The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different types of exercise methods in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a mild curve magnitude (10°-26°) were randomly divided into two groups: the Schroth group...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0249492-e0249492 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0249492 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | e0249492 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Kocaman, Hikmet Bek, Nilgün Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi Büyükturan, Buket Yetiş, Mehmet Büyükturan, Öznur |
| description | The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different types of exercise methods in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a mild curve magnitude (10°-26°) were randomly divided into two groups: the Schroth group (n = 14) and the core group (n = 14). The patients in the Schroth group were treated with supervised Schroth exercises, and the patients in the core group were treated with supervised core stabilization exercises; both groups performed the exercises for three days per week for a total of 10 weeks, and both were given additional traditional exercises to perform. Assessment included Cobb angle (Radiography), trunk rotation (Adam's test), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale), spinal mobility (Spinal Mouse), peripheral muscle strength (Biodex System 4-Pro), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire).
It was found that patients in the Schroth group showed greater improvement in Cobb angles, thoracic trunk rotation angle, cosmetic trunk deformity, spinal mobility, and quality of life than those in the core group (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0249492 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2513232605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A658586354</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9b92f055635f4d6bb59f7c277bb52704</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A658586354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a0964a0c541ef20269a330769e78d7d8db2a54a71901f8ce8792c70566fbb64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99qFDEUxgdRbK2-gWhAEAV3zSSTzMQLYSn-KRQKWr0NmeRkNyWbrMlsrT6Az22muy270gvJRcLJ73zJ-Q6nqp7WeFrTtn57EdcpKD9dxQBTTBrRCHKvOqwFJRNOML2_cz6oHuV8gTGjHecPqwNKO9bWHT6s_pwvAIG1oAd3CQFyRtGi4WdExpVogjAguIKkXQakVqsUlV5ARi4gZaKHrEfCGRdXalg4jbKO3sXs8js0Q9mFuYdJ710wb1BSwcSl-w1momMYUvQeDBqSU_5x9cAqn-HJdj-qvn38cH78eXJ69unkeHY60VyQYaKw4I3CmjU1WIIJF4pS3HIBbWda05meKNaotha4tp2GrhVEt5hxbvueN4YeVc83uisfs9xamCVhNSWU8GLQUXWyIUxUF3KV3FKlXzIqJ68DMc2lSoPTHqToBbGYMU6ZbQzveyZsq0nblhNpcVO03m9fW_dLMKNVSfk90f2b4BZyHi9lh0szCS0Cr7YCKf5YQx7k0hXHvVcB4vr63w0TNW-6gr74B727ui01V6UAF2ws7-pRVM4461hXahn_Pb2DKsvA0pXWgXUlvpfwei9hbC9cDXO1zlmefP3y_-zZ93325Q67AOWHRY5-PbgY8j7YbECdYs4J7K3JNZbjuNy4IcdxkdtxKWnPdht0m3QzH_QvBPkRMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513232605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kocaman, Hikmet ; Bek, Nilgün ; Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi ; Büyükturan, Buket ; Yetiş, Mehmet ; Büyükturan, Öznur</creator><contributor>Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kocaman, Hikmet ; Bek, Nilgün ; Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi ; Büyükturan, Buket ; Yetiş, Mehmet ; Büyükturan, Öznur ; Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different types of exercise methods in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a mild curve magnitude (10°-26°) were randomly divided into two groups: the Schroth group (n = 14) and the core group (n = 14). The patients in the Schroth group were treated with supervised Schroth exercises, and the patients in the core group were treated with supervised core stabilization exercises; both groups performed the exercises for three days per week for a total of 10 weeks, and both were given additional traditional exercises to perform. Assessment included Cobb angle (Radiography), trunk rotation (Adam's test), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale), spinal mobility (Spinal Mouse), peripheral muscle strength (Biodex System 4-Pro), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire).
It was found that patients in the Schroth group showed greater improvement in Cobb angles, thoracic trunk rotation angle, cosmetic trunk deformity, spinal mobility, and quality of life than those in the core group (p<0.05), except for in lumbar trunk rotation angle. Peripheral muscle strength improvement was greater in the core group than in the Schroth group (p<0.05).
Schroth exercises are more effective than core stabilization exercises in the correction of scoliosis and related problems in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and core stabilization exercises are more effective than Schroth exercises in the improvement of peripheral muscle strength.
NCT04421157.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249492</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33857180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Back pain ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Columns (structural) ; Comparative analysis ; Coordination ; Demographic aspects ; Diaphragm ; Diaphragm (anatomy) ; Editing ; Etiology ; Exercise ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Methods ; Muscle strength ; Muscles ; Orthopedics ; Orthoses ; Patients ; Physical therapy ; Physical training ; Physiological aspects ; Posture ; Proprioception ; Prostheses ; Prosthetics ; Rehabilitation ; Respiratory function ; Scoliosis ; Soft tissues ; Spinal curvature ; Spine ; Stretching ; Teenagers ; Training ; University faculty ; Youth</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0249492-e0249492</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Kocaman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Kocaman et al 2021 Kocaman et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a0964a0c541ef20269a330769e78d7d8db2a54a71901f8ce8792c70566fbb64d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a0964a0c541ef20269a330769e78d7d8db2a54a71901f8ce8792c70566fbb64d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4670-4794 ; 0000-0001-5971-7274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049223/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049223/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33857180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kocaman, Hikmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bek, Nilgün</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyükturan, Buket</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yetiş, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyükturan, Öznur</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different types of exercise methods in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a mild curve magnitude (10°-26°) were randomly divided into two groups: the Schroth group (n = 14) and the core group (n = 14). The patients in the Schroth group were treated with supervised Schroth exercises, and the patients in the core group were treated with supervised core stabilization exercises; both groups performed the exercises for three days per week for a total of 10 weeks, and both were given additional traditional exercises to perform. Assessment included Cobb angle (Radiography), trunk rotation (Adam's test), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale), spinal mobility (Spinal Mouse), peripheral muscle strength (Biodex System 4-Pro), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire).
It was found that patients in the Schroth group showed greater improvement in Cobb angles, thoracic trunk rotation angle, cosmetic trunk deformity, spinal mobility, and quality of life than those in the core group (p<0.05), except for in lumbar trunk rotation angle. Peripheral muscle strength improvement was greater in the core group than in the Schroth group (p<0.05).
Schroth exercises are more effective than core stabilization exercises in the correction of scoliosis and related problems in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and core stabilization exercises are more effective than Schroth exercises in the improvement of peripheral muscle strength.
NCT04421157.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diaphragm</subject><subject>Diaphragm (anatomy)</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Orthoses</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Respiratory function</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Soft tissues</subject><subject>Spinal curvature</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Stretching</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99qFDEUxgdRbK2-gWhAEAV3zSSTzMQLYSn-KRQKWr0NmeRkNyWbrMlsrT6Az22muy270gvJRcLJ73zJ-Q6nqp7WeFrTtn57EdcpKD9dxQBTTBrRCHKvOqwFJRNOML2_cz6oHuV8gTGjHecPqwNKO9bWHT6s_pwvAIG1oAd3CQFyRtGi4WdExpVogjAguIKkXQakVqsUlV5ARi4gZaKHrEfCGRdXalg4jbKO3sXs8js0Q9mFuYdJ710wb1BSwcSl-w1momMYUvQeDBqSU_5x9cAqn-HJdj-qvn38cH78eXJ69unkeHY60VyQYaKw4I3CmjU1WIIJF4pS3HIBbWda05meKNaotha4tp2GrhVEt5hxbvueN4YeVc83uisfs9xamCVhNSWU8GLQUXWyIUxUF3KV3FKlXzIqJ68DMc2lSoPTHqToBbGYMU6ZbQzveyZsq0nblhNpcVO03m9fW_dLMKNVSfk90f2b4BZyHi9lh0szCS0Cr7YCKf5YQx7k0hXHvVcB4vr63w0TNW-6gr74B727ui01V6UAF2ws7-pRVM4461hXahn_Pb2DKsvA0pXWgXUlvpfwei9hbC9cDXO1zlmefP3y_-zZ93325Q67AOWHRY5-PbgY8j7YbECdYs4J7K3JNZbjuNy4IcdxkdtxKWnPdht0m3QzH_QvBPkRMQ</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Kocaman, Hikmet</creator><creator>Bek, Nilgün</creator><creator>Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi</creator><creator>Büyükturan, Buket</creator><creator>Yetiş, Mehmet</creator><creator>Büyükturan, Öznur</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4670-4794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-7274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial</title><author>Kocaman, Hikmet ; Bek, Nilgün ; Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi ; Büyükturan, Buket ; Yetiş, Mehmet ; Büyükturan, Öznur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-a0964a0c541ef20269a330769e78d7d8db2a54a71901f8ce8792c70566fbb64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diaphragm</topic><topic>Diaphragm (anatomy)</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Orthoses</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Respiratory function</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Soft tissues</topic><topic>Spinal curvature</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Stretching</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocaman, Hikmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bek, Nilgün</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyükturan, Buket</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yetiş, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyükturan, Öznur</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocaman, Hikmet</au><au>Bek, Nilgün</au><au>Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi</au><au>Büyükturan, Buket</au><au>Yetiş, Mehmet</au><au>Büyükturan, Öznur</au><au>Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0249492</spage><epage>e0249492</epage><pages>e0249492-e0249492</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different types of exercise methods in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
In total, 28 subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a mild curve magnitude (10°-26°) were randomly divided into two groups: the Schroth group (n = 14) and the core group (n = 14). The patients in the Schroth group were treated with supervised Schroth exercises, and the patients in the core group were treated with supervised core stabilization exercises; both groups performed the exercises for three days per week for a total of 10 weeks, and both were given additional traditional exercises to perform. Assessment included Cobb angle (Radiography), trunk rotation (Adam's test), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale), spinal mobility (Spinal Mouse), peripheral muscle strength (Biodex System 4-Pro), and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire).
It was found that patients in the Schroth group showed greater improvement in Cobb angles, thoracic trunk rotation angle, cosmetic trunk deformity, spinal mobility, and quality of life than those in the core group (p<0.05), except for in lumbar trunk rotation angle. Peripheral muscle strength improvement was greater in the core group than in the Schroth group (p<0.05).
Schroth exercises are more effective than core stabilization exercises in the correction of scoliosis and related problems in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and core stabilization exercises are more effective than Schroth exercises in the improvement of peripheral muscle strength.
NCT04421157.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33857180</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0249492</doi><tpages>e0249492</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4670-4794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-7274</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0249492-e0249492 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2513232605 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adolescents Back pain Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Columns (structural) Comparative analysis Coordination Demographic aspects Diaphragm Diaphragm (anatomy) Editing Etiology Exercise Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methodology Methods Muscle strength Muscles Orthopedics Orthoses Patients Physical therapy Physical training Physiological aspects Posture Proprioception Prostheses Prosthetics Rehabilitation Respiratory function Scoliosis Soft tissues Spinal curvature Spine Stretching Teenagers Training University faculty Youth |
| title | The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20two%20different%20exercise%20approaches%20in%20adolescent%20idiopathic%20scoliosis:%20A%20single-blind,%20randomized-controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kocaman,%20Hikmet&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0249492&rft.epage=e0249492&rft.pages=e0249492-e0249492&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0249492&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA658586354%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513232605&rft_id=info:pmid/33857180&rft_galeid=A658586354&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9b92f055635f4d6bb59f7c277bb52704&rfr_iscdi=true |