analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20catheter%20to%20vein%20ratio%20on%20peripheral%20intravenous%20cannulation%20success,%20a%20post-hoc%20analyses&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=van%20Loon,%20Fredericus%20H.%20J&rft.date=2021-05-24&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0252166&rft.epage=e0252166&rft.pages=e0252166-e0252166&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0252166&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA662781708%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531526608&rft_id=info:pmid/34029356&rft_galeid=A662781708&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6cec0e44b06c4c3cb71ec6361e9e76fc&rfr_iscdi=true