Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia
The impact of protected areas on local communities is the subject of intense discussions as part of the implementation of the global ecosystem protection agenda. Conflicts between the interests of environmental protection and the needs of socio-economic development become particularly acute when lar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0251383-e0251383 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0251383 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0251383 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Maksanova, Lyudmila Bardakhanova, Taisiya Lubsanova, Natalia Budaeva, Darima Tulokhonov, Arnold |
description | The impact of protected areas on local communities is the subject of intense discussions as part of the implementation of the global ecosystem protection agenda. Conflicts between the interests of environmental protection and the needs of socio-economic development become particularly acute when large areas of land are taken out of economic circulation as a result of organizing protected areas. In this case, there is an urgent need for detailed and reliable information about the social impacts of such land withdrawal on the well-being of the local population. An analysis of the methodological approaches widely presented in the literature, used to assess the social impact of protected areas, testifies to the insufficiency of completed and practically applicable methodological guidelines for the areas with significant restrictions for people who form part of the protected landscape. In this study, we understand the cost estimate of the social impact of national parks on the local population as a quantitative calculation of the losses due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets. The methodological approach consists in considering the category of losses as a sum total of the actual damage and lost profits. The assessment algorithm includes three stages: systematization of social impacts on citizens, development of indicators and data collection, and calculation of actual damage to the population and lost profits. The assessment is performed using the example of the Tunkinsky National Park located in the Tunkinsky municipal district of the Republic of Buryatia, a region of the Russian Federation, where there are 14 rural settlements with a population of more than 20,000 people. The results of the calculations show that the losses of the rural population due to legal restrictions on the registration of land dealings amount to 170.4 million USD. Taking into account the potential amount of administrative fines and the value of property subject to demolition, the losses amount to 239.2 million USD. It is more than an order of magnitude greater than the amount of own revenues of the Tunkinsky municipal district in 2011-2019. The results obtained demonstrate the real picture of the impact of restrictions on the rights of local people to land within the boundaries of national parks and are useful for developing measures to account for their interests and include protected areas in the socio-economic development of regions. The methodologi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0251383 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2524841524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A661372227</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_52d78bd17ece44fd9e00d36f26e90724</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A661372227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eb480ca4b4ac156793bc8a2ab4fd9e052375580263698a5a283e3c69b5261d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQDC6LgjGnSpq0PwrB4GVhcWUdfQ5qm08x0mpqk6nwiv6anne4ylX2Q0ktOfud_0nMJgqchnoc0Cd9sTGcbUc9b06g5JnFIU3ovOA0zSmaMYHr_6PskeOTcBuOYpow9DE4ozRKcxew0-LNwTjm3U41HpkS16ZfIG-QrBSspatSatquF16ZBRaf6Pauct1r2JofADKy2yPxqlHWVbpHV68oPKrVoCtTfrTWtsn6PBATw7i1agb4UTvVR-1irrtnqxm336PMQCwJ_EXb7Gl13zmnxOHhQitqpJ-P7LPj24f3q4tPs8urj8mJxOZMsI36m8ijFUkR5JGQYsySjuUwFEXlUFpnCMaFJHKeYMMqyVMSCpFRRcM1jwsKCFvQseH7QbSEVfMyx4yQmURqF8ARieSAKIza8tXon7J4boflgMHbNhfVa1orHpEjSvAgTJVV0OAEuKCsJUxlOBq13Y7Qu36lCQhWsqCei051GV3xtfvI0xFlKKQi8HAWs-dFBWfhOO6lqyLsy3XDumLEoYQzQ83_Qu_9upNYCfkA3pYG4shflC8ag8QghCVDzOyi4CrXTEhqy1GCfOLyaOADj1W-_FlBcvvx6_f_s1fcp--KIrZSofeVM3Q2tOQWjAygttLhV5W2SQ8z7ebrJBu_niY_zBG7Pjgt063QzQPQvdHwdBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524841524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Maksanova, Lyudmila ; Bardakhanova, Taisiya ; Lubsanova, Natalia ; Budaeva, Darima ; Tulokhonov, Arnold</creator><creatorcontrib>Maksanova, Lyudmila ; Bardakhanova, Taisiya ; Lubsanova, Natalia ; Budaeva, Darima ; Tulokhonov, Arnold</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of protected areas on local communities is the subject of intense discussions as part of the implementation of the global ecosystem protection agenda. Conflicts between the interests of environmental protection and the needs of socio-economic development become particularly acute when large areas of land are taken out of economic circulation as a result of organizing protected areas. In this case, there is an urgent need for detailed and reliable information about the social impacts of such land withdrawal on the well-being of the local population. An analysis of the methodological approaches widely presented in the literature, used to assess the social impact of protected areas, testifies to the insufficiency of completed and practically applicable methodological guidelines for the areas with significant restrictions for people who form part of the protected landscape. In this study, we understand the cost estimate of the social impact of national parks on the local population as a quantitative calculation of the losses due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets. The methodological approach consists in considering the category of losses as a sum total of the actual damage and lost profits. The assessment algorithm includes three stages: systematization of social impacts on citizens, development of indicators and data collection, and calculation of actual damage to the population and lost profits. The assessment is performed using the example of the Tunkinsky National Park located in the Tunkinsky municipal district of the Republic of Buryatia, a region of the Russian Federation, where there are 14 rural settlements with a population of more than 20,000 people. The results of the calculations show that the losses of the rural population due to legal restrictions on the registration of land dealings amount to 170.4 million USD. Taking into account the potential amount of administrative fines and the value of property subject to demolition, the losses amount to 239.2 million USD. It is more than an order of magnitude greater than the amount of own revenues of the Tunkinsky municipal district in 2011-2019. The results obtained demonstrate the real picture of the impact of restrictions on the rights of local people to land within the boundaries of national parks and are useful for developing measures to account for their interests and include protected areas in the socio-economic development of regions. The methodological approach developed by the authors can be used in other national parks, where it is necessary to optimize the policy of improving land use for local residents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33970956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Community ; Conservation ; Costs ; Drafting software ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic aspects ; Ecosystem services ; Ecotourism ; Editing ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental policy ; Human rights ; Land ownership ; Land tenure ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Local population ; Management ; Management decisions ; Methodology ; National parks ; National parks and reserves ; Natural resources ; Nature ; Ownership ; Parks & recreation areas ; People and Places ; Population ; Poverty ; Property rights ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Resource management ; Restrictions ; Reviews ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; Social aspects ; Social impact ; Social Sciences ; Visualization ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0251383-e0251383</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Maksanova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Maksanova et al 2021 Maksanova et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eb480ca4b4ac156793bc8a2ab4fd9e052375580263698a5a283e3c69b5261d3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eb480ca4b4ac156793bc8a2ab4fd9e052375580263698a5a283e3c69b5261d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6513-2555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109833/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109833/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maksanova, Lyudmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakhanova, Taisiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubsanova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budaeva, Darima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulokhonov, Arnold</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The impact of protected areas on local communities is the subject of intense discussions as part of the implementation of the global ecosystem protection agenda. Conflicts between the interests of environmental protection and the needs of socio-economic development become particularly acute when large areas of land are taken out of economic circulation as a result of organizing protected areas. In this case, there is an urgent need for detailed and reliable information about the social impacts of such land withdrawal on the well-being of the local population. An analysis of the methodological approaches widely presented in the literature, used to assess the social impact of protected areas, testifies to the insufficiency of completed and practically applicable methodological guidelines for the areas with significant restrictions for people who form part of the protected landscape. In this study, we understand the cost estimate of the social impact of national parks on the local population as a quantitative calculation of the losses due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets. The methodological approach consists in considering the category of losses as a sum total of the actual damage and lost profits. The assessment algorithm includes three stages: systematization of social impacts on citizens, development of indicators and data collection, and calculation of actual damage to the population and lost profits. The assessment is performed using the example of the Tunkinsky National Park located in the Tunkinsky municipal district of the Republic of Buryatia, a region of the Russian Federation, where there are 14 rural settlements with a population of more than 20,000 people. The results of the calculations show that the losses of the rural population due to legal restrictions on the registration of land dealings amount to 170.4 million USD. Taking into account the potential amount of administrative fines and the value of property subject to demolition, the losses amount to 239.2 million USD. It is more than an order of magnitude greater than the amount of own revenues of the Tunkinsky municipal district in 2011-2019. The results obtained demonstrate the real picture of the impact of restrictions on the rights of local people to land within the boundaries of national parks and are useful for developing measures to account for their interests and include protected areas in the socio-economic development of regions. The methodological approach developed by the authors can be used in other national parks, where it is necessary to optimize the policy of improving land use for local residents.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Drafting software</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecotourism</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>National parks and reserves</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQDC6LgjGnSpq0PwrB4GVhcWUdfQ5qm08x0mpqk6nwiv6anne4ylX2Q0ktOfud_0nMJgqchnoc0Cd9sTGcbUc9b06g5JnFIU3ovOA0zSmaMYHr_6PskeOTcBuOYpow9DE4ozRKcxew0-LNwTjm3U41HpkS16ZfIG-QrBSspatSatquF16ZBRaf6Pauct1r2JofADKy2yPxqlHWVbpHV68oPKrVoCtTfrTWtsn6PBATw7i1agb4UTvVR-1irrtnqxm336PMQCwJ_EXb7Gl13zmnxOHhQitqpJ-P7LPj24f3q4tPs8urj8mJxOZMsI36m8ijFUkR5JGQYsySjuUwFEXlUFpnCMaFJHKeYMMqyVMSCpFRRcM1jwsKCFvQseH7QbSEVfMyx4yQmURqF8ARieSAKIza8tXon7J4boflgMHbNhfVa1orHpEjSvAgTJVV0OAEuKCsJUxlOBq13Y7Qu36lCQhWsqCei051GV3xtfvI0xFlKKQi8HAWs-dFBWfhOO6lqyLsy3XDumLEoYQzQ83_Qu_9upNYCfkA3pYG4shflC8ag8QghCVDzOyi4CrXTEhqy1GCfOLyaOADj1W-_FlBcvvx6_f_s1fcp--KIrZSofeVM3Q2tOQWjAygttLhV5W2SQ8z7ebrJBu_niY_zBG7Pjgt063QzQPQvdHwdBw</recordid><startdate>20210510</startdate><enddate>20210510</enddate><creator>Maksanova, Lyudmila</creator><creator>Bardakhanova, Taisiya</creator><creator>Lubsanova, Natalia</creator><creator>Budaeva, Darima</creator><creator>Tulokhonov, Arnold</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-2555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210510</creationdate><title>Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia</title><author>Maksanova, Lyudmila ; Bardakhanova, Taisiya ; Lubsanova, Natalia ; Budaeva, Darima ; Tulokhonov, Arnold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eb480ca4b4ac156793bc8a2ab4fd9e052375580263698a5a283e3c69b5261d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Drafting software</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecotourism</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>National parks and reserves</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maksanova, Lyudmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardakhanova, Taisiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubsanova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budaeva, Darima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulokhonov, Arnold</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maksanova, Lyudmila</au><au>Bardakhanova, Taisiya</au><au>Lubsanova, Natalia</au><au>Budaeva, Darima</au><au>Tulokhonov, Arnold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-05-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0251383</spage><epage>e0251383</epage><pages>e0251383-e0251383</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The impact of protected areas on local communities is the subject of intense discussions as part of the implementation of the global ecosystem protection agenda. Conflicts between the interests of environmental protection and the needs of socio-economic development become particularly acute when large areas of land are taken out of economic circulation as a result of organizing protected areas. In this case, there is an urgent need for detailed and reliable information about the social impacts of such land withdrawal on the well-being of the local population. An analysis of the methodological approaches widely presented in the literature, used to assess the social impact of protected areas, testifies to the insufficiency of completed and practically applicable methodological guidelines for the areas with significant restrictions for people who form part of the protected landscape. In this study, we understand the cost estimate of the social impact of national parks on the local population as a quantitative calculation of the losses due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets. The methodological approach consists in considering the category of losses as a sum total of the actual damage and lost profits. The assessment algorithm includes three stages: systematization of social impacts on citizens, development of indicators and data collection, and calculation of actual damage to the population and lost profits. The assessment is performed using the example of the Tunkinsky National Park located in the Tunkinsky municipal district of the Republic of Buryatia, a region of the Russian Federation, where there are 14 rural settlements with a population of more than 20,000 people. The results of the calculations show that the losses of the rural population due to legal restrictions on the registration of land dealings amount to 170.4 million USD. Taking into account the potential amount of administrative fines and the value of property subject to demolition, the losses amount to 239.2 million USD. It is more than an order of magnitude greater than the amount of own revenues of the Tunkinsky municipal district in 2011-2019. The results obtained demonstrate the real picture of the impact of restrictions on the rights of local people to land within the boundaries of national parks and are useful for developing measures to account for their interests and include protected areas in the socio-economic development of regions. The methodological approach developed by the authors can be used in other national parks, where it is necessary to optimize the policy of improving land use for local residents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33970956</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0251383</doi><tpages>e0251383</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-2555</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0251383-e0251383 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2524841524 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biodiversity Biology and Life Sciences Community Conservation Costs Drafting software Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Economic aspects Ecosystem services Ecotourism Editing Environmental aspects Environmental policy Human rights Land ownership Land tenure Laws, regulations and rules Local population Management Management decisions Methodology National parks National parks and reserves Natural resources Nature Ownership Parks & recreation areas People and Places Population Poverty Property rights Protected areas Protection and preservation Resource management Restrictions Reviews Rural areas Rural populations Social aspects Social impact Social Sciences Visualization Wildlife conservation |
title | Assessment of losses to the local population due to restrictions on their ownership rights to land and property assets: The case of the Tunkinsky National Park, Russia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20losses%20to%20the%20local%20population%20due%20to%20restrictions%20on%20their%20ownership%20rights%20to%20land%20and%20property%20assets:%20The%20case%20of%20the%20Tunkinsky%20National%20Park,%20Russia&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Maksanova,%20Lyudmila&rft.date=2021-05-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0251383&rft.epage=e0251383&rft.pages=e0251383-e0251383&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0251383&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA661372227%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524841524&rft_id=info:pmid/33970956&rft_galeid=A661372227&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_52d78bd17ece44fd9e00d36f26e90724&rfr_iscdi=true |