Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak spread to over 100 countries with a total of 100,000 cases during the first week of March 2020. Health care workers, as those on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, are more susceptible to infection. Inadequate related knowledge and preventive beh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250017-e0250017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0250017 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0250017 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Arslanca, Tufan Fidan, Cihan Daggez, Mine Dursun, Polat |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak spread to over 100 countries with a total of 100,000 cases during the first week of March 2020. Health care workers, as those on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, are more susceptible to infection. Inadequate related knowledge and preventive behaviors among health care workers might lead to delayed treatment and result in the rapid spread of the infection. Therefore, this study evaluated the knowledge of health care workers with regard to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 10-18, 2020. Participants were general practitioners, specialists, and nurses working at the forefront of the pandemic. Their knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions concerning COVID-19 were evaluated using an online questionnaire created by our medical specialists. The questionnaire consisted of 29, 5, and 4 items about COVID-19 knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions, respectively. A total of 251 health care workers completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 33.88±8.72 years old, and the sample consisted of 68 males (27.08%) and 183 females (72.91%). While there was no difference between the percentage of correct answers given by female and male participants to knowledge-based questions (p>0.05), the percentage of correct answers to the questions on preventive behaviors was significantly higher in female participants than in males (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0250017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2510585162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A657925352</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b88935ea548a4c1793230b533a56ea15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A657925352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31b259b3e40d317c62d2695cd4e0cceb9eb9ba686f811484d68b948bb0c759bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDC6Jgx6Rp0tQLYRi_BhcGdN3bkKanM5ntNDVpZ917f7iZj12mshfSQkv6vG-a95wTRc8JHhOakXcr27tG1ePWNjDGCcOYZA-iU5LTJOYJpg-P3k-iJ96vMGZUcP44OqFUUI4JPY3-fGvsdQ3lAt6i1sEGms5sABWwVBtjnUeqKZEz_gq14DS0nbENshXqloCm88vZx5jkqA0QrI1-jyZIO-t97EFvSVUj3_XlDTINuujdlfFLtARVd0uklQN0bd0VOP80elSp2sOzw3MU_fz86WL6NT6ff5lNJ-ex5nnSxZQUCcsLCikuKck0T8qE50yXKWCtocjDXSgueCUISUVaclHkqSgKrLOgq-goern3bWvr5SFALxNGMBOM8CQQsz1RWrWSrTNr5W6kVUbuFqxbSOU6o2uQhRA5ZaBYKlSqSRayprhglCrGQREWvD4cduuLNZQ6ROtUPTAdfmnMUi7sRgpM0yzUbhS9Phg4-6sH38m18RrqWjVg-91_kyTNmUgDevYPev_pDtRChQOYprJhX701lRPOsjxhlG2p8T1UuHY1Dt1WmbA-ELwZCALTwe9uoXrv5ezH9_9n55dD9tURu-8bb-t-21l-CKZ7cNd8Dqq7kAmW22G5TUNuh0UehiXIXhwX6E50Ox30L5NBDvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510585162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Arslanca, Tufan ; Fidan, Cihan ; Daggez, Mine ; Dursun, Polat</creator><contributor>Villar, Livia Melo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arslanca, Tufan ; Fidan, Cihan ; Daggez, Mine ; Dursun, Polat ; Villar, Livia Melo</creatorcontrib><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak spread to over 100 countries with a total of 100,000 cases during the first week of March 2020. Health care workers, as those on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, are more susceptible to infection. Inadequate related knowledge and preventive behaviors among health care workers might lead to delayed treatment and result in the rapid spread of the infection. Therefore, this study evaluated the knowledge of health care workers with regard to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 10-18, 2020. Participants were general practitioners, specialists, and nurses working at the forefront of the pandemic. Their knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions concerning COVID-19 were evaluated using an online questionnaire created by our medical specialists. The questionnaire consisted of 29, 5, and 4 items about COVID-19 knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions, respectively. A total of 251 health care workers completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 33.88±8.72 years old, and the sample consisted of 68 males (27.08%) and 183 females (72.91%). While there was no difference between the percentage of correct answers given by female and male participants to knowledge-based questions (p>0.05), the percentage of correct answers to the questions on preventive behaviors was significantly higher in female participants than in males (p<0.001). The overall average percentages of correct responses were 91.66% for knowledge-based questions and 85.96% for preventive behavior questions. The scores for knowledge-based questions were higher for medical specialists, whereas nurses scored higher on preventive behavior questions. Government hospital staff showed a significant difference in preventive behaviors compared to that of university hospitals (p<0.05). In addition, there was a positive correlation between knowledge scores and preventive behaviors. Although all the participants (100%) knew that contracting COVID-19 can lead to death, only 66.93% of them were willing to get vaccinated themselves. The knowledge level of health care workers concerning COVID-19 was above 90%, but the level of competence in terms of preventive behaviors was found to be low, especially in males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33836013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data analysis ; Disease transmission ; Distribution ; Epidemics ; Etiology ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Behavior ; Health care ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Personnel ; Health risks ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medical supplies ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Middle Aged ; Middle East respiratory syndrome ; Nurses ; Obstetrics ; Oncology ; Pandemics ; Pandemics - prevention & control ; People and Places ; Pneumonia ; Prevention ; Professional ethics ; Questionnaires ; Respiratory diseases ; Risk assessment ; Risk perception ; Risk taking ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Turkey - epidemiology ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Viral infections ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250017-e0250017</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Arslanca et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Arslanca et al 2021 Arslanca et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31b259b3e40d317c62d2695cd4e0cceb9eb9ba686f811484d68b948bb0c759bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31b259b3e40d317c62d2695cd4e0cceb9eb9ba686f811484d68b948bb0c759bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9093-1524 ; 0000-0001-5266-9652 ; 0000-0001-5139-364X ; 0000-0001-9686-1603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034719/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034719/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Villar, Livia Melo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arslanca, Tufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidan, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daggez, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dursun, Polat</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak spread to over 100 countries with a total of 100,000 cases during the first week of March 2020. Health care workers, as those on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, are more susceptible to infection. Inadequate related knowledge and preventive behaviors among health care workers might lead to delayed treatment and result in the rapid spread of the infection. Therefore, this study evaluated the knowledge of health care workers with regard to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 10-18, 2020. Participants were general practitioners, specialists, and nurses working at the forefront of the pandemic. Their knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions concerning COVID-19 were evaluated using an online questionnaire created by our medical specialists. The questionnaire consisted of 29, 5, and 4 items about COVID-19 knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions, respectively. A total of 251 health care workers completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 33.88±8.72 years old, and the sample consisted of 68 males (27.08%) and 183 females (72.91%). While there was no difference between the percentage of correct answers given by female and male participants to knowledge-based questions (p>0.05), the percentage of correct answers to the questions on preventive behaviors was significantly higher in female participants than in males (p<0.001). The overall average percentages of correct responses were 91.66% for knowledge-based questions and 85.96% for preventive behavior questions. The scores for knowledge-based questions were higher for medical specialists, whereas nurses scored higher on preventive behavior questions. Government hospital staff showed a significant difference in preventive behaviors compared to that of university hospitals (p<0.05). In addition, there was a positive correlation between knowledge scores and preventive behaviors. Although all the participants (100%) knew that contracting COVID-19 can lead to death, only 66.93% of them were willing to get vaccinated themselves. The knowledge level of health care workers concerning COVID-19 was above 90%, but the level of competence in terms of preventive behaviors was found to be low, especially in males.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical supplies</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Middle East respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention & control</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Turkey - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QDC6Jgx6Rp0tQLYRi_BhcGdN3bkKanM5ntNDVpZ917f7iZj12mshfSQkv6vG-a95wTRc8JHhOakXcr27tG1ePWNjDGCcOYZA-iU5LTJOYJpg-P3k-iJ96vMGZUcP44OqFUUI4JPY3-fGvsdQ3lAt6i1sEGms5sABWwVBtjnUeqKZEz_gq14DS0nbENshXqloCm88vZx5jkqA0QrI1-jyZIO-t97EFvSVUj3_XlDTINuujdlfFLtARVd0uklQN0bd0VOP80elSp2sOzw3MU_fz86WL6NT6ff5lNJ-ex5nnSxZQUCcsLCikuKck0T8qE50yXKWCtocjDXSgueCUISUVaclHkqSgKrLOgq-goern3bWvr5SFALxNGMBOM8CQQsz1RWrWSrTNr5W6kVUbuFqxbSOU6o2uQhRA5ZaBYKlSqSRayprhglCrGQREWvD4cduuLNZQ6ROtUPTAdfmnMUi7sRgpM0yzUbhS9Phg4-6sH38m18RrqWjVg-91_kyTNmUgDevYPev_pDtRChQOYprJhX701lRPOsjxhlG2p8T1UuHY1Dt1WmbA-ELwZCALTwe9uoXrv5ezH9_9n55dD9tURu-8bb-t-21l-CKZ7cNd8Dqq7kAmW22G5TUNuh0UehiXIXhwX6E50Ox30L5NBDvM</recordid><startdate>20210409</startdate><enddate>20210409</enddate><creator>Arslanca, Tufan</creator><creator>Fidan, Cihan</creator><creator>Daggez, Mine</creator><creator>Dursun, Polat</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-364X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-1603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210409</creationdate><title>Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers</title><author>Arslanca, Tufan ; Fidan, Cihan ; Daggez, Mine ; Dursun, Polat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-31b259b3e40d317c62d2695cd4e0cceb9eb9ba686f811484d68b948bb0c759bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical supplies</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Middle East respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention & control</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Turkey - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arslanca, Tufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidan, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daggez, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dursun, Polat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arslanca, Tufan</au><au>Fidan, Cihan</au><au>Daggez, Mine</au><au>Dursun, Polat</au><au>Villar, Livia Melo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-04-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0250017</spage><epage>e0250017</epage><pages>e0250017-e0250017</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak spread to over 100 countries with a total of 100,000 cases during the first week of March 2020. Health care workers, as those on the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, are more susceptible to infection. Inadequate related knowledge and preventive behaviors among health care workers might lead to delayed treatment and result in the rapid spread of the infection. Therefore, this study evaluated the knowledge of health care workers with regard to COVID-19. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 10-18, 2020. Participants were general practitioners, specialists, and nurses working at the forefront of the pandemic. Their knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions concerning COVID-19 were evaluated using an online questionnaire created by our medical specialists. The questionnaire consisted of 29, 5, and 4 items about COVID-19 knowledge, preventive behaviors, and risk perceptions, respectively. A total of 251 health care workers completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 33.88±8.72 years old, and the sample consisted of 68 males (27.08%) and 183 females (72.91%). While there was no difference between the percentage of correct answers given by female and male participants to knowledge-based questions (p>0.05), the percentage of correct answers to the questions on preventive behaviors was significantly higher in female participants than in males (p<0.001). The overall average percentages of correct responses were 91.66% for knowledge-based questions and 85.96% for preventive behavior questions. The scores for knowledge-based questions were higher for medical specialists, whereas nurses scored higher on preventive behavior questions. Government hospital staff showed a significant difference in preventive behaviors compared to that of university hospitals (p<0.05). In addition, there was a positive correlation between knowledge scores and preventive behaviors. Although all the participants (100%) knew that contracting COVID-19 can lead to death, only 66.93% of them were willing to get vaccinated themselves. The knowledge level of health care workers concerning COVID-19 was above 90%, but the level of competence in terms of preventive behaviors was found to be low, especially in males.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33836013</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0250017</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-364X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-1603</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250017-e0250017 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2510585162 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Behavior Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Biology and Life Sciences Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control Cross-Sectional Studies Data analysis Disease transmission Distribution Epidemics Etiology Female Gynecology Health Behavior Health care Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Personnel Health risks Hospitals Humans Knowledge Male Medical personnel Medical research Medical supplies Medicine and Health Sciences Methodology Middle Aged Middle East respiratory syndrome Nurses Obstetrics Oncology Pandemics Pandemics - prevention & control People and Places Pneumonia Prevention Professional ethics Questionnaires Respiratory diseases Risk assessment Risk perception Risk taking SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social aspects Social Sciences Turkey - epidemiology Vaccination Vaccines Viral diseases Viral infections Viruses |
title | Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkish health care workers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge,%20preventive%20behaviors%20and%20risk%20perception%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study%20in%20Turkish%20health%20care%20workers&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Arslanca,%20Tufan&rft.date=2021-04-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0250017&rft.epage=e0250017&rft.pages=e0250017-e0250017&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0250017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA657925352%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510585162&rft_id=info:pmid/33836013&rft_galeid=A657925352&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b88935ea548a4c1793230b533a56ea15&rfr_iscdi=true |