Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study
The demand for high value health care uncovered a steady trend in laboratory tests ordering and inappropriate testing practices. Residents' training in laboratory ordering practice provides an opportunity for quality improvement. We collected information on demographics, the main reason for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0250769 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0250769 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Doi, Dimitria Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho Ferreira Junior, Mario Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes Perazzio, Sandro Félix Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Lichtenstein, Arnaldo Taniguchi, Leandro Utino Sumita, Nairo Massakazu Corá, Aline Pivetta Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik Duarte, Alberto José da Silva |
description | The demand for high value health care uncovered a steady trend in laboratory tests ordering and inappropriate testing practices. Residents' training in laboratory ordering practice provides an opportunity for quality improvement. We collected information on demographics, the main reason for the appointment, preexisting medical conditions and presence of co-morbidities from first-visit patients to the internal medicine outpatient service of our university general hospital. We also collected information on all laboratory tests ordered by the attending medical residents. At a follow-up visit, we recorded residents' subjective perception on the usefulness of each ordered laboratory test for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or screening. We observed that 17.3% of all ordered tests had no perceived utility by the attending resident. Tests were usually ordered to exclude differential diagnoses (26.7%) and to help prognosis estimation (19.1%). Age and co-morbidity influenced the chosen category to legitimate usefulness of tests ordering. This study suggests that clinical objectives (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or prevention) as well as personalization to age and previous health conditions should be considered before test ordering to allow a more appropriate laboratory tests ordering, but further studies are necessary to examine this framework beyond this medical training scenario. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0250769 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2525626375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A661457535</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_98be46bc03c546669cb5ea3a3f586ff1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A661457535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9d78de81cc57abb87f832b47b0608d45ebdc67ca73e8dfad1ff8c56d6d27379b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0ZLEiZ1wgVRNfFSaNMTXreWP49aVG2e2M9H_wQ_GWbOpRbtAuXB8_Lyv7eNzsux5kc8LTIt3Gzf4jtt57zqY52WdU9I-yE6LFpczUub44cH_SfYkhE2e17gh5HF2gnFLK1K2p9mfr-Al9NG4DjmNhgB6sB2EMM4sF87z6PwORQgxxbwCb7oVEjtkugjjAdAWlJGmA-QhGAVd4kyH-FYMdq8NEGMSvUcLFNJoYSZhFKPeu9CDjOYakHRr5yMKcVC7p9kjzW2AZ9N4lv389PHH-ZfZxeXn5fniYiZJW8ZZq2ijoCmkrCkXoqG6waWoqMhJ3qiqBqEkoZJTDI3SXBVaN7ImiqiSYtoKfJa93Pv21gU2JTSwsi5rUhJM60Qs94RyfMN6b7bc75jjht0EnF8x7qORFljbCKiIkDmWdUUIaaWogWOOdd0QrYvk9WHabRApZ2MOPLdHpscrnVmzlbtmTVGUhOBk8GYy8O5qSA_CtiZIsJZ34Iabc5OiogUmCX31D3r_7SZqxdMFTKdd2leOpmxBklWdmJGa30OlT8HWyFR92qT4keDtkSAxEX7HFR9CYMvv3_6fvfx1zL4-YNfAbVwHZ4exeMMxWO1BmQoseNB3SS5yNjbPbTbY2Dxsap4ke3H4QHei227BfwGErhlR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525626375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Doi, Dimitria ; Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do ; Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia ; Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho ; Ferreira Junior, Mario ; Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes ; Perazzio, Sandro Félix ; Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro ; Lichtenstein, Arnaldo ; Taniguchi, Leandro Utino ; Sumita, Nairo Massakazu ; Corá, Aline Pivetta ; Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik ; Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</creator><creatorcontrib>Doi, Dimitria ; Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do ; Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia ; Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho ; Ferreira Junior, Mario ; Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes ; Perazzio, Sandro Félix ; Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro ; Lichtenstein, Arnaldo ; Taniguchi, Leandro Utino ; Sumita, Nairo Massakazu ; Corá, Aline Pivetta ; Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik ; Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</creatorcontrib><description>The demand for high value health care uncovered a steady trend in laboratory tests ordering and inappropriate testing practices. Residents' training in laboratory ordering practice provides an opportunity for quality improvement. We collected information on demographics, the main reason for the appointment, preexisting medical conditions and presence of co-morbidities from first-visit patients to the internal medicine outpatient service of our university general hospital. We also collected information on all laboratory tests ordered by the attending medical residents. At a follow-up visit, we recorded residents' subjective perception on the usefulness of each ordered laboratory test for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or screening. We observed that 17.3% of all ordered tests had no perceived utility by the attending resident. Tests were usually ordered to exclude differential diagnoses (26.7%) and to help prognosis estimation (19.1%). Age and co-morbidity influenced the chosen category to legitimate usefulness of tests ordering. This study suggests that clinical objectives (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or prevention) as well as personalization to age and previous health conditions should be considered before test ordering to allow a more appropriate laboratory tests ordering, but further studies are necessary to examine this framework beyond this medical training scenario.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250769</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33974629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; Clinics ; Cohort analysis ; Costs ; Curricula ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Disease ; Editing ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Evaluation ; Expectancy ; Female ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Incentives ; Internal medicine ; Internal Medicine - education ; Internship and Residency ; Laboratories ; Laboratory tests ; Legal medicine ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Medical prognosis ; Medical tests ; Medical treatment ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Middle Aged ; Monetary incentives ; Outpatient care facilities ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Research and Analysis Methods</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0250769</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Doi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Doi et al 2021 Doi et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9d78de81cc57abb87f832b47b0608d45ebdc67ca73e8dfad1ff8c56d6d27379b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9d78de81cc57abb87f832b47b0608d45ebdc67ca73e8dfad1ff8c56d6d27379b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1909-206X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112663/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112663/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doi, Dimitria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira Junior, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzio, Sandro Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenstein, Arnaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Leandro Utino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumita, Nairo Massakazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corá, Aline Pivetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The demand for high value health care uncovered a steady trend in laboratory tests ordering and inappropriate testing practices. Residents' training in laboratory ordering practice provides an opportunity for quality improvement. We collected information on demographics, the main reason for the appointment, preexisting medical conditions and presence of co-morbidities from first-visit patients to the internal medicine outpatient service of our university general hospital. We also collected information on all laboratory tests ordered by the attending medical residents. At a follow-up visit, we recorded residents' subjective perception on the usefulness of each ordered laboratory test for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or screening. We observed that 17.3% of all ordered tests had no perceived utility by the attending resident. Tests were usually ordered to exclude differential diagnoses (26.7%) and to help prognosis estimation (19.1%). Age and co-morbidity influenced the chosen category to legitimate usefulness of tests ordering. This study suggests that clinical objectives (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or prevention) as well as personalization to age and previous health conditions should be considered before test ordering to allow a more appropriate laboratory tests ordering, but further studies are necessary to examine this framework beyond this medical training scenario.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expectancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - education</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Legal medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monetary incentives</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBYQkJw0ZLEiZ1wgVRNfFSaNMTXreWP49aVG2e2M9H_wQ_GWbOpRbtAuXB8_Lyv7eNzsux5kc8LTIt3Gzf4jtt57zqY52WdU9I-yE6LFpczUub44cH_SfYkhE2e17gh5HF2gnFLK1K2p9mfr-Al9NG4DjmNhgB6sB2EMM4sF87z6PwORQgxxbwCb7oVEjtkugjjAdAWlJGmA-QhGAVd4kyH-FYMdq8NEGMSvUcLFNJoYSZhFKPeu9CDjOYakHRr5yMKcVC7p9kjzW2AZ9N4lv389PHH-ZfZxeXn5fniYiZJW8ZZq2ijoCmkrCkXoqG6waWoqMhJ3qiqBqEkoZJTDI3SXBVaN7ImiqiSYtoKfJa93Pv21gU2JTSwsi5rUhJM60Qs94RyfMN6b7bc75jjht0EnF8x7qORFljbCKiIkDmWdUUIaaWogWOOdd0QrYvk9WHabRApZ2MOPLdHpscrnVmzlbtmTVGUhOBk8GYy8O5qSA_CtiZIsJZ34Iabc5OiogUmCX31D3r_7SZqxdMFTKdd2leOpmxBklWdmJGa30OlT8HWyFR92qT4keDtkSAxEX7HFR9CYMvv3_6fvfx1zL4-YNfAbVwHZ4exeMMxWO1BmQoseNB3SS5yNjbPbTbY2Dxsap4ke3H4QHei227BfwGErhlR</recordid><startdate>20210511</startdate><enddate>20210511</enddate><creator>Doi, Dimitria</creator><creator>Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do</creator><creator>Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia</creator><creator>Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho</creator><creator>Ferreira Junior, Mario</creator><creator>Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes</creator><creator>Perazzio, Sandro Félix</creator><creator>Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro</creator><creator>Lichtenstein, Arnaldo</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Leandro Utino</creator><creator>Sumita, Nairo Massakazu</creator><creator>Corá, Aline Pivetta</creator><creator>Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik</creator><creator>Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-206X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210511</creationdate><title>Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study</title><author>Doi, Dimitria ; Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do ; Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia ; Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho ; Ferreira Junior, Mario ; Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes ; Perazzio, Sandro Félix ; Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro ; Lichtenstein, Arnaldo ; Taniguchi, Leandro Utino ; Sumita, Nairo Massakazu ; Corá, Aline Pivetta ; Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik ; Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9d78de81cc57abb87f832b47b0608d45ebdc67ca73e8dfad1ff8c56d6d27379b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expectancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - education</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Legal medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monetary incentives</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doi, Dimitria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira Junior, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzio, Sandro Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenstein, Arnaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Leandro Utino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumita, Nairo Massakazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corá, Aline Pivetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doi, Dimitria</au><au>Vale, Romulo Ribeiro do</au><au>Monteiro, Jean Michell Correia</au><au>Plens, Glauco Cabral Marinho</au><au>Ferreira Junior, Mario</au><au>Fonseca, Luiz Augusto Marcondes</au><au>Perazzio, Sandro Félix</au><au>Besen, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro</au><au>Lichtenstein, Arnaldo</au><au>Taniguchi, Leandro Utino</au><au>Sumita, Nairo Massakazu</au><au>Corá, Aline Pivetta</au><au>Eisencraft, Adriana Pasmanik</au><au>Duarte, Alberto José da Silva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-05-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0250769</spage><pages>e0250769-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The demand for high value health care uncovered a steady trend in laboratory tests ordering and inappropriate testing practices. Residents' training in laboratory ordering practice provides an opportunity for quality improvement. We collected information on demographics, the main reason for the appointment, preexisting medical conditions and presence of co-morbidities from first-visit patients to the internal medicine outpatient service of our university general hospital. We also collected information on all laboratory tests ordered by the attending medical residents. At a follow-up visit, we recorded residents' subjective perception on the usefulness of each ordered laboratory test for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or screening. We observed that 17.3% of all ordered tests had no perceived utility by the attending resident. Tests were usually ordered to exclude differential diagnoses (26.7%) and to help prognosis estimation (19.1%). Age and co-morbidity influenced the chosen category to legitimate usefulness of tests ordering. This study suggests that clinical objectives (diagnosis, prognosis, treatment or prevention) as well as personalization to age and previous health conditions should be considered before test ordering to allow a more appropriate laboratory tests ordering, but further studies are necessary to examine this framework beyond this medical training scenario.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33974629</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0250769</doi><tpages>e0250769</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-206X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0250769 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2525626375 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Adult Aged Ambulatory Care Biology and Life Sciences Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards Clinics Cohort analysis Costs Curricula Diagnostic Tests, Routine Disease Editing Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Evaluation Expectancy Female Health care Health care policy Hospitals Humans Incentives Internal medicine Internal Medicine - education Internship and Residency Laboratories Laboratory tests Legal medicine Male Medical diagnosis Medical personnel Medical prognosis Medical tests Medical treatment Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methodology Middle Aged Monetary incentives Outpatient care facilities Patients People and Places Physicians Prospective Studies Research and Analysis Methods |
title | Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20usefulness%20of%20laboratory%20tests%20ordering%20by%20internal%20medicine%20residents%20in%20ambulatory%20setting:%20A%20single-center%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Doi,%20Dimitria&rft.date=2021-05-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0250769&rft.pages=e0250769-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0250769&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA661457535%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525626375&rft_id=info:pmid/33974629&rft_galeid=A661457535&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_98be46bc03c546669cb5ea3a3f586ff1&rfr_iscdi=true |