Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening

Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248930-e0248930
Hauptverfasser: Louro, Javier, Román, Marta, Posso, Margarita, Vázquez, Ivonne, Saladié, Francina, Rodriguez-Arana, Ana, Quintana, M Jesús, Domingo, Laia, Baré, Marisa, Marcos-Gragera, Rafael, Vernet-Tomas, María, Sala, Maria, Castells, Xavier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0248930
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0248930
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Louro, Javier
Román, Marta
Posso, Margarita
Vázquez, Ivonne
Saladié, Francina
Rodriguez-Arana, Ana
Quintana, M Jesús
Domingo, Laia
Baré, Marisa
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
Vernet-Tomas, María
Sala, Maria
Castells, Xavier
description Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0248930
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2504306600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A656020285</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ad839c915eb848e28a655a23f73f2ea2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A656020285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2f9c0dee4a8479662d7eab08c7bc0bb0e57fd7c4686c5cf1b315ca2701c2d3723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWx40NukKpyWqlSJU63lmNPdl289tZOltPL42XTaoN6gXLhePL9_4wnnqJ4XKF5RXj16jIM0Ss33wQPc4Rr0RB0pziuGoJnDCNy9-D9qHiQ0iVClAjG7hdHhHBKWYOPi99vYAsubKxflsqbcqucNarfb0vrjd1aM-TgLzBlG0GlvtTKa4hltOlbuYlgrO5t8OU6GHBlF2L5PazBl6rvIeuz01SXdATwOf6wuNcpl-DRuJ4UX969_Xz2YXZ-8X5xdno-07nEfoa7RiMDUCtR84YxbDioFgnNW43aFgHlneG6ZoJpqruqJRXVCnNUaWwIx-SkeLr33biQ5Ni3JDFFNUGMIZSJxZ4wQV3KTbRrFX_KoKz8GwhxKVXsrXYglRGk0U1FoRW1ACwUo1Rh0nHSYVC7bK_HbEO7BqPB91G5ien0i7cruQxbyRvBK9JkgxejQQxXA6Rerm3S4JzyEIZ93ZxzQeuMPvsHvf10I7VU-QDWdyHn1TtTecooQxhhQTM1v4XKj4G11fmSdTbHJ4KXE0FmevjRL9WQklx8-vj_7MXXKfv8gF2Bcv0qBTfsLlmagvUe1DGkFKG7aXKF5G5GrrshdzMixxnJsieHP-hGdD0U5A-5Fg5K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504306600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Louro, Javier ; Román, Marta ; Posso, Margarita ; Vázquez, Ivonne ; Saladié, Francina ; Rodriguez-Arana, Ana ; Quintana, M Jesús ; Domingo, Laia ; Baré, Marisa ; Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ; Vernet-Tomas, María ; Sala, Maria ; Castells, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Louro, Javier ; Román, Marta ; Posso, Margarita ; Vázquez, Ivonne ; Saladié, Francina ; Rodriguez-Arana, Ana ; Quintana, M Jesús ; Domingo, Laia ; Baré, Marisa ; Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ; Vernet-Tomas, María ; Sala, Maria ; Castells, Xavier ; BELE and IRIS Study Groups ; on behalf of the BELE and IRIS Study Groups</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248930</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33755692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast diseases ; Cancer screening ; Chronic illnesses ; Customization ; Demographic aspects ; Diagnosis ; Diseases ; Editing ; Education ; Epidemiology ; Estimates ; Family medical history ; Funding ; Genetics ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health risks ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Mammography ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical research ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Obstetrics ; Oncology ; Pediatrics ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Prediction models ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Public health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Reviews ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248930-e0248930</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Louro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Louro et al 2021 Louro et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2f9c0dee4a8479662d7eab08c7bc0bb0e57fd7c4686c5cf1b315ca2701c2d3723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2f9c0dee4a8479662d7eab08c7bc0bb0e57fd7c4686c5cf1b315ca2701c2d3723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9824-3657 ; 0000-0002-2985-3301 ; 0000-0001-9076-8918 ; 0000-0002-1783-4066</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987139/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987139/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louro, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez, Ivonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saladié, Francina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Arana, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, M Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos-Gragera, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernet-Tomas, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELE and IRIS Study Groups</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the BELE and IRIS Study Groups</creatorcontrib><title>Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast diseases</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWx40NukKpyWqlSJU63lmNPdl289tZOltPL42XTaoN6gXLhePL9_4wnnqJ4XKF5RXj16jIM0Ss33wQPc4Rr0RB0pziuGoJnDCNy9-D9qHiQ0iVClAjG7hdHhHBKWYOPi99vYAsubKxflsqbcqucNarfb0vrjd1aM-TgLzBlG0GlvtTKa4hltOlbuYlgrO5t8OU6GHBlF2L5PazBl6rvIeuz01SXdATwOf6wuNcpl-DRuJ4UX969_Xz2YXZ-8X5xdno-07nEfoa7RiMDUCtR84YxbDioFgnNW43aFgHlneG6ZoJpqruqJRXVCnNUaWwIx-SkeLr33biQ5Ni3JDFFNUGMIZSJxZ4wQV3KTbRrFX_KoKz8GwhxKVXsrXYglRGk0U1FoRW1ACwUo1Rh0nHSYVC7bK_HbEO7BqPB91G5ien0i7cruQxbyRvBK9JkgxejQQxXA6Rerm3S4JzyEIZ93ZxzQeuMPvsHvf10I7VU-QDWdyHn1TtTecooQxhhQTM1v4XKj4G11fmSdTbHJ4KXE0FmevjRL9WQklx8-vj_7MXXKfv8gF2Bcv0qBTfsLlmagvUe1DGkFKG7aXKF5G5GrrshdzMixxnJsieHP-hGdD0U5A-5Fg5K</recordid><startdate>20210323</startdate><enddate>20210323</enddate><creator>Louro, Javier</creator><creator>Román, Marta</creator><creator>Posso, Margarita</creator><creator>Vázquez, Ivonne</creator><creator>Saladié, Francina</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Arana, Ana</creator><creator>Quintana, M Jesús</creator><creator>Domingo, Laia</creator><creator>Baré, Marisa</creator><creator>Marcos-Gragera, Rafael</creator><creator>Vernet-Tomas, María</creator><creator>Sala, Maria</creator><creator>Castells, Xavier</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9824-3657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-3301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-4066</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210323</creationdate><title>Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening</title><author>Louro, Javier ; Román, Marta ; Posso, Margarita ; Vázquez, Ivonne ; Saladié, Francina ; Rodriguez-Arana, Ana ; Quintana, M Jesús ; Domingo, Laia ; Baré, Marisa ; Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ; Vernet-Tomas, María ; Sala, Maria ; Castells, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-2f9c0dee4a8479662d7eab08c7bc0bb0e57fd7c4686c5cf1b315ca2701c2d3723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast diseases</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louro, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posso, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez, Ivonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saladié, Francina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Arana, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, M Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Laia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcos-Gragera, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernet-Tomas, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELE and IRIS Study Groups</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the BELE and IRIS Study Groups</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louro, Javier</au><au>Román, Marta</au><au>Posso, Margarita</au><au>Vázquez, Ivonne</au><au>Saladié, Francina</au><au>Rodriguez-Arana, Ana</au><au>Quintana, M Jesús</au><au>Domingo, Laia</au><au>Baré, Marisa</au><au>Marcos-Gragera, Rafael</au><au>Vernet-Tomas, María</au><au>Sala, Maria</au><au>Castells, Xavier</au><aucorp>BELE and IRIS Study Groups</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the BELE and IRIS Study Groups</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-03-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0248930</spage><epage>e0248930</epage><pages>e0248930-e0248930</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33755692</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0248930</doi><tpages>e0248930</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9824-3657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-3301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-4066</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248930-e0248930
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2504306600
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast diseases
Cancer screening
Chronic illnesses
Customization
Demographic aspects
Diagnosis
Diseases
Editing
Education
Epidemiology
Estimates
Family medical history
Funding
Genetics
Gynecology
Health aspects
Health care
Health risks
Health services
Hospitals
Mammography
Medical diagnosis
Medical research
Medical screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methodology
Obstetrics
Oncology
Pediatrics
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Prediction models
Prevention
Preventive medicine
Public health
Research and Analysis Methods
Reviews
Risk analysis
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Womens health
title Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20and%20validating%20an%20individualized%20breast%20cancer%20risk%20prediction%20model%20for%20women%20attending%20breast%20cancer%20screening&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Louro,%20Javier&rft.aucorp=BELE%20and%20IRIS%20Study%20Groups&rft.date=2021-03-23&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0248930&rft.epage=e0248930&rft.pages=e0248930-e0248930&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0248930&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA656020285%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504306600&rft_id=info:pmid/33755692&rft_galeid=A656020285&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ad839c915eb848e28a655a23f73f2ea2&rfr_iscdi=true