Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more
Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0250241 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim Abdelkarim, Ahmed Al-Hashel, Jasem Y |
description | Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
A total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
Webinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0250241 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2513668613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A658729169</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4fe482c28a3f4ed6b7812adc8d3a6506</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A658729169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2e2175ef7ca4c7fc52f417e847ce7cc4473b98695bf773ea62ca4cd8a6cfa4b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBYqsTjsEv8iJ1wQKqW10qVFvEoR2viTHZdJfYSJ5R-e7y7abWLekA-2Br_5j-e8UySPKXplHJF31z6oXPQTNfe4TRlWcoEvZcc04KziWQpv793PkoehXCZphnPpXyYHPG4U1UUx0n1ZXUdrLHgwksCfW_7oULS-yvoqkCusLQOukDAVcS7xjokWA0GeusdgdZWZLa4mL-f0IKsI4OtNW_JzxU60mAIxAbS-g4fJw9qaAI-GfeT5MfHD99nnyfni0_z2dn5xMiC9ROGjKoMa2VAGFWbjNWCKsyFMqiMEULxsshlkZW1UhxBsg1Y5SBNDaKU_CR5vtNdNz7osUBBs4xyKWPGPBLzHVF5uNTrzrbQXWsPVm8Nvltq6HprGtSiRpEzw3LgtcBKliqnDCqTVxxklm6ivRujDWWLlUHXd9AciB7eOLvSS_9b52lGYwJR4NUo0PlfA4ZetzYYbBpw6Iftu0VWKCnSiJ7-g96d3UgtISZgXe1jXLMR1WcyyxUrqCwiNb2Dimv7fbGbahvtBw6vDxwi0-OffglDCHr-7ev_s4uLQ_bFHrtCaPpV8M2waa5wCIodaDofQof1bZFpqjfDcFMNvRkGPQ5DdHu2_0G3Tjfdz_8CvrgEeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513668613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim ; Abdelkarim, Ahmed ; Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</creator><contributor>Ashkenazi, Itamar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim ; Abdelkarim, Ahmed ; Al-Hashel, Jasem Y ; Ashkenazi, Itamar</creatorcontrib><description>Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
A total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
Webinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33861799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; CAI ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer assisted instruction ; Conferences ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - psychology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data analysis ; Education, Distance - methods ; Education, Distance - trends ; Education, Medical - methods ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Educational aspects ; Epidemics ; Female ; Format ; Humans ; International conferences ; Internet ; Investigations ; Kuwait ; Kuwait - epidemiology ; Male ; Medical education ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meetings ; Methodology ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Neuropsychiatry ; Online education ; Pandemics ; People and Places ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Polls & surveys ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification ; Seminars ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telemedicine ; Videoconferencing ; Viral diseases ; Viruses ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250241</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Ismail et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Ismail et al 2021 Ismail et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2e2175ef7ca4c7fc52f417e847ce7cc4473b98695bf773ea62ca4cd8a6cfa4b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2e2175ef7ca4c7fc52f417e847ce7cc4473b98695bf773ea62ca4cd8a6cfa4b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1429-1051 ; 0000-0002-9788-7044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051773/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051773/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ashkenazi, Itamar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelkarim, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
A total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
Webinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Education, Distance - methods</subject><subject>Education, Distance - trends</subject><subject>Education, Medical - methods</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Kuwait</subject><subject>Kuwait - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychiatry</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Videoconferencing</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAQxyMEoqXwDRBYqsTjsEv8iJ1wQKqW10qVFvEoR2viTHZdJfYSJ5R-e7y7abWLekA-2Br_5j-e8UySPKXplHJF31z6oXPQTNfe4TRlWcoEvZcc04KziWQpv793PkoehXCZphnPpXyYHPG4U1UUx0n1ZXUdrLHgwksCfW_7oULS-yvoqkCusLQOukDAVcS7xjokWA0GeusdgdZWZLa4mL-f0IKsI4OtNW_JzxU60mAIxAbS-g4fJw9qaAI-GfeT5MfHD99nnyfni0_z2dn5xMiC9ROGjKoMa2VAGFWbjNWCKsyFMqiMEULxsshlkZW1UhxBsg1Y5SBNDaKU_CR5vtNdNz7osUBBs4xyKWPGPBLzHVF5uNTrzrbQXWsPVm8Nvltq6HprGtSiRpEzw3LgtcBKliqnDCqTVxxklm6ivRujDWWLlUHXd9AciB7eOLvSS_9b52lGYwJR4NUo0PlfA4ZetzYYbBpw6Iftu0VWKCnSiJ7-g96d3UgtISZgXe1jXLMR1WcyyxUrqCwiNb2Dimv7fbGbahvtBw6vDxwi0-OffglDCHr-7ev_s4uLQ_bFHrtCaPpV8M2waa5wCIodaDofQof1bZFpqjfDcFMNvRkGPQ5DdHu2_0G3Tjfdz_8CvrgEeA</recordid><startdate>20210416</startdate><enddate>20210416</enddate><creator>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim</creator><creator>Abdelkarim, Ahmed</creator><creator>Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-1051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-7044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210416</creationdate><title>Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more</title><author>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim ; Abdelkarim, Ahmed ; Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2e2175ef7ca4c7fc52f417e847ce7cc4473b98695bf773ea62ca4cd8a6cfa4b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Education, Distance - methods</topic><topic>Education, Distance - trends</topic><topic>Education, Medical - methods</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Kuwait</topic><topic>Kuwait - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychiatry</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Videoconferencing</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelkarim, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ismail, Ismail Ibrahim</au><au>Abdelkarim, Ahmed</au><au>Al-Hashel, Jasem Y</au><au>Ashkenazi, Itamar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-04-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0250241</spage><pages>e0250241-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Since the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic, all scientific medical activities were shifted to an online format, in the form of webinars, to maintain continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to assess physicians' attitude among different medical specialties towards this sudden and unexpected shift of traditional face-to-face meetings into webinars, and to suggest future recommendations.
We conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey study using a 25-item questionnaire, from November 1 and November 15, 2020. The survey was created and distributed to physicians from different medical and surgical specialties and from different countries via several social media platforms, using a snowball technique.
A total of 326 physicians responded; 165 (50.6%) were females, mean age of responders was 38.7 ± 7.5 years. The majority of responses (93.2%) came from Arab countries. Of them, 195 (59.8%) reported attending more webinars compared to the same period last year, with average of 3 per month. As regard to the general impression; 244 (74.8%) were "strongly satisfied" or "satisfied", with the most satisfaction for "training courses: by 268 (82.2%), and "International conferences" by 218 (66.9%). However, 246 respondents (75.5%) felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars during the pandemic, 171 (52.5%) reported attending less than 25% of webinars they are invited to, 205 (62.8%) disagreed that webinars can replace in-person meetings after the pandemic, and 239 (73.3%) agreed that online meetings need proper regulations.
Webinars comprised a major avenue for education during COVID-19 pandemic, with initial general satisfaction among physicians. However, this paradigm shift was sudden and lacked proper regulations. Despite initial satisfaction, the majority of physicians felt overwhelmed with the number and frequency of webinars. Physicians' satisfaction is crucial in planning future educational activities, and considering that this current crisis will most likely have long lasting effects, webinars should be viewed as complementing traditional in-person methods, rather than replacement. In this study, we are suggesting recommendations to help future regulation of this change.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33861799</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0250241</doi><tpages>e0250241</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-1051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-7044</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250241 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2513668613 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Attitude of Health Personnel Attitudes Biology and Life Sciences CAI Computer and Information Sciences Computer assisted instruction Conferences Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - psychology Cross-Sectional Studies Data analysis Education, Distance - methods Education, Distance - trends Education, Medical - methods Education, Medical, Continuing Educational aspects Epidemics Female Format Humans International conferences Internet Investigations Kuwait Kuwait - epidemiology Male Medical education Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Meetings Methodology Middle Aged Neurology Neuropsychiatry Online education Pandemics People and Places Pharmaceutical industry Physicians Physicians - psychology Polls & surveys Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification Seminars Social networks Social Sciences Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Telemedicine Videoconferencing Viral diseases Viruses Visualization |
title | Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians'%20attitude%20towards%20webinars%20and%20online%20education%20amid%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20When%20less%20is%20more&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ismail,%20Ismail%20Ibrahim&rft.date=2021-04-16&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0250241&rft.pages=e0250241-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0250241&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA658729169%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513668613&rft_id=info:pmid/33861799&rft_galeid=A658729169&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4fe482c28a3f4ed6b7812adc8d3a6506&rfr_iscdi=true |